Loading…

Arable field margins managed for biodiversity conservation: A review of food resource provision for farmland birds

Most arable field margins are sown grass strips which are limited in the avian food resources they offer but potentially supply grass seeds and, depending on the complexity of the sward structure, a range of arthropods. Adding perennial forbs to a grass mixture provides more diverse plant and invert...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agriculture, ecosystems & environment ecosystems & environment, 2009-09, Vol.133 (1), p.1-13
Main Authors: Vickery, Juliet A., Feber, Ruth E., Fuller, Robert J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-570bdd928a83898d106607aaa30223a5a077b0ee56b3edc7319c1e343195738b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-570bdd928a83898d106607aaa30223a5a077b0ee56b3edc7319c1e343195738b3
container_end_page 13
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Agriculture, ecosystems & environment
container_volume 133
creator Vickery, Juliet A.
Feber, Ruth E.
Fuller, Robert J.
description Most arable field margins are sown grass strips which are limited in the avian food resources they offer but potentially supply grass seeds and, depending on the complexity of the sward structure, a range of arthropods. Adding perennial forbs to a grass mixture provides more diverse plant and invertebrate food resources for birds. The availability of seeds and invertebrates on uncropped margins is strongly influenced by management, particularly cutting, cultivation and herbicide use. Cropped margins with reduced chemical inputs and wild bird cover crops can provide relatively high food resources compared with a conventionally managed crop. However, resources are only present until harvest, their plant communities are relatively poor and arthropod abundance is usually lower than in uncropped margins. The best winter food supplies for birds will be provided by options that create seed-rich habitats in winter. The best summer food supplies will be provided by options that create a structurally and floristically diverse sward. The least valuable margin in terms of food resources is a grass-only strip. On an area-for-area basis, field margins will potentially produce food resources for birds more cost-effectively than whole farm practices such as organic farming, though the value of margins will depend on their management and the diversity of margin types at a farm scale. Because no single margin type can provide the optimum year-round food supply, different types of margins should be incorporated at the farm level, but appropriate management (and further innovation in margin design) is needed to deliver their benefits. Field margins should be managed in conjunction with adjacent boundary features, especially hedgerows, to create complex structures that maximise nesting opportunities for birds and create habitats for a range of invertebrates.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.agee.2009.05.012
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34524373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167880909001625</els_id><sourcerecordid>20871548</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-570bdd928a83898d106607aaa30223a5a077b0ee56b3edc7319c1e343195738b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EEkvhBbjgC9wSxnYcO4jLqoIWqRIH6Nly7EnlVTYudnarvj2zbMURfBlZ-ubT6P8ZeyugFSD6j7vW3yG2EmBoQbcg5DO2EdaoRirQz9mGINNYC8NL9qrWHdCTym5Y2RY_zsinhHPke1_u0lJpLuSLfMqFjynHdMRS0_rIQ14qlqNfU14-8S0veEz4wPNEaI70rflQAvL7ko-pEvRHMfmyn_0SyVVifc1eTH6u-OZpXrDbr19-Xl43N9-vvl1ub5rQWbk22sAY4yCtt8oONgroezDeewVSKq89GDMCou5HhTEYJYYgUHU0tVF2VBfsw9lLx_w6YF3dPtWAM12C-VCd6rTslFH_BSVYI3RnCZRnMJRca8HJ3ZdEmT06Ae7Ug9u5Uw_u1IMD7agHWnr_ZPc1-Hkqfgmp_t2UwuhO9gNx787c5DNZCjG3PyQIRV4trQEiPp8JpNQo9-JqSLgEjKlgWF3M6V-H_AZA_KfJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20871548</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Arable field margins managed for biodiversity conservation: A review of food resource provision for farmland birds</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Vickery, Juliet A. ; Feber, Ruth E. ; Fuller, Robert J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vickery, Juliet A. ; Feber, Ruth E. ; Fuller, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><description>Most arable field margins are sown grass strips which are limited in the avian food resources they offer but potentially supply grass seeds and, depending on the complexity of the sward structure, a range of arthropods. Adding perennial forbs to a grass mixture provides more diverse plant and invertebrate food resources for birds. The availability of seeds and invertebrates on uncropped margins is strongly influenced by management, particularly cutting, cultivation and herbicide use. Cropped margins with reduced chemical inputs and wild bird cover crops can provide relatively high food resources compared with a conventionally managed crop. However, resources are only present until harvest, their plant communities are relatively poor and arthropod abundance is usually lower than in uncropped margins. The best winter food supplies for birds will be provided by options that create seed-rich habitats in winter. The best summer food supplies will be provided by options that create a structurally and floristically diverse sward. The least valuable margin in terms of food resources is a grass-only strip. On an area-for-area basis, field margins will potentially produce food resources for birds more cost-effectively than whole farm practices such as organic farming, though the value of margins will depend on their management and the diversity of margin types at a farm scale. Because no single margin type can provide the optimum year-round food supply, different types of margins should be incorporated at the farm level, but appropriate management (and further innovation in margin