Loading…

Effect of joint angle positioning on shearwave speed and variability with ultrasound shearwave elastography in asymptomatic Achilles and patellar tendons

This study investigated the impact of joint positioning on ultrasound shear wave elastography measurements in the Achilles and patellar tendons. Twenty-eight healthy adults underwent SWE assessment of shear wave speed (SWS) and coefficient of variation in SWS (CV-SWS) at three ankle positions (neutr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of biomechanics 2024-12, Vol.177, p.112427, Article 112427
Main Authors: Vaidya, Rachana, Cui, Stephane, Houston, Bryson, North, Andrew, Chen, Menghan, Baxter, Josh, Zellers, Jennifer A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-3ee12efb6ba50304d0df9a63ff6228c804dc5201d12c98eefd891d6e951d8d493
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 112427
container_title Journal of biomechanics
container_volume 177
creator Vaidya, Rachana
Cui, Stephane
Houston, Bryson
North, Andrew
Chen, Menghan
Baxter, Josh
Zellers, Jennifer A.
description This study investigated the impact of joint positioning on ultrasound shear wave elastography measurements in the Achilles and patellar tendons. Twenty-eight healthy adults underwent SWE assessment of shear wave speed (SWS) and coefficient of variation in SWS (CV-SWS) at three ankle positions (neutral, 10° plantar flexion, and 20° dorsiflexion) and two knee positions (90° flexion and full extension), at two academic sites. Participant positioning for ankle testing differed between sites (prone vs long-sitting)—while knee testing used consistent positioning. At the ankle, both joint and participant positioning significantly affected SWS. In the prone position, SWS was lower in neutral compared to dorsiflexed position (3.07 ± 1.13  m/s vs. 3.95 ± 1.03  m/s, p = 0.013). In long-sitting, SWS was lower in neutral compared to plantarflexed position (2.85 ± 0.53  m/s vs. 4.86 ± 1.92  m/s, p = 0.016); and SWS was higher in the plantarflexed position when participants were in long-sitting compared to prone (4.86 ± 1.92  m/s vs. 3.25 ± 1.13  m/s, p = 0.016). Participant positioning affected CV-SWS, with higher variability observed in prone compared to long-sitting in plantarflexed (29.3 ± 15.5 % vs 12.4 ± 9.12 %, p = 0.005) and neutral ankle angles (p = 0.03). At the knee, joint position significantly influenced SWS, with higher values in flexed versus extended positions (6.48 ± 3.1  m/s vs. 4.60 ± 2.3  m/s, p = 0.007). Extending the knee reduced CV-SWS compared to flexed position (14.5 ± 11.2 vs 19.2 ± 13.4, p = 0.044). In conclusion, joint position significantly affected SWS measurements in both the Achilles and patellar tendons, while participant positioning influenced measurement variability. Thus, standardizing joint and participant positioning is important to enhance the reliability of SWE assessments of tendon elasticity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112427
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3128980453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929024005062</els_id><sourcerecordid>3141521482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-3ee12efb6ba50304d0df9a63ff6228c804dc5201d12c98eefd891d6e951d8d493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQhy0EotvCK1SWuHDJ4j9J1r5RVYUiVeICZ8uxJxtHiR1sZ6t9FN4WL9uCxIWTpfE3vxnNh9A1JVtKaPth3I6dCzOYYcsIq7eUsprtXqANFTteMS7IS7QhhNFKMkku0GVKIyFkV-_ka3TBZVO3grYb9POu78FkHHo8Bucz1n4_AV5CctkF7_weB4_TADo-6gPgtADYAll80NHpzk0uH_GjywNepxx1Cmv5-8vDpFMO-6iX4Yidxzod5yWHWWdn8I0Z3DRB-p236AzTpCPO4G3w6Q161espwdun9wp9_3T37fa-evj6-cvtzUNl2I7nigNQBn3XdrohnNSW2F7qlvd9y5gwolRMwwi1lBkpAHorJLUtyIZaYWvJr9D7c-4Sw48VUlazS-a0ioewJsUpE7LENLyg7_5Bx7BGX7YrVE0bRmvBCtWeKRNDShF6tUQ363hUlKiTPDWqZ3nqJE-d5ZXG66f4tZvB_ml7tlWAj2cAyj0ODqJKxoE3YF0sEpUN7n8zfgFFR7IG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3141521482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of joint angle positioning on shearwave speed and variability with ultrasound shearwave elastography in asymptomatic Achilles and patellar tendons</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Vaidya, Rachana ; Cui, Stephane ; Houston, Bryson ; North, Andrew ; Chen, Menghan ; Baxter, Josh ; Zellers, Jennifer A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vaidya, Rachana ; Cui, Stephane ; Houston, Bryson ; North, Andrew ; Chen, Menghan ; Baxter, Josh ; Zellers, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated the impact of joint positioning on ultrasound shear wave elastography measurements in the Achilles and patellar tendons. Twenty-eight healthy adults underwent SWE assessment of shear wave speed (SWS) and coefficient of variation in SWS (CV-SWS) at three ankle positions (neutral, 10° plantar flexion, and 20° dorsiflexion) and two knee positions (90° flexion and full extension), at two academic sites. Participant positioning for ankle testing differed between sites (prone vs long-sitting)—while knee testing used consistent positioning. At the ankle, both joint and participant positioning significantly affected SWS. In the prone position, SWS was lower in neutral compared to dorsiflexed position (3.07 ± 1.13  m/s vs. 3.95 ± 1.03  m/s, p = 0.013). In long-sitting, SWS was lower in neutral compared to plantarflexed position (2.85 ± 0.53  m/s vs. 4.86 ± 1.92  m/s, p = 0.016); and SWS was higher in the plantarflexed position when participants were in long-sitting compared to prone (4.86 ± 1.92  m/s vs. 3.25 ± 1.13  m/s, p = 0.016). Participant positioning affected CV-SWS, with higher variability observed in prone compared to long-sitting in plantarflexed (29.3 ± 15.5 % vs 12.4 ± 9.12 %, p = 0.005) and neutral ankle angles (p = 0.03). At the knee, joint position significantly influenced SWS, with higher values in flexed versus extended positions (6.48 ± 3.1  m/s vs. 4.60 ± 2.3  m/s, p = 0.007). Extending the knee reduced CV-SWS compared to flexed position (14.5 ± 11.2 vs 19.2 ± 13.4, p = 0.044). In conclusion, joint position significantly affected SWS measurements in both the Achilles and patellar tendons, while participant positioning influenced measurement variability. Thus, standardizing joint and participant positioning is important to enhance the reliability of SWE assessments of tendon elasticity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112427</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39546816</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Achilles Tendon - diagnostic imaging ; Achilles Tendon - physiology ; Adult ; Adults ; Ankle ; Ankle Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Ankle Joint - physiology ; Asymptomatic ; Coefficient of variation ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Joints (anatomy) ; Knee ; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Knee Joint - physiology ; Male ; Patellar Ligament - diagnostic imaging ; Patellar Ligament - physiology ; Plantar flexion ; Position measurement ; Prone position ; Reproducibility ; Tendons ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2024-12, Vol.177, p.112427, Article 112427</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Dec 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-3ee12efb6ba50304d0df9a63ff6228c804dc5201d12c98eefd891d6e951d8d493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39546816$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vaidya, Rachana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Stephane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houston, Bryson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>North, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Menghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxter, Josh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zellers, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of joint angle positioning on shearwave speed and variability with ultrasound shearwave elastography in asymptomatic Achilles and patellar tendons</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>This study investigated the impact of joint positioning on ultrasound shear wave elastography measurements in the Achilles and patellar tendons. Twenty-eight healthy adults underwent SWE assessment of shear wave speed (SWS) and coefficient of variation in SWS (CV-SWS) at three ankle positions (neutral, 10° plantar flexion, and 20° dorsiflexion) and two knee positions (90° flexion and full extension), at two academic sites. Participant positioning for ankle testing differed between sites (prone vs long-sitting)—while knee testing used consistent positioning. At the ankle, both joint and participant positioning significantly affected SWS. In the prone position, SWS was lower in neutral compared to dorsiflexed position (3.07 ± 1.13  m/s vs. 3.95 ± 1.03  m/s, p = 0.013). In long-sitting, SWS was lower in neutral compared to plantarflexed position (2.85 ± 0.53  m/s vs. 4.86 ± 1.92  m/s, p = 0.016); and SWS was higher in the plantarflexed position when participants were in long-sitting compared to prone (4.86 ± 1.92  m/s vs. 3.25 ± 1.13  m/s, p = 0.016). Participant positioning affected CV-SWS, with higher variability observed in prone compared to long-sitting in plantarflexed (29.3 ± 15.5 % vs 12.4 ± 9.12 %, p = 0.005) and neutral ankle angles (p = 0.03). At the knee, joint position significantly influenced SWS, with higher values in flexed versus extended positions (6.48 ± 3.1  m/s vs. 4.60 ± 2.3  m/s, p = 0.007). Extending the knee reduced CV-SWS compared to flexed position (14.5 ± 11.2 vs 19.2 ± 13.4, p = 0.044). In conclusion, joint position significantly affected SWS measurements in both the Achilles and patellar tendons, while participant positioning influenced measurement variability. Thus, standardizing joint and participant positioning is important to enhance the reliability of SWE assessments of tendon elasticity.</description><subject>Achilles Tendon - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Achilles Tendon - physiology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Ankle</subject><subject>Ankle Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ankle Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Asymptomatic</subject><subject>Coefficient of variation</subject><subject>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joints (anatomy)</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Patellar Ligament - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Patellar Ligament - physiology</subject><subject>Plantar flexion</subject><subject>Position measurement</subject><subject>Prone position</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Tendons</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQhy0EotvCK1SWuHDJ4j9J1r5RVYUiVeICZ8uxJxtHiR1sZ6t9FN4WL9uCxIWTpfE3vxnNh9A1JVtKaPth3I6dCzOYYcsIq7eUsprtXqANFTteMS7IS7QhhNFKMkku0GVKIyFkV-_ka3TBZVO3grYb9POu78FkHHo8Bucz1n4_AV5CctkF7_weB4_TADo-6gPgtADYAll80NHpzk0uH_GjywNepxx1Cmv5-8vDpFMO-6iX4Yidxzod5yWHWWdn8I0Z3DRB-p236AzTpCPO4G3w6Q161espwdun9wp9_3T37fa-evj6-cvtzUNl2I7nigNQBn3XdrohnNSW2F7qlvd9y5gwolRMwwi1lBkpAHorJLUtyIZaYWvJr9D7c-4Sw48VUlazS-a0ioewJsUpE7LENLyg7_5Bx7BGX7YrVE0bRmvBCtWeKRNDShF6tUQ363hUlKiTPDWqZ3nqJE-d5ZXG66f4tZvB_ml7tlWAj2cAyj0ODqJKxoE3YF0sEpUN7n8zfgFFR7IG</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Vaidya, Rachana</creator><creator>Cui, Stephane</creator><creator>Houston, Bryson</creator><creator>North, Andrew</creator><creator>Chen, Menghan</creator><creator>Baxter, Josh</creator><creator>Zellers, Jennifer A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Effect of joint angle positioning on shearwave speed and variability with ultrasound shearwave elastography in asymptomatic Achilles and patellar tendons</title><author>Vaidya, Rachana ; Cui, Stephane ; Houston, Bryson ; North, Andrew ; Chen, Menghan ; Baxter, Josh ; Zellers, Jennifer A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-3ee12efb6ba50304d0df9a63ff6228c804dc5201d12c98eefd891d6e951d8d493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Achilles Tendon - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Achilles Tendon - physiology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Ankle</topic><topic>Ankle Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ankle Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Asymptomatic</topic><topic>Coefficient of variation</topic><topic>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joints (anatomy)</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Patellar Ligament - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Patellar Ligament - physiology</topic><topic>Plantar flexion</topic><topic>Position measurement</topic><topic>Prone position</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Tendons</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vaidya, Rachana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Stephane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houston, Bryson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>North, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Menghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxter, Josh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zellers, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vaidya, Rachana</au><au>Cui, Stephane</au><au>Houston, Bryson</au><au>North, Andrew</au><au>Chen, Menghan</au><au>Baxter, Josh</au><au>Zellers, Jennifer