Loading…
Diversity and Entrepreneurialism: PN Review, Feminism and the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1973–1990
Abstract This article examines the evolution of PN Review, a leading Manchester-based poetry magazine, in relation to second-wave feminism in the 1970s and 1980s. Largely funded by the Arts Council of Great Britain, the magazine was initially not a welcoming place for female poets and contributors....
Saved in:
Published in: | Twentieth Century British History 2021-11, Vol.32 (4), p.553-580 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c6a9cb62b23f11fba72b50f84c2e756bc3ca7754c29bc3516f4729dcc8e503a33 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 580 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 553 |
container_title | Twentieth Century British History |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Jaillant, Lise |
description | Abstract
This article examines the evolution of PN Review, a leading Manchester-based poetry magazine, in relation to second-wave feminism in the 1970s and 1980s. Largely funded by the Arts Council of Great Britain, the magazine was initially not a welcoming place for female poets and contributors. Women’s poetry was often disparaged, and few women contributed to the magazine. From the early 1980s, however, PN Review started to include more women voices—a transition led by the founding editor Michael Schmidt, who was eager to include forgotten and neglected female poets on his list. This essay argues that changes in public funding, and increased market opportunities for women authors and feminist ideas, forced the magazine to evolve and adapt quickly. Women were taking a more visible role in the publishing world, as the success of the feminist press Virago (created in 1973) shows. Women poets were becoming more vocal, and openly denounced their marginalization in the poetry scene. The funding cuts decided by Margaret Thatcher’s government led to profound changes as Arts Council ‘clients’ competed fiercely to survive in a tough landscape. Changing priorities at the Arts Council—including the need for more diversity in publishing—also had an impact on grant holders. PN Review therefore offers a good example of a literary institution that was directly pushed towards gender diversity through external pressures from the Arts Council of Great Britain and the market. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/tcbh/hwab020 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3122644509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/tcbh/hwab020</oup_id><sourcerecordid>3122644509</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c6a9cb62b23f11fba72b50f84c2e756bc3ca7754c29bc3516f4729dcc8e503a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUQC0EoqWwMSNvMDTgZ1yzQWkBCQFCMEeOe6Ma5VFsh4qNf-AP-RICLYxM96GjMxyE9ik5pkTzk2jz-cl8aXLCyAbqU6FUIlIlNlGfaCkTxqXuoZ0QngkhSnC2jXpcCzViSvXR_MK9gg8uvmFTz_Ckjh4WHmpovTOlC9Upvr_FD_DqYDnEU6hc3T1_2DgHfOZjwOOmra0rcVPgSw8m4nPvonH1EFOt-Of7B9Wa7KKtwpQB9tZzgJ6mk8fxVXJzd3k9PrtJLE9pTGxqtM1TljNeUFrkRrFckmIkLAMl09xya5SS3am7XdK0EIrpmbUjkIQbzgfoaOVd-OalhRCzygULZWlqaNqQccpYKoTs0g3QcIVa34TgocgW3lXGv2WUZN9ts--22bpthx-szW1ewewP_o3ZAYcroGkX_6u-AGMJg2E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3122644509</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diversity and Entrepreneurialism: PN Review, Feminism and the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1973–1990</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Jaillant, Lise</creator><creatorcontrib>Jaillant, Lise</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
This article examines the evolution of PN Review, a leading Manchester-based poetry magazine, in relation to second-wave feminism in the 1970s and 1980s. Largely funded by the Arts Council of Great Britain, the magazine was initially not a welcoming place for female poets and contributors. Women’s poetry was often disparaged, and few women contributed to the magazine. From the early 1980s, however, PN Review started to include more women voices—a transition led by the founding editor Michael Schmidt, who was eager to include forgotten and neglected female poets on his list. This essay argues that changes in public funding, and increased market opportunities for women authors and feminist ideas, forced the magazine to evolve and adapt quickly. Women were taking a more visible role in the publishing world, as the success of the feminist press Virago (created in 1973) shows. Women poets were becoming more vocal, and openly denounced their marginalization in the poetry scene. The funding cuts decided by Margaret Thatcher’s government led to profound changes as Arts Council ‘clients’ competed fiercely to survive in a tough landscape. Changing priorities at the Arts Council—including the need for more diversity in publishing—also had an impact on grant holders. PN Review therefore offers a good example of a literary institution that was directly pushed towards gender diversity through external pressures from the Arts Council of Great Britain and the market.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0955-2359</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1477-4674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-4674</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/tcbh/hwab020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39478277</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Twentieth Century British History, 2021-11, Vol.32 (4), p.553-580</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) [2021]. Published by Oxford University Press. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) [2021]. Published by Oxford University Press.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c6a9cb62b23f11fba72b50f84c2e756bc3ca7754c29bc3516f4729dcc8e503a33</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-2680-4571</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39478277$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jaillant, Lise</creatorcontrib><title>Diversity and Entrepreneurialism: PN Review, Feminism and the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1973–1990</title><title>Twentieth Century British History</title><addtitle>20 Century Br Hist</addtitle><description>Abstract
