Loading…
Successful Amendment of an Existing Hepatitis B Screening Programme by a Guideline Recommended Hepatitis D Screening in the Primary Care Setting
Despite European guidelines recommending anti-hepatitis D virus (HDV) screening for all hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive cases, screening rates remain insufficient. We analysed anti-HDV screening rates in primary care and implemented prospective HDV screening in HBsAg-positive cases iden...
Saved in:
Published in: | Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 2024-12 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics |
container_volume | |
creator | Herta, Toni Joachim-Richter, Anna Petroff, David Wölk, Benno Wolffram, Ingmar Berg, Thomas Kramer, Jan Bätz, Olaf Wiegand, Johannes |
description | Despite European guidelines recommending anti-hepatitis D virus (HDV) screening for all hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive cases, screening rates remain insufficient.
We analysed anti-HDV screening rates in primary care and implemented prospective HDV screening in HBsAg-positive cases identified in the preventive medical examination from the age of 35 ("Check-Up 35+").
From 2012 to 2021, we reviewed anti-HDV and HDV RNA test rates in HBsAg-positive patients at 11 sites of a large German laboratory group. From 2022 to 2023, we prospectively screened HBsAg-positive samples from the "Check-Up 35+" for anti-HDV. Anti-HDV positive patients were then contacted again for HDV RNA testing.
Retrospectively, 2792/13,905 (20%) HBsAg-positive cases were tested for anti-HDV, with 142/2792 (5.1%) being positive. HDV RNA was tested in 57/142 (40%) anti-HDV-positive cases, with 26/57 (46%) being positive. In the prospective screening, 1159/225,901 (0.51%) individuals were HBsAg-positive. Of these, 700 (60%) were tested for anti-HDV, with 18/700 (2.6%) positive test results. 4/18 (22%) were successfully contacted again for HDV RNA analysis, with one case testing positive. Neither the HBsAg nor the anti-HDV positive result was known prior to screening in these cases. Anti-HDV testing could not be performed in 459/1159 (40%) HBsAg-positive cases, primarily due to insufficient blood sample volume (310/459 cases, 68%), with others missed due to logistical errors.
Retrospective data show insufficient anti-HDV screening in clinical routine. The prospective anti-HDV screening provides a blueprint for using existing hepatitis B virus screening programms for population-based HDV double reflex testing, provided that adequate logistical prerequisites are established.
German Clinical Trial Register: DRKS00029180. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/apt.18424 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3140928981</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3140928981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p176t-9e02d630ed3fe6e2979d68ac7a22f828541cc31ed9ad4297496e45fda5a1c0123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUNtKAzEQDaLYWn3wBySPvmzNbbObx9rWVigoVp-XNJmtkb25yYL9Cz_ZLa3QgWEOM-ecGQahW0rGtI8H3YQxTQUTZ2hIuYwjRrg8P8EDdOX9FyFEJoRdogFXkqWC0iH6XXfGgPd5V-BJCZXtM-A6x7rC8x_ng6u2eAmNDi44jx_x2rQA1b772tbbVpcl4M0Oa7zonIXCVYDfwNTl3gvsiXR2InUVDp_QO7hStzs81S3gNYT9smt0kevCw82xjtDH0_x9uoxWL4vn6WQVNTSRIVJAmJWcgOU5SGAqUVam2iSasTxlaSyoMZyCVdqKfiqUBBHnVseaGkIZH6H7g2_T1t8d-JCVzhsoCl1B3fmMU0EUS1VKe-rdkdptSrBZczg7-_8i_wMrKnSK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3140928981</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Successful Amendment of an Existing Hepatitis B Screening Programme by a Guideline Recommended Hepatitis D Screening in the Primary Care Setting</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Herta, Toni ; Joachim-Richter, Anna ; Petroff, David ; Wölk, Benno ; Wolffram, Ingmar ; Berg, Thomas ; Kramer, Jan ; Bätz, Olaf ; Wiegand, Johannes</creator><creatorcontrib>Herta, Toni ; Joachim-Richter, Anna ; Petroff, David ; Wölk, Benno ; Wolffram, Ingmar ; Berg, Thomas ; Kramer, Jan ; Bätz, Olaf ; Wiegand, Johannes</creatorcontrib><description>Despite European guidelines recommending anti-hepatitis D virus (HDV) screening for all hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive cases, screening rates remain insufficient.
We analysed anti-HDV screening rates in primary care and implemented prospective HDV screening in HBsAg-positive cases identified in the preventive medical examination from the age of 35 ("Check-Up 35+").
