Loading…

Randomized Trial of Self-Guided, Internet-Based, Cognitive Behavior Therapies for Migraine

Self-guided Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy (iCBT) for migraine interventions could improve access to care, but there is poor evidence of their efficacy. A three-arm randomized controlled trial compared: iCBT focused on psychoeducation, self-monitoring and skills training (SPHERE), iCBT fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian journal of neurological sciences 2024-10, p.1-12
Main Authors: Huguet, Anna, Rozario, Sharlene, Chaplin, William, McDonald, Margaret, Wozney, Lori M, Lagman Bartolome, Ana Marissa, Kronish, Ian M, Purdy, Allan, Stinson, Jennifer N, McGrath, Patrick J
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c216t-4b4198bd1a657254e9803bf69013f907295f4e0c87d3831b4fe402d7b46b022c3
container_end_page 12
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Canadian journal of neurological sciences
container_volume
creator Huguet, Anna
Rozario, Sharlene
Chaplin, William
McDonald, Margaret
Wozney, Lori M
Lagman Bartolome, Ana Marissa
Kronish, Ian M
Purdy, Allan
Stinson, Jennifer N
McGrath, Patrick J
description Self-guided Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy (iCBT) for migraine interventions could improve access to care, but there is poor evidence of their efficacy. A three-arm randomized controlled trial compared: iCBT focused on psychoeducation, self-monitoring and skills training (SPHERE), iCBT focused on identifying and managing personal headache triggers (PRISM) and a waitlist control. The primary treatment outcome was a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly headache days at 4 months post-randomization. 428 participants were randomized (mean age = 30.1). 240 participants (56.2%) provided outcome data at 4 months. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis with missing data imputed demonstrated that the proportion of responders with a ≥ 50% reduction was similar between combined iCBTs and waitlist (48.5/285, 17% vs. 16.6/143, 11.6%, = 0.20), but analysis of completers showed both iCBT programs to be superior to the waitlist (24/108, 22.2% vs. 13/113, 11.5%, = 0.047). ITT analysis with missing data imputed showed no difference between the two iCBTs (SPHERE: 24.8/143, 17.3% vs. PRISM: 23.7/142, 16.7%, = 0.99). Uptake rates of the iCBTs were high (76.9% and 81.69% logged in at least once into SPHERE and PRISM, respectively), but adherence was low (out of those who logged in at least once, 19.01% [21/110] completed at least 50% modules in SPHERE and 7.76% [9/116] set a goal for trying out a given trigger-specific recommendation in PRISM). Acceptability ratings were intermediate. Self-guided iCBTs were not found to be superior in our primary ITT analysis. Low adherence could explain the lack of effects as completer analysis showed effects for both interventions. Enhancement of adherence should be a focus of future research.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/cjn.2024.287
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3122634581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3122634581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c216t-4b4198bd1a657254e9803bf69013f907295f4e0c87d3831b4fe402d7b46b022c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLw0AYRQdRbK3uXEuWLpo670mWtmgtVAStGzfDJPmmnZJHnUkK-utNqbq6XDicxUHomuAJwUTd5dt6QjHlE5qoEzSkWKgYEyFO0RAzomIiFRmgixC2GFMpJD9HA5ZyxVNGh-jj1dRFU7lvKKKVd6aMGhu9QWnjeecKKMbRom7B19DGUxMOf9asa9e6PURT2Ji9a3y02oA3Owchsv17dmtvXA2X6MyaMsDV747Q--PDavYUL1_mi9n9Ms4pkW3MM07SJCuIkUJRwSFNMMusTDFhNsWKpsJywHmiCpYwknELHNNCZVxmmNKcjdDt0bvzzWcHodWVCzmUpamh6YJmhFLJuEhIj46PaO6bEDxYvfOuMv5LE6wPNXVfUx9q6r5mj9_8mrusguIf_svHfgCNhm6L</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3122634581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Randomized Trial of Self-Guided, Internet-Based, Cognitive Behavior Therapies for Migraine</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Huguet, Anna ; Rozario, Sharlene ; Chaplin, William ; McDonald, Margaret ; Wozney, Lori M ; Lagman Bartolome, Ana Marissa ; Kronish, Ian M ; Purdy, Allan ; Stinson, Jennifer N ; McGrath, Patrick J</creator><creatorcontrib>Huguet, Anna ; Rozario, Sharlene ; Chaplin, William ; McDonald, Margaret ; Wozney, Lori M ; Lagman Bartolome, Ana Marissa ; Kronish, Ian M ; Purdy, Allan ; Stinson, Jennifer N ; McGrath, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><description>Self-guided Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy (iCBT) for migraine interventions could improve access to care, but there is poor evidence of their efficacy. A three-arm randomized controlled trial compared: iCBT focused on psychoeducation, self-monitoring and skills training (SPHERE), iCBT focused on identifying and managing personal headache triggers (PRISM) and a waitlist control. The primary treatment outcome was a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly headache days at 4 months post-randomization. 428 participants were randomized (mean age = 30.1). 240 participants (56.2%) provided outcome data at 4 months. