Loading…

Steady state thermal-hydraulic analysis of hydride-fueled grid-supported BWRs

A steady state thermal-hydraulic analysis was performed to estimate the power density attainable with hydride-fueled boiling water reactor (BWR) cores with respect to that of an existing oxide BWR core chosen as reference. The power-limiting constraints taken into account were the minimum critical p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nuclear engineering and design 2009-08, Vol.239 (8), p.1544-1559
Main Authors: Ferroni, P., Handwerk, C.S., Todreas, N.E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-7876cc14ff26b7c62f7ebbe6dcbb19a12abcc06ad0d186805edf91547b6c7e933
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-7876cc14ff26b7c62f7ebbe6dcbb19a12abcc06ad0d186805edf91547b6c7e933
container_end_page 1559
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1544
container_title Nuclear engineering and design
container_volume 239
creator Ferroni, P.
Handwerk, C.S.
Todreas, N.E.
description A steady state thermal-hydraulic analysis was performed to estimate the power density attainable with hydride-fueled boiling water reactor (BWR) cores with respect to that of an existing oxide BWR core chosen as reference. The power-limiting constraints taken into account were the minimum critical power ratio (MCPR), core pressure drop, fuel average and centerline temperature, cladding outer temperature, flow-induced vibrations and power/flow ratio. The study consisted of two independent analyses: a whole core analysis and a single bundle analysis. The whole core analysis was performed, with a fixed core volume, for both hydride and oxide fuel over hundreds of combinations of rod diameter–rod pitch, referred to as “geometries”, in the ranges 0.6 ≤ D ≤ 1.6 cm and 1.1 ≤ P/ D ≤ 1.6. For each geometry, the maximum achievable steady state core power was calculated. Preliminary neutronics results derived from a companion neutronic study were then overlaid on the whole-core thermal-hydraulic results to estimate the reduction in maximum achievable power caused by the application of neutronic constraints. The single bundle analysis was performed to compare in greater detail the thermal-hydraulic performance of a limited number of hydride and oxide fuel bundles having D and P values similar to those of the reference oxide bundle, and for which the compliance with neutronic constraints was demonstrated in a companion neutronic study. The study concluded that, if the core pressure drop is not allowed to increase above the reference core value, the power density increase attainable with hydride fuel is estimated to be in the range 0–15%. If the pressure drop is allowed to increase up to a value 50% higher than the reference core value, the power density increase is estimated to be in the range 25–45%. These power density increases, which are defined with respect to the reference oxide core, decrease about 10% if the comparison is made with respect to oxide designs resembling the most recent commercial high-performance oxide cores. The power gain capability of hydride fuel is primarily due to the possibility of: (1) replacing volumes occupied by water rods and water gaps in oxide fuel cores with fuel rods, thus increasing the heat transfer area per core volume, and (2) flattening the bundle pin-by-pin power distribution. The actual achievement of the above-mentioned power density increase is however conditioned to the compliance of hydride-fueled cores to safety require
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.12.029
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34693209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0029549309001022</els_id><sourcerecordid>34693209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-7876cc14ff26b7c62f7ebbe6dcbb19a12abcc06ad0d186805edf91547b6c7e933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-Brty15qkbdIsx8EXjAg-0F1Ik5uZDJ12TFKh_96WEbfezeUezjlwP4QuCc4IJux6m7W9hnZtIGQU4yojNMNUHKEZqThNeSk-j9EMj1JaFiI_RWchbPE0gs7Q02sEZYYkRBUhiRvwO9Wkm8F41TdOJ6pVzRBcSDqbTKozkNoeGjDJejzS0O_3nY_jefPxEs7RiVVNgIvfPUfvd7dvy4d09Xz_uFysUp1zHlNecaY1KaylrOaaUcuhroEZXddEKEJVrTVmymBDKlbhEowVpCx4zTQHkedzdHXo3fvuq4cQ5c4FDU2jWuj6IPOCiZxi8a-RYl5UVcFHIz8Yte9C8GDl3rud8oMkWE6c5Vb-cZYTZ0moHKGOycUhCePD3w68DNpBq8E4DzpK07l_O34ALqSMtA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20748847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Steady state thermal-hydraulic analysis of hydride-fueled grid-supported BWRs</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Ferroni, P. ; Handwerk, C.S. ; Todreas, N.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferroni, P. ; Handwerk, C.S. ; Todreas, N.E.</creatorcontrib><description>A steady state thermal-hydraulic analysis was performed to estimate the power density attainable with hydride-fueled boiling water reactor (BWR) cores with respect to that of an existing oxide BWR core chosen as reference. The power-limiting constraints taken into account were the minimum critical power ratio (MCPR), core pressure drop, fuel average and centerline temperature, cladding outer temperature, flow-induced vibrations and power/flow ratio. The study consisted of two independent analyses: a whole core analysis and a single bundle analysis. The whole core analysis was performed, with a fixed core volume, for both hydride and oxide fuel over hundreds of combinations of rod diameter–rod pitch, referred to as “geometries”, in the ranges 0.6 ≤ D ≤ 1.6 cm and 1.1 ≤ P/ D ≤ 1.6. For each geometry, the maximum achievable steady state core power was calculated. Preliminary neutronics results derived from a companion