Loading…

Enhancing LC×LC separations through multi-task Bayesian optimization

Method development in comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC×LC) is a challenging process. The interdependencies between the two dimensions and the possibility of incorporating complex gradient profiles, such as multi-segmented gradients or shifting gradients, make trial-and-error m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Chromatography A 2024-07, Vol.1726, p.464941, Article 464941
Main Authors: Boelrijk, Jim, Molenaar, Stef R.A., Bos, Tijmen S., Dahlseid, Tina A., Ensing, Bernd, Stoll, Dwight R., Forré, Patrick, Pirok, Bob W.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3051-4f26c267a96126c32fb115e8b28aabb1c91ed970a4ef744558fcd83fe314b3003
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 464941
container_title Journal of Chromatography A
container_volume 1726
creator Boelrijk, Jim
Molenaar, Stef R.A.
Bos, Tijmen S.
Dahlseid, Tina A.
Ensing, Bernd
Stoll, Dwight R.
Forré, Patrick
Pirok, Bob W.J.
description Method development in comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC×LC) is a challenging process. The interdependencies between the two dimensions and the possibility of incorporating complex gradient profiles, such as multi-segmented gradients or shifting gradients, make trial-and-error method development time-consuming and highly dependent on user experience. Retention modeling and Bayesian optimization (BO) have been proposed as solutions to mitigate these issues. However, both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses. On the one hand, retention modeling, which approximates true retention behavior, depends on effective peak tracking and accurate retention time and width predictions, which are increasingly challenging for complex samples and advanced gradient assemblies. On the other hand, Bayesian optimization may require many experiments when dealing with many adjustable parameters, as in LC×LC. Therefore, in this work, we investigate the use of multi-task Bayesian optimization (MTBO), a method that can combine information from both retention modeling and experimental measurements. The algorithm was first tested and compared with BO using a synthetic retention modeling test case, where it was shown that MTBO finds better optima with fewer method-development iterations than conventional BO. Next, the algorithm was tested on the optimization of a method for a pesticide sample and we found that the algorithm was able to improve upon the initial scanning experiments. Multi-task Bayesian optimization is a promising technique in situations where modeling retention is challenging, and the high number of adjustable parameters and/or limited optimization budget makes traditional Bayesian optimization impractical. •A multi-task Bayesian optimization algorithm was developed to optimize LC×LC methods.•It uses both retention modeling and experimental data to guide the optimization.•The performance of multi-task and single-task Bayesian optimization was compared.•The separation of a complex pesticide sample was improved within a few iterations.•The algorithm can run unsupervised in a fully automated closed-loop environment.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chroma.2024.464941
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153784013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021967324003157</els_id><sourcerecordid>3153784013</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3051-4f26c267a96126c32fb115e8b28aabb1c91ed970a4ef744558fcd83fe314b3003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLlOxDAURV2AxLD8AUVKmgQ_29kaJIiGRYpEA7XlOC8zHrJhO0jDj_BB_BgZQk31bnHvkd4h5BJoBBSS612kt3boVMQoE5FIRC7giKwoZRDmScpPyKlzO0ohpSlbkfW636pem34TlMX3V1kEDkdllTdD7wI_o6bNNuim1pvQK_cW3Kk9OqP6YBi96cznb_OcHDeqdXjxd8_I6_36pXgMy-eHp-K2DDWnMYSiYYlmSaryBObEWVMBxJhVLFOqqkDngHWeUiWwSYWI46zRdcYb5CAqTik_I1cLd7TD-4TOy844jW2rehwmJznEPM0EBT5XxVLVdnDOYiNHazpl9xKoPJiSO7mYkgdTcjE1z26WGc5vfBi00mmDvcbaWNRe1oP5H_ADWzN2BQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3153784013</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing LC×LC separations through multi-task Bayesian optimization</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Boelrijk, Jim ; Molenaar, Stef R.A. ; Bos, Tijmen S. ; Dahlseid, Tina A. ; Ensing, Bernd ; Stoll, Dwight R. ; Forré, Patrick ; Pirok, Bob W.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boelrijk, Jim ; Molenaar, Stef R.A. ; Bos, Tijmen S. ; Dahlseid, Tina A. ; Ensing, Bernd ; Stoll, Dwight R. ; Forré, Patrick ; Pirok, Bob W.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Method development in comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC×LC) is a challenging process. The interdependencies between the two dimensions and the possibility of incorporating complex gradient profiles, such as multi-segmented gradients or shifting gradients, make trial-and-error method development time-consuming and highly dependent on user experience. Retention modeling and Bayesian optimization (BO) have been proposed as solutions to mitigate these issues. However, both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses. On the one hand, retention modeling, which approximates true retention behavior, depends on effective peak tracking and accurate retention time and width predictions, which are increasingly challenging for complex samples and advanced gradient assemblies. On the other hand, Bayesian optimization may require many experiments when dealing with many adjustable parameters, as in LC×LC. Therefore, in this work, we investigate the use of multi-task Bayesian optimization (MTBO), a method that can combine information from both retention modeling and experimental measurements. The algorithm was first tested and compared with BO using a synthetic retention modeling test case, where it was shown that MTBO finds better optima with fewer method-development iterations than conventional BO. Next, the algorithm was tested on the optimization of a method for a pesticide sample and we found that the algorithm was able to improve upon the initial scanning experiments. Multi-task Bayesian optimization is a promising technique in situations where modeling retention is challenging, and the high number of adjustable parameters and/or limited optimization budget makes traditional Bayesian optimization impractical. •A multi-task Bayesian optimization algorithm was developed to optimize LC×LC methods.