Loading…

Shifts in the ecological drivers influence the response of tree and soil carbon dynamics in central Himalayan forests

Understanding and regulating global carbon relies crucially on comprehending the components and services of forest ecosystems. In particular, interactions that govern carbon storage in trees, soil, and microbes, driven by factors like vegetation structure, function, and soil characteristics, remain...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental management 2025-01, Vol.373, p.123755, Article 123755
Main Authors: Shankar, Anand, Chandra Garkoti, Satish
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1582-4d7ea405df84c6679eb8b9a9be4c1c8fe26bf9cd1f07a504155d8fd935c542a3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 123755
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 373
creator Shankar, Anand
Chandra Garkoti, Satish
description Understanding and regulating global carbon relies crucially on comprehending the components and services of forest ecosystems. In particular, interactions that govern carbon storage in trees, soil, and microbes, driven by factors like vegetation structure, function, and soil characteristics, remain poorly understood, especially in the central Himalayas. To address this gap, we investigated carbon storage in tree aboveground biomass, root biomass, and soil across different vegetation types. We also examined how vegetation parameters {vegetation diversity (H′), diameter at breast height (DBH), basal area (BA), and biomass}, and soil characteristics {bulk density (BD), moisture (Mo), pH, and total nitrogen (N)} might influence forest carbon storage. Our study, based on 14 plots (0.1 ha each) spanning four distinct vegetation types {Sal forest (SF, 3), Chir-pine forest (PF, 4), Nepalese-alder forest (AF, 3), and Banj-oak forest (OF, 4)} in the central Himalaya, revealed several key insights. Tree carbon storage ranged from ∼79 to 261 Mg C ha−1, accounting for 41–65% of forest carbon storage, while soil carbon storage ranged from ∼28 to 69 Mg C ha−1, contributing 35–58%. These values varied with vegetation types and were influenced by the vegetation and soil characteristics associated with each forest type. Important contributors to tree and soil carbon storage included soil Mo, N, and vegetation structural diversity (H′, BA), explaining 8–64 % of the variation. Path analysis indicated that increased vegetation diversity, soil properties, and conservative traits (fine roots and leaves) strongly influence tree and soil carbon storage. The study highlights the potential complex system to optimizing carbon storage in natural forest ecosystems, offering valuable insight for managing carbon sinks. Further research is needed to fully understand ecosystem responses to carbon storage across different forest habitats and different spatial-temporal scales. [Display omitted] •The effects of various forest ecosystems on tree and soil carbon storage has been assessed in the central Himalaya.•Alder and sal forests showed a significant improvement in carbon storage and soil health compared to oak and pine forests.•Variation in tree and soil carbon storage were strongly influenced by soil N, Mo, and vegetation diversity.•Structural equation modeling effectively captures the complex relationships of tree and soil carbon storage with vegetation diversity, structural attributes,
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123755
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3147481978</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479724037411</els_id><sourcerecordid>3147481978</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1582-4d7ea405df84c6679eb8b9a9be4c1c8fe26bf9cd1f07a504155d8fd935c542a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1u3CAURlHUKDP5eYRWLLvxFAwYs6qqKO1EipRFskcYLgkjG6ZgjzRvXzsz7baru-Dc77schD5TsqGENt92mx3Ew2DipiY139CaSSEu0JoSJaq2YeQTWhNGaMWlkit0XcqOEMJqKq_QiilJiGL1Gk0v78GPBYeIx3fAYFOf3oI1PXY5HCAvL76fIFr4ADKUfYoFcPJ4zADYRIdLCj22JncpYneMZgj2I9FCHPMctQ2D6c3RROzTHDCWW3TpTV_g7jxv0OvPh9f7bfX0_Ovx_sdTZalo64o7CYYT4XzLbdNIBV3bKaM64Jba1kPddF5ZRz2RRhBOhXCtd4oJK3ht2A36eord5_R7mov1EIqFvjcR0lQ0o1zylirZzqg4oTanUjJ4vc_z1fmoKdGLcL3TZ-F6Ea5Pwue9L-eKqRvA_dv6a3gGvp8AmP95CJB1sWHR6UIGO2qXwn8q_gAU55Zh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3147481978</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shifts in the ecological drivers influence the response of tree and soil carbon dynamics in central Himalayan