Vacuum Strength of Two Candidate Glasses for a Space Observatory

The strengths of two‐candidate glass types for use in a space observatory were measured. Samples of ultra‐low expansion glass (ULE) and borosilicate (Pyrex) were tested in air and in vacuum at room temperature (20°C) and in vacuum after being heated to 200°C. Both glasses tested in vacuum showed a s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Ceramic Society 2007-10, Vol.90 (10), p.3318-3319
Main Authors: Manning, Timothy Andrew, Tucker, Dennis S., Herren, Kenneth A., Gregory, Don A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Applied sciences
Borosilicate
Building materials. Ceramics. Glasses
Ceramics
Chemical industry and chemicals
Exact sciences and technology
Glass
Glasses
Heating
Observatories
Samples
Silica
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Strength
Structure, analysis, properties
Temperature
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5902-ca033c9b5ecc8d4ae98a9194e9fd6fdedd5bf7171e951192e42587eb93efe0d93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5902-ca033c9b5ecc8d4ae98a9194e9fd6fdedd5bf7171e951192e42587eb93efe0d93
container_end_page 3319
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3318
container_title Journal of the American Ceramic Society
container_volume 90
creator Manning, Timothy Andrew
Tucker, Dennis S.
Herren, Kenneth A.
Gregory, Don A.
description The strengths of two‐candidate glass types for use in a space observatory were measured. Samples of ultra‐low expansion glass (ULE) and borosilicate (Pyrex) were tested in air and in vacuum at room temperature (20°C) and in vacuum after being heated to 200°C. Both glasses tested in vacuum showed a significant increase in strength over those tested in air. However, there was no statistical difference between the strength of samples tested in vacuum at room temperature and those tested in vacuum after heating to 200°C.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01872.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_31915616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1341257581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5902-ca033c9b5ecc8d4ae98a9194e9fd6fdedd5bf7171e951192e42587eb93efe0d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EEkvLO1hIIC5JPU4c2ycoq3ZpVbWHliJxsbzOGLJkk8VO6O7b1-lWReKA8MW2_M038j-EUGA5pHW0ykEIyLiGKueMyZyBkjzfPiOzp4fnZMYY45lUnL0kr2JcpStoVc7Ix1vrxnFNr4eA3ffhB-09vbnr6dx2dVPbAemitTFipL4P1NLrjXVIr5YRw2879GF3SF5420Z8_bgfkC-nJzfzz9nF1eJsfnyROaFTa2dZUTi9FOicqkuLWlkNukTt68rXWNdi6SVIQC0ANMeSCyVxqQv0yGpdHJB3e-8m9L9GjINZN9Fh29oO-zGaAjSICqoEvv8nCEzxxKYsEvrmL3TVj6FL3zAcpAZVyamx2kMu9DEG9GYTmrUNu2Qy0wjMykxJmylpM43APIzAbFPp20e_jc62PtjONfFPvQZQqTRxH_bcXdPi7r_95vx4fvJwToZsb2jigNsngw0_TSULKczXy4W5Zd8-sXJRmNPiHnrHp2c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217918679</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vacuum Strength of Two Candidate Glasses for a Space Observatory</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Manning, Timothy Andrew ; Tucker, Dennis S. ; Herren, Kenneth A. ; Gregory, Don A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Manning, Timothy Andrew ; Tucker, Dennis S. ; Herren, Kenneth A. ; Gregory, Don A.</creatorcontrib><description>The strengths of two‐candidate glass types for use in a space observatory were measured. Samples of ultra‐low expansion glass (ULE) and borosilicate (Pyrex) were tested in air and in vacuum at room temperature (20°C) and in vacuum after being heated to 200°C. Both glasses tested in vacuum showed a significant increase in strength over those tested in air. However, there was no statistical difference between the strength of samples tested in vacuum at room temperature and those tested in vacuum after heating to 200°C.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-2916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01872.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACTAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Borosilicate ; Building materials. Ceramics. Glasses ; Ceramics ; Chemical industry and chemicals ; Exact sciences and technology ; Glass ; Glasses ; Heating ; Observatories ; Samples ; Silica ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Strength ; Structure, analysis, properties ; Temperature</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2007-10, Vol.90 (10), p.3318-3319</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Ceramic Society Oct 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5902-ca033c9b5ecc8d4ae98a9194e9fd6fdedd5bf7171e951192e42587eb93efe0d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5902-ca033c9b5ecc8d4ae98a9194e9fd6fdedd5bf7171e951192e42587eb93efe0d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19118155$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manning, Timothy Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Dennis S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herren, Kenneth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregory, Don A.</creatorcontrib><title>Vacuum Strength of Two Candidate Glasses for a Space Observatory</title><title>Journal of the American Ceramic Society</title><description>The strengths of two‐candidate glass types for use in a space observatory were measured. Samples of ultra‐low expansion glass (ULE) and borosilicate (Pyrex) were tested in air and in vacuum at room temperature (20°C) and in vacuum after being heated to 200°C. Both glasses tested in vacuum showed a significant increase in strength over those tested in air. However, there was no statistical difference between the strength of samples tested in vacuum at room temperature and those tested in vacuum after heating to 200°C.