Loading…
DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for measuring the efficiency of peer decision making units (DMUs). This tool has been utilized by a number of authors to examine two‐stage processes, where all the outputs from the first stage are the only inputs to the second stage. The current article ex...
Saved in:
Published in: | Naval research logistics 2008-10, Vol.55 (7), p.643-653 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-76830bc9df1571b25f0e0105c00b2cb623a687b6f23a76adfd2d39a912c0445f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-76830bc9df1571b25f0e0105c00b2cb623a687b6f23a76adfd2d39a912c0445f3 |
container_end_page | 653 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 643 |
container_title | Naval research logistics |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Liang, Liang Cook, Wade D. Zhu, Joe |
description | Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for measuring the efficiency of peer decision making units (DMUs). This tool has been utilized by a number of authors to examine two‐stage processes, where all the outputs from the first stage are the only inputs to the second stage. The current article examines and extends these models using game theory concepts. The resulting models are linear, and imply an efficiency decomposition where the overall efficiency of the two‐stage process is a product of the efficiencies of the two individual stages. When there is only one intermediate measure connecting the two stages, both the noncooperative and centralized models yield the same results as applying the standard DEA model to the two stages separately. As a result, the efficiency decomposition is unique. While the noncooperative approach yields a unique efficiency decomposition under multiple intermediate measures, the centralized approach is likely to yield multiple decompositions. Models are developed to test whether the efficiency decomposition arising from the centralized approach is unique. The relations among the noncooperative, centralized, and standard DEA approaches are investigated. Two real world data sets and a randomly generated data set are used to demonstrate the models and verify our findings. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2008 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/nav.20308 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34135188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>34135188</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-76830bc9df1571b25f0e0105c00b2cb623a687b6f23a76adfd2d39a912c0445f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0EEqUw8AaekBjSnuPYSdgqKC2oKghKQSyW49gQSOIQp5S-PYEAG9P9On3_6fQhdEhgQAD8YSnfBz5QiLZQjzAfPB4y2EY9iOLAAx4_7KI9514AgAfAemh-Nh7hwqY6d9jYGjdr67lGPmlc1VZp57Q7wRNZaCyrdiPVM5ZlirUxmcp0qTY41coWlXVZk9lyH-0YmTt98DP76O58vDiderOrycXpaOapgEWRF_KIQqLi1BAWksRnBjQQYAog8VXCfSp5FCbctCHkMjWpn9JYxsRXEATM0D466u62P72ttGtEkTml81yW2q6coAGhjERRCx53oKqtc7U2oqqzQtYbQUB8GROtMfFtrGWHHbvOcr35HxTz0fK34XWNzDX6468h61fBQxoycT-fiOsFu5w-3izFLf0ELbl8IQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>34135188</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Liang, Liang ; Cook, Wade D. ; Zhu, Joe</creator><creatorcontrib>Liang, Liang ; Cook, Wade D. ; Zhu, Joe</creatorcontrib><description>Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for measuring the efficiency of peer decision making units (DMUs). This tool has been utilized by a number of authors to examine two‐stage processes, where all the outputs from the first stage are the only inputs to the second stage. The current article examines and extends these models using game theory concepts. The resulting models are linear, and imply an efficiency decomposition where the overall efficiency of the two‐stage process is a product of the efficiencies of the two individual stages. When there is only one intermediate measure connecting the two stages, both the noncooperative and centralized models yield the same results as applying the standard DEA model to the two stages separately. As a result, the efficiency decomposition is unique. While the noncooperative approach yields a unique efficiency decomposition under multiple intermediate measures, the centralized approach is likely to yield multiple decompositions. Models are developed to test whether the efficiency decomposition arising from the centralized approach is unique. The relations among the noncooperative, centralized, and standard DEA approaches are investigated. Two real world data sets and a randomly generated data set are used to demonstrate the models and verify our findings. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2008</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-069X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6750</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nav.20308</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>cooperative ; data envelopment analysis (DEA) ; efficiency ; game ; intermediate measure ; non-cooperative</subject><ispartof>Naval research logistics, 2008-10, Vol.55 (7), p.643-653</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-76830bc9df1571b25f0e0105c00b2cb623a687b6f23a76adfd2d39a912c0445f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-76830bc9df1571b25f0e0105c00b2cb623a687b6f23a76adfd2d39a912c0445f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liang, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Wade D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Joe</creatorcontrib><title>DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition</title><title>Naval research logistics</title><addtitle>Naval Research Logistics</addtitle><description>Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for measuring the efficiency of peer decision making units (DMUs). This tool has been utilized by a number of authors to examine two‐stage processes, where