Loading…

Different Responses of Terrestrial Carbon Fluxes to Environmental Changes in Cold Temperate Forest Ecosystems

As the largest carbon reservoir within terrestrial ecosystems, forest ecosystems play a major role as carbon sinks in the global carbon cycle. There are still some uncertainties regarding the responses of different carbon fluxes to environmental changes in cold temperate climate forest ecosystems. H...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Forests 2024-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1340
Main Authors: Jiang, Mihang, Liu, Xinjie, Liu, Liangyun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-37f83e35aa890dca806ff7a6165e0347c122573a1b8dd67c26024aadd10822403
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1340
container_title Forests
container_volume 15
creator Jiang, Mihang
Liu, Xinjie
Liu, Liangyun
description As the largest carbon reservoir within terrestrial ecosystems, forest ecosystems play a major role as carbon sinks in the global carbon cycle. There are still some uncertainties regarding the responses of different carbon fluxes to environmental changes in cold temperate climate forest ecosystems. Here, 14 cold temperate forest flux sites for at least ten years were investigated, including carbon fluxes and environmental variables such as temperature, precipitation, shortwave radiation, and vapor pressure deficit. By calculating the Spearman correlation coefficient, there was a congruence between photosynthetic productivity (i.e., gross primary productivity, GPP) and carbon sequestration (i.e., net ecosystem productivity, NEP) at thirteen forest sites, and at one forest site, GPP and NEP were decoupled. Annual GPP and NEP displayed a consistent trend when temperature and precipitation had significantly opposite trends and when temperature had a significantly positive correlation with VPD. But when VPD was significantly negatively correlated with both temperature and SW in spring and when temperature was negatively correlated with both SW and VPD in summer, a decoupling of GPP and NEP occurred. The impacts of various environmental factors on the annual carbon fluxes were calculated for each year and season using the path analysis method. At forest sites with consistent trends in GPP and NEP, annual, spring, and summer temperatures had significant positive correlations with GPP and ecosystem respiration (RE). While at the decoupled forest site, environmental factors had a stronger effect on RE, which then contributed to the observed decoupling of GPP and NEP. Finally, the Partial Least Squares method was used to analyze the relative contribution of each environmental factor to annual carbon fluxes. The results revealed that temperature and summer precipitation were the key environmental factors affecting forest ecosystems. This study provides important insights into the different responses of carbon fluxes in forest ecosystems undergoing environmental changes.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/f15081340
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153781436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A807417659</galeid><sourcerecordid>A807417659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-37f83e35aa890dca806ff7a6165e0347c122573a1b8dd67c26024aadd10822403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUUtLAzEQXkTBUnvwHwS86KE1r90kx1JbFQqC1POSZic1ZTepyVbsvzelIuLMYYb5HnwwRXFN8IQxhe8tKbEkjOOzYkCUUmOusDj_s18Wo5S2OFcppKJ8UHQPzlqI4Hv0CmkXfIKEgkUriBFSH51u0UzHdfBo0e6_MtgHNPefLgbfZdURftd-kwHn0Sy0TZZ2O4i6B7QIRw80NyEdUg9duiourG4TjH7msHhbzFezp_Hy5fF5Nl2ODS15P2bCSgas1Foq3BgtcWWt0BWpSsCMC0MoLQXTZC2bphKGVphyrZuGYEkpx2xY3J58dzF87HOGunPJQNtqD2GfakZKJiThrMrUm3_UbdhHn9PVDCuhGOeUZ9bkxNroFmrnbeijNrkb6JwJHqzL96nEghNRlSoL7k4CE0NKEWy9i67T8VATXB-fVf8-i30DOnqFdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3097934424</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Different Responses of Terrestrial Carbon Fluxes to Environmental Changes in Cold Temperate Forest Ecosystems</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Jiang, Mihang ; Liu, Xinjie ; Liu, Liangyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Mihang ; Liu, Xinjie ; Liu, Liangyun</creatorcontrib><description>As the largest carbon reservoir within terrestrial ecosystems, forest ecosystems play a major role as carbon sinks in the global carbon cycle. There are still some uncertainties regarding the responses of different carbon fluxes to environmental changes in cold temperate climate forest ecosystems. Here, 14 cold temperate forest flux sites for at least ten years were investigated, including carbon fluxes and environmental variables such as temperature, precipitation, shortwave radiation, and vapor pressure deficit. By calculating the Spearman correlation coefficient, there was a congruence between photosynthetic productivity (i.e., gross primary productivity, GPP) and carbon sequestration (i.e., net ecosystem productivity, NEP) at thirteen forest sites, and at one forest site, GPP and NEP were decoupled. Annual GPP and NEP displayed a consistent trend when temperature and precipitation had significantly opposite trends and when temperature had a significantly positive correlation with VPD. But when VPD was significantly negatively correlated with both temperature and SW in spring and when temperature was negatively correlated with both SW and VPD in summer, a decoupling of GPP and NEP occurred. The impacts of various environmental factors on the annual carbon fluxes were calculated for each year and season using the path analysis method. At forest sites with consistent trends in GPP and NEP, annual, spring, and summer temperatures had significant positive correlations with GPP and ecosystem respiration (RE). While at the decoupled forest site, environmental factors had a stronger effect on RE, which then contributed to the observed decoupling of GPP and NEP. Finally, the Partial Least Squares method was used to analyze the relative contribution of each environmental factor to annual carbon fluxes. The results revealed that temperature and summer precipitation were the key environmental factors affecting forest ecosystems. This study provides important insights into the different responses of carbon fluxes in forest ecosystems undergoing environmental