•It uses both retention modeling and experimental data to guide the optimization.•The performance of multi-task and single-task Bayesian optimization was compared.•The separation of a complex pesticide sample was improved within a few iterations.•The algorithm can run unsupervised in a fully automated closed-loop environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2024.464941</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>2D-LC ; algorithms ; Bayesian optimization ; Bayesian theory ; Closed-loop method development ; comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography ; Machine learning ; pesticides ; Shifting gradients</subject><ispartof>Journal of Chromatography A, 2024-07, Vol.1726, p.464941, Article 464941</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3051-4f26c267a96126c32fb115e8b28aabb1c91ed970a4ef744558fcd83fe314b3003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4558-3778 ; 0000-0003-3922-6616 ; 0000-0001-8385-5706 ; 0000-0003-4663-3842 ; 0000-0002-0728-6385 ; 0000-0002-4142-7233 ; 0000-0002-4070-9132</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boelrijk, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molenaar, Stef R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bos, Tijmen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlseid, Tina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ensing, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoll, Dwight R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forré, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirok, Bob W.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing LC×LC separations through multi-task Bayesian optimization</title><title>Journal of Chromatography A</title><description>Method development in comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC×LC) is a challenging process. The interdependencies between the two dimensions and the possibility of incorporating complex gradient profiles, such as multi-segmented gradients or shifting gradients, make trial-and-error method development time-consuming and highly dependent on user experience. Retention modeling and Bayesian optimization (BO) have been proposed as solutions to mitigate these issues. However, both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses. On the one hand, retention modeling, which approximates true retention behavior, depends on effective peak tracking and accurate retention time and width predictions, which are increasingly challenging for complex samples and advanced gradient assemblies. On the other hand, Bayesian optimization may require many experiments when dealing with many adjustable parameters, as in LC×LC. Therefore, in this work, we investigate the use of multi-task Bayesian optimization (MTBO), a method that can combine information from both retention modeling and experimental measurements. The algorithm was first tested and compared with BO using a synthetic retention modeling test case, where it was shown that MTBO finds better optima with fewer method-development iterations than conventional BO. Next, the algorithm was tested on the optimization of a method for a pesticide sample and we found that the algorithm was able to improve upon the initial scanning experiments. Multi-task Bayesian optimization is a promising technique in situations where modeling retention is challenging, and the high number of adjustable parameters and/or limited optimization budget makes traditional Bayesian optimization impractical. •A multi-task Bayesian optimization algorithm was developed to optimize LC×LC methods.•It uses both retention modeling and experimental data to guide the optimization.•The performance of multi-task and single-task Bayesian optimization was compared.•The separation of a complex pesticide sample was improved within a few iterations.•The algorithm can run unsupervised in a fully automated closed-loop environment.</description><subject>2D-LC</subject><subject>algorithms</subject><subject>Bayesian optimization</subject><subject>Bayesian theory</subject><subject>Closed-loop method development</subject><subject>comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>pesticides</subject><subject>Shifting gradients</subject><issn>0021-9673</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLlOxDAURV2AxLD8AUVKmgQ_29kaJIiGRYpEA7XlOC8zHrJhO0jDj_BB_BgZQk31bnHvkd4h5BJoBBSS612kt3boVMQoE5FIRC7giKwoZRDmScpPyKlzO0ohpSlbkfW636pem34TlMX3V1kEDkdllTdD7wI_o6bNNuim1pvQK_cW3Kk9OqP6YBi96cznb_OcHDeqdXjxd8_I6_36pXgMy-eHp-K2DDWnMYSiYYlmSaryBObEWVMBxJhVLFOqqkDngHWeUiWwSYWI46zRdcYb5CAqTik_I1cLd7TD-4TOy844jW2rehwmJznEPM0EBT5XxVLVdnDOYiNHazpl9xKoPJiSO7mYkgdTcjE1z26WGc5vfBi00mmDvcbaWNRe1oP5H_ADWzN2BQ</recordid><startdate>20240705</startdate><enddate>20240705</enddate><creator>Boelrijk, Jim</creator><creator>Molenaar, Stef R.A.</creator><creator>Bos, Tijmen S.</creator><creator>Dahlseid, Tina A.</creator><creator>Ensing, Bernd</creator><creator>Stoll, Dwight R.</creator><creator>Forré, Patrick</creator><creator>Pirok, Bob W.J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4558-3778</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3922-6616</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8385-5706</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4663-3842</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0728-6385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-7233</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4070-9132</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240705</creationdate><title>Enhancing LC×LC separations through multi-task Bayesian optimization</title><author>Boelrijk, Jim ; Molenaar, Stef R.A. ; Bos, Tijmen S. ; Dahlseid, Tina A. ; Ensing, Bernd ; Stoll, Dwight R. ; Forré, Patrick ; Pirok, Bob W.