Loading…

Is distal pancreatectomy the optimal surgical procedure for pancreatic neck cancer?

The optimal resection for pancreatic neck cancer is challenging in clinical practice because we could dissect by pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of lymph node dissection and to help determine the optimal surgical treatment...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Surgery 2024-11, p.108930, Article 108930
Main Authors: Nomura, Satoshi, Masui, Toshihiko, Muto, Jun, Hashida, Kazuki, Kitagawa, Hirohisa, Fujinuma, Ibuki, Kitamura, Kei, Ogura, Toshiro, Takahashi, Amane, Kawamoto, Kazuyuki
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1526-4dc39569737b71682e990a48e0ccfde9c4105e56552e0acdd8244583adc70c3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 108930
container_title Surgery
container_volume
creator Nomura, Satoshi
Masui, Toshihiko
Muto, Jun
Hashida, Kazuki
Kitagawa, Hirohisa
Fujinuma, Ibuki
Kitamura, Kei
Ogura, Toshiro
Takahashi, Amane
Kawamoto, Kazuyuki
description The optimal resection for pancreatic neck cancer is challenging in clinical practice because we could dissect by pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of lymph node dissection and to help determine the optimal surgical treatment for pancreatic neck cancer. We retrospectively evaluated 462 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent curative-intent pancreatectomy between 2012 and 2022, 35 of whom had pancreatic neck cancer without preoperative radiologic gastroduodenal artery contact. We analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics, lymph node metastasis stations, and the efficacy index of lymph node dissection, which was calculated by multiplying the frequency of lymph node metastasis to each station by the 5-year survival rate of patients with positive lymph nodes at each station. The lymph node station with the greatest rate of metastasis was #11p (28.6%), followed by #8 (17.1%), #14 (14.3%), #13 (14.3%), #17 (9.5%), and #6 (4.8%). The efficacy indices of lymph node dissection were 14.3 for #11, 4.76 for #13, and 8.57 for #14. There were no significant differences in 5-year recurrence-free survival and 5-year overall survival between patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy and those undergoing distal pancreatectomy (23.7% vs 54.7%, P = .142; 29.9% vs 51.1%, P = .179, respectively). Univariate survival analysis showed that tumor size ≥2 cm was associated with poor prognosis (hazard ratio, 3.842, P = .009). PD with #11p lymph node dissection is preferable to DP in terms of survival benefit for pancreatic neck cancer with lymph node metastasis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.021
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3132609007</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0039606024009061</els_id><sourcerecordid>3132609007</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1526-4dc39569737b71682e990a48e0ccfde9c4105e56552e0acdd8244583adc70c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwAhxQjlxS1nbiJBISQhU_lSpxKHcrXW_AJWmKnSD17XHU0iMny-uZ8c7H2DWHKQeu7tZT37uPqQCRhMEUBD9hY55KEWdS8VM2BpBFrEDBiF14vwaAIuH5ORvJIs15lqsxW859ZKzvyjralht0VHaEXdvsou6Tonbb2SY8Df9YHDSuRTK9o6hq3dFhMdoQfkUY7uQeLtlZVdaerg7nhC2fn95nr_Hi7WU-e1zEyFOh4sRg2EMVmcxWGVe5oKKAMskJECtDBSYcUkpVmgqCEo3JRZKkuSwNZoBywm73qWGn7558pxvrkeq63FDbey25FAoKgCxIxV6KrvXeUaW3LvRyO81BDyj1Wg8V9YBymAWUwXRzyO9XDZmj5Y9dENzvBRQ6_lhy2qOlQMBYFxhq09r_8n8Be9aFUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3132609007</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is distal pancreatectomy the optimal surgical procedure for pancreatic neck cancer?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Nomura, Satoshi ; Masui, Toshihiko ; Muto, Jun ; Hashida, Kazuki ; Kitagawa, Hirohisa ; Fujinuma, Ibuki ; Kitamura, Kei ; Ogura, Toshiro ; Takahashi, Amane ; Kawamoto, Kazuyuki</creator><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Satoshi ; Masui, Toshihiko ; Muto, Jun ; Hashida, Kazuki ; Kitagawa, Hirohisa ; Fujinuma, Ibuki ; Kitamura, Kei ; Ogura, Toshiro ; Takahashi, Amane ; Kawamoto, Kazuyuki</creatorcontrib><description>The optimal resection for pancreatic neck cancer is challenging in clinical practice because we could dissect by pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of lymph node dissection and to help determine the optimal surgical treatment for pancreatic neck cancer. We retrospectively evaluated 462 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent curative-intent pancreatectomy between 2012 and 2022, 35 of whom had pancreatic neck cancer without preoperative radiologic gastroduodenal artery contact. We analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics, lymph