changes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1999-4907</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1999-4907</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/f15081340</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Annual precipitation ; Autumn ; Brittleness ; carbon ; Carbon cycle ; Carbon cycle (Biogeochemistry) ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon sequestration ; Carbon sinks ; China ; Climatic changes ; Cold ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Datasets ; Decoupling ; ecosystem respiration ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental changes ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental factors ; Fluxes ; Forecasts and trends ; Forest ecosystems ; Forests ; Forests and forestry ; global carbon budget ; gross primary productivity ; Least squares method ; net ecosystem production ; path analysis ; photosynthesis ; Precipitation ; Productivity ; Radiation ; Respiration ; Short wave radiation ; shortwave radiation ; Spring ; Spring (season) ; Statistical analysis ; Summer ; Temperate forests ; temperate zones ; Temperature ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Time series ; Trends ; Vapor pressure ; vapor pressure deficit ; Variables ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Forests, 2024-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1340</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-37f83e35aa890dca806ff7a6165e0347c122573a1b8dd67c26024aadd10822403</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7689-3031 ; 0000-0002-7987-037X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3097934424/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3097934424?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Mihang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xinjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Liangyun</creatorcontrib><title>Different Responses of Terrestrial Carbon Fluxes to Environmental Changes in Cold Temperate Forest Ecosystems</title><title>Forests</title><description>As the largest carbon reservoir within terrestrial ecosystems, forest ecosystems play a major role as carbon sinks in the global carbon cycle. There are still some uncertainties regarding the responses of different carbon fluxes to environmental changes in cold temperate climate forest ecosystems. Here, 14 cold temperate forest flux sites for at least ten years were investigated, including carbon fluxes and environmental variables such as temperature, precipitation, shortwave radiation, and vapor pressure deficit. By calculating the Spearman correlation coefficient, there was a congruence between photosynthetic productivity (i.e., gross primary productivity, GPP) and carbon sequestration (i.e., net ecosystem productivity, NEP) at thirteen forest sites, and at one forest site, GPP and NEP were decoupled. Annual GPP and NEP displayed a consistent trend when temperature and precipitation had significantly opposite trends and when temperature had a significantly positive correlation with VPD. But when VPD was significantly negatively correlated with both temperature and SW in spring and when temperature was negatively correlated with both SW and VPD in summer, a decoupling of GPP and NEP occurred. The impacts of various environmental factors on the annual carbon fluxes were calculated for each year and season using the path analysis method. At forest sites with consistent trends in GPP and NEP, annual, spring, and summer temperatures had significant positive correlations with GPP and ecosystem respiration (RE). While at the decoupled forest site, environmental factors had a stronger effect on RE, which then contributed to the observed decoupling of GPP and NEP. Finally, the Partial Least Squares method was used to analyze the relative contribution of each environmental factor to annual carbon fluxes. The results revealed that temperature and summer precipitation were the key environmental factors affecting forest ecosystems. This study provides important insights into the different responses of carbon fluxes in forest ecosystems undergoing environmental changes.</description><subject>Annual precipitation</subject><subject>Autumn</subject><subject>Brittleness</subject><subject>carbon</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>Carbon cycle (Biogeochemistry)</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Carbon sinks</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Climatic changes</subject><subject>Cold</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decoupling</subject><subject>ecosystem respiration</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Forests and forestry</subject><subject>global carbon budget</subject><subject>gross primary productivity</subject><subject>Least squares method</subject><subject>net ecosystem production</subject><subject>path analysis</subject><subject>photosynthesis</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Short wave radiation</subject><subject>shortwave radiation</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Spring (season)</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Temperate forests</subject><subject>temperate zones</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Vapor pressure</subject><subject>vapor pressure deficit</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>1999-4907</issn><issn>1999-4907</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUUtLAzEQXkTBUnvwHwS86KE1r90kx1JbFQqC1POSZic1ZTepyVbsvzelIuLMYYb5HnwwRXFN8IQxhe8tKbEkjOOzYkCUUmOusDj_s18Wo5S2OFcppKJ8UHQPzlqI4Hv0CmkXfIKEgkUriBFSH51u0UzHdfBo0e6_MtgHNPefLgbfZdURftd-kwHn0Sy0TZZ2O4i6B7QIRw80NyEdUg9duiourG4TjH7msHhbzFezp_Hy5fF5Nl2ODS15P2bCSgas1Foq3BgtcWWt0BWpSsCMC0MoLQXTZC2bphKGVphyrZuGYEkpx2xY3J58dzF87HOGunPJQNtqD2GfakZKJiThrMrUm3_UbdhHn9PVDCuhGOeUZ9bkxNroFmrnbeijNrkb6JwJHqzL96nEghNRlSoL7k4CE0NKEWy9i67T8VATXB-fVf8-i30DOnqFdw</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Jiang, Mihang</creator><creator>Liu, Xinjie</creator><creator>Liu, Liangyun</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7689-3031</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7987-037X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Different Responses of Terrestrial Carbon Fluxes to Environmental Changes in Cold Temperate