Loading…

Re‐thinking training needs analysis: A proposed framework for literature review

This paper reviews the literature on training needs analysis with the intention of organising conceptually the various approaches. It offers a way of going beyond simple descriptions to a quantitative approach. A simple yet comprehensive model is proposed which consists of four aspects focusing on f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Personnel review 1999-01, Vol.28 (1/2), p.77-90
Main Authors: Chiu, Warren, Thompson, David, Mak, Wai-ming, Lo, K L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-44b597c27cc9ff5e8ec717b8f4d1fdc48ccd7e8855cca505be5f50eba9ff64ec3
container_end_page 90
container_issue 1/2
container_start_page 77
container_title Personnel review
container_volume 28
creator Chiu, Warren
Thompson, David
Mak, Wai-ming
Lo, K L
description This paper reviews the literature on training needs analysis with the intention of organising conceptually the various approaches. It offers a way of going beyond simple descriptions to a quantitative approach. A simple yet comprehensive model is proposed which consists of four aspects focusing on four related questions: Who are the key initiators of the TNA studies? What are the levels of interest in the studies (i.e. organization, process, group and individual)? What methods of analysis are used? What is the intended outcome of the analysis? Based on these, four hypotheses are proposed. A literature search produced a total of 118 articles, of which 44 were randomly picked for detailed review. As expected, the literature was dominated by 'supply-led' players, i.e. trainers and academics, but with an unexpectedly strong emphasis on the 'demand-led' aspects of the organisation, especially its business results and growth.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/00483489910249009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_33485585</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>116360250</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-44b597c27cc9ff5e8ec717b8f4d1fdc48ccd7e8855cca505be5f50eba9ff64ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M9KAzEQBvAgCtbqA3grgt5Wk01md3KU4j8oCKLnkM1OdOt2tybbQ28-gs_ok5haT3rwNAPzY-D7GDsW_FwIjhecK5QKtRY8V5pzvcNGogTMCi3lLhtt7lkCxT47iHHOv30-YqcP9Pn-Mbw03WvTPU-GYJtus3REdZzYzrbr2MRDtudtG-noZ47Z0_XV4_Q2m93f3E0vZ5mTEodMqQp06fLSOe09EJIrRVmhV7XwtVPoXF0SIoBzFjhUBB44VTbpQpGTY3a2_bsM_duK4mAWTXTUtrajfhWNTAkAEP6HqYYiR53gyS8471chxYomFwo5pKoSElvkQh9jIG-WoVnYsDaCm0295k-98gsiJmz4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214805009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Re‐thinking training needs analysis: A proposed framework for literature review</title><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Chiu, Warren ; Thompson, David ; Mak, Wai-ming ; Lo, K L</creator><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Warren ; Thompson, David ; Mak, Wai-ming ; Lo, K L</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reviews the literature on training needs analysis with the intention of organising conceptually the various approaches. It offers a way of going beyond simple descriptions to a quantitative approach. A simple yet comprehensive model is proposed which consists of four aspects focusing on four related questions: Who are the key initiators of the TNA studies? What are the levels of interest in the studies (i.e. organization, process, group and individual)? What methods of analysis are used? What is the intended outcome of the analysis? Based on these, four hypotheses are proposed. A literature search produced a total of 118 articles, of which 44 were randomly picked for detailed review. As expected, the literature was dominated by 'supply-led' players, i.e. trainers and academics, but with an unexpectedly strong emphasis on the 'demand-led' aspects of the organisation, especially its business results and growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-3486</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6933</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/00483489910249009</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PRRVAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Farnborough: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Business process reengineering ; Hypotheses ; Information sources ; Literature reviews ; Management by objectives ; Needs analysis ; Questionnaires ; Self evaluation ; Studies ; Total quality ; Trainers ; Training</subject><ispartof>Personnel review, 1999-01, Vol.28 (1/2), p.77-90</ispartof><rights>Copyright MCB UP Limited (MCB) 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-44b597c27cc9ff5e8ec717b8f4d1fdc48ccd7e8855cca505be5f50eba9ff64ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Warren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mak, Wai-ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, K L</creatorcontrib><title>Re‐thinking training needs analysis: A proposed framework for literature review</title><title>Personnel review</title><description>This paper reviews the literature on training needs analysis with the intention of organising conceptually the various approaches. It offers a way of going beyond simple descriptions to a quantitative approach. A simple yet comprehensive model is proposed which consists of four aspects focusing on four related questions: Who are the key initiators of the TNA studies? What are the levels of interest in the studies (i.e. organization, process, group and individual)? What methods of analysis are used? What is the intended outcome of the analysis? Based on these, four hypotheses are proposed. A literature search produced a total of 118 articles, of which 44 were randomly picked for detailed review. As expected, the literature was dominated by 'supply-led' players, i.e. trainers and academics, but with an unexpectedly strong emphasis on the 'demand-led' aspects of the organisation, especially its business results and growth.