Implant-supported fixed prostheses with cantilever: a systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: International journal of implant dentistry 2024-11, Vol.10 (1), p.57, Article 57
• Main Authors: Kondo, Yusuke, Sakai, Kiyoshi, Minakuchi, Hajime, Horimai, Takuya, Kuboki, Takuo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Alveolar Bone Loss - etiology; Dental Implants; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Dental Restoration Failure; Dentistry; Denture, Partial, Fixed; Humans; Jaw, Edentulous, Partially; Medicine; Patient Satisfaction; Prostheses; Review; Surgical implants; Survival; Systematic review; Transplants & implants
• ISSN: 2198-4034; 2198-4034
• DOI: 10.1186/s40729-024-00573-8

Purpose This systematic review (SR) aimed to investigate whether the presence of a cantilever affects the results of implant treatment for partial edentulism, including an analysis of the anterior and posterior regions of the dental arches. Methods An electronic search was performed, and original articles published between 1995 and November 2023 were included. The outcomes were the implant survival rate, patient satisfaction, occurrence of mechanical complications, and marginal bone loss around the implants. Two SR members independently examined the validity of the studies, extracted evidence from the included studies, and performed risk of bias assessment, comprehensive evidence evaluation, and meta-analysis. Results Nine studies met our inclusion criteria. Implant survival rate tended to be lower in the cantilever group, and marginal bone loss tended to be higher in the cantilever group; however, there was no significant difference. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction based on the presence or absence of a cantilever. Moreover, the incidence of mechanical complications was significantly higher in the cantilever group. According to the analysis of anterior and posterior regions, implant survival rate tended to be lower in the cantilever group of the posterior region, and marginal bone loss around the implants tended to be higher in the cantilever group of the anterior region. Conclusion Implant-supported fixed prostheses with cantilevers did not negatively affect implant survival rate, marginal bone loss, or patient satisfaction. However, the incidence of mechanical complications significantly increased in the cantilever group.