Loading…
Gestational diabetes mellitus – Can we do better with postpartum diabetes screening?
•Normal fasting plasma glucose levels 24-48 hours postpartum in women with gestational diabetes mellitus show a remarkable negative predictive value (99.30%) for type 2 diabetes at 6–12 weeks postpartum, particularly in low-risk cases managed by lifestyle changes.•With low compliance rates for stand...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2024-12, Vol.303, p.153-158 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Normal fasting plasma glucose levels 24-48 hours postpartum in women with gestational diabetes mellitus show a remarkable negative predictive value (99.30%) for type 2 diabetes at 6–12 weeks postpartum, particularly in low-risk cases managed by lifestyle changes.•With low compliance rates for standard postpartum oral glucose tolerance tests, measuring FPG shortly after delivery emerges as a practical and effective screening tool to identify women at risk for future glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes.•Immediate postpartum testing can effectively exclude diabetes risk in the majority of low-risk GDM cases, thereby aiding in targeted follow-up and management strategies.
This study aimed to assess the accuracy of measuring fasting plasma glucose (FPG) within 24–48 h postpartum in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) as a predictor for abnormal 6–12-week postpartum oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).
A retrospective cohort study (2012–2021) included women with GDM and singleton pregnancies who had FPG levels recorded 24–28 h postpartum and underwent a 6–12-week OGTT. The study compared the predictive accuracy of these FPG readings with the OGTT results.
Among 3128 GDM patients, 1163 (37.2 %) had a postpartum OGTT, with 935 (80.2 %) showing normal FPG ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0301-2115 1872-7654 1872-7654 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.006 |