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis with missing data imputed demonstrated that the proportion of responders with a ≥ 50% reduction was similar between combined iCBTs and waitlist (48.5/285, 17% vs. 16.6/143, 11.6%, = 0.20), but analysis of completers showed both iCBT programs to be superior to the waitlist (24/108, 22.2% vs. 13/113, 11.5%, = 0.047). ITT analysis with missing data imputed showed no difference between the two iCBTs (SPHERE: 24.8/143, 17.3% vs. PRISM: 23.7/142, 16.7%, = 0.99). Uptake rates of the iCBTs were high (76.9% and 81.69% logged in at least once into SPHERE and PRISM, respectively), but adherence was low (out of those who logged in at least once, 19.01% [21/110] completed at least 50% modules in SPHERE and 7.76% [9/116] set a goal for trying out a given trigger-specific recommendation in PRISM). Acceptability ratings were intermediate. Self-guided iCBTs were not found to be superior in our primary ITT analysis. Low adherence could explain the lack of effects as completer analysis showed effects for both interventions. Enhancement of adherence should be a focus of future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0317-1671</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2057-0155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2024.287</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39474932</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Canadian journal of neurological sciences, 2024-10, p.1-12</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c216t-4b4198bd1a657254e9803bf69013f907295f4e0c87d3831b4fe402d7b46b022c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4002-8644 ; 0000-0002-4859-6216</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39474932$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huguet, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozario, Sharlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaplin, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wozney, Lori M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagman Bartolome, Ana Marissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronish, Ian M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purdy, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stinson, Jennifer N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGrath, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><title>Randomized Trial of Self-Guided, Internet-Based, Cognitive Behavior Therapies for Migraine</title><title>Canadian journal of neurological sciences</title><addtitle>Can J Neurol Sci</addtitle><description>Self-guided Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy (iCBT) for migraine interventions could improve access to care, but there is poor evidence of their efficacy. A three-arm randomized controlled trial compared: iCBT focused on psychoeducation, self-monitoring and skills training (SPHERE), iCBT focused on identifying and managing personal headache triggers (PRISM) and a waitlist control. The primary treatment outcome was a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly headache days at 4 months post-randomization. 428 participants were randomized (mean age = 30.1). 240 participants (56.2%) provided outcome data at 4 months. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis with missing data imputed demonstrated that the proportion of responders with a ≥ 50% reduction was similar between combined iCBTs and waitlist (48.5/285, 17% vs. 16.6/143, 11.6%, = 0.20), but analysis of completers showed both iCBT programs to be superior to the waitlist (24/108, 22.2% vs. 13/113, 11.5%, = 0.047). ITT analysis with missing data imputed showed no difference between the two iCBTs (SPHERE: 24.8/143, 17.3% vs. PRISM: 23.7/142, 16.7%, = 0.99). Uptake rates of the iCBTs were high (76.9% and 81.69% logged in at least once into SPHERE and PRISM, respectively), but adherence was low (out of those who logged in at least once, 19.01% [21/110] completed at least 50% modules in SPHERE and 7.76% [9/116] set a goal for trying out a given trigger-specific recommendation in PRISM). Acceptability ratings were intermediate. Self-guided iCBTs were not found to be superior in our primary ITT analysis. Low adherence could explain the lack of effects as completer analysis showed effects for both interventions. Enhancement of adherence should be a focus of future research.</description><issn>0317-1671</issn><issn>2057-0155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtLw0AYRQdRbK3uXEuWLpo670mWtmgtVAStGzfDJPmmnZJHnUkK-utNqbq6XDicxUHomuAJwUTd5dt6QjHlE5qoEzSkWKgYEyFO0RAzomIiFRmgixC2GFMpJD9HA5ZyxVNGh-jj1dRFU7lvKKKVd6aMGhu9QWnjeecKKMbRom7B19DGUxMOf9asa9e6PURT2Ji9a3y02oA3Owchsv17dmtvXA2X6MyaMsDV747Q--PDavYUL1_mi9n9Ms4pkW3MM07SJCuIkUJRwSFNMMusTDFhNsWKpsJywHmiCpYwknELHNNCZVxmmNKcjdDt0bvzzWcHodWVCzmUpamh6YJmhFLJuEhIj46PaO6bEDxYvfOuMv5LE6wPNXVfUx9q6r5mj9_8mrusguIf_svHfgCNhm6L</recordid><startdate>20241030</startdate><enddate>20241030</enddate><creator>Huguet, Anna</creator><creator>Rozario, Sharlene</creator><creator>Chaplin, William</creator><creator>McDonald, Margaret</creator><creator>Wozney, Lori M</creator><creator>Lagman Bartolome, Ana Marissa</creator><creator>Kronish, Ian M</creator><creator>Purdy, Allan</creator><creator>Stinson, Jennifer N</creator><creator>McGrath, Patrick