Comparison of ICSI, IVF, and in vivo derived embryos to produce CRISPR-Cas9 gene-edited pigs for xenotransplantation

• Published in: Theriogenology 2024-05, Vol.220, p.43-55
• Main Authors: Briski, Olinda, La Motta, Gastón Emilio, Ratner, Laura Daniela, Allegroni, Federico Andrés, Pillado, Santiago, Álvarez, Guadalupe, Gutierrez, Betiana, Tarragona, Lisa, Zaccagnini, Andrea, Acerbo, Marcelo, Ciampi, Carla, Fernández-Martin, Rafael, Salamone, Daniel Felipe
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: biosynthesis; CRISPR-Cas systems; embryogenesis; genes; GGTA1; GHR; homozygosity; humans; Knock-out; Microinjection; mutation; oocytes; Piglets; pregnancy; RNP-Complex; somatotropin receptors; spermatozoa; swine; xenotransplantation
• ISSN: 0093-691X; 1879-3231
• DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.02.028

Genome editing in pigs for xenotransplantation has seen significant advances in recent years. This study compared three methodologies to generate gene-edited embryos, including co-injection of sperm together with the CRISPR-Cas9 system into oocytes, named ICSI-MGE (mediated gene editing); microinjection of CRISPR-Cas9 components into oocytes followed by in vitro fertilization (IVF), and microinjection of in vivo fertilized zygotes with the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Our goal was to knock-out (KO) porcine genes involved in the biosynthesis of xenoantigens responsible for the hyperacute rejection of interspecific xenografts, namely GGTA1, CMAH, and β4GalNT2. Additionally, we attempted to KO the growth hormone receptor (GHR) gene with the aim of limiting the growth of porcine organs to a size that is physiologically suitable for human transplantation. Embryo development, pregnancy, and gene editing rates were evaluated. We found an efficient mutation of the GGTA1 gene following ICSI-MGE, comparable to the results obtained through the microinjection of oocytes followed by IVF. ICSI-MGE also showed higher rates of biallelic mutations compared to the other techniques. Five healthy piglets were born from in vivo-derived embryos, all of them exhibiting biallelic mutations in the GGTA1 gene, with three displaying mutations in the GHR gene. No mutations were observed in the CMAH and β4GalNT2 genes. In conclusion, in vitro methodologies showed high rates of gene-edited embryos. Specifically, ICSI-MGE proved to be an efficient technique for obtaining homozygous biallelic mutated embryos. Lastly, only live births were obtained from in vivo-derived embryos showing efficient multiple gene editing for GGTA1 and GHR. •A comparison of three methodologies based on the introduction of CRISPR-Cas9 complex before (IVF), during (ICSI-MGE), and after fertilization (in vivo) for the production of genetically edited pigs was performed.•ICSI mediated gene editing proved to be an efficient technique for obtaining homozygous biallelic mutated pig embryos, similar to the microinjection of oocytes followed by IVF.•Live births were obtained from in vivo-derived embryos showing efficient multiple gene editing for GGTA1 and GHR genes.