Same‐Day Discharge After Uncomplicated Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve‐In‐Valve Implantation

• Published in: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2025-01, Vol.105 (1), p.144-149
• Main Authors: Chan, Joseph Mun Hoong, Anderson, Jason H., Hagler, Donald J., Cabalka, Allison K., Taggart, Nathaniel W.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects; Cardiac Catheterization - adverse effects; Cardiac Catheterization - instrumentation; congenital heart disease; elective procedure; Female; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Minnesota; Patient Discharge; patient selection; procedural outcomes; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; same‐day discharge (SDD); Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Tricuspid Valve - diagnostic imaging; Tricuspid Valve - physiopathology; Tricuspid Valve - surgery; tricuspid valve‐in‐valve (TVIV)
• ISSN: 1522-1946; 1522-726X; 1522-726X
• DOI: 10.1002/ccd.31328

ABSTRACT Background Tricuspid valve‐in‐valve (TVIV) implantation has traditionally included post‐procedure overnight in‐hospital observation with next‐day discharge. Recently, our practice has shifted toward same‐day discharge for most patients after vascular access site hemostasis and adequate recovery from anesthesia. However, data on the safety of this approach remains scarce. Aims Our study aims to describe our practice change and to identify factors that may lead to overnight observation post‐TVIV. Methods We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who underwent uncomplicated TVIV implantation as an outpatient procedure at Mayo Clinic between 2011 and 2023. Results Of the 83 patients who underwent TVIV from 2011 to 2023, 65 (78%) were included in the study. The first 39 patients in our institutional series were observed overnight as standard practice. 18 (69%) of the most recent 26 patients in our series were discharged the same day; three patients who remained in the hospital overnight were because of provider preference and/or patient preference without any specific medical concern. Of all 47 patients who were observed overnight, one patient was treated for fluid overload, one patient had non‐sustained ventricular tachycardia on telemetry that resulted in adjustment of antiarrhythmic therapy, two patients had continued bleeding from the access sites and was observed for another day. Among the two of them, one also developed atrial tachyarrhythmias requiring initiation of additional antiarrhythmic therapy. Out of 18 patients discharged the same day, one patient had an ED presentation within 24 h due to access site bleeding which was resolved promptly. There was no mortality or procedural‐related readmission. Conclusion Same‐day discharge may be considered for adult patients who have undergone uncomplicated TVIV with adequate hemostasis and recovery after anesthesia.