design) is needed to deliver their benefits. Field margins should be managed in conjunction with adjacent boundary features, especially hedgerows, to create complex structures that maximise nesting opportunities for birds and create habitats for a range of invertebrates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8809</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.05.012</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AEENDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agri-environment schemes ; Agricultural intensification ; agricultural land ; agroecosystems ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Arable land ; Arthropoda ; Arthropods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birds ; cover crops ; edge effects ; Farms ; Field boundary habitat ; Foods ; forbs ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agroecology ; General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development ; Grasses ; Habitat heterogeneity ; habitats ; Hedgerow ; herbicides ; Invertebrates ; land management ; literature reviews ; mowing ; nesting ; organic production ; overwintering ; plant communities ; sward ; tillage ; vegetation structure ; wild birds ; wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment, 2009-09, Vol.133 (1), p.1-13</ispartof><rights>2009</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-570bdd928a83898d106607aaa30223a5a077b0ee56b3edc7319c1e343195738b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-570bdd928a83898d106607aaa30223a5a077b0ee56b3edc7319c1e343195738b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21754269$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vickery, Juliet A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feber, Ruth E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><title>Arable field margins managed for biodiversity conservation: A review of food resource provision for farmland birds</title><title>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment</title><description>Most arable field margins are sown grass strips which are limited in the avian food resources they offer but potentially supply grass seeds and, depending on the complexity of the sward structure, a range of arthropods. Adding perennial forbs to a grass mixture provides more diverse plant and invertebrate food resources for birds. The availability of seeds and invertebrates on uncropped margins is strongly influenced by management, particularly cutting, cultivation and herbicide use. Cropped margins with reduced chemical inputs and wild bird cover crops can provide relatively high food resources compared with a conventionally managed crop. However, resources are only present until harvest, their plant communities are relatively poor and arthropod abundance is usually lower than in uncropped margins. The best winter food supplies for birds will be provided by options that create seed-rich habitats in winter. The best summer food supplies will be provided by options that create a structurally and floristically diverse sward. The least valuable margin in terms of food resources is a grass-only strip. On an area-for-area basis, field margins will potentially produce food resources for birds more cost-effectively than whole farm practices such as organic farming, though the value of margins will depend on their management and the diversity of margin types at a farm scale. Because no single margin type can provide the optimum year-round food supply, different types of margins should be incorporated at the farm level, but appropriate management (and further innovation in margin design) is needed to deliver their benefits. Field margins should be managed in conjunction with adjacent boundary features, especially hedgerows, to create complex structures that maximise nesting opportunities for birds and create habitats for a range of invertebrates.</description><subject>Agri-environment schemes</subject><subject>Agricultural intensification</subject><subject>agricultural land</subject><subject>agroecosystems</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Arable land</subject><subject>Arthropoda</subject><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>cover crops</subject><subject>edge effects</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Field boundary habitat</subject><subject>Foods</subject><subject>forbs</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agroecology</subject><subject>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Habitat heterogeneity</subject><subject>habitats</subject><subject>Hedgerow</subject><subject>herbicides</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>land management</subject><subject>literature reviews</subject><subject>mowing</subject><subject>nesting</subject><subject>organic production</subject><subject>overwintering</subject><subject>plant communities</subject><subject>sward</subject><subject>tillage</subject><subject>vegetation structure</subject><subject>wild birds</subject><subject>wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0167-8809</issn><issn>1873-2305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EEkvhBbjgC9wSxnYcO4jLqoIWqRIH6Nly7EnlVTYudnarvj2zbMURfBlZ-ubT6P8ZeyugFSD6j7vW3yG2EmBoQbcg5DO2EdaoRirQz9mGINNYC8NL9qrWHdCTym5Y2RY_zsinhHPke1_u0lJpLuSLfMqFjynHdMRS0_rIQ14qlqNfU14-8S0veEz4wPNEaI70rflQAvL7ko-pEvRHMfmyn_0SyVVifc1eTH6u-OZpXrDbr19-Xl43N9-vvl1ub5rQWbk22sAY4yCtt8oONgroezDeewVSKq89GDMCou5HhTEYJYYgUHU0tVF2VBfsw9lLx_w6YF3dPtWAM12C-VCd6rTslFH_BSVYI3RnCZRnMJRca8HJ3ZdEmT06Ae7Ug9u5Uw_u1IMD7agHWnr_ZPc1-Hkqfgmp_t2UwuhO9gNx787c5DNZCjG3PyQIRV4trQEiPp8JpNQo9-JqSLgEjKlgWF3M6V-H_AZA_KfJ</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Vickery, Juliet A.</creator><creator>Feber, Ruth E.