Loading…
Validation of British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding from 8,956 cases in Japan
We sought to validate the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB). We analyzed 8,956 patients with ALGIB in CODE BLUE-J study and categorized them into four groups based on BSG guidelines. Outcomes included 30-day rebleeding, 30-day mort...
Saved in:
Published in: | Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2024-11 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We sought to validate the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB).
We analyzed 8,956 patients with ALGIB in CODE BLUE-J study and categorized them into four groups based on BSG guidelines. Outcomes included 30-day rebleeding, 30-day mortality, blood transfusion, therapeutic intervention, and severe bleeding.
The severe bleeding rates significantly decreased from Group I to IV: 92.1%, 70.1%, 58.7%, and 38.4%. The rate of the need for blood transfusion and 30-day mortality also decreased from I to IV. Although outpatient follow-up was recommended in Group IV, it had high rates of severe bleeding (38%) and 30-day rebleeding (11%). Notably, for colonic diverticular bleeding, the rate of 30-day rebleeding was 25.5%, even with an Oakland score ≤ 8. We identified abdominal pain, diarrhea, and a high white blood cell count as independent factors that differentiate between non-severe and severe bleeding cases in Group IV. Using these factors, the 30-day rebleeding rate in the non-severe group was 3.6%, suggesting the feasibility of outpatient follow-up in this group. Furthermore, a novel, Group X, which deviated from the existing four groups, had a high severe bleeding rate (70.9%) comparable to that of Group II.
The BSG guidelines suggest a management approach that can clearly differentiate severity. However, caution is advised when using the Oakland score to triage patients for outpatient follow-up. Additionally, prompt intervention may be necessary for groups not covered by the guidelines. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0016-5107 1097-6779 1097-6779 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.020 |