Loading…

Assessing the Interpretability–Performance Trade-Off of Artificial Neural Networks Using Sentinel Fish Health Data

A number of sentinel species are regularly sampled from the environment near the Oil Sands Region (OSR) in Alberta, Canada. In particular, trout-perch are sampled as a proxy for the health of the aquatic ecosystem. As the development of the OSR began before the environmental monitoring program was i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environments (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2024-05, Vol.11 (5), p.94
Main Authors: McMillan, Patrick G., Feng, Zeny Z., Arciszewski, Tim J., Proner, Robert, Deeth, Lorna E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-a8dd0e6853c7f73aa4dd18feee74d04bb5d0e77d9dc9cc116e21035deb5a4a223
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 94
container_title Environments (Basel, Switzerland)
container_volume 11
creator McMillan, Patrick G.
Feng, Zeny Z.
Arciszewski, Tim J.
Proner, Robert
Deeth, Lorna E.
description A number of sentinel species are regularly sampled from the environment near the Oil Sands Region (OSR) in Alberta, Canada. In particular, trout-perch are sampled as a proxy for the health of the aquatic ecosystem. As the development of the OSR began before the environmental monitoring program was in place, there is currently no established measure for the baseline health of the local ecosystem. A common solution is to calculate normal ranges for fish endpoints. Observations found to be outside the normal range are then flagged, alerting researchers to the potential presence of stressors in the local environment. The quality of the normal ranges is dependent on the accuracy of the estimates used to calculate them. This paper explores the use of neural networks and regularized regression for improving the prediction accuracy of fish endpoints. We also consider the trade-off between the prediction accuracy and interpretability of each model. We find that neural networks can provide increased prediction accuracy, but this improvement in accuracy may not be worth the loss in interpretability in some ecological studies. The elastic net offers both good prediction accuracy and interpretability, making it a safe choice for many ecological applications. A hybridized method combining both the neural network and elastic net offers high prediction accuracy as well as some interpretability, and therefore it is the recommended method for this application.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/environments11050094
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153567274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A795398456</galeid><sourcerecordid>A795398456</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-a8dd0e6853c7f73aa4dd18feee74d04bb5d0e77d9dc9cc116e21035deb5a4a223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUctKBDEQHERBUf_AQ8CLl9FkkkxmjotvEBXU89CbdNzoTLImWcWb_-Af-iWOrgcR6UM13VVFQRXFDqP7nLf0AP2zi8EP6HNijEpKW7FSbFRU1SWv2mb1175ebKf0QCllsuGK840iT1LClJy_J3mG5NxnjPOIGaaud_n14-39GqMNcQCvkdxGMFheWUuCJZOYnXXaQU8ucRG_Ib-E-JjI3bfhzRjJeezJiUszcobQ5xk5ggxbxZqFPuH2D24WdyfHt4dn5cXV6fnh5KLUlapzCY0xFOtGcq2s4gDCGNZYRFTCUDGdyvGtlGmNbrVmrMaKUS4NTiUIqCq-WewtfecxPC0w5W5wSWPfg8ewSB1nkstaVUqM1N0_1IewiH5M13EqW8FU1dQja3_JuoceO-dtyBH0OAYHp4NH68b7RLWSt42QXwKxFOgYUopou3l0A8TXjtHuq77uv_r4J7Kgk-c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3059417286</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the Interpretability–Performance Trade-Off of Artificial Neural Networks Using Sentinel Fish Health Data</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>McMillan, Patrick G. ; Feng, Zeny Z. ; Arciszewski, Tim J. ; Proner, Robert ; Deeth, Lorna E.</creator><creatorcontrib>McMillan, Patrick G. ; Feng, Zeny Z. ; Arciszewski, Tim J. ; Proner, Robert ; Deeth, Lorna E.</creatorcontrib><description>A number of sentinel species are regularly sampled from the environment near the Oil Sands Region (OSR) in Alberta, Canada. In particular, trout-perch are sampled as a proxy for the health of the aquatic ecosystem. As the development of the OSR began before the environmental monitoring program was in place, there is currently no established measure for the baseline health of the local ecosystem. A common solution is to calculate normal ranges for fish endpoints. Observations found to be outside the normal range are then flagged, alerting researchers to the potential presence of stressors in the local environment. The quality of the normal ranges is dependent on the accuracy of the estimates used to calculate them. This paper explores the use of neural networks and regularized regression for improving the prediction accuracy of fish endpoints. We also consider the trade-off between the prediction accuracy and interpretability of each model. We find that neural networks can provide increased prediction accuracy, but this improvement in accuracy may not be worth the loss in interpretability in some ecological studies. The elastic net offers both good prediction accuracy and interpretability, making it a safe choice for many ecological applications. A hybridized method combining both the neural network and elastic net offers high prediction accuracy as well as some interpretability, and therefore it is the recommended method for this application.