This article examines the evolution of PN Review, a leading Manchester-based poetry magazine, in relation to second-wave feminism in the 1970s and 1980s. Largely funded by the Arts Council of Great Britain, the magazine was initially not a welcoming place for female poets and contributors. Women’s poetry was often disparaged, and few women contributed to the magazine. From the early 1980s, however, PN Review started to include more women voices—a transition led by the founding editor Michael Schmidt, who was eager to include forgotten and neglected female poets on his list. This essay argues that changes in public funding, and increased market opportunities for women authors and feminist ideas, forced the magazine to evolve and adapt quickly. Women were taking a more visible role in the publishing world, as the success of the feminist press Virago (created in 1973) shows. Women poets were becoming more vocal, and openly denounced their marginalization in the poetry scene. The funding cuts decided by Margaret Thatcher’s government led to profound changes as Arts Council ‘clients’ competed fiercely to survive in a tough landscape. Changing priorities at the Arts Council—including the need for more diversity in publishing—also had an impact on grant holders. PN Review therefore offers a good example of a literary institution that was directly pushed towards gender diversity through external pressures from the Arts Council of Great Britain and the market.</description><issn>0955-2359</issn><issn>1477-4674</issn><issn>1477-4674</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUQC0EoqWwMSNvMDTgZ1yzQWkBCQFCMEeOe6Ma5VFsh4qNf-AP-RICLYxM96GjMxyE9ik5pkTzk2jz-cl8aXLCyAbqU6FUIlIlNlGfaCkTxqXuoZ0QngkhSnC2jXpcCzViSvXR_MK9gg8uvmFTz_Ckjh4WHmpovTOlC9Upvr_FD_DqYDnEU6hc3T1_2DgHfOZjwOOmra0rcVPgSw8m4nPvonH1EFOt-Of7B9Wa7KKtwpQB9tZzgJ6mk8fxVXJzd3k9PrtJLE9pTGxqtM1TljNeUFrkRrFckmIkLAMl09xya5SS3am7XdK0EIrpmbUjkIQbzgfoaOVd-OalhRCzygULZWlqaNqQccpYKoTs0g3QcIVa34TgocgW3lXGv2WUZN9ts--22bpthx-szW1ewewP_o3ZAYcroGkX_6u-AGMJg2E</recordid><startdate>20211128</startdate><enddate>20211128</enddate><creator>Jaillant, Lise</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2680-4571</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211128</creationdate><title>Diversity and Entrepreneurialism: PN Review, Feminism and the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1973–1990</title><author>Jaillant, Lise</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c6a9cb62b23f11fba72b50f84c2e756bc3ca7754c29bc3516f4729dcc8e503a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jaillant, Lise</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Twentieth Century British History</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jaillant, Lise</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diversity and Entrepreneurialism: PN Review, Feminism and the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1973–1990</atitle><jtitle>Twentieth Century British History</jtitle><addtitle>20 Century Br Hist</addtitle><date>2021-11-28</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>553</spage><epage>580</epage><pages>553-580</pages><issn>0955-2359</issn><issn>1477-4674</issn><eissn>1477-4674</eissn><abstract>Abstract
This article examines the evolution of PN Review, a leading Manchester-based poetry magazine, in relation to second-wave feminism in the 1970s and 1980s. Largely funded by the Arts Council of Great Britain, the magazine was initially not a welcoming place for female poets and contributors. Women’s poetry was often disparaged, and few women contributed to the magazine. From the early 1980s, however, PN Review started to include more women voices—a transition led by the founding editor Michael Schmidt, who was eager to include forgotten and neglected female poets on his list. This essay argues that changes in public funding, and increased market opportunities for women authors and feminist ideas, forced the magazine to evolve and adapt quickly. Women were taking a more visible role in the publishing world, as the success of the feminist press Virago (created in 1973) shows. Women poets were becoming more vocal, and openly denounced their marginalization in the poetry scene. The funding cuts decided by Margaret Thatcher’s government led to profound changes as Arts Council ‘clients’ competed fiercely to survive in a tough landscape. Changing priorities at the Arts Council—including the need for more diversity in publishing—also had an impact on grant holders. PN Review therefore offers a good example of a literary institution that was directly pushed towards gender diversity through external pressures from the Arts Council of Great Britain and the market.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>39478277</pmid><doi>10.1093/tcbh/hwab020</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2680-4571</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0955-2359 |
ispartof | Twentieth Century British History, 2021-11, Vol.32 (4), p.553-580 |
issn | 0955-2359 1477-4674 1477-4674 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3122644509 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
title | Diversity and Entrepreneurialism: PN Review, Feminism and the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1973–1990 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A22%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diversity%20and%20Entrepreneurialism:%20PN%20Review,%20Feminism%20and%20the%20Arts%20Council%20of%20Great%20Britain,%201973%E2%80%931990&rft.jtitle=Twentieth%20Century%20British%20History&rft.au=Jaillant,%20Lise&rft.date=2021-11-28&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=553&rft.epage=580&rft.pages=553-580&rft.issn=0955-2359&rft.eissn=1477-4674&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/tcbh/hwab020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3122644509%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c6a9cb62b23f11fba72b50f84c2e756bc3ca7754c29bc3516f4729dcc8e503a33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3122644509&rft_id=info:pmid/39478277&rft_oup_id=10.1093/tcbh/hwab020&rfr_iscdi=true |