all the outputs from the first stage are the only inputs to the second stage. The current article examines and extends these models using game theory concepts. The resulting models are linear, and imply an efficiency decomposition where the overall efficiency of the two‐stage process is a product of the efficiencies of the two individual stages. When there is only one intermediate measure connecting the two stages, both the noncooperative and centralized models yield the same results as applying the standard DEA model to the two stages separately. As a result, the efficiency decomposition is unique. While the noncooperative approach yields a unique efficiency decomposition under multiple intermediate measures, the centralized approach is likely to yield multiple decompositions. Models are developed to test whether the efficiency decomposition arising from the centralized approach is unique. The relations among the noncooperative, centralized, and standard DEA approaches are investigated. Two real world data sets and a randomly generated data set are used to demonstrate the models and verify our findings. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2008</description><subject>cooperative</subject><subject>data envelopment analysis (DEA)</subject><subject>efficiency</subject><subject>game</subject><subject>intermediate measure</subject><subject>non-cooperative</subject><issn>0894-069X</issn><issn>1520-6750</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0EEqUw8AaekBjSnuPYSdgqKC2oKghKQSyW49gQSOIQp5S-PYEAG9P9On3_6fQhdEhgQAD8YSnfBz5QiLZQjzAfPB4y2EY9iOLAAx4_7KI9514AgAfAemh-Nh7hwqY6d9jYGjdr67lGPmlc1VZp57Q7wRNZaCyrdiPVM5ZlirUxmcp0qTY41coWlXVZk9lyH-0YmTt98DP76O58vDiderOrycXpaOapgEWRF_KIQqLi1BAWksRnBjQQYAog8VXCfSp5FCbctCHkMjWpn9JYxsRXEATM0D466u62P72ttGtEkTml81yW2q6coAGhjERRCx53oKqtc7U2oqqzQtYbQUB8GROtMfFtrGWHHbvOcr35HxTz0fK34XWNzDX6468h61fBQxoycT-fiOsFu5w-3izFLf0ELbl8IQ</recordid><startdate>200810</startdate><enddate>200810</enddate><creator>Liang, Liang</creator><creator>Cook, Wade D.</creator><creator>Zhu, Joe</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200810</creationdate><title>DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition</title><author>Liang, Liang ; Cook, Wade D. ; Zhu, Joe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-76830bc9df1571b25f0e0105c00b2cb623a687b6f23a76adfd2d39a912c0445f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>cooperative</topic><topic>data envelopment analysis (DEA)</topic><topic>efficiency</topic><topic>game</topic><topic>intermediate measure</topic><topic>non-cooperative</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liang, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Wade D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Joe</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Naval research logistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liang, Liang</au><au>Cook, Wade D.</au><au>Zhu, Joe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition</atitle><jtitle>Naval research logistics</jtitle><addtitle>Naval Research Logistics</addtitle><date>2008-10</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>643</spage><epage>653</epage><pages>643-653</pages><issn>0894-069X</issn><eissn>1520-6750</eissn><abstract>Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a method for measuring the efficiency of peer decision making units (DMUs). This tool has been utilized by a number of authors to examine two‐stage processes, where all the outputs from the first stage are the only inputs to the second stage. The current article examines and extends these models using game theory concepts. The resulting models are linear, and imply an efficiency decomposition where the overall efficiency of the two‐stage process is a product of the efficiencies of the two individual stages. When there is only one intermediate measure connecting the two stages, both the noncooperative and centralized models yield the same results as applying the standard DEA model to the two stages separately. As a result, the efficiency decomposition is unique. While the noncooperative approach yields a unique efficiency decomposition under multiple intermediate measures, the centralized approach is likely to yield multiple decompositions. Models are developed to test whether the efficiency decomposition arising from the centralized approach is unique. The relations among the noncooperative, centralized, and standard DEA approaches are investigated. Two real world data sets and a randomly generated data set are used to demonstrate the models and verify our findings. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2008</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/nav.20308</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-069X |
ispartof | Naval research logistics, 2008-10, Vol.55 (7), p.643-653 |
issn | 0894-069X 1520-6750 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34135188 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | cooperative data envelopment analysis (DEA) efficiency game intermediate measure non-cooperative |
title | DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T23%3A48%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DEA%20models%20for%20two-stage%20processes:%20Game%20approach%20and%20efficiency%20decomposition&rft.jtitle=Naval%20research%20logistics&rft.au=Liang,%20Liang&rft.date=2008-10&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=643&rft.epage=653&rft.pages=643-653&rft.issn=0894-069X&rft.eissn=1520-6750&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nav.20308&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E34135188%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4588-76830bc9df1571b25f0e0105c00b2cb623a687b6f23a76adfd2d39a912c0445f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=34135188&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |