Loading…
Effects of cross‐linking agents on hydroxyproline release and root caries lesion size: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis of in vitro studies
A promising approach for managing root caries is the use of cross‐linking agents to stabilize collagen. However, despite testing various natural and synthetic agents in vitro, their efficacy remains uncertain. The aim of this review was to examine which cross‐linking agent performs better in reducin...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of oral sciences 2024-12, Vol.132 (6), p.e13028-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2438-b89855ec886a5348e659a8b95b24c23509317b66995c9f223916122a17cf02b33 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e13028 |
container_title | European journal of oral sciences |
container_volume | 132 |
creator | Monici Silva, Isabela Barbosa, Cecília de Brito Cena, Jéssica Alves de Ribeiro, Erick Garcia, Fernanda Cristina Pimentel Stefani, Cristine Miron Dame‐Teixeira, Naile |
description | A promising approach for managing root caries is the use of cross‐linking agents to stabilize collagen. However, despite testing various natural and synthetic agents in vitro, their efficacy remains uncertain. The aim of this review was to examine which cross‐linking agent performs better in reducing root caries lesion depth and the release of hydroxyproline, which is a marker of collagen degradation. Studies evaluating the impact of cross‐linking agents on dentin were included, while studies performed on enamel surface/cell cultures and studies evaluating collagenase inhibitors were excluded, among others. A comprehensive search covered eight databases, and study quality was assessed using the QUINN Tool for in vitro dental studies. Synthesis of the results was done using a Bayesian network meta‐analysis to compare agents. Fifty studies involving 31 cross‐linking agents were included for qualitative synthesis. The network meta‐analysis for lesion depth involved 284 samples across 36 comparisons and ranked cross‐linking agents in terms of their caries lesion depth‐reducing effect (from best to worst): naringin > quercetin > riboflavin > proanthocyanidins > hesperidin > glutaraldehyde > cranberry > grape seed extract > untreated controls. Only naringin, quercetin, proanthocyanidins, and glutaraldehyde showed statistically significant efficacy over untreated controls. Cranberry extract excelled in reducing hydroxyproline release, followed by proanthocyanidins. In conclusion, proanthocyanidins positively affected both outcomes, suggesting they are prime candidates for translational research. Clinical studies are now essential to evaluate their real‐world effectiveness against root caries. PROSPERO‐CRD42023404911. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/eos.13028 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3132366805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3133524429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2438-b89855ec886a5348e659a8b95b24c23509317b66995c9f223916122a17cf02b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10b9u1TAUBnALUdFLYeAFkCUWGNL6T-zYbFV1oZUqdSjMkeN7UtwmdrGdXsLEIzDzeDwJbm7LgIQXD_7pOzr-EHpFySEt5whCOqScMPUEragkpCINY0_RimiiK6W43EfPU7omhHKqm2don2vRaMrYCv1a9z3YnHDosY0hpd8_fg7O3zh_hc0V-PsXj7_Mmxi-zbcxlDfAEQYwCbDxGxxDyNia6CDhAZIrOrnv8B5fzinDaLKzxd852C7cQ96GeINHyKaMMt4Mc3LLeOfxncsx4JSnTYl7gfZ6MyR4-XAfoM8f1p9OTqvzi49nJ8fnlWU1V1WntBICrFLSCF4rkEIb1WnRsdoyLojmtOmk1FpY3TPGNZVldUMb2xPWcX6A3u5yy3pfJ0i5HV2yMAzGQ5hSyylnXEpFRKFv_qHXYYplh0Vxweqa6aLe7dTyoRH69ja60cS5paS9L6wthbVLYcW-fkicuhE2f-VjQwUc7cDWDTD_P6ldX1zuIv8AsdOisA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3133524429</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of cross‐linking agents on hydroxyproline release and root caries lesion size: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis of in vitro studies</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Monici Silva, Isabela ; Barbosa, Cecília de Brito ; Cena, Jéssica Alves de ; Ribeiro, Erick ; Garcia, Fernanda Cristina Pimentel ; Stefani, Cristine Miron ; Dame‐Teixeira, Naile</creator><creatorcontrib>Monici Silva, Isabela ; Barbosa, Cecília de Brito ; Cena, Jéssica Alves de ; Ribeiro, Erick ; Garcia, Fernanda Cristina Pimentel ; Stefani, Cristine Miron ; Dame‐Teixeira, Naile</creatorcontrib><description>A promising approach for managing root caries is the use of cross‐linking agents to stabilize collagen. However, despite testing various natural and synthetic agents in vitro, their efficacy remains uncertain. The aim of this review was to examine which cross‐linking agent performs better in reducing root caries lesion depth and the release of hydroxyproline, which is a marker of collagen degradation. Studies evaluating the impact of cross‐linking agents on dentin were included, while studies performed on enamel surface/cell