From 2012 to 2021, we reviewed anti-HDV and HDV RNA test rates in HBsAg-positive patients at 11 sites of a large German laboratory group. From 2022 to 2023, we prospectively screened HBsAg-positive samples from the "Check-Up 35+" for anti-HDV. Anti-HDV positive patients were then contacted again for HDV RNA testing.
Retrospectively, 2792/13,905 (20%) HBsAg-positive cases were tested for anti-HDV, with 142/2792 (5.1%) being positive. HDV RNA was tested in 57/142 (40%) anti-HDV-positive cases, with 26/57 (46%) being positive. In the prospective screening, 1159/225,901 (0.51%) individuals were HBsAg-positive. Of these, 700 (60%) were tested for anti-HDV, with 18/700 (2.6%) positive test results. 4/18 (22%) were successfully contacted again for HDV RNA analysis, with one case testing positive. Neither the HBsAg nor the anti-HDV positive result was known prior to screening in these cases. Anti-HDV testing could not be performed in 459/1159 (40%) HBsAg-positive cases, primarily due to insufficient blood sample volume (310/459 cases, 68%), with others missed due to logistical errors.
Retrospective data show insufficient anti-HDV screening in clinical routine. The prospective anti-HDV screening provides a blueprint for using existing hepatitis B virus screening programms for population-based HDV double reflex testing, provided that adequate logistical prerequisites are established.
German Clinical Trial Register: DRKS00029180.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/apt.18424</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39628411</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2024-12</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-0401-1140 ; 0000-0002-6916-1465 ; 0000-0001-9233-4064</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39628411$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herta, Toni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joachim-Richter, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petroff, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wölk, Benno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolffram, Ingmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bätz, Olaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiegand, Johannes</creatorcontrib><title>Successful Amendment of an Existing Hepatitis B Screening Programme by a Guideline Recommended Hepatitis D Screening in the Primary Care Setting</title><title>Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics</title><addtitle>Aliment Pharmacol Ther</addtitle><description>Despite European guidelines recommending anti-hepatitis D virus (HDV) screening for all hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive cases, screening rates remain insufficient.
We analysed anti-HDV screening rates in primary care and implemented prospective HDV screening in HBsAg-positive cases identified in the preventive medical examination from the age of 35 ("Check-Up 35+").
From 2012 to 2021, we reviewed anti-HDV and HDV RNA test rates in HBsAg-positive patients at 11 sites of a large German laboratory group. From 2022 to 2023, we prospectively screened HBsAg-positive samples from the "Check-Up 35+" for anti-HDV. Anti-HDV positive patients were then contacted again for HDV RNA testing.
Retrospectively, 2792/13,905 (20%) HBsAg-positive cases were tested for anti-HDV, with 142/2792 (5.1%) being positive. HDV RNA was tested in 57/142 (40%) anti-HDV-positive cases, with 26/57 (46%) being positive. In the prospective screening, 1159/225,901 (0.51%) individuals were HBsAg-positive. Of these, 700 (60%) were tested for anti-HDV, with 18/700 (2.6%) positive test results. 4/18 (22%) were successfully contacted again for HDV RNA analysis, with one case testing positive. Neither the HBsAg nor the anti-HDV positive result was known prior to screening in these cases. Anti-HDV testing could not be performed in 459/1159 (40%) HBsAg-positive cases, primarily due to insufficient blood sample volume (310/459 cases, 68%), with others missed due to logistical errors.
Retrospective data show insufficient anti-HDV screening in clinical routine. The prospective anti-HDV screening provides a blueprint for using existing hepatitis B virus screening programms for population-based HDV double reflex testing, provided that adequate logistical prerequisites are established.
