Standardizing MRI orientation improves reliability of entorhinal and transentorhinal cortical volume measurement

The current study compared the reliability of manual collateral sulcus depth and entorhinal and transentorhinal cortical volume measurements between native oriented MRI scans versus MRI scans realigned to the hippocampal long axis. Data included 10 participants with two serial 3.0T MRI scans from th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging 2023-12, Vol.336, p.111735, Article 111735
Main Authors: Quek, Yi-En, Fung, Yi Leng, Vogrin, Simon J, Bourgeat, Pierrick, Vogrin, Sara, Fripp, Jurgen, Collins, Steven J, Bowden, Stephen C
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The current study compared the reliability of manual collateral sulcus depth and entorhinal and transentorhinal cortical volume measurements between native oriented MRI scans versus MRI scans realigned to the hippocampal long axis. Data included 10 participants with two serial 3.0T MRI scans from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Both collateral sulcus depth and entorhinal and transentorhinal cortical volume measurement reliability improved from the native to the hippocampal oriented scans. Standardizing scan orientation is important to optimize reliability of MRI-derived manual measurements of the entorhinal and transentorhinal cortices. In quantitative MRI studies, aligning scans to a common, normalized orientation is recommended.
ISSN:0925-4927
1872-7506
1872-7506
DOI:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2023.111735