Feasibility of pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation under mild conscious sedation

• Published in: Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology 2024-12
• Main Authors: Calvert, Peter, Mills, Mark T, Murray, Ben, Kendall, Jonathan, Ratnasingham, Justin, Luther, Vishal, Gupta, Dhiraj
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 1572-8595; 1572-8595
• DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01961-1

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a new modality for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF). PFA is performed under general anaesthetic (GA) or deep sedation with propofol, but this requires anaesthetic support in many countries, restricting use. No study has tested the feasibility of PFA under mild conscious sedation (MCS). We prospectively recruited patients undergoing PFA PVI, offered the option of MCS delivered by electrophysiologists, and compared these with patients who opted for GA. MCS comprised intravenous midazolam and fentanyl. All procedures were performed under anaesthetic supervision in case of requirement to convert to GA, which formed the primary outcome. Twenty-three patients were recruited (8 MCS, 15 GA). One patient (1/8 [12.5%]) required conversion from MCS to GA. Total procedural times were similar between groups (MCS 92 ± 12.4 min vs. GA 101 ± 17.3 min; p = 0.199). High mean sedative doses were required in the MCS group (5.12 ± 0.83 mg midazolam and 209 ± 40 mcg fentanyl). Median intraprocedural pain perception by the patient, rated from 0 to 100 was 45 (IQR 22.5-72.5) in the MCS group. Post-procedural groin pain (0 [0-0] vs. 5 [0-35]; p = 0.027) and throat pain (0 [0-0] vs. 10 [5-40]; p = 0.001) were lower in the MCS group. PFA under MCS is feasible in selected patients but pain and tolerance may be suboptimal, and high sedative doses are required.