German Clinical Trial Register: DRKS00029180.</description><issn>1365-2036</issn><issn>1365-2036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUNtKAzEQDaLYWn3wBySPvmzNbbObx9rWVigoVp-XNJmtkb25yYL9Cz_ZLa3QgWEOM-ecGQahW0rGtI8H3YQxTQUTZ2hIuYwjRrg8P8EDdOX9FyFEJoRdogFXkqWC0iH6XXfGgPd5V-BJCZXtM-A6x7rC8x_ng6u2eAmNDi44jx_x2rQA1b772tbbVpcl4M0Oa7zonIXCVYDfwNTl3gvsiXR2InUVDp_QO7hStzs81S3gNYT9smt0kevCw82xjtDH0_x9uoxWL4vn6WQVNTSRIVJAmJWcgOU5SGAqUVam2iSasTxlaSyoMZyCVdqKfiqUBBHnVseaGkIZH6H7g2_T1t8d-JCVzhsoCl1B3fmMU0EUS1VKe-rdkdptSrBZczg7-_8i_wMrKnSK</recordid><startdate>20241204</startdate><enddate>20241204</enddate><creator>Herta, Toni</creator><creator>Joachim-Richter, Anna</creator><creator>Petroff, David</creator><creator>Wölk, Benno</creator><creator>Wolffram, Ingmar</creator><creator>Berg, Thomas</creator><creator>Kramer, Jan</creator><creator>Bätz, Olaf</creator><creator>Wiegand, Johannes</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0401-1140</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6916-1465</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9233-4064</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241204</creationdate><title>Successful Amendment of an Existing Hepatitis B Screening Programme by a Guideline Recommended Hepatitis D Screening in the Primary Care Setting</title><author>Herta, Toni ; Joachim-Richter, Anna ; Petroff, David ; Wölk, Benno ; Wolffram, Ingmar ; Berg, Thomas ; Kramer, Jan ; Bätz, Olaf ; Wiegand, Johannes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p176t-9e02d630ed3fe6e2979d68ac7a22f828541cc31ed9ad4297496e45fda5a1c0123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herta, Toni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joachim-Richter, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petroff, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wölk, Benno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolffram, Ingmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bätz, Olaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiegand, Johannes</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herta, Toni</au><au>Joachim-Richter, Anna</au><au>Petroff, David</au><au>Wölk, Benno</au><au>Wolffram, Ingmar</au><au>Berg, Thomas</au><au>Kramer, Jan</au><au>Bätz, Olaf</au><au>Wiegand, Johannes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Successful Amendment of an Existing Hepatitis B Screening Programme by a Guideline Recommended Hepatitis D Screening in the Primary Care Setting</atitle><jtitle>Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Aliment Pharmacol Ther</addtitle><date>2024-12-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>1365-2036</issn><eissn>1365-2036</eissn><abstract>Despite European guidelines recommending anti-hepatitis D virus (HDV) screening for all hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive cases, screening rates remain insufficient.
We analysed anti-HDV screening rates in primary care and implemented prospective HDV screening in HBsAg-positive cases identified in the preventive medical examination from the age of 35 ("Check-Up 35+").
From 2012 to 2021, we reviewed anti-HDV and HDV RNA test rates in HBsAg-positive patients at 11 sites of a large German laboratory group. From 2022 to 2023, we prospectively screened HBsAg-positive samples from the "Check-Up 35+" for anti-HDV. Anti-HDV positive patients were then contacted again for HDV RNA testing.
Retrospectively, 2792/13,905 (20%) HBsAg-positive cases were tested for anti-HDV, with 142/2792 (5.1%) being positive. HDV RNA was tested in 57/142 (40%) anti-HDV-positive cases, with 26/57 (46%) being positive. In the prospective screening, 1159/225,901 (0.51%) individuals were HBsAg-positive. Of these, 700 (60%) were tested for anti-HDV, with 18/700 (2.6%) positive test results. 4/18 (22%) were successfully contacted again for HDV RNA analysis, with one case testing positive. Neither the HBsAg nor the anti-HDV positive result was known prior to screening in these cases. Anti-HDV testing could not be performed in 459/1159 (40%) HBsAg-positive cases, primarily due to insufficient blood sample volume (310/459 cases, 68%), with others missed due to logistical errors.
Retrospective data show insufficient anti-HDV screening in clinical routine. The prospective anti-HDV screening provides a blueprint for using existing hepatitis B virus screening programms for population-based HDV double reflex testing, provided that adequate logistical prerequisites are established.
German Clinical Trial Register: DRKS00029180.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>39628411</pmid><doi>10.1111/apt.18424</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0401-1140</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6916-1465</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9233-4064</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1365-2036 |
ispartof | Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2024-12 |
issn | 1365-2036 1365-2036 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3140928981 |
source | Wiley |
title | Successful Amendment of an Existing Hepatitis B Screening Programme by a Guideline Recommended Hepatitis D Screening in the Primary Care Setting |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A03%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Successful%20Amendment%20of%20an%20Existing%20Hepatitis%20B%20Screening%20Programme%20by%20a%20Guideline%20Recommended%20Hepatitis%20D%20Screening%20in%20the%20Primary%20Care%20Setting&rft.jtitle=Alimentary%20pharmacology%20&%20therapeutics&rft.au=Herta,%20Toni&rft.date=2024-12-04&rft.issn=1365-2036&rft.eissn=1365-2036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/apt.18424&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3140928981%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p176t-9e02d630ed3fe6e2979d68ac7a22f828541cc31ed9ad4297496e45fda5a1c0123%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3140928981&rft_id=info:pmid/39628411&rfr_iscdi=true |