J</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4002-8644</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4859-6216</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241030</creationdate><title>Randomized Trial of Self-Guided, Internet-Based, Cognitive Behavior Therapies for Migraine</title><author>Huguet, Anna ; Rozario, Sharlene ; Chaplin, William ; McDonald, Margaret ; Wozney, Lori M ; Lagman Bartolome, Ana Marissa ; Kronish, Ian M ; Purdy, Allan ; Stinson, Jennifer N ; McGrath, Patrick J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c216t-4b4198bd1a657254e9803bf69013f907295f4e0c87d3831b4fe402d7b46b022c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huguet, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozario, Sharlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaplin, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wozney, Lori M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagman Bartolome, Ana Marissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronish, Ian M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purdy, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stinson, Jennifer N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGrath, Patrick J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of neurological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huguet, Anna</au><au>Rozario, Sharlene</au><au>Chaplin, William</au><au>McDonald, Margaret</au><au>Wozney, Lori M</au><au>Lagman Bartolome, Ana Marissa</au><au>Kronish, Ian M</au><au>Purdy, Allan</au><au>Stinson, Jennifer N</au><au>McGrath, Patrick J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Randomized Trial of Self-Guided, Internet-Based, Cognitive Behavior Therapies for Migraine</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of neurological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Neurol Sci</addtitle><date>2024-10-30</date><risdate>2024</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1-12</pages><issn>0317-1671</issn><eissn>2057-0155</eissn><abstract>Self-guided Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy (iCBT) for migraine interventions could improve access to care, but there is poor evidence of their efficacy. A three-arm randomized controlled trial compared: iCBT focused on psychoeducation, self-monitoring and skills training (SPHERE), iCBT focused on identifying and managing personal headache triggers (PRISM) and a waitlist control. The primary treatment outcome was a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly headache days at 4 months post-randomization. 428 participants were randomized (mean age = 30.1). 240 participants (56.2%) provided outcome data at 4 months. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis with missing data imputed demonstrated that the proportion of responders with a ≥ 50% reduction was similar between combined iCBTs and waitlist (48.5/285, 17% vs. 16.6/143, 11.6%, = 0.20), but analysis of completers showed both iCBT programs to be superior to the waitlist (24/108, 22.2% vs. 13/113, 11.5%, = 0.047). ITT analysis with missing data imputed showed no difference between the two iCBTs (SPHERE: 24.8/143, 17.3% vs. PRISM: 23.7/142, 16.7%, = 0.99). Uptake rates of the iCBTs were high (76.9% and 81.69% logged in at least once into SPHERE and PRISM, respectively), but adherence was low (out of those who logged in at least once, 19.01% [21/110] completed at least 50% modules in SPHERE and 7.76% [9/116] set a goal for trying out a given trigger-specific recommendation in PRISM). Acceptability ratings were intermediate. Self-guided iCBTs were not found to be superior in our primary ITT analysis. Low adherence could explain the lack of effects as completer analysis showed effects for both interventions. Enhancement of adherence should be a focus of future research.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>39474932</pmid><doi>10.1017/cjn.2024.287</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4002-8644</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4859-6216</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0317-1671
ispartof Canadian journal of neurological sciences, 2024-10, p.1-12
issn 0317-1671
2057-0155
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3122634581
source Cambridge University Press
title Randomized Trial of Self-Guided, Internet-Based, Cognitive Behavior Therapies for Migraine
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A12%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomized%20Trial%20of%20Self-Guided,%20Internet-Based,%20Cognitive%20Behavior%20Therapies%20for%20Migraine&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20neurological%20sciences&rft.au=Huguet,%20Anna&rft.date=2024-10-30&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1-12&rft.issn=0317-1671&rft.eissn=2057-0155&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/cjn.2024.287&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3122634581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c216t-4b4198bd1a657254e9803bf69013f907295f4e0c87d3831b4fe402d7b46b022c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3122634581&rft_id=info:pmid/39474932&rfr_iscdi=true