Loading…
Different Responses of Terrestrial Carbon Fluxes to Environmental Changes in Cold Temperate Forest Ecosystems
As the largest carbon reservoir within terrestrial ecosystems, forest ecosystems play a major role as carbon sinks in the global carbon cycle. There are still some uncertainties regarding the responses of different carbon fluxes to environmental changes in cold temperate climate forest ecosystems. H...
Saved in:
Published in: | Forests 2024-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1340 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-37f83e35aa890dca806ff7a6165e0347c122573a1b8dd67c26024aadd10822403 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1340 |
container_title | Forests |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Jiang, Mihang Liu, Xinjie Liu, Liangyun |
description | As the largest carbon reservoir within terrestrial ecosystems, forest ecosystems play a major role as carbon sinks in the global carbon cycle. There are still some uncertainties regarding the responses of different carbon fluxes to environmental changes in cold temperate climate forest ecosystems. Here, 14 cold temperate forest flux sites for at least ten years were investigated, including carbon fluxes and environmental variables such as temperature, precipitation, shortwave radiation, and vapor pressure deficit. By calculating the Spearman correlation coefficient, there was a congruence between photosynthetic productivity (i.e., gross primary productivity, GPP) and carbon sequestration (i.e., net ecosystem productivity, NEP) at thirteen forest sites, and at one forest site, GPP and NEP were decoupled. Annual GPP and NEP displayed a consistent trend when temperature and precipitation had significantly opposite trends and when temperature had a significantly positive correlation with VPD. But when VPD was significantly negatively correlated with both temperature and SW in spring and when temperature was negatively correlated with both SW and VPD in summer, a decoupling of GPP and NEP occurred. The impacts of various environmental factors on the annual carbon fluxes were calculated for each year and season using the path analysis method. At forest sites with consistent trends in GPP and NEP, annual, spring, and summer temperatures had significant positive correlations with GPP and ecosystem respiration (RE). While at the decoupled forest site, environmental factors had a stronger effect on RE, which then contributed to the observed decoupling of GPP and NEP. Finally, the Partial Least Squares method was used to analyze the relative contribution of each environmental factor to annual carbon fluxes. The results revealed that temperature and summer precipitation were the key environmental factors affecting forest ecosystems. This study provides important insights into the different responses of carbon fluxes in forest ecosystems undergoing environmental changes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/f15081340 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153781436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A807417659</galeid><sourcerecordid>A807417659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-37f83e35aa890dca806ff7a6165e0347c122573a1b8dd67c26024aadd10822403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUUtLAzEQXkTBUnvwHwS86KE1r90kx1JbFQqC1POSZic1ZTepyVbsvzelIuLMYYb5HnwwRXFN8IQxhe8tKbEkjOOzYkCUUmOusDj_s18Wo5S2OFcppKJ8UHQPzlqI4Hv0CmkXfIKEgkUriBFSH51u0UzHdfBo0e6_MtgHNPefLgbfZdURftd-kwHn0Sy0TZZ2O4i6B7QIRw80NyEdUg9duiourG4TjH7msHhbzFezp_Hy5fF5Nl2ODS15P2bCSgas1Foq3BgtcWWt0BWpSsCMC0MoLQXTZC2bphKGVphyrZuGYEkpx2xY3J58dzF87HOGunPJQNtqD2GfakZKJiThrMrUm3_UbdhHn9PVDCuhGOeUZ9bkxNroFmrnbeijNrkb6JwJHqzL96nEghNRlSoL7k4CE0NKEWy9i67T8VATXB-fVf8-i30DOnqFdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3097934424</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Different Responses of Terrestrial Carbon Fluxes to Environmental Changes in Cold Temperate Forest Ecosystems</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Jiang, Mihang ; Liu, Xinjie ; Liu, Liangyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Mihang ; Liu, Xinjie ; Liu, Liangyun</creatorcontrib><description>As the largest carbon reservoir within terrestrial ecosystems, forest ecosystems play a major role as carbon sinks in the global carbon cycle. There are still some uncertainties regarding the responses of different carbon fluxes to environmental changes in cold temperate climate forest ecosystems. Here, 14 cold temperate forest flux sites for at least ten years were investigated, including carbon fluxes and environmental variables such as temperature, precipitation, shortwave radiation, and vapor pressure deficit. By calculating the Spearman correlation coefficient, there was a congruence between photosynthetic productivity (i.e., gross primary productivity, GPP) and carbon sequestration (i.e., net ecosystem productivity, NEP) at thirteen forest sites, and at one forest site, GPP and NEP were decoupled. Annual GPP and NEP displayed a consistent trend when temperature and precipitation had significantly opposite trends and when temperature had a significantly positive correlation with VPD. But when VPD was significantly negatively correlated with both temperature and SW in spring and when temperature was negatively correlated with both SW and VPD in summer, a decoupling of GPP and NEP occurred. The impacts of various environmental factors on the annual carbon fluxes were calculated for each year and season using the path analysis method. At forest sites with consistent trends in GPP and NEP, annual, spring, and summer temperatures had significant positive correlations with GPP and ecosystem respiration (RE). While at the decoupled forest site, environmental factors had a stronger effect on RE, which then contributed to the observed decoupling of GPP and NEP. Finally, the Partial Least Squares method was used to analyze the relative contribution of each environmental factor to annual carbon fluxes. The results revealed that temperature and summer precipitation were the key environmental factors affecting forest ecosystems. This study provides important insights into the different responses of carbon fluxes in forest ecosystems undergoing environmental