Loading…

Disentangling the topological symptom structure of schizophrenia: A network analysis

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), comprehensively assesses schizophrenia severity. While network analyses of schizophrenic symptoms have yielded inconsistent results, components of disorganized thought consistently rank high in centrality. The present study aims to explore the centra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Schizophrenia research 2024-12, Vol.275, p.115-122
Main Authors: Li, Jingjing, Pang, Lijuan, Liu, Fang, Lu, Zhe, Zhang, Yu, Yang, Yongfeng, Li, Xue, Hu, Qiushi, Su, Keju, Chen, Yishao, Zhang, Yan, Zhao, Fangfang, Song, Xueqin, Hei, Gangrui
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), comprehensively assesses schizophrenia severity. While network analyses of schizophrenic symptoms have yielded inconsistent results, components of disorganized thought consistently rank high in centrality. The present study aims to explore the centrality of disorganized thought across patient subgroups and its potential as a treatment target. We hypothesize that disorganized thought will emerge as a central feature in the symptom network across different patient populations. We conducted a network psychometric analysis on data from 1435 schizophrenia patients, stratified into four groups based on family history and sex. Local and global network properties, including centrality, clustering coefficient, degree, density, and community detection, were investigated. Network comparisons were performed across groups, and results were validated using an independent dataset. Disorganized thought emerged as the most central factor in Marder 5-factor model, maintaining stability across family history and sex differences. While family history did not significantly impact symptom structures (Females: M = 0.2, P = 0.4; S = 0.4, P = 0.7; Males: M = 0.2, P = 0.7; S = 0.1, P = 0.9), significant differences were observed between male and female symptom structures (Positive family history: M = 0.3, P 
ISSN:0920-9964
1573-2509
1573-2509
DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2024.12.002