A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of joint angle positioning on shearwave speed and variability with ultrasound shearwave elastography in asymptomatic Achilles and patellar tendons</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>177</volume><spage>112427</spage><pages>112427-</pages><artnum>112427</artnum><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>This study investigated the impact of joint positioning on ultrasound shear wave elastography measurements in the Achilles and patellar tendons. Twenty-eight healthy adults underwent SWE assessment of shear wave speed (SWS) and coefficient of variation in SWS (CV-SWS) at three ankle positions (neutral, 10° plantar flexion, and 20° dorsiflexion) and two knee positions (90° flexion and full extension), at two academic sites. Participant positioning for ankle testing differed between sites (prone vs long-sitting)—while knee testing used consistent positioning. At the ankle, both joint and participant positioning significantly affected SWS. In the prone position, SWS was lower in neutral compared to dorsiflexed position (3.07 ± 1.13  m/s vs. 3.95 ± 1.03  m/s, p = 0.013). In long-sitting, SWS was lower in neutral compared to plantarflexed position (2.85 ± 0.53  m/s vs. 4.86 ± 1.92  m/s, p = 0.016); and SWS was higher in the plantarflexed position when participants were in long-sitting compared to prone (4.86 ± 1.92  m/s vs. 3.25 ± 1.13  m/s, p = 0.016). Participant positioning affected CV-SWS, with higher variability observed in prone compared to long-sitting in plantarflexed (29.3 ± 15.5 % vs 12.4 ± 9.12 %, p = 0.005) and neutral ankle angles (p = 0.03). At the knee, joint position significantly influenced SWS, with higher values in flexed versus extended positions (6.48 ± 3.1  m/s vs. 4.60 ± 2.3  m/s, p = 0.007). Extending the knee reduced CV-SWS compared to flexed position (14.5 ± 11.2 vs 19.2 ± 13.4, p = 0.044). In conclusion, joint position significantly affected SWS measurements in both the Achilles and patellar tendons, while participant positioning influenced measurement variability. Thus, standardizing joint and participant positioning is important to enhance the reliability of SWE assessments of tendon elasticity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39546816</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112427</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9290
ispartof Journal of biomechanics, 2024-12, Vol.177, p.112427, Article 112427
issn 0021-9290
1873-2380
1873-2380
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3128980453
source Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)
subjects Achilles Tendon - diagnostic imaging
Achilles Tendon - physiology
Adult
Adults
Ankle
Ankle Joint - diagnostic imaging
Ankle Joint - physiology
Asymptomatic
Coefficient of variation
Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods
Female
Humans
Joints (anatomy)
Knee
Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging
Knee Joint - physiology
Male
Patellar Ligament - diagnostic imaging
Patellar Ligament - physiology
Plantar flexion
Position measurement
Prone position
Reproducibility
Tendons
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasound
Young Adult
title Effect of joint angle positioning on shearwave speed and variability with ultrasound shearwave elastography in asymptomatic Achilles and patellar tendons
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A59%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20joint%20angle%20positioning%20on%20shearwave%20speed%20and%20variability%20with%20ultrasound%20shearwave%20elastography%20in%20asymptomatic%20Achilles%20and%20patellar%20tendons&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Vaidya,%20Rachana&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=177&rft.spage=112427&rft.pages=112427-&rft.artnum=112427&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112427&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3141521482%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-3ee12efb6ba50304d0df9a63ff6228c804dc5201d12c98eefd891d6e951d8d493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3141521482&rft_id=info:pmid/39546816&rfr_iscdi=true