Lost and found: dynamics of relationship and employment status over time in people with affective and psychotic spectrum disorders

• Published in: BJPsych open 2024-12, Vol.11 (1), p.e11
• Main Authors: Senner, Fanny, Kerkhoff, Lisa, Adorjan, Kristina, Lauseker, Michael, Budde, Monika, Heilbronner, Maria, Kalman, Janos L., Kohshour, Mojtaba Oraki, Papiol, Sergi, Reich-Erkelenz, Daniela, Schaupp, Sabrina K., Schulte, Eva C., Vogl, Thomas, Anghelescu, Ion-George, Arolt, Volker, Baune, Bernhardt T., Dannlowski, Udo, Dalkner, Nina, Dietrich, Detlef E., Fallgatter, Andreas J., Figge, Christian, Konrad, Carsten, Lang, Fabian U., Reimer, Jens, Reinighaus, Eva Z., Schmauß, Max, Schmitt, Andrea, Senner, Simon, Spitzer, Carsten, Zimmermann, Jörg, Hasan, Alkomiet, Falkai, Peter, Schulze, Thomas G., Heilbronner, Urs, Greiner, Sophie-Kathrin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bipolar disorder; Divorce; Employment; Intellectual disabilities; Mental disorders; Psychosis; Quality of life; Rehabilitation and Social; Remission (Medicine); Schizophrenia; Social integration
• ISSN: 2056-4724; 2056-4724
• DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2024.816

Employment and relationship are crucial for social integration. However, individuals with major psychiatric disorders often face challenges in these domains. We investigated employment and relationship status changes among patients across the affective and psychotic spectrum - in comparison with healthy controls, examining whether diagnostic groups or functional levels influence these transitions. The sample from the longitudinal multicentric PsyCourse Study comprised 1260 patients with affective and psychotic spectrum disorders and 441 controls (mean age ± s.d., 39.91 ± 12.65 years; 48.9% female). Multistate models (Markov) were used to analyse transitions in employment and relationship status, focusing on transition intensities. Analyses contained multiple multistate models adjusted for age, gender, job or partner, diagnostic group and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) in different combinations to analyse the impact of the covariates on the hazard ratio of changing employment or relationship status. The clinical group had a higher hazard ratio of losing partner (hazard ratio 1.46, < 0.001) and job (hazard ratio 4.18, < 0.001) than the control group (corrected for age/gender). Compared with controls, clinical groups had a higher hazard of losing partner (affective group, hazard ratio 2.69, = 0.003; psychotic group, hazard ratio 3.06, = 0.001) and job (affective group, hazard ratio 3.43, < 0.001; psychotic group, hazard ratio 4.11, < 0.001). Adjusting for GAF, the hazard ratio of losing partner and job decreased in both clinical groups compared with controls. Patients face an increased hazard of job loss and relationship dissolution compared with healthy controls, and this is partially conditioned by the diagnosis and functional level. These findings underscore a high demand for destigmatisation and support for individuals in managing their functional limitations.