Loading…

Employee-led development: another piece of left luggage?

The article explores the growth of EDAP-style employee led development (ELD) schemes in the 1990s and critically appraises the arguments offered in their support. The dominant claims for ELD sit with equal comfort in the discourse of trade unionists promoting "bargaining for skills", and m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Personnel review 2000-01, Vol.29 (4), p.509-520
Main Author: Hamblett, John
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-183e3f909666ccacce6627c7c543f0ff4cdf94855ffb70d230183bc2c42fbaa33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-183e3f909666ccacce6627c7c543f0ff4cdf94855ffb70d230183bc2c42fbaa33
container_end_page 520
container_issue 4
container_start_page 509
container_title Personnel review
container_volume 29
creator Hamblett, John
description The article explores the growth of EDAP-style employee led development (ELD) schemes in the 1990s and critically appraises the arguments offered in their support. The dominant claims for ELD sit with equal comfort in the discourse of trade unionists promoting "bargaining for skills", and managerialists promoting populist notions of the "learning company". However, the article draws on recent research which suggests that ELD is better understood as a marginal addition to the effort-reward bargain; a "fringe benefit", a "way of giving something back" in a period characterised by an intensification of effort, upheaval and uncertainty. Its contribution, therefore, to the emergence of sustainable human resource development is minimal - at least in conventional terms. Through the exposition of two case studies a reformulated argument is offered which seeks to place ELD in a framework of theory and practice which is both more durable and liberating. The article concludes that the ability to make and act upon an informed and rational interpretation of one's interests, as an individual, or as a member of a collective within the workplace, must surely be premised on the development of an ongoing educational process; a process toward which a reformulated notion of ELD may well contribute.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/00483480010296302
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_33296594</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>268307611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-183e3f909666ccacce6627c7c543f0ff4cdf94855ffb70d230183bc2c42fbaa33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9giBiYC59hxbBaEqvIhVWKB2XKdc2nl1CFOkPrvSShioCCmG-553tO9hJxSuKQU5BUAl4xLAAqZEgyyPTKiRS5ToRjbJ6Nhn_aAOCRHMa7gk89GRE6r2ocNYuqxTEp8Rx_qCtftdWLWoX3FJqmXaDEJLvHo2sR3i4VZ4M0xOXDGRzz5mmPycjd9njyks6f7x8ntLLWcQptSyZA5BUoIYa2xFoXIClvYnDMHznFbOsVlnjs3L6DMGPTG3GaWZ25uDGNjcr7NrZvw1mFsdbWMFr03awxd1Iz1_-aK_w-CUorBkHj2A1yFrln3T-iMckmB0SGNbiHbhBgbdLpulpVpNpqCHhrXO433zsXWwQob48tvZQfVdel6HH7H_77wAUUfjOo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214810314</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Employee-led development: another piece of left luggage?</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Hamblett, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamblett, John</creatorcontrib><description>The article explores the growth of EDAP-style employee led development (ELD) schemes in the 1990s and critically appraises the arguments offered in their support. The dominant claims for ELD sit with equal comfort in the discourse of trade unionists promoting "bargaining for skills", and managerialists promoting populist notions of the "learning company". However, the article draws on recent research which suggests that ELD is better understood as a marginal addition to the effort-reward bargain; a "fringe benefit", a "way of giving something back" in a period characterised by an intensification of effort, upheaval and uncertainty. Its contribution, therefore, to the emergence of sustainable human resource development is minimal - at least in conventional terms. Through the exposition of two case studies a reformulated argument is offered which seeks to place ELD in a framework of theory and practice which is both more durable and liberating. The article concludes that the ability to make and act upon an informed and rational interpretation of one's interests, as an individual, or as a member of a collective within the workplace, must surely be premised on the development of an ongoing educational process; a process toward which a reformulated notion of ELD may well contribute.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-3486</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6933</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/00483480010296302</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PRRVAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Farnborough: MCB UP Ltd</publisher><subject>Democracy ; Employee development ; Employees ; Human resources ; Industrial democracy ; Organizational learning ; Regulation</subject><ispartof>Personnel review, 2000-01, Vol.29 (4), p.509-520</ispartof><rights>MCB UP Limited</rights><rights>Copyright MCB UP Limited (MCB) 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-183e3f909666ccacce6627c7c543f0ff4cdf94855ffb70d230183bc2c42fbaa33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-183e3f909666ccacce6627c7c543f0ff4cdf94855ffb70d230183bc2c42fbaa33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/214810314/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/214810314?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,27901,27902,36037,36038,44339,74865</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamblett, John</creatorcontrib><title>Employee-led development: another piece of left luggage?