Loading…

DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for measuring the efficiency of peer decision making units (DMUs). This tool has been utilized by a number of authors to examine two‐stage processes, where all the outputs from the first stage are the only inputs to the second stage. The current article ex...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Naval research logistics 2008-10, Vol.55 (7), p.643-653
Main Authors: Liang, Liang, Cook, Wade D., Zhu, Joe
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-76830bc9df1571b25f0e0105c00b2cb623a687b6f23a76adfd2d39a912c0445f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-76830bc9df1571b25f0e0105c00b2cb623a687b6f23a76adfd2d39a912c0445f3
container_end_page 653
container_issue 7
container_start_page 643
container_title Naval research logistics
container_volume 55
creator Liang, Liang
Cook, Wade D.
Zhu, Joe
description Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for measuring the efficiency of peer decision making units (DMUs). This tool has been utilized by a number of authors to examine two‐stage processes, where all the outputs from the first stage are the only inputs to the second stage. The current article examines and extends these models using game theory concepts. The resulting models are linear, and imply an efficiency decomposition where the overall efficiency of the two‐stage process is a product of the efficiencies of the two individual stages. When there is only one intermediate measure connecting the two stages, both the noncooperative and centralized models yield the same results as applying the standard DEA model to the two stages separately. As a result, the efficiency decomposition is unique. While the noncooperative approach yields a unique efficiency decomposition under multiple intermediate measures, the centralized approach is likely to yield multiple decompositions. Models are developed to test whether the efficiency decomposition arising from the centralized approach is unique. The relations among the noncooperative, centralized, and standard DEA approaches are investigated. Two real world data sets and a randomly generated data set are used to demonstrate the models and verify our findings. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2008
doi_str_mv 10.1002/nav.20308
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34135188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>34135188</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-76830bc9df1571b25f0e0105c00b2cb623a687b6f23a76adfd2d39a912c0445f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0EEqUw8AaekBjSnuPYSdgqKC2oKghKQSyW49gQSOIQp5S-PYEAG9P9On3_6fQhdEhgQAD8YSnfBz5QiLZQjzAfPB4y2EY9iOLAAx4_7KI9514AgAfAemh-Nh7hwqY6d9jYGjdr67lGPmlc1VZp57Q7wRNZaCyrdiPVM5ZlirUxmcp0qTY41coWlXVZk9lyH-0YmTt98DP76O58vDiderOrycXpaOapgEWRF_KIQqLi1BAWksRnBjQQYAog8VXCfSp5FCbctCHkMjWpn9JYxsRXEATM0D466u62P72ttGtEkTml81yW2q6coAGhjERRCx53oKqtc7U2oqqzQtYbQUB8GROtMfFtrGWHHbvOcr35HxTz0fK34XWNzDX6468h61fBQxoycT-fiOsFu5w-3izFLf0ELbl8IQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>34135188</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Liang, Liang ; Cook, Wade D. ; Zhu, Joe</creator><creatorcontrib>Liang, Liang ; Cook, Wade D. ; Zhu, Joe</creatorcontrib><description>Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for measuring the efficiency of peer decision making units (DMUs). This tool has been utilized by a number of authors to examine two‐stage processes, where all the outputs from the first stage are the only inputs to the second stage. The current article examines and extends these models using game theory concepts. The resulting models are linear, and imply an efficiency decomposition where the overall efficiency of the two‐stage process is a product of the efficiencies of the two individual stages. When there is only one intermediate measure connecting the two stages, both the noncooperative and centralized models yield the same results as applying the standard DEA model to the two stages separately. As a result, the efficiency decomposition is unique. While the noncooperative approach yields a unique efficiency decomposition under multiple intermediate measures, the centralized approach is likely to yield multiple decompositions. Models are developed to test whether the efficiency decomposition arising from the centralized approach is unique. The relations among the noncooperative, centralized, and standard DEA approaches are investigated. Two real world data sets and a randomly generated data set are used to demonstrate the models and verify our findings. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2008</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-069X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6750</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nav.20308</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>cooperative ; data envelopment analysis (DEA) ; efficiency ; game ; intermediate measure ; non-cooperative</subject><ispartof>Naval research logistics, 2008-10, Vol.55 (7), p.643-653</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-76830bc9df1571b25f0e0105c00b2cb623a687b6f23a76adfd2d39a912c0445f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-76830bc9df1571b25f0e0105c00b2cb623a687b6f23a76adfd2d39a912c0445f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liang, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Wade D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Joe</creatorcontrib><title>DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition</title><title>Naval research logistics</title><addtitle>Naval Research Logistics</addtitle><description>Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for measuring the efficiency of peer decision making units (DMUs). This tool has been utilized by a number of authors to examine