Loading…

Effect of mechanical and antiseptic therapy on peri-implant mucositis: an experimental study in monkeys

Objectives: This experiment was performed to evaluate clinically and histologically the effect of mechanical therapy with or without antiseptic therapy on peri‐implant mucositis lesions in nine cynomolgus monkeys. Material and methods: Two ITI titanium implants were inserted into each side of the ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical oral implants research 2006-06, Vol.17 (3), p.294-304
Main Authors: Trejo, Pedro M., Bonaventura, Gina, Weng, Ditmar, Caffesse, Raul G., Bragger, Urs, Lang, Niklaus P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives: This experiment was performed to evaluate clinically and histologically the effect of mechanical therapy with or without antiseptic therapy on peri‐implant mucositis lesions in nine cynomolgus monkeys. Material and methods: Two ITI titanium implants were inserted into each side of the mandibles. After 90 days of plaque control and soft tissue healing, a baseline clinical examination was completed. Peri‐implant lesions were induced by placing silk ligatures and allowing plaque to accumulate for 6 weeks. The clinical examination was then repeated, and the monkeys were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: group A, mechanical cleansing only; group B, mechanical cleansing and local irrigation with 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX) and application of 0.2% CHX gel; and group C, control, no treatment. The implants in treatment groups A and B were treated and maintained according to the assigned treatment for two additional months. At the end of the maintenance period, a final clinical examination was performed and the animals were sacrificed for biopsies. Results: The mean probing depths (PD) values at mucositis were: 3.5, 3.7, and 3.4 mm, and clinical attachment level (CAL)=3.8, 4.1, and 3.9 mm for treatment groups A, B and C, respectively. The corresponding values after treatment were: PD=1.7, 2.1, and 2.5 mm, and CAL=2.6, 2.6, and 3.1 mm. ANOVA of mean changes (Δ) in PD and CAL after treatment showed no statistical difference between the treatment groups. Comparison of the mean changes in PD and CAL after treatment yielded statistical differences between the control and treatment groups P
ISSN:0905-7161
1600-0501
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01226.x