Reliability and Validity of the L Test in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis

• Published in: Perceptual and motor skills 2024-11, p.315125241298728
• Main Authors: Bilek, Furkan, Demir, Caner F
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0031-5125; 1558-688X; 1558-688X
• DOI: 10.1177/00315125241298728

The L Test has been developed to assess balance and gait disorders. Our aim in this study was to estimate the test-retest reliability and validity of the L Test when used with 82 persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). For these participants, we examined the degree of agreement between the results of a first and second administration of the L Test (separated by one day), using Bland-Altman analysis and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). We computed minimal detectable change (MDC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) values for the L Test and evaluated concurrent validity by correlating L Test results with the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) and the 10-minute Walk Test (10MWT). Prior to administering these measurements, we randomized the sequence of the test administrations to our participants. The Bland-Altman analysis showed that L Test was reproducible, with upper and lower limits of agreement of 0.99 and -1.45 seconds, respectively. The L Test demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability, with an ICC value of 0.996 (95% CI: 0.994-0.998). Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.996. The performance of the L Test is measured by seconds required to complete the task, and we found the L Test SEM value to be 0.35 seconds, and its MDC value to be 0.97 seconds. The L Test showed a strong correlation with both the TUG test (rho = 0.936; < .001) and the 10MWT (rho = 0.925; < .001). We concluded that the L Test is a reliable and valid \ tool for assessing functional mobility and balance in PwMS.