Loading…

The effectiveness of sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy for posterior sacroiliac joint complex pain in patients selected by dual sacral lateral branch blocks; A real-world cohort study

Previous study of spinal neurotomy procedures indicates that stringent block selection improves outcomes. However, this pattern is not established for sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy (SLBRFN). Few SLBRFN studies have used stringent block selection criteria such as ≥80 % pain reduction...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Interventional Pain Medicine (Online) 2024-12, Vol.3 (4), p.100442, Article 100442
Main Authors: Boos, Austin, Cooper, Amanda, Martin, Brook, Burnham, Robert, Glinka Przybysz, Allison, Conger, Aaron M., McCormick, Zachary L., Burnham, Taylor R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1962-8b921872eaa37c02258ba6aae16fe3d2a37fc936994e7fc2e3fecfedfc08ad3f3
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 100442
container_title Interventional Pain Medicine (Online)
container_volume 3
creator Boos, Austin
Cooper, Amanda
Martin, Brook
Burnham, Robert
Glinka Przybysz, Allison
Conger, Aaron M.
McCormick, Zachary L.
Burnham, Taylor R.
description Previous study of spinal neurotomy procedures indicates that stringent block selection improves outcomes. However, this pattern is not established for sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy (SLBRFN). Few SLBRFN studies have used stringent block selection criteria such as ≥80 % pain reduction following dual sacral lateral branch blocks (SLBB). Evaluate the effectiveness of SLBRFN in patients with ≥80 % pain relief following dual SLBBs. Retrospective single-arm cohort study of consecutive patients from two Canadian musculoskeletal and pain clinics who underwent first-time SLBRFN after report of ≥80 % pain relief following dual diagnostic SLBBs. Patients were identified by electronic medical record query between 2016 and 2022. The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals with a ≥50 % reduction in the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) score three months after SLBRFN. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of responders achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the pain disability quality-of-life questionnaire (PDQQ), and the duration and mean percentage of pain relief among those with recurrent symptoms after a successful SLBRFN. Of the 70 participants included, 32 (45.7 %; 95 % CI = 34.6–57.3) reported a ≥50 % reduction in NPRS, and 35 (50.0 %; 95 % CI = 38.6–61.4) achieved the MCID on the PDQQ at 3-months. Among the 17 patients who reported a return of symptoms, the mean duration of relief was 8.0 ± 3.5 months, and the mean percentage of pain relief was 77.9 % ± 16.4 %. Logistic regression models revealed that the use of multi-tined RF probes and lower patient BMI were associated with treatment success. SLBRFN reduced pain and disability in approximately 50 % of patients at 3 months when selected using relatively restrictive selection criteria. Treatment success was associated with multi-tined RF probe type and lower patient BMI. Larger prospective studies assessing long-term outcomes are needed to further evaluate the impact of different selection criteria and techniques on SLBRFN effectiveness.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100442
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3129682859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2772594424000633</els_id><sourcerecordid>3129682859</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1962-8b921872eaa37c02258ba6aae16fe3d2a37fc936994e7fc2e3fecfedfc08ad3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU2L1TAUDaI4wzh_wIVk6aZv0qTta9DNMKgjDLgZ1yFNbnh5pklN2nH6__xh3vJGcSFC4F4u54OcQ8jrmu1qVndXx52P07jjjDd4YE3Dn5Fzvt_zqpVN8_yv_YxclnJkjHHZCSG6l-RMyLblneDn5Of9ASg4B2b2DxChFJocLdpkHWjQM2xzyDqaA83a-uQyfF8gmpVGWHKa07hSlzKdUkGwx20jJx-8NvSYfJypSeMU4JFO2keKb9KzhzgXWiCgL1g6rNQuaPRv3yEk8628o9c0gw7Vj5SDRdFDyjMt82LXV-SF06HA5dO8IF8_fri_ua3uvnz6fHN9V5ladrzqB8nrfs9Ba7E3jPO2H3SnNdSdA2E5Xp2RopOyAdw4CIzFgXWG9doKJy7I25PulBOGUGY1-mIgBB0hLUWJGiPued9KhPITFLMoJYNTU_ajzquqmdoKVEe1Fai2AtWpQCS9edJfhhHsH8rvuhDw_gQA_OWDh6yKwSgNWJ8xSWWT_5_-LxcrspY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3129682859</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effectiveness of sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy for posterior sacroiliac joint complex pain in patients selected by dual sacral lateral branch blocks; A real-world cohort study</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Boos, Austin ; Cooper, Amanda ; Martin, Brook ; Burnham, Robert ; Glinka Przybysz, Allison ; Conger, Aaron M. ; McCormick, Zachary L. ; Burnham, Taylor R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boos, Austin ; Cooper, Amanda ; Martin, Brook ; Burnham, Robert ; Glinka Przybysz, Allison ; Conger, Aaron M. ; McCormick, Zachary L. ; Burnham, Taylor R.