Loading…

Diversity and Entrepreneurialism: PN Review, Feminism and the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1973–1990

Abstract This article examines the evolution of PN Review, a leading Manchester-based poetry magazine, in relation to second-wave feminism in the 1970s and 1980s. Largely funded by the Arts Council of Great Britain, the magazine was initially not a welcoming place for female poets and contributors....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Twentieth Century British History 2021-11, Vol.32 (4), p.553-580
Main Author: Jaillant, Lise
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c6a9cb62b23f11fba72b50f84c2e756bc3ca7754c29bc3516f4729dcc8e503a33
cites
container_end_page 580
container_issue 4
container_start_page 553
container_title Twentieth Century British History
container_volume 32
creator Jaillant, Lise
description Abstract This article examines the evolution of PN Review, a leading Manchester-based poetry magazine, in relation to second-wave feminism in the 1970s and 1980s. Largely funded by the Arts Council of Great Britain, the magazine was initially not a welcoming place for female poets and contributors. Women’s poetry was often disparaged, and few women contributed to the magazine. From the early 1980s, however, PN Review started to include more women voices—a transition led by the founding editor Michael Schmidt, who was eager to include forgotten and neglected female poets on his list. This essay argues that changes in public funding, and increased market opportunities for women authors and feminist ideas, forced the magazine to evolve and adapt quickly. Women were taking a more visible role in the publishing world, as the success of the feminist press Virago (created in 1973) shows. Women poets were becoming more vocal, and openly denounced their marginalization in the poetry scene. The funding cuts decided by Margaret Thatcher’s government led to profound changes as Arts Council ‘clients’ competed fiercely to survive in a tough landscape. Changing priorities at the Arts Council—including the need for more diversity in publishing—also had an impact on grant holders. PN Review therefore offers a good example of a literary institution that was directly pushed towards gender diversity through external pressures from the Arts Council of Great Britain and the market.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/tcbh/hwab020
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3122644509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/tcbh/hwab020</oup_id><sourcerecordid>3122644509</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c6a9cb62b23f11fba72b50f84c2e756bc3ca7754c29bc3516f4729dcc8e503a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUQC0EoqWwMSNvMDTgZ1yzQWkBCQFCMEeOe6Ma5VFsh4qNf-AP-RICLYxM96GjMxyE9ik5pkTzk2jz-cl8aXLCyAbqU6FUIlIlNlGfaCkTxqXuoZ0QngkhSnC2jXpcCzViSvXR_MK9gg8uvmFTz_Ckjh4WHmpovTOlC9Upvr_FD_DqYDnEU6hc3T1_2DgHfOZjwOOmra0rcVPgSw8m4nPvonH1EFOt-Of7B9Wa7KKtwpQB9tZzgJ6mk8fxVXJzd3k9PrtJLE9pTGxqtM1TljNeUFrkRrFckmIkLAMl09xya5SS3am7XdK0EIrpmbUjkIQbzgfoaOVd-OalhRCzygULZWlqaNqQccpYKoTs0g3QcIVa34TgocgW3lXGv2WUZN9ts--22bpthx-szW1ewewP_o3ZAYcroGkX_6u-AGMJg2E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3122644509</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diversity and Entrepreneurialism: PN Review, Feminism and the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1973–1990</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Jaillant, Lise</creator><creatorcontrib>Jaillant, Lise</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract This article examines the evolution of PN Review, a leading Manchester-based poetry magazine, in relation to second-wave feminism in the 1970s and 1980s. Largely funded by the Arts Council of Great Britain, the magazine was initially not a welcoming place for female poets and contributors. Women’s poetry was often disparaged, and few women contributed to the magazine. From the early 1980s, however, PN Review started to include more women voices—a transition led by the founding editor Michael Schmidt, who was eager to include forgotten and neglected female poets on his list. This essay argues that changes in public funding, and increased market opportunities for women authors and feminist ideas, forced the magazine to evolve and adapt quickly. Women were taking a more visible role in the publishing world, as the success of the feminist press Virago (created in 1973) shows. Women poets were becoming more vocal, and openly denounced their marginalization in the poetry scene. The funding cuts decided by Margaret Thatcher’s government led to profound changes as Arts Council ‘clients’ competed fiercely to survive in a tough landscape. Changing priorities at the Arts Council—including the need for more diversity in publishing—also had an impact on grant holders. PN Review therefore offers a good example of a literary institution that was directly pushed towards gender diversity through external pressures from the Arts Council of Great Britain and the market.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0955-2359</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1477-4674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-4674</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/tcbh/hwab020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39478277</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Twentieth Century British History, 2021-11, Vol.32 (4), p.553-580</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) [2021]. Published by Oxford University Press. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) [2021]. Published by Oxford University Press.