Loading…
Physical activity guidelines for adults with type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review
The aim of this study was to systematically review recommendations on physical activity for adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Online databases were searched for clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), statements, and recommendations. Two authors screened the guidelines based on eligibility criteria. F...
Saved in:
Published in: | Diabetes research and clinical practice 2025-02, Vol.220, p.111982, Article 111982 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1580-25bd4d17f60d4da2be4dd9bf9c6e5fef7fe0c9acaa89b38ac4204e9556d87b93 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 111982 |
container_title | Diabetes research and clinical practice |
container_volume | 220 |
creator | Tonga, Eda Worboys, Hannah Evans, Rachael A. Singh, Sally J. Davies, Melanie J. Andre Ng, G. Yates, Thomas |
description | The aim of this study was to systematically review recommendations on physical activity for adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Online databases were searched for clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), statements, and recommendations. Two authors screened the guidelines based on eligibility criteria. FITT (Frequency, Intensity, Time, Type) for physical activity and disease-specific precautions were extracted independently. The methodological quality of CPGs was assessed using the AGREE II instrument. Recommendations were categorized according to FITT, with disease-specific adaptations also recorded.
Fifteen guidelines were included. Nine underwent AGREE II evaluation, with three rated high quality and the rest moderate to low. The predominant recommendation was to engage in at least 150 min of moderate aerobic exercise per week. Adaptations for T2D focused on glucose levels, diet, foot care, weather conditions, sedentary behaviour, neuropathy, and retinopathy.
While guidelines consistently recommended aerobic exercise, there was limited emphasis on strength and flexibility exercises. Significant limitations in methodological and reporting quality were noted, especially in stakeholder involvement and applicability. Future guidelines should use a standardized FITT framework and adhere to standard development methods to enhance usability for healthcare professionals and patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111982 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3151200825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168822724008921</els_id><sourcerecordid>3151200825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1580-25bd4d17f60d4da2be4dd9bf9c6e5fef7fe0c9acaa89b38ac4204e9556d87b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EglL4BJCXbBJsJ04cNgiVp1SpSHRvOfaEukqaYjut8vektLBlNbM4d67mIHRFSUwJzW6XsbGqdOBjRlgaU0oLwY7QiIqcRYKx_BiNBk787Gfo3PslISRLUn6KzpIiTzPOyQjN3he9t1rVWOlgNzb0-LOzBmq7Ao-r1mFlujp4vLVhgUO_Bszw49AMAfwd_uh9gEYFq7GDjYXtBTqpVO3h8jDHaP78NJ-8RtPZy9vkYRppygWJGC9NamheZWSYipWQGlOUVaEz4BVUeQVEF0orJYoyEUqnjKRQcJ4ZkZdFMkY3-7Nr13514INsrNdQ12oFbedlQjllhAjGB5TvUe1a7x1Ucu1so1wvKZE7lXIpDyrlTqXcqxxy14eKrmzA_KV-3Q3A_R6A4c_hdye9trDSYKwDHaRp7T8V3xypiKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3151200825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physical activity guidelines for adults with type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Tonga, Eda ; Worboys, Hannah ; Evans, Rachael A. ; Singh, Sally J. ; Davies, Melanie J. ; Andre Ng, G. ; Yates, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Tonga, Eda ; Worboys, Hannah ; Evans, Rachael A. ; Singh, Sally J. ; Davies, Melanie J. ; Andre Ng, G. ; Yates, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to systematically review recommendations on physical activity for adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Online databases were searched for clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), statements, and recommendations. Two authors screened the guidelines based on eligibility criteria. FITT (Frequency, Intensity, Time, Type) for physical activity and disease-specific precautions were extracted independently. The methodological quality of CPGs was assessed using the AGREE II instrument. Recommendations were categorized according to FITT, with disease-specific adaptations also recorded.
Fifteen guidelines were included. Nine underwent AGREE II evaluation, with three rated high quality and the rest moderate to low. The predominant recommendation was to engage in at least 150 min of moderate aerobic exercise per week. Adaptations for T2D focused on glucose levels, diet, foot care, weather conditions, sedentary behaviour, neuropathy, and retinopathy.
While guidelines consistently recommended aerobic exercise, there was limited emphasis on strength and flexibility exercises. Significant limitations in methodological and reporting quality were noted, especially in stakeholder involvement and applicability. Future guidelines should use a standardized FITT framework and adhere to standard development methods to enhance usability for healthcare professionals and patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-8227</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1872-8227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111982</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39746550</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>FITT ; Guidelines ; Physical activity ; Recommendations ; Type 2 Diabetes</subject><ispartof>Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2025-02, Vol.220, p.111982, Article 111982</ispartof><rights>2025 University of Leicester</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1580-25bd4d17f60d4da2be4dd9bf9c6e5fef7fe0c9acaa89b38ac4204e9556d87b93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39746550$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tonga, Eda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worboys, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Rachael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Sally J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Melanie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andre Ng, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yates, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Physical activity guidelines for adults with type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review</title><title>Diabetes research and clinical practice</title><addtitle>Diabetes Res Clin Pract</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to systematically review recommendations on physical activity for adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Online databases were searched for clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), statements, and recommendations. Two authors screened the guidelines based on eligibility criteria. FITT (Frequency, Intensity, Time, Type) for physical activity and disease-specific precautions were extracted independently. The methodological quality of CPGs was assessed using the AGREE II instrument. Recommendations were categorized according to FITT, with disease-specific adaptations also recorded.