node metastasis stations, and the efficacy index of lymph node dissection, which was calculated by multiplying the frequency of lymph node metastasis to each station by the 5-year survival rate of patients with positive lymph nodes at each station. The lymph node station with the greatest rate of metastasis was #11p (28.6%), followed by #8 (17.1%), #14 (14.3%), #13 (14.3%), #17 (9.5%), and #6 (4.8%). The efficacy indices of lymph node dissection were 14.3 for #11, 4.76 for #13, and 8.57 for #14. There were no significant differences in 5-year recurrence-free survival and 5-year overall survival between patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy and those undergoing distal pancreatectomy (23.7% vs 54.7%, P = .142; 29.9% vs 51.1%, P = .179, respectively). Univariate survival analysis showed that tumor size ≥2 cm was associated with poor prognosis (hazard ratio, 3.842, P = .009). PD with #11p lymph node dissection is preferable to DP in terms of survival benefit for pancreatic neck cancer with lymph node metastasis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6060</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39581786</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Surgery, 2024-11, p.108930, Article 108930</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1526-4dc39569737b71682e990a48e0ccfde9c4105e56552e0acdd8244583adc70c3</cites><orcidid>0009-0000-9081-6430</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39581786$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masui, Toshihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muto, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashida, Kazuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitagawa, Hirohisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujinuma, Ibuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitamura, Kei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogura, Toshiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Amane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawamoto, Kazuyuki</creatorcontrib><title>Is distal pancreatectomy the optimal surgical procedure for pancreatic neck cancer?</title><title>Surgery</title><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><description>The optimal resection for pancreatic neck cancer is challenging in clinical practice because we could dissect by pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of lymph node dissection and to help determine the optimal surgical treatment for pancreatic neck cancer. We retrospectively evaluated 462 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent curative-intent pancreatectomy between 2012 and 2022, 35 of whom had pancreatic neck cancer without preoperative radiologic gastroduodenal artery contact. We analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics, lymph node metastasis stations, and the efficacy index of lymph node dissection, which was calculated by multiplying the frequency of lymph node metastasis to each station by the 5-year survival rate of patients with positive lymph nodes at each station. The lymph node station with the greatest rate of metastasis was #11p (28.6%), followed by #8 (17.1%), #14 (14.3%), #13 (14.3%), #17 (9.5%), and #6 (4.8%). The efficacy indices of lymph node dissection were 14.3 for #11, 4.76 for #13, and 8.57 for #14. There were no significant differences in 5-year recurrence-free survival and 5-year overall survival between patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy and those undergoing distal pancreatectomy (23.7% vs 54.7%, P = .142; 29.9% vs 51.1%, P = .179, respectively). Univariate survival analysis showed that tumor size ≥2 cm was associated with poor prognosis (hazard ratio, 3.842, P = .009). PD with #11p lymph node dissection is preferable to DP in terms of survival benefit for pancreatic neck cancer with lymph node metastasis.</description><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwAhxQjlxS1nbiJBISQhU_lSpxKHcrXW_AJWmKnSD17XHU0iMny-uZ8c7H2DWHKQeu7tZT37uPqQCRhMEUBD9hY55KEWdS8VM2BpBFrEDBiF14vwaAIuH5ORvJIs15lqsxW859ZKzvyjralht0VHaEXdvsou6Tonbb2SY8Df9YHDSuRTK9o6hq3dFhMdoQfkUY7uQeLtlZVdaerg7nhC2fn95nr_Hi7WU-e1zEyFOh4sRg2EMVmcxWGVe5oKKAMskJECtDBSYcUkpVmgqCEo3JRZKkuSwNZoBywm73qWGn7558pxvrkeq63FDbey25FAoKgCxIxV6KrvXeUaW3LvRyO81BDyj1Wg8V9YBymAWUwXRzyO9XDZmj5Y9dENzvBRQ6_lhy2qOlQMBYFxhq09r_8n8Be9aFUQ</recordid><startdate>20241123</startdate><enddate>20241123</enddate><creator>Nomura, Satoshi</creator><creator>Masui, Toshihiko</creator><creator>Muto, Jun</creator><creator>Hashida, Kazuki</creator><creator>Kitagawa, Hirohisa</creator><creator>Fujinuma, Ibuki</creator><creator>Kitamura, Kei</creator><creator>Ogura, Toshiro</creator><creator>Takahashi, Amane</creator><creator>Kawamoto, Kazuyuki</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9081-6430</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241123</creationdate><title>Is distal pancreatectomy the optimal surgical procedure for pancreatic neck cancer?