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous study of spinal neurotomy procedures indicates that stringent block selection improves outcomes. However, this pattern is not established for sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy (SLBRFN). Few SLBRFN studies have used stringent block selection criteria such as ≥80 % pain reduction following dual sacral lateral branch blocks (SLBB). Evaluate the effectiveness of SLBRFN in patients with ≥80 % pain relief following dual SLBBs. Retrospective single-arm cohort study of consecutive patients from two Canadian musculoskeletal and pain clinics who underwent first-time SLBRFN after report of ≥80 % pain relief following dual diagnostic SLBBs. Patients were identified by electronic medical record query between 2016 and 2022. The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals with a ≥50 % reduction in the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) score three months after SLBRFN. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of responders achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the pain disability quality-of-life questionnaire (PDQQ), and the duration and mean percentage of pain relief among those with recurrent symptoms after a successful SLBRFN. Of the 70 participants included, 32 (45.7 %; 95 % CI = 34.6–57.3) reported a ≥50 % reduction in NPRS, and 35 (50.0 %; 95 % CI = 38.6–61.4) achieved the MCID on the PDQQ at 3-months. Among the 17 patients who reported a return of symptoms, the mean duration of relief was 8.0 ± 3.5 months, and the mean percentage of pain relief was 77.9 % ± 16.4 %. Logistic regression models revealed that the use of multi-tined RF probes and lower patient BMI were associated with treatment success. SLBRFN reduced pain and disability in approximately 50 % of patients at 3 months when selected using relatively restrictive selection criteria. Treatment success was associated with multi-tined RF probe type and lower patient BMI. Larger prospective studies assessing long-term outcomes are needed to further evaluate the impact of different selection criteria and techniques on SLBRFN effectiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2772-5944</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2772-5944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100442</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39552632</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Dual lateral branch block ; Radiofrequency ablation ; Sacroiliac joint pain</subject><ispartof>Interventional Pain Medicine (Online), 2024-12, Vol.3 (4), p.100442, Article 100442</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>2024 The Authors.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1962-8b921872eaa37c02258ba6aae16fe3d2a37fc936994e7fc2e3fecfedfc08ad3f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2402-4835 ; 0000-0001-5493-9695 ; 0000-0002-3195-9500 ; 0000-0001-7552-6670 ; 0000-0003-4250-8745 ; 0000-0003-1808-3425 ; 0000-0001-8871-0792</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594424000633$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39552632$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boos, Austin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Brook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burnham, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glinka Przybysz, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conger, Aaron M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormick, Zachary L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burnham, Taylor R.</creatorcontrib><title>The effectiveness of sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy for posterior sacroiliac joint complex pain in patients selected by dual sacral lateral branch blocks; A real-world cohort study</title><title>Interventional Pain Medicine (Online)</title><addtitle>Interv Pain Med</addtitle><description>Previous study of spinal neurotomy procedures indicates that stringent block selection improves outcomes. However, this pattern is not established for sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy (SLBRFN). Few SLBRFN studies have used stringent block selection criteria such as ≥80 % pain reduction following dual sacral lateral branch blocks (SLBB). Evaluate the effectiveness of SLBRFN in patients with ≥80 % pain relief following dual SLBBs. Retrospective single-arm cohort study of consecutive patients from two Canadian musculoskeletal and pain clinics who underwent first-time SLBRFN after report of ≥80 % pain relief following dual diagnostic SLBBs. Patients were identified by electronic medical record query between 2016 and 2022. The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals with a ≥50 % reduction in the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) score three months after SLBRFN. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of responders achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the pain disability quality-of-life questionnaire (PDQQ), and the duration and mean percentage of pain relief among those with recurrent symptoms after a successful SLBRFN. Of the 70 participants included, 32 (45.7 %; 95 % CI = 34.6–57.3) reported a ≥50 % reduction in NPRS, and 35 (50.0 %; 95 % CI = 38.6–61.4) achieved the MCID on the PDQQ at 3-months. Among the 17 patients who reported a return of symptoms, the mean duration of relief was 8.0 ± 3.5 months, and the mean percentage of pain relief was 77.9 % ± 16.4 %. Logistic regression models revealed that the use of multi-tined RF probes and lower patient BMI were associated with treatment success. SLBRFN reduced pain and disability in approximately 50 % of patients at 3 months when selected using relatively restrictive selection criteria. Treatment success was associated with multi-tined RF probe type and lower patient BMI. Larger prospective studies assessing long-term outcomes are needed to further evaluate the impact of different selection criteria and techniques on SLBRFN effectiveness.</description><subject>Dual lateral branch block</subject><subject>Radiofrequency ablation</subject><subject>Sacroiliac joint pain</subject><issn>2772-5944</issn><issn>2772-5944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UU2L1TAUDaI4wzh_wIVk6aZv0qTta9DNMKgjDLgZ1yFNbnh5pklN2nH6__xh3vJGcSFC4F4u54OcQ8jrmu1qVndXx52P07jjjDd4YE3Dn5Fzvt_zqpVN8_yv_YxclnJkjHHZCSG6l-RMyLblneDn5Of9ASg4B2b2DxChFJocLdpkHWjQM2xzyDqaA83a-uQyfF8gmpVGWHKa07hSlzKdUkGwx20jJx-8NvSYfJypSeMU4JFO2keKb9KzhzgXWiCgL1g6rNQuaPRv3yEk8628o9c0gw7Vj5SDRdFDyjMt82LXV-SF06HA5dO8IF8_fri_ua3uvnz6fHN9V5ladrzqB8nrfs9Ba7E3jPO2H3SnNdSdA2E5Xp2RopOyAdw4CIzFgXWG9doKJy7I25PulBOGUGY1-mIgBB0hLUWJGiPued9KhPITFLMoJYNTU_ajzquqmdoKVEe1Fai2AtWpQCS9edJfhhHsH8rvuhDw_gQA_OWDh6yKwSgNWJ8xSWWT_5_-LxcrspY</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Boos, Austin</creator><creator>Cooper, Amanda</creator><creator>Martin, Brook</creator><creator>Burnham, Robert</creator><creator>Glinka Przybysz, Allison</creator><creator>Conger, Aaron M.</creator><creator>McCormick, Zachary L.</creator><creator>Burnham, Taylor R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2402-4835</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5493-9695</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3195-9500</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7552-6670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4250-8745</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1808-3425</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8871-0792</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>The effectiveness of sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy for posterior sacroiliac joint complex pain in patients selected by dual sacral lateral branch blocks; A real-world cohort study</title><author>Boos, Austin ; Cooper, Amanda ; Martin, Brook ; Burnham, Robert ; Glinka Przybysz, Allison ; Conger, Aaron M. ; McCormick, Zachary L. ; Burnham, Taylor R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1962-8b921872eaa37c02258ba6aae16fe3d2a37fc936994e7fc2e3fecfedfc08ad3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Dual lateral branch block</topic><topic>Radiofrequency ablation</topic><topic>Sacroiliac joint pain</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boos, Austin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Brook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burnham, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glinka Przybysz, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conger, Aaron M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormick, Zachary L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burnham, Taylor R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Interventional Pain Medicine (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boos, Austin</au><au>Cooper, Amanda</au><au>Martin, Brook</au><au>Burnham, Robert</au><au>Glinka Przybysz, Allison</au><au>Conger, Aaron M.</au><au>McCormick, Zachary L.