Loading…
No synergistic effect of extracellular cryoprotectants with dimethyl sulfoxide in the conservation of northern tiger cat fibroblasts
The success of somatic cell cryobanks is dependent on establishing reproducible cryopreservation methodologies. We supposed that associated extracellular cryoprotectants (sucrose and L-proline) with 2.5 or 10 % dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO) could guarantee better northern tiger cat cells quality rates...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cryobiology 2025-03, Vol.118, p.105169, Article 105169 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The success of somatic cell cryobanks is dependent on establishing reproducible cryopreservation methodologies. We supposed that associated extracellular cryoprotectants (sucrose and L-proline) with 2.5 or 10 % dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO) could guarantee better northern tiger cat cells quality rates after thawing when compared to Me2SO alone. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of sucrose or L-proline with 2.5 or 10 % Me2SO on the cryopreservation of northern tiger cat fibroblasts. Somatic cells were also cryopreserved with 2.5 % or 10 % Me2SO alone. All cells were analyzed for morphology, membrane integrity, proliferative activity, metabolism, apoptosis classification, reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, and mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm). Regardless of the cryoprotective solution, cryopreservation did not affect morphology, membrane integrity after culture, proliferative activity, and metabolism (P > 0.05). However, immediately after thawing, 2.5 % Me2SO with L-proline and 10 % Me2SO promoted higher rates of membrane integrity when compared to the other cryopreserved groups (P 0.05). However, the percentage of viable cells evaluated by apoptosis classification was reduced when using 10 % Me2SO with L-proline compared to non-cryopreserved groups (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0011-2240 1090-2392 1090-2392 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2024.105169 |