</title><author>Nomura, Satoshi ; Masui, Toshihiko ; Muto, Jun ; Hashida, Kazuki ; Kitagawa, Hirohisa ; Fujinuma, Ibuki ; Kitamura, Kei ; Ogura, Toshiro ; Takahashi, Amane ; Kawamoto, Kazuyuki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1526-4dc39569737b71682e990a48e0ccfde9c4105e56552e0acdd8244583adc70c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masui, Toshihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muto, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashida, Kazuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitagawa, Hirohisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujinuma, Ibuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitamura, Kei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogura, Toshiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Amane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawamoto, Kazuyuki</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nomura, Satoshi</au><au>Masui, Toshihiko</au><au>Muto, Jun</au><au>Hashida, Kazuki</au><au>Kitagawa, Hirohisa</au><au>Fujinuma, Ibuki</au><au>Kitamura, Kei</au><au>Ogura, Toshiro</au><au>Takahashi, Amane</au><au>Kawamoto, Kazuyuki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is distal pancreatectomy the optimal surgical procedure for pancreatic neck cancer?</atitle><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><date>2024-11-23</date><risdate>2024</risdate><spage>108930</spage><pages>108930-</pages><artnum>108930</artnum><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><eissn>1532-7361</eissn><abstract>The optimal resection for pancreatic neck cancer is challenging in clinical practice because we could dissect by pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of lymph node dissection and to help determine the optimal surgical treatment for pancreatic neck cancer. We retrospectively evaluated 462 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent curative-intent pancreatectomy between 2012 and 2022, 35 of whom had pancreatic neck cancer without preoperative radiologic gastroduodenal artery contact. We analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics, lymph node metastasis stations, and the efficacy index of lymph node dissection, which was calculated by multiplying the frequency of lymph node metastasis to each station by the 5-year survival rate of patients with positive lymph nodes at each station. The lymph node station with the greatest rate of metastasis was #11p (28.6%), followed by #8 (17.1%), #14 (14.3%), #13 (14.3%), #17 (9.5%), and #6 (4.8%). The efficacy indices of lymph node dissection were 14.3 for #11, 4.76 for #13, and 8.57 for #14. There were no significant differences in 5-year recurrence-free survival and 5-year overall survival between patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy and those undergoing distal pancreatectomy (23.7% vs 54.7%, P = .142; 29.9% vs 51.1%, P = .179, respectively). Univariate survival analysis showed that tumor size ≥2 cm was associated with poor prognosis (hazard ratio, 3.842, P = .009). PD with #11p lymph node dissection is preferable to DP in terms of survival benefit for pancreatic neck cancer with lymph node metastasis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39581786</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.021</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9081-6430</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-6060
ispartof Surgery, 2024-11, p.108930, Article 108930
issn 0039-6060
1532-7361
1532-7361
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3132609007
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
title Is distal pancreatectomy the optimal surgical procedure for pancreatic neck cancer?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A35%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20distal%20pancreatectomy%20the%20optimal%20surgical%20procedure%20for%20pancreatic%20neck%20cancer?&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=Nomura,%20Satoshi&rft.date=2024-11-23&rft.spage=108930&rft.pages=108930-&rft.artnum=108930&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft.eissn=1532-7361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3132609007%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1526-4dc39569737b71682e990a48e0ccfde9c4105e56552e0acdd8244583adc70c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3132609007&rft_id=info:pmid/39581786&rfr_iscdi=true