two‐stage processes, where all the outputs from the first stage are the only inputs to the second stage. The current article examines and extends these models using game theory concepts. The resulting models are linear, and imply an efficiency decomposition where the overall efficiency of the two‐stage process is a product of the efficiencies of the two individual stages. When there is only one intermediate measure connecting the two stages, both the noncooperative and centralized models yield the same results as applying the standard DEA model to the two stages separately. As a result, the efficiency decomposition is unique. While the noncooperative approach yields a unique efficiency decomposition under multiple intermediate measures, the centralized approach is likely to yield multiple decompositions. Models are developed to test whether the efficiency decomposition arising from the centralized approach is unique. The relations among the noncooperative, centralized, and standard DEA approaches are investigated. Two real world data sets and a randomly generated data set are used to demonstrate the models and verify our findings. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2008</description><subject>cooperative</subject><subject>data envelopment analysis (DEA)</subject><subject>efficiency</subject><subject>game</subject><subject>intermediate measure</subject><subject>non-cooperative</subject><issn>0894-069X</issn><issn>1520-6750</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0EEqUw8AaekBjSnuPYSdgqKC2oKghKQSyW49gQSOIQp5S-PYEAG9P9On3_6fQhdEhgQAD8YSnfBz5QiLZQjzAfPB4y2EY9iOLAAx4_7KI9514AgAfAemh-Nh7hwqY6d9jYGjdr67lGPmlc1VZp57Q7wRNZaCyrdiPVM5ZlirUxmcp0qTY41coWlXVZk9lyH-0YmTt98DP76O58vDiderOrycXpaOapgEWRF_KIQqLi1BAWksRnBjQQYAog8VXCfSp5FCbctCHkMjWpn9JYxsRXEATM0D466u62P72ttGtEkTml81yW2q6coAGhjERRCx53oKqtc7U2oqqzQtYbQUB8GROtMfFtrGWHHbvOcr35HxTz0fK34XWNzDX6468h61fBQxoycT-fiOsFu5w-3izFLf0ELbl8IQ</recordid><startdate>200810</startdate><enddate>200810</enddate><creator>Liang, Liang</creator><creator>Cook, Wade D.</creator><creator>Zhu, Joe</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200810</creationdate><title>DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition</title><author>Liang, Liang ; Cook, Wade D. ; Zhu, Joe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-76830bc9df1571b25f0e0105c00b2cb623a687b6f23a76adfd2d39a912c0445f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>cooperative</topic><topic>data envelopment analysis (DEA)</topic><topic>efficiency</topic><topic>game</topic><topic>intermediate measure</topic><topic>non-cooperative</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liang, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Wade D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Joe</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Naval research logistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liang, Liang</au><au>Cook, Wade D.</au><au>Zhu, Joe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition</atitle><jtitle>Naval research logistics</jtitle><addtitle>Naval Research Logistics</addtitle><date>2008-10</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>643</spage><epage>653</epage><pages>643-653</pages><issn>0894-069X</issn><eissn>1520-6750</eissn><abstract>Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for measuring the efficiency of peer decision making units (DMUs). This tool has been utilized by a number of authors to examine two‐stage processes, where all the outputs from the first stage are the only inputs to the second stage. The current article examines and extends these models using game theory concepts. The resulting models are linear, and imply an efficiency decomposition where the overall efficiency of the two‐stage process is a product of the efficiencies of the two individual stages. When there is only one intermediate measure connecting the two stages, both the noncooperative and centralized models yield the same results as applying the standard DEA model to the two stages separately. As a result, the efficiency decomposition is unique. While the noncooperative approach yields a unique efficiency decomposition under multiple intermediate measures, the centralized approach is likely to yield multiple decompositions. Models are developed to test whether the efficiency decomposition arising from the centralized approach is unique. The relations among the noncooperative, centralized, and standard DEA approaches are investigated. Two real world data sets and a randomly generated data set are used to demonstrate the models and verify our findings. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2008</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/nav.20308</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-069X
ispartof Naval research logistics, 2008-10, Vol.55 (7), p.643-653
issn 0894-069X
1520-6750
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34135188
source Wiley
subjects cooperative
data envelopment analysis (DEA)
efficiency
game
intermediate measure
non-cooperative
title DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T23%3A48%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DEA%20models%20for%20two-stage%20processes:%20Game%20approach%20and%20efficiency%20decomposition&rft.jtitle=Naval%20research%20logistics&rft.au=Liang,%20Liang&rft.date=2008-10&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=643&rft.epage=653&rft.pages=643-653&rft.issn=0894-069X&rft.eissn=1520-6750&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nav.20308&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E34135188%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-76830bc9df1571b25f0e0105c00b2cb623a687b6f23a76adfd2d39a912c0445f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=34135188&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true