Comparing the Exactech Equinoxe Reverse TSA for Fracture versus Degenerative Conditions: Five-Year Minimum Follow-Up

• Published in: Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2024-11
• Main Authors: Jenkins, Sarah M., Elwell, Josie, Muh, Stephanie J., Roche, Christopher P., Rogalski, Brandon L., Eichinger, Josef K., Friedman, Richard J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: glenohumeral arthritis; patient satisfaction; patient-reported outcomes; Proximal humerus fracture; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; rotator cuff arthropathy
• ISSN: 1058-2746; 1532-6500; 1532-6500
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.047

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has become the operative treatment of choice for acute proximal humerus fractures in the elderly population, but little data exists on the long-term outcomes or how they compare to rTSA done for degenerative conditions. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing rTSA for acute fracture versus degenerative conditions with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Data was extracted from an international registry of patients with the Exactech Equinoxe rTSA implant from 2007-2018. Patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years were then split into fracture and degenerative cohorts and matched 1:3 based on age, sex, and follow-up duration. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared between the cohorts including range of motion (ROM), patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), VAS pain score, complication and revision rates, implant characteristics, and scapular notching. This data was analyzed using Welch’s t-test, Fisher’s exact test, or Wilcoxon rank sum test. There were 384 total patients included in the study, with 96 fractures and 288 degenerative. At a mean follow-up of 6.4 years, the degenerative cohort had significant improvements in all PROMs and ROM, compared to their preoperative status. At the latest follow-up, the mean ASES score was 83 and the mean VAS pain score was 1.1 for both cohorts. Patients with degenerative indications had greater forward elevation which did not meet the minimally clinically important difference and greater internal rotation which did not meet the substantial clinical benefit threshold. Patient satisfaction was very high for both cohorts, with 97% in the degenerative cohort and 91% in the fracture cohort satisfied with the procedure (p=0.276). Complication and revision rates were similar between the two cohorts. Patients in the fracture cohort had a larger glenosphere diameter (p=0.045) and greater combined liner/tray offset (p=0.05). Patients in the elective cohort more frequently required an augmented baseplate (p