Loading…

A comparative study of yield components and their trade-off in oilseed crops (Brassica napus L. and Brassica carinata A. Braun)

Canola (Brassica napus L.) and carinata (Brassica carinata A. Braun) are two oilseed crops that have seen a surge in demand in recent years. However, current yields achieved by farmers are inconsistent and significantly lower than those achieved in research experiments. Therefore, a better understan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of agronomy 2024-11, Vol.161, p.127377, Article 127377
Main Authors: Verocai, Maximiliano, González-Barrios, Pablo, Mazzilli, Sebastián R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c212t-83602242e80334460ade8875387f87f12483e0f2624fc6db1daf87d6725c88ea3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 127377
container_title European journal of agronomy
container_volume 161
creator Verocai, Maximiliano
González-Barrios, Pablo
Mazzilli, Sebastián R.
description Canola (Brassica napus L.) and carinata (Brassica carinata A. Braun) are two oilseed crops that have seen a surge in demand in recent years. However, current yields achieved by farmers are inconsistent and significantly lower than those achieved in research experiments. Therefore, a better understanding of the trade-off between yield components is crucial to help breeders develop new high-yielding cultivars and for farmers to manage their crops more effectively. Unfortunately, scientific literature focused on trade-offs between yield components in rapeseed is scarce for canola and lacking for carinata. To address this issue, we conducted field experiments in Uruguay over three consecutive seasons (2016–2018) using the cultivars “Rivette” and “Avanza 641” for canola and carinata, respectively. Our goal was to study yield compensation and determine the comparative performance of canola and carinata across a wide range of sowing dates. Our results showed that carinata yields ranged from 854 kg ha−1 to 7283 kg ha−1, while canola yields ranged from 1152 kg ha−1 to 4489 kg ha−1. Higher biomass production was linked to increased yields in carinata, while an increase in biomass did not necessarily result in higher yields in canola due to a harvest index reduction. Carinata yield was positively correlated with grain number, silique number, and grains per silique. In canola, moderate to large yield changes were primarily influenced by grain number and grain weight, as silique number had a negative trade-off with yield, while grains per silique had a neutral relationship with yield. Our study revealed a distinct yield building process in canola and carinata, despite the general belief that they share physiological similarities and can be managed alike. These findings enhance our understanding of crop knowledge and management, potentially leading to increased crop productivity, and generate more effective breeding programs. Enhancing the yield performance of canola and carinata will position them as economically profitable crops, allowing for greater crop diversification and meeting the growing global demand for biofuels. •Trade-offs between yield components were studied in canola and carinata.•Carinata out-yields canola, particularly at early sowing dates.•Yield components show varied trade-offs in canola and carinata.•In carinata, biomass-HI trade-off favors higher biomass, increasing grain yield.•Canola grain yield can be enhanced through increased grain weight.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eja.2024.127377
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153814066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1161030124002983</els_id><sourcerecordid>3153814066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c212t-83602242e80334460ade8875387f87f12483e0f2624fc6db1daf87d6725c88ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEUzEHB-vEDvOVYD7vmY5sNeKrFLyh40XOIyVvMsk3WJFvoyb9u2opH4cGDeTPDm0HompKaEipu-xp6XTPCmpqylrftCZpRKmhFOKFn6DylnhAi2aKZoe8lNmEz6qiz2wJOebI7HDq8czDYwyl48Dlh7S3On-AizlFbqELXYedxcEMCKMwYxoTn91Gn5IzGXo9Twuv6oPtDjY7O66zxst6Dk7-5RKedLhZXv_sCvT8-vK2eq_Xr08tqua4MoyxXkgvCWMNAEs6bRpDygpTtgsu2K0NZIzmQjgnWdEbYD2p1wa1o2cJICZpfoPnRd4zha4KU1cYlA8OgPYQpKU6LF22IEIVKj9SSKaUInRqj2-i4U5SofcGqV6VgtS9YHQsumrujBkqGrYOoknHgDVgXwWRlg_tH_QO9HoRf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3153814066</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative study of yield components and their trade-off in oilseed crops (Brassica napus L. and Brassica carinata A. Braun)</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Verocai, Maximiliano ; González-Barrios, Pablo ; Mazzilli, Sebastián R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Verocai, Maximiliano ; González-Barrios, Pablo ; Mazzilli, Sebastián R.</creatorcontrib><description>Canola (Brassica napus L.) and carinata (Brassica carinata A. Braun) are two oilseed crops that have seen a surge in demand in recent years. However, current yields achieved by farmers are inconsistent and significantly lower than those achieved in research experiments. Therefore, a better understanding of the trade-off between yield components is crucial to help breeders develop new high-yielding cultivars and for farmers to manage their crops more effectively. Unfortunately, scientific literature focused on trade-offs between yield components in rapeseed is scarce for canola and lacking for carinata. To address this issue, we conducted field experiments in Uruguay over three consecutive seasons (2016–2018) using the cultivars “Rivette” and “Avanza 641” for canola and carinata, respectively. Our goal was to study yield compensation and determine the comparative performance of canola and carinata across a wide range of sowing dates. Our results showed that carinata yields ranged from 854 kg ha−1 to 7283 kg ha−1, while canola yields ranged from 1152 kg ha−1 to 4489 kg ha−1. Higher biomass production was linked to increased