Fifteen guidelines were included. Nine underwent AGREE II evaluation, with three rated high quality and the rest moderate to low. The predominant recommendation was to engage in at least 150 min of moderate aerobic exercise per week. Adaptations for T2D focused on glucose levels, diet, foot care, weather conditions, sedentary behaviour, neuropathy, and retinopathy.
While guidelines consistently recommended aerobic exercise, there was limited emphasis on strength and flexibility exercises. Significant limitations in methodological and reporting quality were noted, especially in stakeholder involvement and applicability. Future guidelines should use a standardized FITT framework and adhere to standard development methods to enhance usability for healthcare professionals and patients.</description><subject>FITT</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Recommendations</subject><subject>Type 2 Diabetes</subject><issn>0168-8227</issn><issn>1872-8227</issn><issn>1872-8227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EglL4BJCXbBJsJ04cNgiVp1SpSHRvOfaEukqaYjut8vektLBlNbM4d67mIHRFSUwJzW6XsbGqdOBjRlgaU0oLwY7QiIqcRYKx_BiNBk787Gfo3PslISRLUn6KzpIiTzPOyQjN3he9t1rVWOlgNzb0-LOzBmq7Ao-r1mFlujp4vLVhgUO_Bszw49AMAfwd_uh9gEYFq7GDjYXtBTqpVO3h8jDHaP78NJ-8RtPZy9vkYRppygWJGC9NamheZWSYipWQGlOUVaEz4BVUeQVEF0orJYoyEUqnjKRQcJ4ZkZdFMkY3-7Nr13514INsrNdQ12oFbedlQjllhAjGB5TvUe1a7x1Ucu1so1wvKZE7lXIpDyrlTqXcqxxy14eKrmzA_KV-3Q3A_R6A4c_hdye9trDSYKwDHaRp7T8V3xypiKg</recordid><startdate>202502</startdate><enddate>202502</enddate><creator>Tonga, Eda</creator><creator>Worboys, Hannah</creator><creator>Evans, Rachael A.</creator><creator>Singh, Sally J.</creator><creator>Davies, Melanie J.</creator><creator>Andre Ng, G.</creator><creator>Yates, Thomas</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202502</creationdate><title>Physical activity guidelines for adults with type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review</title><author>Tonga, Eda ; Worboys, Hannah ; Evans, Rachael A. ; Singh, Sally J. ; Davies, Melanie J. ; Andre Ng, G. ; Yates, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1580-25bd4d17f60d4da2be4dd9bf9c6e5fef7fe0c9acaa89b38ac4204e9556d87b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>FITT</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Recommendations</topic><topic>Type 2 Diabetes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tonga, Eda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worboys, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Rachael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Sally J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Melanie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andre Ng, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yates, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diabetes research and clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tonga, Eda</au><au>Worboys, Hannah</au><au>Evans, Rachael A.</au><au>Singh, Sally J.</au><au>Davies, Melanie J.</au><au>Andre Ng, G.</au><au>Yates, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physical activity guidelines for adults with type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes research and clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>Diabetes Res Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2025-02</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>220</volume><spage>111982</spage><pages>111982-</pages><artnum>111982</artnum><issn>0168-8227</issn><issn>1872-8227</issn><eissn>1872-8227</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to systematically review recommendations on physical activity for adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Online databases were searched for clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), statements, and recommendations. Two authors screened the guidelines based on eligibility criteria. FITT (Frequency, Intensity, Time, Type) for physical activity and disease-specific precautions were extracted independently. The methodological quality of CPGs was assessed using the AGREE II instrument. Recommendations were categorized according to FITT, with disease-specific adaptations also recorded.
Fifteen guidelines were included. Nine underwent AGREE II evaluation, with three rated high quality and the rest moderate to low. The predominant recommendation was to engage in at least 150 min of moderate aerobic exercise per week. Adaptations for T2D focused on glucose levels, diet, foot care, weather conditions, sedentary behaviour, neuropathy, and retinopathy.
While guidelines consistently recommended aerobic exercise, there was limited emphasis on strength and flexibility exercises. Significant limitations in methodological and reporting quality were noted, especially in stakeholder involvement and applicability. Future guidelines should use a standardized FITT framework and adhere to standard development methods to enhance usability for healthcare professionals and patients.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>39746550</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111982</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-8227 |
ispartof | Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2025-02, Vol.220, p.111982, Article 111982 |
issn | 0168-8227 1872-8227 1872-8227 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3151200825 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | FITT Guidelines Physical activity Recommendations Type 2 Diabetes |
title | Physical activity guidelines for adults with type 2 Diabetes: Systematic review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T23%3A33%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physical%20activity%20guidelines%20for%20adults%20with%20type%202%20Diabetes:%20Systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20research%20and%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Tonga,%20Eda&rft.date=2025-02&rft.volume=220&rft.spage=111982&rft.pages=111982-&rft.artnum=111982&rft.issn=0168-8227&rft.eissn=1872-8227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111982&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3151200825%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1580-25bd4d17f60d4da2be4dd9bf9c6e5fef7fe0c9acaa89b38ac4204e9556d87b93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3151200825&rft_id=info:pmid/39746550&rfr_iscdi=true |