cultures and studies evaluating collagenase inhibitors were excluded, among others. A comprehensive search covered eight databases, and study quality was assessed using the QUINN Tool for in vitro dental studies. Synthesis of the results was done using a Bayesian network meta‐analysis to compare agents. Fifty studies involving 31 cross‐linking agents were included for qualitative synthesis. The network meta‐analysis for lesion depth involved 284 samples across 36 comparisons and ranked cross‐linking agents in terms of their caries lesion depth‐reducing effect (from best to worst): naringin > quercetin > riboflavin > proanthocyanidins > hesperidin > glutaraldehyde > cranberry > grape seed extract > untreated controls. Only naringin, quercetin, proanthocyanidins, and glutaraldehyde showed statistically significant efficacy over untreated controls. Cranberry extract excelled in reducing hydroxyproline release, followed by proanthocyanidins. In conclusion, proanthocyanidins positively affected both outcomes, suggesting they are prime candidates for translational research. Clinical studies are now essential to evaluate their real‐world effectiveness against root caries. PROSPERO‐CRD42023404911.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0909-8836</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1600-0722</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0722</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/eos.13028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39579122</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Clinical outcomes ; Collagen ; Collagenase ; Cross-Linking Reagents ; Dental caries ; Dental enamel ; Dentin - drug effects ; dentin biomodification ; Effectiveness ; Evaluation ; Flavanones - pharmacology ; Flavanones - therapeutic use ; Glutaraldehyde ; Hesperidin ; Humans ; Hydroxyproline ; Hydroxyproline - analysis ; In Vitro Techniques ; Lesions ; Meta-analysis ; Network Meta-Analysis ; Plant extracts ; Proanthocyanidins ; Qualitative analysis ; Quercetin ; Riboflavin ; root caries ; Root Caries - drug therapy ; Statistical analysis ; Synthesis ; systematic review</subject><ispartof>European journal of oral sciences, 2024-12, Vol.132 (6), p.e13028-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 Scandinavian Division of the International Association for Dental Research. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2438-b89855ec886a5348e659a8b95b24c23509317b66995c9f223916122a17cf02b33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4010-4280 ; 0000-0001-6442-5639 ; 0000-0003-3385-0207 ; 0000-0002-0490-0036 ; 0000-0003-4712-9779 ; 0000-0003-1292-2371 ; 0000-0002-7560-7320</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39579122$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monici Silva, Isabela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Cecília de Brito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cena, Jéssica Alves de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Erick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Fernanda Cristina Pimentel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefani, Cristine Miron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dame‐Teixeira, Naile</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of cross‐linking agents on hydroxyproline release and root caries lesion size: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis of in vitro studies</title><title>European journal of oral sciences</title><addtitle>Eur J Oral Sci</addtitle><description>A promising approach for managing root caries is the use of cross‐linking agents to stabilize collagen. However, despite testing various natural and synthetic agents in vitro, their efficacy remains uncertain. The aim of this review was to examine which cross‐linking agent performs better in reducing root caries lesion depth and the release of hydroxyproline, which is a marker of collagen degradation. Studies evaluating the impact of cross‐linking agents on dentin were included, while studies performed on enamel surface/cell cultures and studies evaluating collagenase inhibitors were excluded, among others. A comprehensive search covered eight databases, and study quality was assessed using the QUINN Tool for in vitro dental studies. Synthesis of the results was done using a Bayesian network meta‐analysis to compare agents. Fifty studies involving 31 cross‐linking agents were included for qualitative synthesis. The network meta‐analysis for lesion depth involved 284 samples across 36 comparisons and ranked cross‐linking agents in terms of their caries lesion depth‐reducing effect (from best to worst): naringin > quercetin > riboflavin > proanthocyanidins > hesperidin > glutaraldehyde > cranberry > grape seed extract > untreated controls. Only naringin, quercetin, proanthocyanidins, and glutaraldehyde showed statistically significant efficacy over untreated controls. Cranberry extract excelled in reducing hydroxyproline release, followed by proanthocyanidins. In conclusion, proanthocyanidins positively affected both outcomes, suggesting they are prime candidates for translational research. Clinical studies are now essential to evaluate their real‐world effectiveness against root caries. PROSPERO‐CRD42023404911.