Loading…

Effects of cross‐linking agents on hydroxyproline release and root caries lesion size: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis of in vitro studies

A promising approach for managing root caries is the use of cross‐linking agents to stabilize collagen. However, despite testing various natural and synthetic agents in vitro, their efficacy remains uncertain. The aim of this review was to examine which cross‐linking agent performs better in reducin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of oral sciences 2024-12, Vol.132 (6), p.e13028-n/a
Main Authors: Monici Silva, Isabela, Barbosa, Cecília de Brito, Cena, Jéssica Alves de, Ribeiro, Erick, Garcia, Fernanda Cristina Pimentel, Stefani, Cristine Miron, Dame‐Teixeira, Naile
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2438-b89855ec886a5348e659a8b95b24c23509317b66995c9f223916122a17cf02b33
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 6
container_start_page e13028
container_title European journal of oral sciences
container_volume 132
creator Monici Silva, Isabela
Barbosa, Cecília de Brito
Cena, Jéssica Alves de
Ribeiro, Erick
Garcia, Fernanda Cristina Pimentel
Stefani, Cristine Miron
Dame‐Teixeira, Naile
description A promising approach for managing root caries is the use of cross‐linking agents to stabilize collagen. However, despite testing various natural and synthetic agents in vitro, their efficacy remains uncertain. The aim of this review was to examine which cross‐linking agent performs better in reducing root caries lesion depth and the release of hydroxyproline, which is a marker of collagen degradation. Studies evaluating the impact of cross‐linking agents on dentin were included, while studies performed on enamel surface/cell cultures and studies evaluating collagenase inhibitors were excluded, among others. A comprehensive search covered eight databases, and study quality was assessed using the QUINN Tool for in vitro dental studies. Synthesis of the results was done using a Bayesian network meta‐analysis to compare agents. Fifty studies involving 31 cross‐linking agents were included for qualitative synthesis. The network meta‐analysis for lesion depth involved 284 samples across 36 comparisons and ranked cross‐linking agents in terms of their caries lesion depth‐reducing effect (from best to worst): naringin > quercetin > riboflavin > proanthocyanidins > hesperidin > glutaraldehyde > cranberry > grape seed extract > untreated controls. Only naringin, quercetin, proanthocyanidins, and glutaraldehyde showed statistically significant efficacy over untreated controls. Cranberry extract excelled in reducing hydroxyproline release, followed by proanthocyanidins. In conclusion, proanthocyanidins positively affected both outcomes, suggesting they are prime candidates for translational research. Clinical studies are now essential to evaluate their real‐world effectiveness against root caries. PROSPERO‐CRD42023404911.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/eos.13028
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3132366805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3133524429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2438-b89855ec886a5348e659a8b95b24c23509317b66995c9f223916122a17cf02b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10b9u1TAUBnALUdFLYeAFkCUWGNL6T-zYbFV1oZUqdSjMkeN7UtwmdrGdXsLEIzDzeDwJbm7LgIQXD_7pOzr-EHpFySEt5whCOqScMPUEragkpCINY0_RimiiK6W43EfPU7omhHKqm2don2vRaMrYCv1a9z3YnHDosY0hpd8_fg7O3zh_hc0V-PsXj7_Mmxi-zbcxlDfAEQYwCbDxGxxDyNia6CDhAZIrOrnv8B5fzinDaLKzxd852C7cQ96GeINHyKaMMt4Mc3LLeOfxncsx4JSnTYl7gfZ6MyR4-XAfoM8f1p9OTqvzi49nJ8fnlWU1V1WntBICrFLSCF4rkEIb1WnRsdoyLojmtOmk1FpY3TPGNZVldUMb2xPWcX6A3u5yy3pfJ0i5HV2yMAzGQ5hSyylnXEpFRKFv_qHXYYplh0Vxweqa6aLe7dTyoRH69ja60cS5paS9L6wthbVLYcW-fkicuhE2f-VjQwUc7cDWDTD_P6ldX1zuIv8AsdOisA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3133524429</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of cross‐linking agents on hydroxyproline release and root caries lesion size: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis of in vitro studies</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Monici Silva, Isabela ; Barbosa, Cecília de Brito ; Cena, Jéssica Alves de ; Ribeiro, Erick ; Garcia, Fernanda Cristina Pimentel ; Stefani, Cristine Miron ; Dame‐Teixeira, Naile</creator><creatorcontrib>Monici Silva, Isabela ; Barbosa, Cecília de Brito ; Cena, Jéssica Alves de ; Ribeiro, Erick ; Garcia, Fernanda Cristina Pimentel ; Stefani, Cristine Miron ; Dame‐Teixeira, Naile</creatorcontrib><description>A promising approach for managing root caries is the use of cross‐linking agents to stabilize collagen. However, despite testing various natural and synthetic agents in vitro, their efficacy remains uncertain. The aim of this review was to examine which cross‐linking agent performs better in reducing root caries lesion depth and the release of hydroxyproline, which is a marker of collagen