The use of distinct disciplines to investigate past earthquakes

The investigation of past earthquakes can be approached in many different ways with a large variety of methods and techniques. This is mainly due to the complexity of this natural phenomenon in both its genetic aspects and consequential ones. In the present note, we briefly analyse the peculiarities...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Tectonophysics 2008-06, Vol.453 (1), p.7-19
Main Authors: Caputo, R., Helly, B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Archaeoseismology
Historical Seismology
Morphogenic earthquakes
Morphotectonics
Palaeoseismology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The investigation of past earthquakes can be approached in many different ways with a large variety of methods and techniques. This is mainly due to the complexity of this natural phenomenon in both its genetic aspects and consequential ones. In the present note, we briefly analyse the peculiarities of Instrumental Seismology, Historical Seismology, Archaeoseismology and Earthquake Geology, but especially we emphasise the major differences among these four distinct approaches. In order to better define and clearly separate these disciplines, in terms of appropriate tools to be applied and possible outcomes to be expected, an alternative point of view is proposed based on the source of information and not on a chronological distribution as commonly accepted in the literature. Although multidisciplinarity is a common approach for investigating past earthquakes, each one of the discussed disciplines has its own peculiarities, advantages and limitations, and researchers should be aware of this.
ISSN:0040-1951
1879-3266
DOI:10.1016/j.tecto.2007.05.007