changes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1999-4907</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1999-4907</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/f15081340</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Annual precipitation ; Autumn ; Brittleness ; carbon ; Carbon cycle ; Carbon cycle (Biogeochemistry) ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon sequestration ; Carbon sinks ; China ; Climatic changes ; Cold ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Datasets ; Decoupling ; ecosystem respiration ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental changes ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental factors ; Fluxes ; Forecasts and trends ; Forest ecosystems ; Forests ; Forests and forestry ; global carbon budget ; gross primary productivity ; Least squares method ; net ecosystem production ; path analysis ; photosynthesis ; Precipitation ; Productivity ; Radiation ; Respiration ; Short wave radiation ; shortwave radiation ; Spring ; Spring (season) ; Statistical analysis ; Summer ; Temperate forests ; temperate zones ; Temperature ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Time series ; Trends ; Vapor pressure ; vapor pressure deficit ; Variables ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Forests, 2024-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1340</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-37f83e35aa890dca806ff7a6165e0347c122573a1b8dd67c26024aadd10822403</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7689-3031 ; 0000-0002-7987-037X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3097934424/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3097934424?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Mihang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xinjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Liangyun</creatorcontrib><title>Different Responses of Terrestrial Carbon Fluxes to Environmental Changes in Cold Temperate Forest Ecosystems</title><title>Forests</title><description>As the largest carbon reservoir within terrestrial ecosystems, forest ecosystems play a major role as carbon sinks in the global carbon cycle. There are still some uncertainties regarding the responses of different carbon fluxes to environmental changes in cold temperate climate forest ecosystems. Here, 14 cold temperate forest flux sites for at least ten years were investigated, including carbon fluxes and environmental variables such as temperature, precipitation, shortwave radiation, and vapor pressure deficit. By calculating the Spearman correlation coefficient, there was a congruence between photosynthetic productivity (i.e., gross primary productivity, GPP) and carbon sequestration (i.e., net ecosystem productivity, NEP) at thirteen forest sites, and at one forest site, GPP and NEP were decoupled. Annual GPP and NEP displayed a consistent trend when temperature and precipitation had significantly opposite trends and when temperature had a significantly positive correlation with VPD. But when VPD was significantly negatively correlated with both temperature and SW in spring and when temperature was negatively correlated with both SW and VPD in summer, a decoupling of GPP and NEP occurred. The impacts of various environmental factors on the annual carbon fluxes were calculated for each year and season using the path analysis method. At forest sites with consistent trends in GPP and NEP, annual, spring, and summer temperatures had significant positive correlations with GPP and ecosystem respiration (RE). While at the decoupled forest site, environmental factors had a stronger effect on RE, which then contributed to the observed decoupling of GPP and NEP. Finally, the Partial Least Squares method was used to analyze the relative contribution of each environmental factor to annual carbon fluxes. The results revealed that temperature and summer precipitation were the key environmental factors affecting forest ecosystems. This study provides important insights into the different responses of carbon fluxes in forest ecosystems undergoing environmental changes.</description><subject>Annual precipitation</subject><subject>Autumn</subject><subject>Brittleness</subject><subject>carbon</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>Carbon cycle (Biogeochemistry)</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Carbon sinks</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Climatic changes</subject><subject>Cold</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decoupling</subject><subject>ecosystem respiration</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Forests and forestry</subject><subject>global carbon budget</subject><subject>gross primary productivity</subject><subject>Least squares method</subject><subject>net ecosystem production</subject><subject>path analysis</subject><subject>photosynthesis</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Short wave radiation</subject><subject>shortwave radiation</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Spring (season)</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Temperate forests</subject><subject>temperate zones</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Vapor pressure</subject><subject>vapor pressure deficit</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>1999-4907</issn><issn>1999-4907</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUUtLAzEQXkTBUnvwHwS86KE1r90kx1JbFQqC1POSZic1ZTepyVbsvzelIuLMYYb5HnwwRXFN8IQxhe8tKbEkjOOzYkCUUmOusDj_s18Wo5S2OFcppKJ8UHQPzlqI4Hv0CmkXfIKEgkUriBFSH51u0UzHdfBo0e6_MtgHNPefLgbfZdURftd-kwHn0Sy0TZZ2O4i6B7QIRw80NyEdUg9duiourG4TjH7msHhbzFezp_Hy5fF5Nl2ODS15P2bCSgas1Foq3BgtcWWt0BWpSsCMC0MoLQXTZC2bphKGVphyrZuGYEkpx2xY3J58dzF87HOGunPJQNtqD2GfakZKJiThrMrUm3_UbdhHn9PVDCuhGOeUZ9bkxNroFmrnbeijNrkb6JwJHqzL96nEghNRlSoL7k4CE0NKEWy9i67T8VATXB-fVf8-i30DOnqFdw</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Jiang, Mihang</creator><creator>Liu, Xinjie</creator><creator>Liu, Liangyun</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7689-3031</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7987-037X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Different Responses of Terrestrial Carbon Fluxes to Environmental Changes in Cold Temperate Forest Ecosystems</title><author>Jiang, Mihang ; Liu, Xinjie ; Liu, Liangyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-37f83e35aa890dca806ff7a6165e0347c122573a1b8dd67c26024aadd10822403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Annual precipitation</topic><topic>Autumn</topic><topic>Brittleness</topic><topic>carbon</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>Carbon cycle (Biogeochemistry)</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Carbon sinks</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Climatic changes</topic><topic>Cold</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decoupling</topic><topic>ecosystem respiration</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Forests and forestry</topic><topic>global carbon budget</topic><topic>gross primary productivity</topic><topic>Least squares method</topic><topic>net ecosystem production</topic><topic>path analysis</topic><topic>photosynthesis</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Short wave radiation</topic><topic>shortwave radiation</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Spring (season)</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Temperate forests</topic><topic>temperate zones</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Vapor pressure</topic><topic>vapor pressure deficit</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Mihang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xinjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Liangyun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Forests</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jiang, Mihang</au><au>Liu, Xinjie</au><au>Liu, Liangyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Different Responses of Terrestrial Carbon Fluxes to Environmental Changes in Cold Temperate Forest Ecosystems</atitle><jtitle>Forests</jtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1340</spage><pages>1340-</pages><issn>1999-4907</issn><eissn>1999-4907</eissn><abstract>As the largest carbon reservoir within terrestrial ecosystems, forest ecosystems play a major role as carbon sinks in the global carbon cycle. There are still some uncertainties regarding the responses of different carbon fluxes to environmental changes in cold temperate climate forest ecosystems. Here, 14 cold temperate forest flux sites for at least ten years were investigated, including carbon fluxes and environmental variables such as temperature, precipitation, shortwave radiation, and vapor pressure deficit. By calculating the Spearman correlation coefficient, there was a congruence between photosynthetic productivity (i.e., gross primary productivity, GPP) and carbon sequestration (i.e., net ecosystem productivity, NEP) at thirteen forest sites, and at one forest site, GPP and NEP were decoupled. Annual GPP and NEP displayed a consistent trend when temperature and precipitation had significantly opposite trends and when temperature had a significantly positive correlation with VPD. But when VPD was significantly negatively correlated with both temperature and SW in spring and when temperature was negatively correlated with both SW and VPD in summer, a decoupling of GPP and NEP occurred. The impacts of various environmental factors on the annual carbon fluxes were calculated for each year and season using the path analysis method. At forest sites with consistent trends in GPP and NEP, annual, spring, and summer temperatures had significant positive correlations with GPP and ecosystem respiration (RE). While at the decoupled forest site, environmental factors had a stronger effect on RE, which then contributed to the observed decoupling of GPP and NEP. Finally, the Partial Least Squares method was used to analyze the relative contribution of each environmental factor to annual carbon fluxes. The results revealed that temperature and summer precipitation were the key environmental factors affecting forest ecosystems. This study provides important insights into the different responses of carbon fluxes in forest ecosystems undergoing environmental changes.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/f15081340</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7689-3031</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7987-037X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1999-4907 |
ispartof | Forests, 2024-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1340 |
issn | 1999-4907 1999-4907 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153781436 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Annual precipitation Autumn Brittleness carbon Carbon cycle Carbon cycle (Biogeochemistry) Carbon dioxide Carbon sequestration Carbon sinks China Climatic changes Cold Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients Datasets Decoupling ecosystem respiration Environmental aspects Environmental changes Environmental conditions Environmental factors Fluxes Forecasts and trends Forest ecosystems Forests Forests and forestry global carbon budget gross primary productivity Least squares method net ecosystem production path analysis photosynthesis Precipitation Productivity Radiation Respiration Short wave radiation shortwave radiation Spring Spring (season) Statistical analysis Summer Temperate forests temperate zones Temperature Terrestrial ecosystems Time series Trends Vapor pressure vapor pressure deficit Variables Vegetation |
title | Different Responses of Terrestrial Carbon Fluxes to Environmental Changes in Cold Temperate Forest Ecosystems |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T06%3A59%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different%20Responses%20of%20Terrestrial%20Carbon%20Fluxes%20to%20Environmental%20Changes%20in%20Cold%20Temperate%20Forest%20Ecosystems&rft.jtitle=Forests&rft.au=Jiang,%20Mihang&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1340&rft.pages=1340-&rft.issn=1999-4907&rft.eissn=1999-4907&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/f15081340&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA807417659%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-37f83e35aa890dca806ff7a6165e0347c122573a1b8dd67c26024aadd10822403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3097934424&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A807417659&rfr_iscdi=true |