Forest Ecosystems</title><author>Jiang, Mihang ; Liu, Xinjie ; Liu, Liangyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-37f83e35aa890dca806ff7a6165e0347c122573a1b8dd67c26024aadd10822403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Annual precipitation</topic><topic>Autumn</topic><topic>Brittleness</topic><topic>carbon</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>Carbon cycle (Biogeochemistry)</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Carbon sinks</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Climatic changes</topic><topic>Cold</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decoupling</topic><topic>ecosystem respiration</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Forests and forestry</topic><topic>global carbon budget</topic><topic>gross primary productivity</topic><topic>Least squares method</topic><topic>net ecosystem production</topic><topic>path analysis</topic><topic>photosynthesis</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Short wave radiation</topic><topic>shortwave radiation</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Spring (season)</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Temperate forests</topic><topic>temperate zones</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Vapor pressure</topic><topic>vapor pressure deficit</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Mihang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xinjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Liangyun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Forests</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jiang, Mihang</au><au>Liu, Xinjie</au><au>Liu, Liangyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Different Responses of Terrestrial Carbon Fluxes to Environmental Changes in Cold Temperate Forest Ecosystems</atitle><jtitle>Forests</jtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1340</spage><pages>1340-</pages><issn>1999-4907</issn><eissn>1999-4907</eissn><abstract>As the largest carbon reservoir within terrestrial ecosystems, forest ecosystems play a major role as carbon sinks in the global carbon cycle. There are still some uncertainties regarding the responses of different carbon fluxes to environmental changes in cold temperate climate forest ecosystems. Here, 14 cold temperate forest flux sites for at least ten years were investigated, including carbon fluxes and environmental variables such as temperature, precipitation, shortwave radiation, and vapor pressure deficit. By calculating the Spearman correlation coefficient, there was a congruence between photosynthetic productivity (i.e., gross primary productivity, GPP) and carbon sequestration (i.e., net ecosystem productivity, NEP) at thirteen forest sites, and at one forest site, GPP and NEP were decoupled. Annual GPP and NEP displayed a consistent trend when temperature and precipitation had significantly opposite trends and when temperature had a significantly positive correlation with VPD. But when VPD was significantly negatively correlated with both temperature and SW in spring and when temperature was negatively correlated with both SW and VPD in summer, a decoupling of GPP and NEP occurred. The impacts of various environmental factors on the annual carbon fluxes were calculated for each year and season using the path analysis method. At forest sites with consistent trends in GPP and NEP, annual, spring, and summer temperatures had significant positive correlations with GPP and ecosystem respiration (RE). While at the decoupled forest site, environmental factors had a stronger effect on RE, which then contributed to the observed decoupling of GPP and NEP. Finally, the Partial Least Squares method was used to analyze the relative contribution of each environmental factor to annual carbon fluxes. The results revealed that temperature and summer precipitation were the key environmental factors affecting forest ecosystems. This study provides important insights into the different responses of carbon fluxes in forest ecosystems undergoing environmental changes.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/f15081340</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7689-3031</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7987-037X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1999-4907
ispartof Forests, 2024-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1340
issn 1999-4907
1999-4907
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153781436
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Annual precipitation
Autumn
Brittleness
carbon
Carbon cycle
Carbon cycle (Biogeochemistry)
Carbon dioxide
Carbon sequestration
Carbon sinks
China
Climatic changes
Cold
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
Datasets
Decoupling
ecosystem respiration
Environmental aspects
Environmental changes
Environmental conditions
Environmental factors
Fluxes
Forecasts and trends
Forest ecosystems
Forests
Forests and forestry
global carbon budget
gross primary productivity
Least squares method
net ecosystem production
path analysis
photosynthesis
Precipitation
Productivity
Radiation
Respiration
Short wave radiation
shortwave radiation
Spring
Spring (season)
Statistical analysis
Summer
Temperate forests
temperate zones
Temperature
Terrestrial ecosystems
Time series
Trends
Vapor pressure
vapor pressure deficit
Variables
Vegetation
title Different Responses of Terrestrial Carbon Fluxes to Environmental Changes in Cold Temperate Forest Ecosystems
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T06%3A59%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different%20Responses%20of%20Terrestrial%20Carbon%20Fluxes%20to%20Environmental%20Changes%20in%20Cold%20Temperate%20Forest%20Ecosystems&rft.jtitle=Forests&rft.au=Jiang,%20Mihang&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1340&rft.pages=1340-&rft.issn=1999-4907&rft.eissn=1999-4907&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/f15081340&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA807417659%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-37f83e35aa890dca806ff7a6165e0347c122573a1b8dd67c26024aadd10822403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3097934424&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A807417659&rfr_iscdi=true