degradation. Studies evaluating the impact of cross‐linking agents on dentin were included, while studies performed on enamel surface/cell cultures and studies evaluating collagenase inhibitors were excluded, among others. A comprehensive search covered eight databases, and study quality was assessed using the QUINN Tool for in vitro dental studies. Synthesis of the results was done using a Bayesian network meta‐analysis to compare agents. Fifty studies involving 31 cross‐linking agents were included for qualitative synthesis. The network meta‐analysis for lesion depth involved 284 samples across 36 comparisons and ranked cross‐linking agents in terms of their caries lesion depth‐reducing effect (from best to worst): naringin &gt; quercetin &gt; riboflavin &gt; proanthocyanidins &gt; hesperidin &gt; glutaraldehyde &gt; cranberry &gt; grape seed extract &gt; untreated controls. Only naringin, quercetin, proanthocyanidins, and glutaraldehyde showed statistically significant efficacy over untreated controls. Cranberry extract excelled in reducing hydroxyproline release, followed by proanthocyanidins. In conclusion, proanthocyanidins positively affected both outcomes, suggesting they are prime candidates for translational research. Clinical studies are now essential to evaluate their real‐world effectiveness against root caries. PROSPERO‐CRD42023404911.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0909-8836</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1600-0722</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0722</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/eos.13028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39579122</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Clinical outcomes ; Collagen ; Collagenase ; Cross-Linking Reagents ; Dental caries ; Dental enamel ; Dentin - drug effects ; dentin biomodification ; Effectiveness ; Evaluation ; Flavanones - pharmacology ; Flavanones - therapeutic use ; Glutaraldehyde ; Hesperidin ; Humans ; Hydroxyproline ; Hydroxyproline - analysis ; In Vitro Techniques ; Lesions ; Meta-analysis ; Network Meta-Analysis ; Plant extracts ; Proanthocyanidins ; Qualitative analysis ; Quercetin ; Riboflavin ; root caries ; Root Caries - drug therapy ; Statistical analysis ; Synthesis ; systematic review</subject><ispartof>European journal of oral sciences, 2024-12, Vol.132 (6), p.e13028-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 Scandinavian Division of the International Association for Dental Research. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2438-b89855ec886a5348e659a8b95b24c23509317b66995c9f223916122a17cf02b33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4010-4280 ; 0000-0001-6442-5639 ; 0000-0003-3385-0207 ; 0000-0002-0490-0036 ; 0000-0003-4712-9779 ; 0000-0003-1292-2371 ; 0000-0002-7560-7320</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39579122$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monici Silva, Isabela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Cecília de Brito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cena, Jéssica Alves de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Erick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Fernanda Cristina Pimentel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefani, Cristine Miron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dame‐Teixeira, Naile</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of cross‐linking agents on hydroxyproline release and root caries lesion size: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis of in vitro studies</title><title>European journal of oral sciences</title><addtitle>Eur J Oral Sci</addtitle><description>A promising approach for managing root caries is the use of cross‐linking agents to stabilize collagen. However, despite testing various natural and synthetic agents in vitro, their efficacy remains uncertain. The aim of this review was to examine which cross‐linking agent performs better in reducing root caries lesion depth and the release of hydroxyproline, which is a marker of collagen degradation. Studies evaluating the impact of cross‐linking agents on dentin were included, while studies performed on enamel surface/cell cultures and studies evaluating collagenase inhibitors were excluded, among others. A comprehensive search covered eight databases, and study quality was assessed using the QUINN Tool for in vitro dental studies. Synthesis of the results was done using a Bayesian network meta‐analysis to compare agents. Fifty studies involving 31 cross‐linking agents were included for qualitative synthesis. The network meta‐analysis for lesion depth involved 284 samples across 36 comparisons and ranked cross‐linking agents in terms of their caries lesion depth‐reducing effect (from best to worst): naringin &gt; quercetin &gt; riboflavin &gt; proanthocyanidins &gt; hesperidin &gt; glutaraldehyde &gt; cranberry &gt; grape seed extract &gt; untreated controls. Only naringin, quercetin, proanthocyanidins, and glutaraldehyde showed statistically significant efficacy over untreated controls. Cranberry extract excelled in reducing hydroxyproline release, followed by proanthocyanidins. In conclusion, proanthocyanidins positively affected both outcomes, suggesting they are prime candidates for translational research. Clinical studies are now essential to evaluate their real‐world effectiveness against root caries. PROSPERO‐CRD42023404911.