</creator><creator>Fuller, Robert J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Arable field margins managed for biodiversity conservation: A review of food resource provision for farmland birds</title><author>Vickery, Juliet A. ; Feber, Ruth E. ; Fuller, Robert J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-570bdd928a83898d106607aaa30223a5a077b0ee56b3edc7319c1e343195738b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Agri-environment schemes</topic><topic>Agricultural intensification</topic><topic>agricultural land</topic><topic>agroecosystems</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Arable land</topic><topic>Arthropoda</topic><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>cover crops</topic><topic>edge effects</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Field boundary habitat</topic><topic>Foods</topic><topic>forbs</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agroecology</topic><topic>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Habitat heterogeneity</topic><topic>habitats</topic><topic>Hedgerow</topic><topic>herbicides</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>land management</topic><topic>literature reviews</topic><topic>mowing</topic><topic>nesting</topic><topic>organic production</topic><topic>overwintering</topic><topic>plant communities</topic><topic>sward</topic><topic>tillage</topic><topic>vegetation structure</topic><topic>wild birds</topic><topic>wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vickery, Juliet A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feber, Ruth E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vickery, Juliet A.</au><au>Feber, Ruth E.</au><au>Fuller, Robert J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Arable field margins managed for biodiversity conservation: A review of food resource provision for farmland birds</atitle><jtitle>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment</jtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>133</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>1-13</pages><issn>0167-8809</issn><eissn>1873-2305</eissn><coden>AEENDO</coden><abstract>Most arable field margins are sown grass strips which are limited in the avian food resources they offer but potentially supply grass seeds and, depending on the complexity of the sward structure, a range of arthropods. Adding perennial forbs to a grass mixture provides more diverse plant and invertebrate food resources for birds. The availability of seeds and invertebrates on uncropped margins is strongly influenced by management, particularly cutting, cultivation and herbicide use. Cropped margins with reduced chemical inputs and wild bird cover crops can provide relatively high food resources compared with a conventionally managed crop. However, resources are only present until harvest, their plant communities are relatively poor and arthropod abundance is usually lower than in uncropped margins. The best winter food supplies for birds will be provided by options that create seed-rich habitats in winter. The best summer food supplies will be provided by options that create a structurally and floristically diverse sward. The least valuable margin in terms of food resources is a grass-only strip. On an area-for-area basis, field margins will potentially produce food resources for birds more cost-effectively than whole farm practices such as organic farming, though the value of margins will depend on their management and the diversity of margin types at a farm scale. Because no single margin type can provide the optimum year-round food supply, different types of margins should be incorporated at the farm level, but appropriate management (and further innovation in margin design) is needed to deliver their benefits. Field margins should be managed in conjunction with adjacent boundary features, especially hedgerows, to create complex structures that maximise nesting opportunities for birds and create habitats for a range of invertebrates.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agee.2009.05.012</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-8809
ispartof Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2009-09, Vol.133 (1), p.1-13
issn 0167-8809
1873-2305
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34524373
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Agri-environment schemes
Agricultural intensification
agricultural land
agroecosystems
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Arable land
Arthropoda
Arthropods
Biological and medical sciences
Birds
cover crops
edge effects
Farms
Field boundary habitat
Foods
forbs
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agroecology
General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping
General agronomy. Plant production
Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development
Grasses
Habitat heterogeneity
habitats
Hedgerow
herbicides
Invertebrates
land management
literature reviews
mowing
nesting
organic production
overwintering
plant communities
sward
tillage
vegetation structure
wild birds
wildlife habitats
title Arable field margins managed for biodiversity conservation: A review of food resource provision for farmland birds
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T17%3A43%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Arable%20field%20margins%20managed%20for%20biodiversity%20conservation:%20A%20review%20of%20food%20resource%20provision%20for%20farmland%20birds&rft.jtitle=Agriculture,%20ecosystems%20&%20environment&rft.au=Vickery,%20Juliet%20A.&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=133&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=1-13&rft.issn=0167-8809&rft.eissn=1873-2305&rft.coden=AEENDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agee.2009.05.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20871548%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-570bdd928a83898d106607aaa30223a5a077b0ee56b3edc7319c1e343195738b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20871548&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true