forests</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Shankar, Anand ; Chandra Garkoti, Satish</creator><creatorcontrib>Shankar, Anand ; Chandra Garkoti, Satish</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding and regulating global carbon relies crucially on comprehending the components and services of forest ecosystems. In particular, interactions that govern carbon storage in trees, soil, and microbes, driven by factors like vegetation structure, function, and soil characteristics, remain poorly understood, especially in the central Himalayas. To address this gap, we investigated carbon storage in tree aboveground biomass, root biomass, and soil across different vegetation types. We also examined how vegetation parameters {vegetation diversity (H′), diameter at breast height (DBH), basal area (BA), and biomass}, and soil characteristics {bulk density (BD), moisture (Mo), pH, and total nitrogen (N)} might influence forest carbon storage. Our study, based on 14 plots (0.1 ha each) spanning four distinct vegetation types {Sal forest (SF, 3), Chir-pine forest (PF, 4), Nepalese-alder forest (AF, 3), and Banj-oak forest (OF, 4)} in the central Himalaya, revealed several key insights. Tree carbon storage ranged from ∼79 to 261 Mg C ha−1, accounting for 41–65% of forest carbon storage, while soil carbon storage ranged from ∼28 to 69 Mg C ha−1, contributing 35–58%. These values varied with vegetation types and were influenced by the vegetation and soil characteristics associated with each forest type. Important contributors to tree and soil carbon storage included soil Mo, N, and vegetation structural diversity (H′, BA), explaining 8–64 % of the variation. Path analysis indicated that increased vegetation diversity, soil properties, and conservative traits (fine roots and leaves) strongly influence tree and soil carbon storage. The study highlights the potential complex system to optimizing carbon storage in natural forest ecosystems, offering valuable insight for managing carbon sinks. Further research is needed to fully understand ecosystem responses to carbon storage across different forest habitats and different spatial-temporal scales. [Display omitted] •The effects of various forest ecosystems on tree and soil carbon storage has been assessed in the central Himalaya.•Alder and sal forests showed a significant improvement in carbon storage and soil health compared to oak and pine forests.•Variation in tree and soil carbon storage were strongly influenced by soil N, Mo, and vegetation diversity.•Structural equation modeling effectively captures the complex relationships of tree and soil carbon storage with vegetation diversity, structural attributes, and soil characteristics.•Key factors driving tree and soil carbon storage included vegetation diversity, soil N, and fine root biomass.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123755</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39700932</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biomass ; Carbon - metabolism ; Carbon storage ; Ecosystem ; Forests ; Mountain ecosystems ; Niche complementarity effect ; Nitrogen - analysis ; Nitrogen - metabolism ; Soil - chemistry ; Soil physicochemical properties ; Trees ; Vegetation attributes ; Vegetation-soil interactions</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2025-01, Vol.373, p.123755, Article 123755</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1582-4d7ea405df84c6679eb8b9a9be4c1c8fe26bf9cd1f07a504155d8fd935c542a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7647-6473</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39700932$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shankar, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandra Garkoti, Satish</creatorcontrib><title>Shifts in the ecological drivers influence the response of tree and soil carbon dynamics in central Himalayan forests</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Understanding and regulating global carbon relies crucially on comprehending the components and services of forest ecosystems. In particular, interactions that govern carbon storage in trees, soil, and microbes, driven by factors like vegetation structure, function, and soil characteristics, remain poorly understood, especially in the central Himalayas. To address this gap, we investigated carbon storage in tree aboveground biomass, root biomass, and soil across different vegetation types. We also examined how vegetation parameters {vegetation diversity (H′), diameter