</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Collagen</subject><subject>Collagenase</subject><subject>Cross-Linking Reagents</subject><subject>Dental caries</subject><subject>Dental enamel</subject><subject>Dentin - drug effects</subject><subject>dentin biomodification</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Flavanones - pharmacology</subject><subject>Flavanones - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Glutaraldehyde</subject><subject>Hesperidin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydroxyproline</subject><subject>Hydroxyproline - analysis</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Network Meta-Analysis</subject><subject>Plant extracts</subject><subject>Proanthocyanidins</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Quercetin</subject><subject>Riboflavin</subject><subject>root caries</subject><subject>Root Caries - drug therapy</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Synthesis</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><issn>0909-8836</issn><issn>1600-0722</issn><issn>1600-0722</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10b9u1TAUBnALUdFLYeAFkCUWGNL6T-zYbFV1oZUqdSjMkeN7UtwmdrGdXsLEIzDzeDwJbm7LgIQXD_7pOzr-EHpFySEt5whCOqScMPUEragkpCINY0_RimiiK6W43EfPU7omhHKqm2don2vRaMrYCv1a9z3YnHDosY0hpd8_fg7O3zh_hc0V-PsXj7_Mmxi-zbcxlDfAEQYwCbDxGxxDyNia6CDhAZIrOrnv8B5fzinDaLKzxd852C7cQ96GeINHyKaMMt4Mc3LLeOfxncsx4JSnTYl7gfZ6MyR4-XAfoM8f1p9OTqvzi49nJ8fnlWU1V1WntBICrFLSCF4rkEIb1WnRsdoyLojmtOmk1FpY3TPGNZVldUMb2xPWcX6A3u5yy3pfJ0i5HV2yMAzGQ5hSyylnXEpFRKFv_qHXYYplh0Vxweqa6aLe7dTyoRH69ja60cS5paS9L6wthbVLYcW-fkicuhE2f-VjQwUc7cDWDTD_P6ldX1zuIv8AsdOisA</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Monici Silva, Isabela</creator><creator>Barbosa, Cecília de Brito</creator><creator>Cena, Jéssica Alves de</creator><creator>Ribeiro, Erick</creator><creator>Garcia, Fernanda Cristina Pimentel</creator><creator>Stefani, Cristine Miron</creator><creator>Dame‐Teixeira, Naile</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4010-4280</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6442-5639</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3385-0207</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0490-0036</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4712-9779</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1292-2371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7560-7320</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Effects of cross‐linking agents on hydroxyproline release and root caries lesion size: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis of in vitro studies</title><author>Monici Silva, Isabela ; Barbosa, Cecília de Brito ; Cena, Jéssica Alves de ; Ribeiro, Erick ; Garcia, Fernanda Cristina Pimentel ; Stefani, Cristine Miron ; Dame‐Teixeira, Naile</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2438-b89855ec886a5348e659a8b95b24c23509317b66995c9f223916122a17cf02b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Collagen</topic><topic>Collagenase</topic><topic>Cross-Linking Reagents</topic><topic>Dental caries</topic><topic>Dental enamel</topic><topic>Dentin - drug effects</topic><topic>dentin biomodification</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Flavanones - pharmacology</topic><topic>Flavanones - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Glutaraldehyde</topic><topic>Hesperidin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydroxyproline</topic><topic>Hydroxyproline - analysis</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Network Meta-Analysis</topic><topic>Plant extracts</topic><topic>Proanthocyanidins</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Quercetin</topic><topic>Riboflavin</topic><topic>root caries</topic><topic>Root Caries - drug therapy</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Synthesis</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monici Silva, Isabela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Cecília de Brito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cena, Jéssica Alves de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Erick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Fernanda Cristina Pimentel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefani, Cristine Miron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dame‐Teixeira, Naile</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of oral sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monici Silva, Isabela</au><au>Barbosa, Cecília