yields in carinata, while an increase in biomass did not necessarily result in higher yields in canola due to a harvest index reduction. Carinata yield was positively correlated with grain number, silique number, and grains per silique. In canola, moderate to large yield changes were primarily influenced by grain number and grain weight, as silique number had a negative trade-off with yield, while grains per silique had a neutral relationship with yield. Our study revealed a distinct yield building process in canola and carinata, despite the general belief that they share physiological similarities and can be managed alike. These findings enhance our understanding of crop knowledge and management, potentially leading to increased crop productivity, and generate more effective breeding programs. Enhancing the yield performance of canola and carinata will position them as economically profitable crops, allowing for greater crop diversification and meeting the growing global demand for biofuels. •Trade-offs between yield components were studied in canola and carinata.•Carinata out-yields canola, particularly at early sowing dates.•Yield components show varied trade-offs in canola and carinata.•In carinata, biomass-HI trade-off favors higher biomass, increasing grain yield.•Canola grain yield can be enhanced through increased grain weight.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1161-0301</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2024.127377</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>agronomy ; biofuels ; biomass production ; Brassica carinata ; Brassica napus ; Breeding ; canola ; comparative study ; crop diversification ; Ecophysiology ; Harvest Index ; high-yielding varieties ; Numerical yield components ; Rapeseed ; siliques ; Uruguay</subject><ispartof>European journal of agronomy, 2024-11, Vol.161, p.127377, Article 127377</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c212t-83602242e80334460ade8875387f87f12483e0f2624fc6db1daf87d6725c88ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Verocai, Maximiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Barrios, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzilli, Sebastián R.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study of yield components and their trade-off in oilseed crops (Brassica napus L. and Brassica carinata A. Braun)</title><title>European journal of agronomy</title><description>Canola (Brassica napus L.) and carinata (Brassica carinata A. Braun) are two oilseed crops that have seen a surge in demand in recent years. However, current yields achieved by farmers are inconsistent and significantly lower than those achieved in research experiments. Therefore, a better understanding of the trade-off between yield components is crucial to help breeders develop new high-yielding cultivars and for farmers to manage their crops more effectively. Unfortunately, scientific literature focused on trade-offs between yield components in rapeseed is scarce for canola and lacking for carinata. To address this issue, we conducted field experiments in Uruguay over three consecutive seasons (2016–2018) using the cultivars “Rivette” and “Avanza 641” for canola and carinata, respectively. Our goal was to study yield compensation and determine the comparative performance of canola and carinata across a wide range of sowing dates. Our results showed that carinata yields ranged from 854 kg ha−1 to 7283 kg ha−1, while canola yields ranged from 1152 kg ha−1 to 4489 kg ha−1. Higher biomass production was linked to increased yields in carinata, while an increase in biomass did not necessarily result in higher yields in canola due to a harvest index reduction. Carinata yield was positively correlated with grain number, silique number, and grains per silique. In canola, moderate to large yield changes were primarily influenced by grain number and grain weight, as silique number had a negative trade-off with yield, while grains per silique had a neutral relationship with yield. Our study revealed a distinct yield building process in canola and carinata, despite the general belief that they share physiological similarities and can be managed alike. These findings enhance our understanding of crop knowledge and management, potentially leading to increased crop productivity, and generate more effective breeding programs. Enhancing the yield performance of canola and carinata will position them as economically profitable crops, allowing for greater crop diversification and meeting the growing global demand for biofuels. •Trade-offs between yield components were studied in canola and carinata.•Carinata out-yields canola, particularly at early sowing dates.•Yield components show varied trade-offs in canola and carinata.•In carinata, biomass-HI trade-off favors higher biomass, increasing grain yield.•Canola grain yield can be enhanced through increased grain weight.</description><subject>agronomy</subject><subject>biofuels</subject><subject>biomass production</subject><subject>Brassica carinata</subject><subject>Brassica napus</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>canola</subject><subject>comparative study</subject><subject>crop diversification</subject><subject>Ecophysiology</subject><subject>Harvest Index</subject><subject>high-yielding varieties</subject><subject>Numerical yield components</subject><subject>Rapeseed</subject><subject>siliques</subject><subject>Uruguay</subject><issn>1161-0301</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEUzEHB-vEDvOVYD7vmY5sNeKrFLyh40XOIyVvMsk3WJFvoyb9u2opH4cGDeTPDm0HompKaEipu-xp6XTPCmpqylrftCZpRKmhFOKFn6DylnhAi2aKZoe8lNmEz6qiz2wJOebI7HDq8czDYwyl48Dlh7S3On-AizlFbqELXYedxcEMCKMwYxoTn91Gn5IzGXo9Twuv6oPtDjY7O66zxst6Dk7-5RKedLhZXv_sCvT8-vK2eq_Xr08tqua4MoyxXkgvCWMNAEs6bRpDygpTtgsu2K0NZIzmQjgnWdEbYD2p1wa1o2cJICZpfoPnRd4zha4KU1cYlA8OgPYQpKU6LF22IEIVKj9SSKaUInRqj2-i4U5SofcGqV6VgtS9YHQsumrujBkqGrYOoknHgDVgXwWRlg_tH_QO9HoRf</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Verocai, Maximiliano</creator><creator>González-Barrios, Pablo</creator><creator>Mazzilli, Sebastián R.