at breast height (DBH), basal area (BA), and biomass}, and soil characteristics {bulk density (BD), moisture (Mo), pH, and total nitrogen (N)} might influence forest carbon storage. Our study, based on 14 plots (0.1 ha each) spanning four distinct vegetation types {Sal forest (SF, 3), Chir-pine forest (PF, 4), Nepalese-alder forest (AF, 3), and Banj-oak forest (OF, 4)} in the central Himalaya, revealed several key insights. Tree carbon storage ranged from ∼79 to 261 Mg C ha−1, accounting for 41–65% of forest carbon storage, while soil carbon storage ranged from ∼28 to 69 Mg C ha−1, contributing 35–58%. These values varied with vegetation types and were influenced by the vegetation and soil characteristics associated with each forest type. Important contributors to tree and soil carbon storage included soil Mo, N, and vegetation structural diversity (H′, BA), explaining 8–64 % of the variation. Path analysis indicated that increased vegetation diversity, soil properties, and conservative traits (fine roots and leaves) strongly influence tree and soil carbon storage. The study highlights the potential complex system to optimizing carbon storage in natural forest ecosystems, offering valuable insight for managing carbon sinks. Further research is needed to fully understand ecosystem responses to carbon storage across different forest habitats and different spatial-temporal scales. [Display omitted] •The effects of various forest ecosystems on tree and soil carbon storage has been assessed in the central Himalaya.•Alder and sal forests showed a significant improvement in carbon storage and soil health compared to oak and pine forests.•Variation in tree and soil carbon storage were strongly influenced by soil N, Mo, and vegetation diversity.•Structural equation modeling effectively captures the complex relationships of tree and soil carbon storage with vegetation diversity, structural attributes, and soil characteristics.•Key factors driving tree and soil carbon storage included vegetation diversity, soil N, and fine root biomass.</description><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carbon - metabolism</subject><subject>Carbon storage</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Mountain ecosystems</subject><subject>Niche complementarity effect</subject><subject>Nitrogen - analysis</subject><subject>Nitrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Soil - chemistry</subject><subject>Soil physicochemical properties</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Vegetation attributes</subject><subject>Vegetation-soil interactions</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1u3CAURlHUKDP5eYRWLLvxFAwYs6qqKO1EipRFskcYLgkjG6ZgjzRvXzsz7baru-Dc77schD5TsqGENt92mx3Ew2DipiY139CaSSEu0JoSJaq2YeQTWhNGaMWlkit0XcqOEMJqKq_QiilJiGL1Gk0v78GPBYeIx3fAYFOf3oI1PXY5HCAvL76fIFr4ADKUfYoFcPJ4zADYRIdLCj22JncpYneMZgj2I9FCHPMctQ2D6c3RROzTHDCWW3TpTV_g7jxv0OvPh9f7bfX0_Ovx_sdTZalo64o7CYYT4XzLbdNIBV3bKaM64Jba1kPddF5ZRz2RRhBOhXCtd4oJK3ht2A36eord5_R7mov1EIqFvjcR0lQ0o1zylirZzqg4oTanUjJ4vc_z1fmoKdGLcL3TZ-F6Ea5Pwue9L-eKqRvA_dv6a3gGvp8AmP95CJB1sWHR6UIGO2qXwn8q_gAU55Zh</recordid><startdate>202501</startdate><enddate>202501</enddate><creator>Shankar, Anand</creator><creator>Chandra Garkoti, Satish</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7647-6473</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202501</creationdate><title>Shifts in the ecological drivers influence the response of tree and soil carbon dynamics in central Himalayan forests</title><author>Shankar, Anand ; Chandra Garkoti, Satish</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1582-4d7ea405df84c6679eb8b9a9be4c1c8fe26bf9cd1f07a504155d8fd935c542a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carbon - metabolism</topic><topic>Carbon storage</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Mountain ecosystems</topic><topic>Niche complementarity effect</topic><topic>Nitrogen - analysis</topic><topic>Nitrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Soil - chemistry</topic><topic>Soil physicochemical properties</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Vegetation attributes</topic><topic>Vegetation-soil interactions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shankar, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandra Garkoti, Satish</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shankar, Anand</au><au>Chandra Garkoti, Satish</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shifts in the ecological