neutronic study were then overlaid on the whole-core thermal-hydraulic results to estimate the reduction in maximum achievable power caused by the application of neutronic constraints. The single bundle analysis was performed to compare in greater detail the thermal-hydraulic performance of a limited number of hydride and oxide fuel bundles having D and P values similar to those of the reference oxide bundle, and for which the compliance with neutronic constraints was demonstrated in a companion neutronic study. The study concluded that, if the core pressure drop is not allowed to increase above the reference core value, the power density increase attainable with hydride fuel is estimated to be in the range 0–15%. If the pressure drop is allowed to increase up to a value 50% higher than the reference core value, the power density increase is estimated to be in the range 25–45%. These power density increases, which are defined with respect to the reference oxide core, decrease about 10% if the comparison is made with respect to oxide designs resembling the most recent commercial high-performance oxide cores. The power gain capability of hydride fuel is primarily due to the possibility of: (1) replacing volumes occupied by water rods and water gaps in oxide fuel cores with fuel rods, thus increasing the heat transfer area per core volume, and (2) flattening the bundle pin-by-pin power distribution. The actual achievement of the above-mentioned power density increase is however conditioned to the compliance of hydride-fueled cores to safety requirements related to core behavior during transients, hydrodynamic stability and steam dryer performance, which are fields of study not addressed in this work. A potential 25–45% power density increase justifies however interest for further investigation on this alternative fuel.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-5493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-759X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.12.029</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><ispartof>Nuclear engineering and design, 2009-08, Vol.239 (8), p.1544-1559</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-7876cc14ff26b7c62f7ebbe6dcbb19a12abcc06ad0d186805edf91547b6c7e933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-7876cc14ff26b7c62f7ebbe6dcbb19a12abcc06ad0d186805edf91547b6c7e933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferroni, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handwerk, C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todreas, N.E.</creatorcontrib><title>Steady state thermal-hydraulic analysis of hydride-fueled grid-supported BWRs</title><title>Nuclear engineering and design</title><description>A steady state thermal-hydraulic analysis was performed to estimate the power density attainable with hydride-fueled boiling water reactor (BWR) cores with respect to that of an existing oxide BWR core chosen as reference. The power-limiting constraints taken into account were the minimum critical power ratio (MCPR), core pressure drop, fuel average and centerline temperature, cladding outer temperature, flow-induced vibrations and power/flow ratio. The study consisted of two independent analyses: a whole core analysis and a single bundle analysis. The whole core analysis was performed, with a fixed core volume, for both hydride and oxide fuel over hundreds of combinations of rod diameter–rod pitch, referred to as “geometries”, in the ranges 0.6 ≤ D ≤ 1.6 cm and 1.1 ≤ P/ D ≤ 1.6. For each geometry, the maximum achievable steady state core power was calculated. Preliminary neutronics results derived from a companion neutronic study were then overlaid on the whole-core thermal-hydraulic results to estimate the reduction in maximum achievable power caused by the application of neutronic constraints. The single bundle analysis was performed to compare in greater detail the thermal-hydraulic performance of a limited number of hydride and oxide fuel bundles having D and P values similar to those of the reference oxide bundle, and for which the compliance with neutronic constraints was demonstrated in a companion neutronic study. The study concluded that, if the core pressure drop is not allowed to increase above the reference core value, the power density increase attainable with hydride fuel is estimated to be in the range 0–15%. If the pressure drop is allowed to increase up to a value 50% higher than the reference core value, the power density increase is estimated to be in the range 25–45%. These power density increases, which are defined with respect to the reference oxide core, decrease about 10% if the comparison is made with respect to oxide designs resembling the most recent commercial high-performance oxide cores. The power gain capability of hydride fuel is primarily due to the possibility of: (1) replacing volumes occupied by water rods and water gaps in oxide fuel cores with fuel rods, thus increasing the heat transfer area per core volume, and (2) flattening the bundle pin-by-pin power distribution. The actual achievement of the above-mentioned power density increase is however conditioned to the compliance of hydride-fueled cores to safety requirements related to core behavior during transients, hydrodynamic stability and steam dryer performance, which are fields of study not addressed in this work. A potential 25–45% power density increase justifies however interest for further investigation on this alternative fuel.