</description><subject>Business process reengineering</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Management by objectives</subject><subject>Needs analysis</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Total quality</subject><subject>Trainers</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0048-3486</issn><issn>1758-6933</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0M9KAzEQBvAgCtbqA3grgt5Wk01md3KU4j8oCKLnkM1OdOt2tybbQ28-gs_ok5haT3rwNAPzY-D7GDsW_FwIjhecK5QKtRY8V5pzvcNGogTMCi3lLhtt7lkCxT47iHHOv30-YqcP9Pn-Mbw03WvTPU-GYJtus3REdZzYzrbr2MRDtudtG-noZ47Z0_XV4_Q2m93f3E0vZ5mTEodMqQp06fLSOe09EJIrRVmhV7XwtVPoXF0SIoBzFjhUBB44VTbpQpGTY3a2_bsM_duK4mAWTXTUtrajfhWNTAkAEP6HqYYiR53gyS8471chxYomFwo5pKoSElvkQh9jIG-WoVnYsDaCm0295k-98gsiJmz4</recordid><startdate>19990101</startdate><enddate>19990101</enddate><creator>Chiu, Warren</creator><creator>Thompson, David</creator><creator>Mak, Wai-ming</creator><creator>Lo, K L</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990101</creationdate><title>Re‐thinking training needs analysis</title><author>Chiu, Warren ; Thompson, David ; Mak, Wai-ming ; Lo, K L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-44b597c27cc9ff5e8ec717b8f4d1fdc48ccd7e8855cca505be5f50eba9ff64ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Business process reengineering</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Management by objectives</topic><topic>Needs analysis</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Total quality</topic><topic>Trainers</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Warren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mak, Wai-ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, K L</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Personnel review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chiu, Warren</au><au>Thompson, David</au><au>Mak, Wai-ming</au><au>Lo, K L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Re‐thinking training needs analysis: A proposed framework for literature review</atitle><jtitle>Personnel review</jtitle><date>1999-01-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1/2</issue><spage>77</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>77-90</pages><issn>0048-3486</issn><eissn>1758-6933</eissn><coden>PRRVAQ</coden><abstract>This paper reviews the literature on training needs analysis with the intention of organising conceptually the various approaches. It offers a way of going beyond simple descriptions to a quantitative approach. A simple yet comprehensive model is proposed which consists of four aspects focusing on four related questions: Who are the key initiators of the TNA studies? What are the levels of interest in the studies (i.e. organization, process, group and individual)? What methods of analysis are used? What is the intended outcome of the analysis? Based on these, four hypotheses are proposed. A literature search produced a total of 118 articles, of which 44 were randomly picked for detailed review. As expected, the literature was dominated by 'supply-led' players, i.e. trainers and academics, but with an unexpectedly strong emphasis on the 'demand-led' aspects of the organisation, especially its business results and growth.</abstract><cop>Farnborough</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/00483489910249009</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-3486
ispartof Personnel review, 1999-01, Vol.28 (1/2), p.77-90
issn 0048-3486
1758-6933
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_33485585
source Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)
subjects Business process reengineering
Hypotheses
Information sources
Literature reviews
Management by objectives
Needs analysis
Questionnaires
Self evaluation
Studies
Total quality
Trainers
Training
title Re‐thinking training needs analysis: A proposed framework for literature review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A34%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Re%E2%80%90thinking%20training%20needs%20analysis:%20A%20proposed%20framework%20for%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=Personnel%20review&rft.au=Chiu,%20Warren&rft.date=1999-01-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1/2&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=77-90&rft.issn=0048-3486&rft.eissn=1758-6933&rft.coden=PRRVAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/00483489910249009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E116360250%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-44b597c27cc9ff5e8ec717b8f4d1fdc48ccd7e8855cca505be5f50eba9ff64ec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214805009&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true