Effect of torque customization with composite resin bases on the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant patterns of lingual brackets : An in vitro evaluation

This study evaluated the effect of torque customization of lingual brackets with resin-modified bases on their shear bond strength (SBS), adhesive remnant index (ARI), and bond failure patterns (BFP). The sample comprised 200 lingual lower incisor brackets (DTC® ORG, DTC Medical Apparatus, Hangzhou,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of orofacial orthopedics 2024-12
Main Authors: Kumar, Sekar Santhosh, Ramteke, Shivangi, Nivethitha, Bhaskar, Madhan, Balasubramanian
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Journal of orofacial orthopedics
container_volume
creator Kumar, Sekar Santhosh
Ramteke, Shivangi
Nivethitha, Bhaskar
Madhan, Balasubramanian
description This study evaluated the effect of torque customization of lingual brackets with resin-modified bases on their shear bond strength (SBS), adhesive remnant index (ARI), and bond failure patterns (BFP). The sample comprised 200 lingual lower incisor brackets (DTC® ORG, DTC Medical Apparatus, Hangzhou, China); 40 brackets were tested as-received and 4 groups with 40 brackets each were customized for -10, -20, +10 and +20° torque respectively with light-cured composite resin (Transbond XT™, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) bases. All brackets were bonded to bovine mandibular incisors. Their SBS were estimated in a universal testing machine (INSTRON®, Norwood, MA, USA) with a gingivally directed force applied at the incisal bracket-adhesive interface with 1 mm/min crosshead speed. Their ARI and BFP were evaluated under 20× magnification. The SBS was 19.9 ± 7.6 MPa for noncustomized brackets, 20.1 ± 9.0 and 18.7 ± 8.2 MPa for brackets with 10 and 20° of negative torque, and 16.6 ± 5.68 and 19.45 ± 5.84 MPa for brackets with 10 and 20° of positive torque, respectively. The differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.097). Teeth with the -20° brackets exhibited higher median ARI scores than noncustomized brackets (1.5 vs 2, p = 0.018). Adhesive-cohesive bond failure with nearly axial split was more frequent in noncustomized brackets than customized ones, the reverse being true for adhesive-cohesive failure with nearly vertical split (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00056-024-00559-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146571039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3146571039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p560-db15eb83782cc907b46adfa3bb4abe390b65a5378b93d8ab521e7b657394a4cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMlOxDAMhiMEYn8BDshHLoVkkqZTbgixSUhcuI-c1mUCbVKSdBC8DK9KhkXi5O37f1tm7EjwU8F5dRY556Uu-EwVOSnrQm-wXaFFWehKqM1_-Q7bi_F5jSuut9mOrLWSleK77POq66hJ4DtIPrxOBM0Ukx_sBybrHbzZtITGD6OPNhEEitaBwUgR8jQtCeKSMIDxroWYArmnLMBcYLvM8GqtGRy6BCOmRMHF9a7euqcJezABmxdKEc7hwkG2XtkUPNAK--n7gAO21WEf6fA37rPH66vHy9vi_uHm7vLivhhLzYvWiJLMXFbzWdPUvDJKY9uhNEahIVlzo0ss89jUsp2jKWeCqtyrZK1QNa3cZyc_tmPw-QkxLQYbG-p7dOSnuJBCZVpwWWf0-BedzEDtYgx2wPC--Pup_AKk6H0O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3146571039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of torque customization with composite resin bases on the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant patterns of lingual brackets : An in vitro evaluation</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Kumar, Sekar Santhosh ; Ramteke, Shivangi ; Nivethitha, Bhaskar ; Madhan, Balasubramanian</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sekar Santhosh ; Ramteke, Shivangi ; Nivethitha, Bhaskar ; Madhan, Balasubramanian</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated the effect of torque customization of lingual brackets with resin-modified bases on their shear bond strength (SBS), adhesive remnant index (ARI), and bond failure patterns (BFP). The sample comprised 200 lingual lower incisor brackets (DTC® ORG, DTC Medical Apparatus, Hangzhou, China); 40 brackets were tested as-received and 4 groups with 40 brackets each were customized for -10, -20, +10 and +20° torque respectively with light-cured composite resin (Transbond XT™, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) bases. All brackets were bonded to bovine mandibular incisors. Their SBS were estimated in a universal testing machine (INSTRON®, Norwood, MA, USA) with a gingivally directed force applied at the incisal bracket-adhesive interface with 1 mm/min crosshead speed. Their