de Brito</au><au>Cena, Jéssica Alves de</au><au>Ribeiro, Erick</au><au>Garcia, Fernanda Cristina Pimentel</au><au>Stefani, Cristine Miron</au><au>Dame‐Teixeira, Naile</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of cross‐linking agents on hydroxyproline release and root caries lesion size: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis of in vitro studies</atitle><jtitle>European journal of oral sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Oral Sci</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e13028</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13028-n/a</pages><issn>0909-8836</issn><issn>1600-0722</issn><eissn>1600-0722</eissn><abstract>A promising approach for managing root caries is the use of cross‐linking agents to stabilize collagen. However, despite testing various natural and synthetic agents in vitro, their efficacy remains uncertain. The aim of this review was to examine which cross‐linking agent performs better in reducing root caries lesion depth and the release of hydroxyproline, which is a marker of collagen degradation. Studies evaluating the impact of cross‐linking agents on dentin were included, while studies performed on enamel surface/cell cultures and studies evaluating collagenase inhibitors were excluded, among others. A comprehensive search covered eight databases, and study quality was assessed using the QUINN Tool for in vitro dental studies. Synthesis of the results was done using a Bayesian network meta‐analysis to compare agents. Fifty studies involving 31 cross‐linking agents were included for qualitative synthesis. The network meta‐analysis for lesion depth involved 284 samples across 36 comparisons and ranked cross‐linking agents in terms of their caries lesion depth‐reducing effect (from best to worst): naringin > quercetin > riboflavin > proanthocyanidins > hesperidin > glutaraldehyde > cranberry > grape seed extract > untreated controls. Only naringin, quercetin, proanthocyanidins, and glutaraldehyde showed statistically significant efficacy over untreated controls. Cranberry extract excelled in reducing hydroxyproline release, followed by proanthocyanidins. In conclusion, proanthocyanidins positively affected both outcomes, suggesting they are prime candidates for translational research. Clinical studies are now essential to evaluate their real‐world effectiveness against root caries. PROSPERO‐CRD42023404911.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>39579122</pmid><doi>10.1111/eos.13028</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4010-4280</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6442-5639</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3385-0207</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0490-0036</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4712-9779</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1292-2371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7560-7320</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0909-8836 |
ispartof | European journal of oral sciences, 2024-12, Vol.132 (6), p.e13028-n/a |
issn | 0909-8836 1600-0722 1600-0722 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3132366805 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Bayesian analysis Clinical outcomes Collagen Collagenase Cross-Linking Reagents Dental caries Dental enamel Dentin - drug effects dentin biomodification Effectiveness Evaluation Flavanones - pharmacology Flavanones - therapeutic use Glutaraldehyde Hesperidin Humans Hydroxyproline Hydroxyproline - analysis In Vitro Techniques Lesions Meta-analysis Network Meta-Analysis Plant extracts Proanthocyanidins Qualitative analysis Quercetin Riboflavin root caries Root Caries - drug therapy Statistical analysis Synthesis systematic review |
title | Effects of cross‐linking agents on hydroxyproline release and root caries lesion size: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis of in vitro studies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A59%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20cross%E2%80%90linking%20agents%20on%20hydroxyproline%20release%20and%20root%20caries%20lesion%20size:%20Systematic%20review%20and%20network%20meta%E2%80%90analysis%20of%20in%20vitro%20studies&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20oral%20sciences&rft.au=Monici%20Silva,%20Isabela&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e13028&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13028-n/a&rft.issn=0909-8836&rft.eissn=1600-0722&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/eos.13028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3133524429%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2438-b89855ec886a5348e659a8b95b24c23509317b66995c9f223916122a17cf02b33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3133524429&rft_id=info:pmid/39579122&rfr_iscdi=true |