</au><au>Burnham, Taylor R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effectiveness of sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy for posterior sacroiliac joint complex pain in patients selected by dual sacral lateral branch blocks; A real-world cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Interventional Pain Medicine (Online)</jtitle><addtitle>Interv Pain Med</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>100442</spage><pages>100442-</pages><artnum>100442</artnum><issn>2772-5944</issn><eissn>2772-5944</eissn><abstract>Previous study of spinal neurotomy procedures indicates that stringent block selection improves outcomes. However, this pattern is not established for sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy (SLBRFN). Few SLBRFN studies have used stringent block selection criteria such as ≥80 % pain reduction following dual sacral lateral branch blocks (SLBB). Evaluate the effectiveness of SLBRFN in patients with ≥80 % pain relief following dual SLBBs. Retrospective single-arm cohort study of consecutive patients from two Canadian musculoskeletal and pain clinics who underwent first-time SLBRFN after report of ≥80 % pain relief following dual diagnostic SLBBs. Patients were identified by electronic medical record query between 2016 and 2022. The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals with a ≥50 % reduction in the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) score three months after SLBRFN. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of responders achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the pain disability quality-of-life questionnaire (PDQQ), and the duration and mean percentage of pain relief among those with recurrent symptoms after a successful SLBRFN. Of the 70 participants included, 32 (45.7 %; 95 % CI = 34.6–57.3) reported a ≥50 % reduction in NPRS, and 35 (50.0 %; 95 % CI = 38.6–61.4) achieved the MCID on the PDQQ at 3-months. Among the 17 patients who reported a return of symptoms, the mean duration of relief was 8.0 ± 3.5 months, and the mean percentage of pain relief was 77.9 % ± 16.4 %. Logistic regression models revealed that the use of multi-tined RF probes and lower patient BMI were associated with treatment success. SLBRFN reduced pain and disability in approximately 50 % of patients at 3 months when selected using relatively restrictive selection criteria. Treatment success was associated with multi-tined RF probe type and lower patient BMI. Larger prospective studies assessing long-term outcomes are needed to further evaluate the impact of different selection criteria and techniques on SLBRFN effectiveness.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39552632</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100442</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2402-4835</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5493-9695</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3195-9500</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7552-6670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4250-8745</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1808-3425</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8871-0792</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2772-5944
ispartof Interventional Pain Medicine (Online), 2024-12, Vol.3 (4), p.100442, Article 100442
issn 2772-5944
2772-5944
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3129682859
source ScienceDirect; PubMed Central Free
subjects Dual lateral branch block
Radiofrequency ablation
Sacroiliac joint pain
title The effectiveness of sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy for posterior sacroiliac joint complex pain in patients selected by dual sacral lateral branch blocks; A real-world cohort study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A11%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effectiveness%20of%20sacral%20lateral%20branch%20radiofrequency%20neurotomy%20for%20posterior%20sacroiliac%20joint%20complex%20pain%20in%20patients%20selected%20by%20dual%20sacral%20lateral%20branch%20blocks;%20A%20real-world%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Interventional%20Pain%20Medicine%20(Online)&rft.au=Boos,%20Austin&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=100442&rft.pages=100442-&rft.artnum=100442&rft.issn=2772-5944&rft.eissn=2772-5944&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100442&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3129682859%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1962-8b921872eaa37c02258ba6aae16fe3d2a37fc936994e7fc2e3fecfedfc08ad3f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3129682859&rft_id=info:pmid/39552632&rfr_iscdi=true