ARI and BFP were evaluated under 20× magnification. The SBS was 19.9 ± 7.6 MPa for noncustomized brackets, 20.1 ± 9.0 and 18.7 ± 8.2 MPa for brackets with 10 and 20° of negative torque, and 16.6 ± 5.68 and 19.45 ± 5.84 MPa for brackets with 10 and 20° of positive torque, respectively. The differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.097). Teeth with the -20° brackets exhibited higher median ARI scores than noncustomized brackets (1.5 vs 2, p = 0.018). Adhesive-cohesive bond failure with nearly axial split was more frequent in noncustomized brackets than customized ones, the reverse being true for adhesive-cohesive failure with nearly vertical split (p &lt; 0.05). Truly cohesive bond failures were seen only in brackets with positive torque. Torque customization with a resin base is an acceptable strategy for metal orthodontic brackets as it does not affect their SBS. However, their BFP differed from noncustomized brackets, depending on the type of torque introduced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1615-6714</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-6714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00056-024-00559-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39643740</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><ispartof>Journal of orofacial orthopedics, 2024-12</ispartof><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39643740$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sekar Santhosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramteke, Shivangi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nivethitha, Bhaskar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madhan, Balasubramanian</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of torque customization with composite resin bases on the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant patterns of lingual brackets : An in vitro evaluation</title><title>Journal of orofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>J Orofac Orthop</addtitle><description>This study evaluated the effect of torque customization of lingual brackets with resin-modified bases on their shear bond strength (SBS), adhesive remnant index (ARI), and bond failure patterns (BFP). The sample comprised 200 lingual lower incisor brackets (DTC® ORG, DTC Medical Apparatus, Hangzhou, China); 40 brackets were tested as-received and 4 groups with 40 brackets each were customized for -10, -20, +10 and +20° torque respectively with light-cured composite resin (Transbond XT™, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) bases. All brackets were bonded to bovine mandibular incisors. Their SBS were estimated in a universal testing machine (INSTRON®, Norwood, MA, USA) with a gingivally directed force applied at the incisal bracket-adhesive interface with 1 mm/min crosshead speed. Their ARI and BFP were evaluated under 20× magnification. The SBS was 19.9 ± 7.6 MPa for noncustomized brackets, 20.1 ± 9.0 and 18.7 ± 8.2 MPa for brackets with 10 and 20° of negative torque, and 16.6 ± 5.68 and 19.45 ± 5.84 MPa for brackets with 10 and 20° of positive torque, respectively. The differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.097). Teeth with the -20° brackets exhibited higher median ARI scores than noncustomized brackets (1.5 vs 2, p = 0.018). Adhesive-cohesive bond failure with nearly axial split was more frequent in noncustomized brackets than customized ones, the reverse being true for adhesive-cohesive failure with nearly vertical split (p &lt; 0.05). Truly cohesive bond failures were seen only in brackets with positive torque. Torque customization with a resin base is an acceptable strategy for metal orthodontic brackets as it does not affect their SBS. However, their BFP differed from noncustomized brackets, depending on the type of torque introduced.</description><issn>1615-6714</issn><issn>1615-6714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkMlOxDAMhiMEYn8BDshHLoVkkqZTbgixSUhcuI-c1mUCbVKSdBC8DK9KhkXi5O37f1tm7EjwU8F5dRY556Uu-EwVOSnrQm-wXaFFWehKqM1_-Q7bi_F5jSuut9mOrLWSleK77POq66hJ4DtIPrxOBM0Ukx_sBybrHbzZtITGD6OPNhEEitaBwUgR8jQtCeKSMIDxroWYArmnLMBcYLvM8GqtGRy6BCOmRMHF9a7euqcJezABmxdKEc7hwkG2XtkUPNAK--n7gAO21WEf6fA37rPH66vHy9vi_uHm7vLivhhLzYvWiJLMXFbzWdPUvDJKY9uhNEahIVlzo0ss89jUsp2jKWeCqtyrZK1QNa3cZyc_tmPw-QkxLQYbG-p7dOSnuJBCZVpwWWf0-BedzEDtYgx2wPC--Pup_AKk6H0O</recordid><startdate>20241206</startdate><enddate>20241206</enddate><creator>Kumar, Sekar