</title><title>Personnel review</title><description>The article explores the growth of EDAP-style employee led development (ELD) schemes in the 1990s and critically appraises the arguments offered in their support. The dominant claims for ELD sit with equal comfort in the discourse of trade unionists promoting "bargaining for skills", and managerialists promoting populist notions of the "learning company". However, the article draws on recent research which suggests that ELD is better understood as a marginal addition to the effort-reward bargain; a "fringe benefit", a "way of giving something back" in a period characterised by an intensification of effort, upheaval and uncertainty. Its contribution, therefore, to the emergence of sustainable human resource development is minimal - at least in conventional terms. Through the exposition of two case studies a reformulated argument is offered which seeks to place ELD in a framework of theory and practice which is both more durable and liberating. The article concludes that the ability to make and act upon an informed and rational interpretation of one's interests, as an individual, or as a member of a collective within the workplace, must surely be premised on the development of an ongoing educational process; a process toward which a reformulated notion of ELD may well contribute.</description><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Employee development</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Human resources</subject><subject>Industrial democracy</subject><subject>Organizational learning</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><issn>0048-3486</issn><issn>1758-6933</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9giBiYC59hxbBaEqvIhVWKB2XKdc2nl1CFOkPrvSShioCCmG-553tO9hJxSuKQU5BUAl4xLAAqZEgyyPTKiRS5ToRjbJ6Nhn_aAOCRHMa7gk89GRE6r2ocNYuqxTEp8Rx_qCtftdWLWoX3FJqmXaDEJLvHo2sR3i4VZ4M0xOXDGRzz5mmPycjd9njyks6f7x8ntLLWcQptSyZA5BUoIYa2xFoXIClvYnDMHznFbOsVlnjs3L6DMGPTG3GaWZ25uDGNjcr7NrZvw1mFsdbWMFr03awxd1Iz1_-aK_w-CUorBkHj2A1yFrln3T-iMckmB0SGNbiHbhBgbdLpulpVpNpqCHhrXO433zsXWwQob48tvZQfVdel6HH7H_77wAUUfjOo</recordid><startdate>20000101</startdate><enddate>20000101</enddate><creator>Hamblett, John</creator><general>MCB UP Ltd</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000101</creationdate><title>Employee-led development: another piece of left luggage?</title><author>Hamblett, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-183e3f909666ccacce6627c7c543f0ff4cdf94855ffb70d230183bc2c42fbaa33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Employee development</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Human resources</topic><topic>Industrial democracy</topic><topic>Organizational learning</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamblett, John</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Personnel review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamblett, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Employee-led development: another piece of left luggage?</atitle><jtitle>Personnel review</jtitle><date>2000-01-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>509</spage><epage>520</epage><pages>509-520</pages><issn>0048-3486</issn><eissn>1758-6933</eissn><coden>PRRVAQ</coden><abstract>The article explores the growth of EDAP-style employee led development (ELD) schemes in the 1990s and critically appraises the arguments offered in their support. The dominant claims for ELD sit with equal comfort in the discourse of trade unionists promoting "bargaining for skills", and managerialists promoting populist notions of the "learning company". However, the article draws on recent research which suggests that ELD is better understood as a marginal addition to the effort-reward bargain; a "fringe benefit", a "way of giving something back" in a period characterised by an intensification of effort, upheaval and uncertainty. Its contribution, therefore, to the emergence of sustainable human resource development is minimal - at least in conventional terms. Through the exposition of two case studies a reformulated argument is offered which seeks to place ELD in a framework of theory and practice which is both more durable and liberating. The article concludes that the ability to make and act upon an informed and rational interpretation of one's interests, as an individual, or as a member of a collective within the workplace, must surely be premised on the development of an ongoing educational process; a process toward which a reformulated notion of ELD may well contribute.</abstract><cop>Farnborough</cop><pub>MCB UP Ltd</pub><doi>10.1108/00483480010296302</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-3486
ispartof Personnel review, 2000-01, Vol.29 (4), p.509-520
issn 0048-3486
1758-6933
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_33296594
source ABI/INFORM global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)
subjects Democracy
Employee development
Employees
Human resources
Industrial democracy
Organizational learning
Regulation
title Employee-led development: another piece of left luggage?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T08%3A47%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Employee-led%20development:%20another%20piece%20of%20left%20luggage?&rft.jtitle=Personnel%20review&rft.au=Hamblett,%20John&rft.date=2000-01-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=509&rft.epage=520&rft.pages=509-520&rft.issn=0048-3486&rft.eissn=1758-6933&rft.coden=PRRVAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/00483480010296302&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E268307611%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-183e3f909666ccacce6627c7c543f0ff4cdf94855ffb70d230183bc2c42fbaa33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214810314&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true