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>A comparative study of yield components and their trade-off in oilseed crops (Brassica napus L. and Brassica carinata A. Braun)</title><author>Verocai, Maximiliano ; González-Barrios, Pablo ; Mazzilli, Sebastián R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c212t-83602242e80334460ade8875387f87f12483e0f2624fc6db1daf87d6725c88ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>agronomy</topic><topic>biofuels</topic><topic>biomass production</topic><topic>Brassica carinata</topic><topic>Brassica napus</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>canola</topic><topic>comparative study</topic><topic>crop diversification</topic><topic>Ecophysiology</topic><topic>Harvest Index</topic><topic>high-yielding varieties</topic><topic>Numerical yield components</topic><topic>Rapeseed</topic><topic>siliques</topic><topic>Uruguay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Verocai, Maximiliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Barrios, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzilli, Sebastián R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of agronomy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Verocai, Maximiliano</au><au>González-Barrios, Pablo</au><au>Mazzilli, Sebastián R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative study of yield components and their trade-off in oilseed crops (Brassica napus L. and Brassica carinata A. Braun)</atitle><jtitle>European journal of agronomy</jtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>161</volume><spage>127377</spage><pages>127377-</pages><artnum>127377</artnum><issn>1161-0301</issn><abstract>Canola (Brassica napus L.) and carinata (Brassica carinata A. Braun) are two oilseed crops that have seen a surge in demand in recent years. However, current yields achieved by farmers are inconsistent and significantly lower than those achieved in research experiments. Therefore, a better understanding of the trade-off between yield components is crucial to help breeders develop new high-yielding cultivars and for farmers to manage their crops more effectively. Unfortunately, scientific literature focused on trade-offs between yield components in rapeseed is scarce for canola and lacking for carinata. To address this issue, we conducted field experiments in Uruguay over three consecutive seasons (2016–2018) using the cultivars “Rivette” and “Avanza 641” for canola and carinata, respectively. Our goal was to study yield compensation and determine the comparative performance of canola and carinata across a wide range of sowing dates. Our results showed that carinata yields ranged from 854 kg ha−1 to 7283 kg ha−1, while canola yields ranged from 1152 kg ha−1 to 4489 kg ha−1. Higher biomass production was linked to increased yields in carinata, while an increase in biomass did not necessarily result in higher yields in canola due to a harvest index reduction. Carinata yield was positively correlated with grain number, silique number, and grains per silique. In canola, moderate to large yield changes were primarily influenced by grain number and grain weight, as silique number had a negative trade-off with yield, while grains per silique had a neutral relationship with yield. Our study revealed a distinct yield building process in canola and carinata, despite the general belief that they share physiological similarities and can be managed alike. These findings enhance our understanding of crop knowledge and management, potentially leading to increased crop productivity, and generate more effective breeding programs. Enhancing the yield performance of canola and carinata will position them as economically profitable crops, allowing for greater crop diversification and meeting the growing global demand for biofuels. •Trade-offs between yield components were studied in canola and carinata.•Carinata out-yields canola, particularly at early sowing dates.•Yield components show varied trade-offs in canola and carinata.•In carinata, biomass-HI trade-off favors higher biomass, increasing grain yield.•Canola grain yield can be enhanced through increased grain weight.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.eja.2024.127377</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1161-0301
ispartof European journal of agronomy, 2024-11, Vol.161, p.127377, Article 127377
issn 1161-0301
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3153814066
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects agronomy
biofuels
biomass production
Brassica carinata
Brassica napus
Breeding
canola
comparative study
crop diversification
Ecophysiology
Harvest Index
high-yielding varieties
Numerical yield components
Rapeseed
siliques
Uruguay
title A comparative study of yield components and their trade-off in oilseed crops (Brassica napus L. and Brassica carinata A. Braun)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T16%3A38%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20of%20yield%20components%20and%20their%20trade-off%20in%20oilseed%20crops%20(Brassica%20napus%20L.%20and%20Brassica%20carinata%20A.%20Braun)&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20agronomy&rft.au=Verocai,%20Maximiliano&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=161&rft.spage=127377&rft.pages=127377-&rft.artnum=127377&rft.issn=1161-0301&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eja.2024.127377&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153814066%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c212t-83602242e80334460ade8875387f87f12483e0f2624fc6db1daf87d6725c88ea3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3153814066&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true