Santhosh</creator><creator>Ramteke, Shivangi</creator><creator>Nivethitha, Bhaskar</creator><creator>Madhan, Balasubramanian</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241206</creationdate><title>Effect of torque customization with composite resin bases on the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant patterns of lingual brackets : An in vitro evaluation</title><author>Kumar, Sekar Santhosh ; Ramteke, Shivangi ; Nivethitha, Bhaskar ; Madhan, Balasubramanian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p560-db15eb83782cc907b46adfa3bb4abe390b65a5378b93d8ab521e7b657394a4cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sekar Santhosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramteke, Shivangi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nivethitha, Bhaskar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madhan, Balasubramanian</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, Sekar Santhosh</au><au>Ramteke, Shivangi</au><au>Nivethitha, Bhaskar</au><au>Madhan, Balasubramanian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of torque customization with composite resin bases on the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant patterns of lingual brackets : An in vitro evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orofacial orthopedics</jtitle><addtitle>J Orofac Orthop</addtitle><date>2024-12-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>1615-6714</issn><eissn>1615-6714</eissn><abstract>This study evaluated the effect of torque customization of lingual brackets with resin-modified bases on their shear bond strength (SBS), adhesive remnant index (ARI), and bond failure patterns (BFP). The sample comprised 200 lingual lower incisor brackets (DTC® ORG, DTC Medical Apparatus, Hangzhou, China); 40 brackets were tested as-received and 4 groups with 40 brackets each were customized for -10, -20, +10 and +20° torque respectively with light-cured composite resin (Transbond XT™, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) bases. All brackets were bonded to bovine mandibular incisors. Their SBS were estimated in a universal testing machine (INSTRON®, Norwood, MA, USA) with a gingivally directed force applied at the incisal bracket-adhesive interface with 1 mm/min crosshead speed. Their ARI and BFP were evaluated under 20× magnification. The SBS was 19.9 ± 7.6 MPa for noncustomized brackets, 20.1 ± 9.0 and 18.7 ± 8.2 MPa for brackets with 10 and 20° of negative torque, and 16.6 ± 5.68 and 19.45 ± 5.84 MPa for brackets with 10 and 20° of positive torque, respectively. The differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.097). Teeth with the -20° brackets exhibited higher median ARI scores than noncustomized brackets (1.5 vs 2, p = 0.018). Adhesive-cohesive bond failure with nearly axial split was more frequent in noncustomized brackets than customized ones, the reverse being true for adhesive-cohesive failure with nearly vertical split (p &lt; 0.05). Truly cohesive bond failures were seen only in brackets with positive torque. Torque customization with a resin base is an acceptable strategy for metal orthodontic brackets as it does not affect their SBS. However, their BFP differed from noncustomized brackets, depending on the type of torque introduced.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>39643740</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00056-024-00559-6</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1615-6714
ispartof Journal of orofacial orthopedics, 2024-12
issn 1615-6714
1615-6714
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3146571039
source Springer Nature
title Effect of torque customization with composite resin bases on the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant patterns of lingual brackets : An in vitro evaluation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A30%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20torque%20customization%20with%20composite%20resin%20bases%20on%20the%20shear%20bond%20strength%20and%20adhesive%20remnant%20patterns%20of%20lingual%20brackets%20:%20An%20in%20vitro%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Kumar,%20Sekar%20Santhosh&rft.date=2024-12-06&rft.issn=1615-6714&rft.eissn=1615-6714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00056-024-00559-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3146571039%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p560-db15eb83782cc907b46adfa3bb4abe390b65a5378b93d8ab521e7b657394a4cd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3146571039&rft_id=info:pmid/39643740&rfr_iscdi=true