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3051-4f26c267a96126c32fb115e8b28aabb1c91ed970a4ef744558fcd83fe314b3003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>2D-LC</topic><topic>algorithms</topic><topic>Bayesian optimization</topic><topic>Bayesian theory</topic><topic>Closed-loop method development</topic><topic>comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>pesticides</topic><topic>Shifting gradients</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boelrijk, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molenaar, Stef R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bos, Tijmen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlseid, Tina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ensing, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoll, Dwight R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forré, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirok, Bob W.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Chromatography A</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boelrijk, Jim</au><au>Molenaar, Stef R.A.</au><au>Bos, Tijmen S.</au><au>Dahlseid, Tina A.</au><au>Ensing, Bernd</au><au>Stoll, Dwight R.</au><au>Forré, Patrick</au><au>Pirok, Bob W.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancing LC×LC separations through multi-task Bayesian optimization</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Chromatography A</jtitle><date>2024-07-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>1726</volume><spage>464941</spage><pages>464941-</pages><artnum>464941</artnum><issn>0021-9673</issn><abstract>Method development in comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC×LC) is a challenging process. The interdependencies between the two dimensions and the possibility of incorporating complex gradient profiles, such as multi-segmented gradients or shifting gradients, make trial-and-error method development time-consuming and highly dependent on user experience. Retention modeling and Bayesian optimization (BO) have been proposed as solutions to mitigate these issues. However, both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses. On the one hand, retention modeling, which approximates true retention behavior, depends on effective peak tracking and accurate retention time and width predictions, which are increasingly challenging for complex samples and advanced gradient assemblies. On the other hand, Bayesian optimization may require many experiments when dealing with many adjustable parameters, as in LC×LC. Therefore, in this work, we investigate the use of multi-task Bayesian optimization (MTBO), a method that can combine information from both retention modeling and experimental measurements. The algorithm was first tested and compared with BO using a synthetic retention modeling test case, where it was shown that MTBO finds better optima with fewer method-development iterations than conventional BO. Next, the algorithm was tested on the optimization of a method for a pesticide sample and we found that the algorithm was able to improve upon the initial scanning experiments. Multi-task Bayesian optimization is a promising technique in situations where modeling retention is challenging, and the high number of adjustable parameters and/or limited optimization budget makes traditional Bayesian optimization impractical. •A multi-task Bayesian optimization algorithm was developed to optimize LC×LC methods.•It uses both retention modeling and experimental data to guide the optimization.•The performance of multi-task and single-task Bayesian optimization was compared.•The separation of a complex pesticide sample was improved within a few iterations.•The algorithm can run unsupervised in a fully automated closed-loop environment.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.chroma.2024.464941</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4558-3778</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3922-6616</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8385-5706</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4663-3842</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0728-6385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-7233</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4070-9132</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9673
ispartof Journal of Chromatography A, 2024-07, Vol.1726, p.464941, Article 464941
issn 0021-9673
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153784013
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects 2D-LC
algorithms
Bayesian optimization
Bayesian theory
Closed-loop method development
comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography
Machine learning
pesticides
Shifting gradients
title Enhancing LC×LC separations through multi-task Bayesian optimization
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T09%3A55%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20LC%C3%97LC%20separations%20through%20multi-task%20Bayesian%20optimization&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Chromatography%20A&rft.au=Boelrijk,%20Jim&rft.date=2024-07-05&rft.volume=1726&rft.spage=464941&rft.pages=464941-&rft.artnum=464941&rft.issn=0021-9673&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chroma.2024.464941&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153784013%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3051-4f26c267a96126c32fb115e8b28aabb1c91ed970a4ef744558fcd83fe314b3003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3153784013&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true