</description><issn>0029-5493</issn><issn>1872-759X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-Brty15qkbdIsx8EXjAg-0F1Ik5uZDJ12TFKh_96WEbfezeUezjlwP4QuCc4IJux6m7W9hnZtIGQU4yojNMNUHKEZqThNeSk-j9EMj1JaFiI_RWchbPE0gs7Q02sEZYYkRBUhiRvwO9Wkm8F41TdOJ6pVzRBcSDqbTKozkNoeGjDJejzS0O_3nY_jefPxEs7RiVVNgIvfPUfvd7dvy4d09Xz_uFysUp1zHlNecaY1KaylrOaaUcuhroEZXddEKEJVrTVmymBDKlbhEowVpCx4zTQHkedzdHXo3fvuq4cQ5c4FDU2jWuj6IPOCiZxi8a-RYl5UVcFHIz8Yte9C8GDl3rud8oMkWE6c5Vb-cZYTZ0moHKGOycUhCePD3w68DNpBq8E4DzpK07l_O34ALqSMtA</recordid><startdate>20090801</startdate><enddate>20090801</enddate><creator>Ferroni, P.</creator><creator>Handwerk, C.S.</creator><creator>Todreas, N.E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090801</creationdate><title>Steady state thermal-hydraulic analysis of hydride-fueled grid-supported BWRs</title><author>Ferroni, P. ; Handwerk, C.S. ; Todreas, N.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-7876cc14ff26b7c62f7ebbe6dcbb19a12abcc06ad0d186805edf91547b6c7e933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferroni, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handwerk, C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todreas, N.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Nuclear engineering and design</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferroni, P.</au><au>Handwerk, C.S.</au><au>Todreas, N.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Steady state thermal-hydraulic analysis of hydride-fueled grid-supported BWRs</atitle><jtitle>Nuclear engineering and design</jtitle><date>2009-08-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>239</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1544</spage><epage>1559</epage><pages>1544-1559</pages><issn>0029-5493</issn><eissn>1872-759X</eissn><abstract>A steady state thermal-hydraulic analysis was performed to estimate the power density attainable with hydride-fueled boiling water reactor (BWR) cores with respect to that of an existing oxide BWR core chosen as reference. The power-limiting constraints taken into account were the minimum critical power ratio (MCPR), core pressure drop, fuel average and centerline temperature, cladding outer temperature, flow-induced vibrations and power/flow ratio. The study consisted of two independent analyses: a whole core analysis and a single bundle analysis. The whole core analysis was performed, with a fixed core volume, for both hydride and oxide fuel over hundreds of combinations of rod diameter–rod pitch, referred to as “geometries”, in the ranges 0.6 ≤ D ≤ 1.6 cm and 1.1 ≤ P/ D ≤ 1.6. For each geometry, the maximum achievable steady state core power was calculated. Preliminary neutronics results derived from a companion neutronic study were then overlaid on the whole-core thermal-hydraulic results to estimate the reduction in maximum achievable power caused by the application of neutronic constraints. The single bundle analysis was performed to compare in greater detail the thermal-hydraulic performance of a limited number of hydride and oxide fuel bundles having D and P values similar to those of the reference oxide bundle, and for which the compliance with neutronic constraints was demonstrated in a companion neutronic study. The study concluded that, if the core pressure drop is not allowed to increase above the reference core value, the power density increase attainable with hydride fuel is estimated to be in the range 0–15%. If the pressure drop is allowed to increase up to a value 50% higher than the reference core value, the power density increase is estimated to be in the range 25–45%. These power density increases, which are defined with respect to the reference oxide core, decrease about 10% if the comparison is made with respect to oxide designs resembling the most recent commercial high-performance oxide cores. The power gain capability of hydride fuel is primarily due to the possibility of: (1) replacing volumes occupied by water rods and water gaps in oxide fuel cores with fuel rods, thus increasing the heat transfer area per core volume, and (2) flattening the bundle pin-by-pin power distribution. The actual achievement of the above-mentioned power density increase is however conditioned to the compliance of hydride-fueled cores to safety requirements related to core behavior during transients, hydrodynamic stability and steam dryer performance, which are fields of study not addressed in this work. A potential 25–45% power density increase justifies however interest for further investigation on this alternative fuel.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.12.029</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-5493
ispartof Nuclear engineering and design, 2009-08, Vol.239 (8), p.1544-1559
issn 0029-5493
1872-759X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34693209
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
title Steady state thermal-hydraulic analysis of hydride-fueled grid-supported BWRs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A07%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Steady%20state%20thermal-hydraulic%20analysis%20of%20hydride-fueled%20grid-supported%20BWRs&rft.jtitle=Nuclear%20engineering%20and%20design&rft.au=Ferroni,%20P.&rft.date=2009-08-01&rft.volume=239&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1544&rft.epage=1559&rft.pages=1544-1559&rft.issn=0029-5493&rft.eissn=1872-759X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.12.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E34693209%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-7876cc14ff26b7c62f7ebbe6dcbb19a12abcc06ad0d186805edf91547b6c7e933%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20748847&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true