Evaluating Test Suites and Adequacy Criteria Using Simulation-Based Models of Distributed Systems

• Published in: IEEE transactions on software engineering 2008-07, Vol.34 (4), p.452-470
• Main Authors: Rutherford, M.J., Carzaniga, A., Wolf, A.L.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adequacy; Alliances; Computational modeling; Computer networks; Computer simulation; Computer Society; Criteria; Digital Object Identifier; Discrete event simulation; Domain Name System; Domain names; Engineers; Failure; Failure analysis; Foils; Mathematical models; Network servers; Quality control; Simulation; Software engineering; Specification; Specifications; Studies; System testing; Systems development; Test coverage of specifications; Timing; Topology; Web server
• ISSN: 0098-5589; 1939-3520
• DOI: 10.1109/TSE.2008.33

Test adequacy criteria provide the engineer with guidance on how to populate test suites. While adequacy criteria have long been a focus of research, existing testing methods do not address many of the fundamental characteristics of distributed systems, such as distribution topology, communication failure, and timing. Furthermore, they do not provide the engineer with a means to evaluate the relative effectiveness of different criteria, nor the relative effectiveness of adequate test suites satisfying a given criterion. This paper makes three contributions to the development and use of test adequacy criteria for distributed systems: (1) a testing method based on discrete-event simulations; (2) a fault-based analysis technique for evaluating test suites and adequacy criteria; and (3) a series of case studies that validate the method and technique. The testing method uses a discrete-event simulation as an operational specification of a system, in which the behavioral effects of distribution are explicitly represented. Adequacy criteria and test cases are then defined in terms of this simulation-based specification. The fault-based analysis involves mutation of the simulation-based specification to provide a foil against which test suites and the criteria that formed them can be evaluated. Three distributed systems were used to validate the method and technique, including DNS, the domain name system.