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-3298</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-3298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/environments11050094</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Alberta ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Artificial neural networks ; Contamination ; Datasets ; Ecological studies ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental impact ; Environmental monitoring ; Fish ; fish health ; Human beings ; indicator species ; Influence on nature ; Methods ; Neural networks ; Oil sands ; oils ; prediction ; Predictions ; Regression analysis ; River ecology ; Tradeoffs ; Trout ; Variables ; Water quality</subject><ispartof>Environments (Basel, Switzerland), 2024-05, Vol.11 (5), p.94</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-a8dd0e6853c7f73aa4dd18feee74d04bb5d0e77d9dc9cc116e21035deb5a4a223</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6622-8663 ; 0000-0002-4285-6822 ; 0000-0002-8113-3619</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3059417286/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3059417286?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McMillan, Patrick G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Zeny Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arciszewski, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proner, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deeth, Lorna E.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the Interpretability–Performance Trade-Off of Artificial Neural Networks Using Sentinel Fish Health Data</title><title>Environments (Basel, Switzerland)</title><description>A number of sentinel species are regularly sampled from the environment near the Oil Sands Region (OSR) in Alberta, Canada. In particular, trout-perch are sampled as a proxy for the health of the aquatic ecosystem. As the development of the OSR began before the environmental monitoring program was in place, there is currently no established measure for the baseline health of the local ecosystem. A common solution is to calculate normal ranges for fish endpoints. Observations found to be outside the normal range are then flagged, alerting researchers to the potential presence of stressors in the local environment. The quality of the normal ranges is dependent on the accuracy of the estimates used to calculate them. This paper explores the use of neural networks and regularized regression for improving the prediction accuracy of fish endpoints. We also consider the trade-off between the prediction accuracy and interpretability of each model. We find that neural networks can provide increased prediction accuracy, but this improvement in accuracy may not be worth the loss in interpretability in some ecological studies. The elastic net offers both good prediction accuracy and interpretability, making it a safe choice for many ecological applications. A hybridized method combining both the neural network and elastic net offers high prediction accuracy as well as some interpretability, and therefore it is the recommended method for this application.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Alberta</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Ecological studies</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>fish health</subject><subject>Human beings</subject><subject>indicator species</subject><subject>Influence on nature</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Oil sands</subject><subject>oils</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>River ecology</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><subject>Trout</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><issn>2076-3298</issn><issn>2076-3298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNptUctKBDEQHERBUf_AQ8CLl9FkkkxmjotvEBXU89CbdNzoTLImWcWb_-Af-iWOrgcR6UM13VVFQRXFDqP7nLf0AP2zi8EP6HNijEpKW7FSbFRU1SWv2mb1175ebKf0QCllsuGK840iT1LClJy_J3mG5NxnjPOIGaaud_n14-39GqMNcQCvkdxGMFheWUuCJZOYnXXaQU8ucRG_Ib-E-JjI3bfhzRjJeezJiUszcobQ5xk5ggxbxZqFPuH2D24WdyfHt4dn5cXV6fnh5KLUlapzCY0xFOtGcq2s4gDCGNZYRFTCUDGdyvGtlGmNbrVmrMaKUS4NTiUIqCq-WewtfecxPC0w5W5wSWPfg8ewSB1nkstaVUqM1N0_1IewiH5M13EqW8FU1dQja3_JuoceO-dtyBH0OAYHp4NH68b7RLWSt42QXwKxFOgYUopou3l0A8TXjtHuq77uv_r4J7Kgk-c</recordid><startdate>20240503</startdate><enddate>20240503</enddate><creator>McMillan, Patrick G.</creator><creator>Feng, Zeny Z.</creator><creator>Arciszewski, Tim J.</creator><creator>Proner, Robert</creator><creator>Deeth, Lorna E.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6622-8663</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4285-6822</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8113-3619</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240503</creationdate><title>Assessing the Interpretability–Performance Trade-Off of Artificial Neural Networks Using Sentinel Fish Health Data</title><author>McMillan, Patrick G. ; Feng, Zeny Z. ; Arciszewski, Tim J. ; Proner, Robert ; Deeth, Lorna E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-a8dd0e6853c7f73aa4dd18feee74d04bb5d0e77d9dc9cc116e21035deb5a4a223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Alberta</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Ecological studies</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>fish health</topic><topic>Human beings</topic><topic>indicator species</topic><topic>Influence on nature</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Oil sands</topic><topic>oils</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>River ecology</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><topic>Trout</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McMillan, Patrick G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Zeny Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arciszewski, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proner, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deeth, Lorna E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environments (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McMillan, Patrick G.</au><au>Feng, Zeny Z.</au><au>Arciszewski, Tim J.</au><au>Proner, Robert</au><au>Deeth, Lorna E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the Interpretability–Performance Trade-Off of Artificial Neural Networks Using Sentinel Fish Health Data</atitle><jtitle>Environments (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><date>2024-05-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>94</spage><pages>94-</pages><issn>2076-3298</issn><eissn>2076-3298</eissn><abstract>A number of sentinel species are regularly sampled from the environment near the Oil Sands Region (OSR) in Alberta, Canada. In particular, trout-perch are sampled as a proxy for the health of the aquatic ecosystem. As the development of the OSR began before the environmental monitoring program was in place, there is currently no established measure for the baseline health of the local ecosystem. A common solution is to calculate normal ranges for fish endpoints. Observations found to be outside the normal range are then flagged, alerting researchers to the potential presence of stressors in the local environment. The quality of the normal ranges is dependent on the accuracy of the estimates used to calculate them. This paper explores the use of neural networks and regularized regression for improving the prediction accuracy of fish endpoints. We also consider the trade-off between the prediction accuracy and interpretability of each model. We find that neural networks can provide increased prediction accuracy, but this improvement in accuracy may not be worth the loss in interpretability in some ecological studies. The elastic net offers both good prediction accuracy and interpretability, making it a safe choice for many ecological applications. A hybridized method combining both the neural network and elastic net offers high prediction accuracy as well as some interpretability, and therefore it is the recommended method for this application.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/environments11050094</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6622-8663</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4285-6822</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8113-3619</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2076-3298
ispartof Environments (Basel, Switzerland), 2024-05, Vol.11 (5), p.94
issn 2076-3298
2076-3298
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153567274
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Accuracy
Alberta
Aquatic ecosystems
Artificial neural networks
Contamination
Datasets
Ecological studies
Environmental aspects
Environmental impact
Environmental monitoring
Fish
fish health
Human beings
indicator species
Influence on nature
Methods
Neural networks
Oil sands
oils
prediction
Predictions
Regression analysis
River ecology
Tradeoffs
Trout
Variables
Water quality
title Assessing the Interpretability–Performance Trade-Off of Artificial Neural Networks Using Sentinel Fish Health Data
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A41%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20Interpretability%E2%80%93Performance%20Trade-Off%20of%20Artificial%20Neural%20Networks%20Using%20Sentinel%20Fish%20Health%20Data&rft.jtitle=Environments%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=McMillan,%20Patrick%20G.&rft.date=2024-05-03&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=94&rft.pages=94-&rft.issn=2076-3298&rft.eissn=2076-3298&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/environments11050094&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA795398456%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-a8dd0e6853c7f73aa4dd18feee74d04bb5d0e77d9dc9cc116e21035deb5a4a223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3059417286&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A795398456&rfr_iscdi=true