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c6a9cb62b23f11fba72b50f84c2e756bc3ca7754c29bc3516f4729dcc8e503a33</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-2680-4571</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39478277$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jaillant, Lise</creatorcontrib><title>Diversity and Entrepreneurialism: PN Review, Feminism and the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1973–1990</title><title>Twentieth Century British History</title><addtitle>20 Century Br Hist</addtitle><description>Abstract This article examines the evolution of PN Review, a leading Manchester-based poetry magazine, in relation to second-wave feminism in the 1970s and 1980s. Largely funded by the Arts Council of Great Britain, the magazine was initially not a welcoming place for female poets and contributors. Women’s poetry was often disparaged, and few women contributed to the magazine. From the early 1980s, however, PN Review started to include more women voices—a transition led by the founding editor Michael Schmidt, who was eager to include forgotten and neglected female poets on his list. This essay argues that changes in public funding, and increased market opportunities for women authors and feminist ideas, forced the magazine to evolve and adapt quickly. Women were taking a more visible role in the publishing world, as the success of the feminist press Virago (created in 1973) shows. Women poets were becoming more vocal, and openly denounced their marginalization in the poetry scene. The funding cuts decided by Margaret Thatcher’s government led to profound changes as Arts Council ‘clients’ competed fiercely to survive in a tough landscape. Changing priorities at the Arts Council—including the need for more diversity in publishing—also had an impact on grant holders. PN Review therefore offers a good example of a literary institution that was directly pushed towards gender diversity through external pressures from the Arts Council of Great Britain and the market.</description><issn>0955-2359</issn><issn>1477-4674</issn><issn>1477-4674</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUQC0EoqWwMSNvMDTgZ1yzQWkBCQFCMEeOe6Ma5VFsh4qNf-AP-RICLYxM96GjMxyE9ik5pkTzk2jz-cl8aXLCyAbqU6FUIlIlNlGfaCkTxqXuoZ0QngkhSnC2jXpcCzViSvXR_MK9gg8uvmFTz_Ckjh4WHmpovTOlC9Upvr_FD_DqYDnEU6hc3T1_2DgHfOZjwOOmra0rcVPgSw8m4nPvonH1EFOt-Of7B9Wa7KKtwpQB9tZzgJ6mk8fxVXJzd3k9PrtJLE9pTGxqtM1TljNeUFrkRrFckmIkLAMl09xya5SS3am7XdK0EIrpmbUjkIQbzgfoaOVd-OalhRCzygULZWlqaNqQccpYKoTs0g3QcIVa34TgocgW3lXGv2WUZN9ts--22bpthx-szW1ewewP_o3ZAYcroGkX_6u-AGMJg2E</recordid><startdate>20211128</startdate><enddate>20211128</enddate><creator>Jaillant, Lise</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2680-4571</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211128</creationdate><title>Diversity and Entrepreneurialism: PN Review, Feminism and the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1973–1990</title><author>Jaillant, Lise</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c6a9cb62b23f11fba72b50f84c2e756bc3ca7754c29bc3516f4729dcc8e503a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jaillant, Lise</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Twentieth Century British History</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jaillant, Lise</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diversity and Entrepreneurialism: PN Review, Feminism and the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1973–1990</atitle><jtitle>Twentieth Century British History</jtitle><addtitle>20 Century Br Hist</addtitle><date>2021-11-28</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>553</spage><epage>580</epage><pages>553-580</pages><issn>0955-2359</issn><issn>1477-4674</issn><eissn>1477-4674</eissn><abstract>Abstract This article examines the evolution of PN Review, a leading Manchester-based poetry magazine, in relation to second-wave feminism in the 1970s and 1980s. Largely funded by the Arts Council of Great Britain, the magazine was initially not a welcoming place for female poets and contributors. Women’s poetry was often disparaged, and few women contributed to the magazine. From the early 1980s, however, PN Review started to include more women voices—a transition led by the founding editor Michael Schmidt, who was eager to include forgotten and neglected female poets on his list. This essay argues that changes in public funding, and increased market opportunities for women authors and feminist ideas, forced the magazine to evolve and adapt quickly. Women were taking a more visible role in the publishing world, as the success of the feminist press Virago (created in 1973) shows. Women poets were becoming more vocal, and openly denounced their marginalization in the poetry scene. The funding cuts decided by Margaret Thatcher’s government led to profound changes as Arts Council ‘clients’ competed fiercely to survive in a tough landscape. Changing priorities at the Arts Council—including the need for more diversity in publishing—also had an impact on grant holders. PN Review therefore offers a good example of a literary institution that was directly pushed towards gender diversity through external pressures from the Arts Council of Great Britain and the market.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>39478277</pmid><doi>10.1093/tcbh/hwab020</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2680-4571</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0955-2359
ispartof Twentieth Century British History, 2021-11, Vol.32 (4), p.553-580
issn 0955-2359
1477-4674
1477-4674
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3122644509
source Oxford Journals Online
title Diversity and Entrepreneurialism: PN Review, Feminism and the Arts Council of Great Britain, 1973–1990
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A22%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diversity%20and%20Entrepreneurialism:%20PN%20Review,%20Feminism%20and%20the%20Arts%20Council%20of%20Great%20Britain,%201973%E2%80%931990&rft.jtitle=Twentieth%20Century%20British%20History&rft.au=Jaillant,%20Lise&rft.date=2021-11-28&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=553&rft.epage=580&rft.pages=553-580&rft.issn=0955-2359&rft.eissn=1477-4674&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/tcbh/hwab020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3122644509%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-c6a9cb62b23f11fba72b50f84c2e756bc3ca7754c29bc3516f4729dcc8e503a33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3122644509&rft_id=info:pmid/39478277&rft_oup_id=10.1093/tcbh/hwab020&rfr_iscdi=true