drivers influence the response of tree and soil carbon dynamics in central Himalayan forests</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2025-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>373</volume><spage>123755</spage><pages>123755-</pages><artnum>123755</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>Understanding and regulating global carbon relies crucially on comprehending the components and services of forest ecosystems. In particular, interactions that govern carbon storage in trees, soil, and microbes, driven by factors like vegetation structure, function, and soil characteristics, remain poorly understood, especially in the central Himalayas. To address this gap, we investigated carbon storage in tree aboveground biomass, root biomass, and soil across different vegetation types. We also examined how vegetation parameters {vegetation diversity (H′), diameter at breast height (DBH), basal area (BA), and biomass}, and soil characteristics {bulk density (BD), moisture (Mo), pH, and total nitrogen (N)} might influence forest carbon storage. Our study, based on 14 plots (0.1 ha each) spanning four distinct vegetation types {Sal forest (SF, 3), Chir-pine forest (PF, 4), Nepalese-alder forest (AF, 3), and Banj-oak forest (OF, 4)} in the central Himalaya, revealed several key insights. Tree carbon storage ranged from ∼79 to 261 Mg C ha−1, accounting for 41–65% of forest carbon storage, while soil carbon storage ranged from ∼28 to 69 Mg C ha−1, contributing 35–58%. These values varied with vegetation types and were influenced by the vegetation and soil characteristics associated with each forest type. Important contributors to tree and soil carbon storage included soil Mo, N, and vegetation structural diversity (H′, BA), explaining 8–64 % of the variation. Path analysis indicated that increased vegetation diversity, soil properties, and conservative traits (fine roots and leaves) strongly influence tree and soil carbon storage. The study highlights the potential complex system to optimizing carbon storage in natural forest ecosystems, offering valuable insight for managing carbon sinks. Further research is needed to fully understand ecosystem responses to carbon storage across different forest habitats and different spatial-temporal scales. [Display omitted] •The effects of various forest ecosystems on tree and soil carbon storage has been assessed in the central Himalaya.•Alder and sal forests showed a significant improvement in carbon storage and soil health compared to oak and pine forests.•Variation in tree and soil carbon storage were strongly influenced by soil N, Mo, and vegetation diversity.•Structural equation modeling effectively captures the complex relationships of tree and soil carbon storage with vegetation diversity, structural attributes, and soil characteristics.•Key factors driving tree and soil carbon storage included vegetation diversity, soil N, and fine root biomass.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39700932</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123755</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7647-6473</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2025-01, Vol.373, p.123755, Article 123755
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3147481978
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Biomass
Carbon - metabolism
Carbon storage
Ecosystem
Forests
Mountain ecosystems
Niche complementarity effect
Nitrogen - analysis
Nitrogen - metabolism
Soil - chemistry
Soil physicochemical properties
Trees
Vegetation attributes
Vegetation-soil interactions
title Shifts in the ecological drivers influence the response of tree and soil carbon dynamics in central Himalayan forests
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T03%3A22%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shifts%20in%20the%20ecological%20drivers%20influence%20the%20response%20of%20tree%20and%20soil%20carbon%20dynamics%20in%20central%20Himalayan%20forests&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Shankar,%20Anand&rft.date=2025-01&rft.volume=373&rft.spage=123755&rft.pages=123755-&rft.artnum=123755&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123755&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3147481978%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1582-4d7ea405df84c6679eb8b9a9be4c1c8fe26bf9cd1f07a504155d8fd935c542a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3147481978&rft_id=info:pmid/39700932&rfr_iscdi=true