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Borosilicate</subject><subject>Building materials. Ceramics. Glasses</subject><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>Chemical industry and chemicals</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Glass</subject><subject>Glasses</subject><subject>Heating</subject><subject>Observatories</subject><subject>Samples</subject><subject>Silica</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Strength</subject><subject>Structure, analysis, properties</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><issn>0002-7820</issn><issn>1551-2916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhi0EEkvLO1hIIC5JPU4c2ycoq3ZpVbWHliJxsbzOGLJkk8VO6O7b1-lWReKA8MW2_M038j-EUGA5pHW0ykEIyLiGKueMyZyBkjzfPiOzp4fnZMYY45lUnL0kr2JcpStoVc7Ix1vrxnFNr4eA3ffhB-09vbnr6dx2dVPbAemitTFipL4P1NLrjXVIr5YRw2879GF3SF5420Z8_bgfkC-nJzfzz9nF1eJsfnyROaFTa2dZUTi9FOicqkuLWlkNukTt68rXWNdi6SVIQC0ANMeSCyVxqQv0yGpdHJB3e-8m9L9GjINZN9Fh29oO-zGaAjSICqoEvv8nCEzxxKYsEvrmL3TVj6FL3zAcpAZVyamx2kMu9DEG9GYTmrUNu2Qy0wjMykxJmylpM43APIzAbFPp20e_jc62PtjONfFPvQZQqTRxH_bcXdPi7r_95vx4fvJwToZsb2jigNsngw0_TSULKczXy4W5Zd8-sXJRmNPiHnrHp2c</recordid><startdate>200710</startdate><enddate>200710</enddate><creator>Manning, Timothy Andrew</creator><creator>Tucker, Dennis S.</creator><creator>Herren, Kenneth A.</creator><creator>Gregory, Don A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200710</creationdate><title>Vacuum Strength of Two Candidate Glasses for a Space Observatory</title><author>Manning, Timothy Andrew ; Tucker, Dennis S. ; Herren, Kenneth A. ; Gregory, Don A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5902-ca033c9b5ecc8d4ae98a9194e9fd6fdedd5bf7171e951192e42587eb93efe0d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Borosilicate</topic><topic>Building materials. Ceramics. Glasses</topic><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>Chemical industry and chemicals</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Glass</topic><topic>Glasses</topic><topic>Heating</topic><topic>Observatories</topic><topic>Samples</topic><topic>Silica</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Strength</topic><topic>Structure, analysis, properties</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manning, Timothy Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Dennis S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herren, Kenneth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregory, Don A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Ceramic Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manning, Timothy Andrew</au><au>Tucker, Dennis S.</au><au>Herren, Kenneth A.</au><au>Gregory, Don A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vacuum Strength of Two Candidate Glasses for a Space Observatory</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Ceramic Society</jtitle><date>2007-10</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3318</spage><epage>3319</epage><pages>3318-3319</pages><issn>0002-7820</issn><eissn>1551-2916</eissn><coden>JACTAW</coden><abstract>The strengths of two‐candidate glass types for use in a space observatory were measured. Samples of ultra‐low expansion glass (ULE) and borosilicate (Pyrex) were tested in air and in vacuum at room temperature (20°C) and in vacuum after being heated to 200°C. Both glasses tested in vacuum showed a significant increase in strength over those tested in air. However, there was no statistical difference between the strength of samples tested in vacuum at room temperature and those tested in vacuum after heating to 200°C.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01872.x</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-7820
ispartof Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2007-10, Vol.90 (10), p.3318-3319
issn 0002-7820
1551-2916
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_31915616
source Wiley
subjects Applied sciences
Borosilicate
Building materials. Ceramics. Glasses
Ceramics
Chemical industry and chemicals
Exact sciences and technology
Glass
Glasses
Heating
Observatories
Samples
Silica
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Strength
Structure, analysis, properties
Temperature
title Vacuum Strength of Two Candidate Glasses for a Space Observatory
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T13%3A57%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vacuum%20Strength%20of%20Two%20Candidate%20Glasses%20for%20a%20Space%20Observatory&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Ceramic%20Society&rft.au=Manning,%20Timothy%20Andrew&rft.date=2007-10&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3318&rft.epage=3319&rft.pages=3318-3319&rft.issn=0002-7820&rft.eissn=1551-2916&rft.coden=JACTAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01872.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1341257581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5902-ca033c9b5ecc8d4ae98a9194e9fd6fdedd5bf7171e951192e42587eb93efe0d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217918679&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true