</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Collagen</subject><subject>Collagenase</subject><subject>Cross-Linking Reagents</subject><subject>Dental caries</subject><subject>Dental enamel</subject><subject>Dentin - drug effects</subject><subject>dentin biomodification</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Flavanones - pharmacology</subject><subject>Flavanones - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Glutaraldehyde</subject><subject>Hesperidin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydroxyproline</subject><subject>Hydroxyproline - analysis</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Network Meta-Analysis</subject><subject>Plant extracts</subject><subject>Proanthocyanidins</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Quercetin</subject><subject>Riboflavin</subject><subject>root caries</subject><subject>Root Caries - drug therapy</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Synthesis</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><issn>0909-8836</issn><issn>1600-0722</issn><issn>1600-0722</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10b9u1TAUBnALUdFLYeAFkCUWGNL6T-zYbFV1oZUqdSjMkeN7UtwmdrGdXsLEIzDzeDwJbm7LgIQXD_7pOzr-EHpFySEt5whCOqScMPUEragkpCINY0_RimiiK6W43EfPU7omhHKqm2don2vRaMrYCv1a9z3YnHDosY0hpd8_fg7O3zh_hc0V-PsXj7_Mmxi-zbcxlDfAEQYwCbDxGxxDyNia6CDhAZIrOrnv8B5fzinDaLKzxd852C7cQ96GeINHyKaMMt4Mc3LLeOfxncsx4JSnTYl7gfZ6MyR4-XAfoM8f1p9OTqvzi49nJ8fnlWU1V1WntBICrFLSCF4rkEIb1WnRsdoyLojmtOmk1FpY3TPGNZVldUMb2xPWcX6A3u5yy3pfJ0i5HV2yMAzGQ5hSyylnXEpFRKFv_qHXYYplh0Vxweqa6aLe7dTyoRH69ja60cS5paS9L6wthbVLYcW-fkicuhE2f-VjQwUc7cDWDTD_P6ldX1zuIv8AsdOisA</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Monici Silva, Isabela</creator><creator>Barbosa, Cecília de Brito</creator><creator>Cena, Jéssica Alves de</creator><creator>Ribeiro, Erick</creator><creator>Garcia, Fernanda Cristina Pimentel</creator><creator>Stefani, Cristine Miron</creator><creator>Dame‐Teixeira, Naile</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4010-4280</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6442-5639</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3385-0207</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0490-0036</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4712-9779</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1292-2371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7560-7320</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Effects of cross‐linking agents on hydroxyproline release and root caries lesion size: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis of in vitro studies</title><author>Monici Silva, Isabela ; Barbosa, Cecília de Brito ; Cena, Jéssica Alves de ; Ribeiro, Erick ; Garcia, Fernanda Cristina Pimentel ; Stefani, Cristine Miron ; Dame‐Teixeira, Naile</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2438-b89855ec886a5348e659a8b95b24c23509317b66995c9f223916122a17cf02b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Collagen</topic><topic>Collagenase</topic><topic>Cross-Linking Reagents</topic><topic>Dental caries</topic><topic>Dental enamel</topic><topic>Dentin - drug effects</topic><topic>dentin biomodification</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Flavanones - pharmacology</topic><topic>Flavanones - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Glutaraldehyde</topic><topic>Hesperidin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydroxyproline</topic><topic>Hydroxyproline - analysis</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Network Meta-Analysis</topic><topic>Plant extracts</topic><topic>Proanthocyanidins</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Quercetin</topic><topic>Riboflavin</topic><topic>root caries</topic><topic>Root Caries - drug therapy</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Synthesis</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monici Silva, Isabela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Cecília de Brito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cena, Jéssica Alves de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Erick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Fernanda Cristina Pimentel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefani, Cristine Miron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dame‐Teixeira, Naile</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of oral sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monici Silva, Isabela</au><au>Barbosa, Cecília de Brito</au><au>Cena, Jéssica Alves de</au><au>Ribeiro, Erick</au><au>Garcia, Fernanda Cristina Pimentel</au><au>Stefani, Cristine Miron</au><au>Dame‐Teixeira, Naile</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of cross‐linking agents on hydroxyproline release and root caries lesion size: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis of in vitro studies</atitle><jtitle>European journal of oral sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Oral Sci</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e13028</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13028-n/a</pages><issn>0909-8836</issn><issn>1600-0722</issn><eissn>1600-0722</eissn><abstract>A promising approach for managing root caries is the use of cross‐linking agents to stabilize collagen. However, despite testing various natural and synthetic agents in vitro, their efficacy remains uncertain. The aim of this review was to examine which cross‐linking agent performs better in reducing root caries lesion depth and the release of hydroxyproline, which is a marker of collagen degradation. Studies evaluating the impact of cross‐linking agents on dentin were included, while studies performed on enamel surface/cell cultures and studies evaluating collagenase inhibitors were excluded, among others. A comprehensive search covered eight databases, and study quality was assessed using the QUINN Tool for in vitro dental studies. Synthesis of the results was done using a Bayesian network meta‐analysis to compare agents. Fifty studies involving 31 cross‐linking agents were included for qualitative synthesis. The network meta‐analysis for lesion depth involved 284 samples across 36 comparisons and ranked cross‐linking agents in terms of their caries lesion depth‐reducing effect (from best to worst): naringin &gt; quercetin &gt; riboflavin &gt; proanthocyanidins &gt; hesperidin &gt; glutaraldehyde &gt; cranberry &gt; grape seed extract &gt; untreated controls. Only naringin, quercetin, proanthocyanidins, and glutaraldehyde showed statistically significant efficacy over untreated controls. Cranberry extract excelled in reducing hydroxyproline release, followed by proanthocyanidins. In conclusion, proanthocyanidins positively affected both outcomes, suggesting they are prime candidates for translational research. Clinical studies are now essential to evaluate their real‐world effectiveness against root caries. PROSPERO‐CRD42023404911.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>39579122</pmid><doi>10.1111/eos.13028</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4010-4280</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6442-5639</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3385-0207</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0490-0036</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4712-9779</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1292-2371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7560-7320</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0909-8836
ispartof European journal of oral sciences, 2024-12, Vol.132 (6), p.e13028-n/a
issn 0909-8836
1600-0722
1600-0722
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3132366805
source Wiley
subjects Bayesian analysis
Clinical outcomes
Collagen
Collagenase
Cross-Linking Reagents
Dental caries
Dental enamel
Dentin - drug effects
dentin biomodification
Effectiveness
Evaluation
Flavanones - pharmacology
Flavanones - therapeutic use
Glutaraldehyde
Hesperidin
Humans
Hydroxyproline
Hydroxyproline - analysis
In Vitro Techniques
Lesions
Meta-analysis
Network Meta-Analysis
Plant extracts
Proanthocyanidins
Qualitative analysis
Quercetin
Riboflavin
root caries
Root Caries - drug therapy
Statistical analysis
Synthesis
systematic review
title Effects of cross‐linking agents on hydroxyproline release and root caries lesion size: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis of in vitro studies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A59%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20cross%E2%80%90linking%20agents%20on%20hydroxyproline%20release%20and%20root%20caries%20lesion%20size:%20Systematic%20review%20and%20network%20meta%E2%80%90analysis%20of%20in%20vitro%20studies&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20oral%20sciences&rft.au=Monici%20Silva,%20Isabela&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e13028&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13028-n/a&rft.issn=0909-8836&rft.eissn=1600-0722&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/eos.13028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3133524429%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2438-b89855ec886a5348e659a8b95b24c23509317b66995c9f223916122a17cf02b33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3133524429&rft_id=info:pmid/39579122&rfr_iscdi=true