Loading…
Critical Evaluation of Compression Interpretation Criteria for Drilled Shafts
This paper is a critical evaluation of the interpretation criteria of drilled shafts under axial compression loading. A wide variety of load test data are used for analysis, and these data are divided into drained and undrained databases. The interpretation criteria are examined from these load test...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering 2009-08, Vol.135 (8), p.1056-1069 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-a90fbe49f1b88cb7fcc0ce5382e8adf0516b08974247eb857c0d1c603785de33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-a90fbe49f1b88cb7fcc0ce5382e8adf0516b08974247eb857c0d1c603785de33 |
container_end_page | 1069 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1056 |
container_title | Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering |
container_volume | 135 |
creator | Chen, Yit-Jin Fang, Yi-Chung |
description | This paper is a critical evaluation of the interpretation criteria of drilled shafts under axial compression loading. A wide variety of load test data are used for analysis, and these data are divided into drained and undrained databases. The interpretation criteria are examined from these load test results to establish a consistent compression interpretation criterion. Among these criteria, the range of each interpretation method presents approximately the same trend for both drained and undrained conditions. The statistical results show that the smaller the compression displacement, the higher the coefficient of variation. Moreover, the undrained load test results reveal less variability than the drained results. The load-displacement curve of a drained loading also demonstrates more ductility than that for undrained loading. Based on these analyses, the relative merits and interrelationships of these criteria are established, and specific design recommendations for the interpretation of compression drilled shaft load test, in terms of both capacity and displacement, are given. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000027 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34726335</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1875859010</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-a90fbe49f1b88cb7fcc0ce5382e8adf0516b08974247eb857c0d1c603785de33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVFLwzAQx4MoOKffoQjKfOi8NGmT-jbqnIOJD-t7SNMEO7p2Jq3gt7ehY29qXi6X-939w_0RusUwx5Dgx9limy0fVvkcp5SEcQLJHPyJ2BmanN7OhzukEEJE8SW6cm43IBR4NEFvma26Ssk6WH7Jupdd1TZBa4Ks3R-sds6n66bTdsi6seo7tK1kYFobPNuqrnUZbD-k6dw1ujCydvrmGKcof1nm2Wu4eV-ts8UmlJTQLpQpmELT1OCCc1UwoxQoHRMeaS5LAzFOCuApoxFluuAxU1BilQBhPC41IVN0P4492Paz164T-8opXdey0W3vBKEsSgiJ_wUj4Jh4dopmf4KYs5jHKWAY0KcRVbZ1zmojDrbaS_stMAhvihDeFLHKhTdAeAPE0ZSh-e6oI92wdGNloyp3mhBhxjhg__Fk5AZMi13b22bY50nhd4EfkaOdbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1875859010</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Critical Evaluation of Compression Interpretation Criteria for Drilled Shafts</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers</source><creator>Chen, Yit-Jin ; Fang, Yi-Chung</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yit-Jin ; Fang, Yi-Chung</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is a critical evaluation of the interpretation criteria of drilled shafts under axial compression loading. A wide variety of load test data are used for analysis, and these data are divided into drained and undrained databases. The interpretation criteria are examined from these load test results to establish a consistent compression interpretation criterion. Among these criteria, the range of each interpretation method presents approximately the same trend for both drained and undrained conditions. The statistical results show that the smaller the compression displacement, the higher the coefficient of variation. Moreover, the undrained load test results reveal less variability than the drained results. The load-displacement curve of a drained loading also demonstrates more ductility than that for undrained loading. Based on these analyses, the relative merits and interrelationships of these criteria are established, and specific design recommendations for the interpretation of compression drilled shaft load test, in terms of both capacity and displacement, are given.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-0241</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000027</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Buildings. Public works ; Compression ; Drilling ; Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geotechnics ; Q1 ; TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><ispartof>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 2009-08, Vol.135 (8), p.1056-1069</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-a90fbe49f1b88cb7fcc0ce5382e8adf0516b08974247eb857c0d1c603785de33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-a90fbe49f1b88cb7fcc0ce5382e8adf0516b08974247eb857c0d1c603785de33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000027$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3239,10049,27905,27906,75940,75948</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21778015$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yit-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Yi-Chung</creatorcontrib><title>Critical Evaluation of Compression Interpretation Criteria for Drilled Shafts</title><title>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</title><description>This paper is a critical evaluation of the interpretation criteria of drilled shafts under axial compression loading. A wide variety of load test data are used for analysis, and these data are divided into drained and undrained databases. The interpretation criteria are examined from these load test results to establish a consistent compression interpretation criterion. Among these criteria, the range of each interpretation method presents approximately the same trend for both drained and undrained conditions. The statistical results show that the smaller the compression displacement, the higher the coefficient of variation. Moreover, the undrained load test results reveal less variability than the drained results. The load-displacement curve of a drained loading also demonstrates more ductility than that for undrained loading. Based on these analyses, the relative merits and interrelationships of these criteria are established, and specific design recommendations for the interpretation of compression drilled shaft load test, in terms of both capacity and displacement, are given.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Compression</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geotechnics</subject><subject>Q1</subject><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><issn>1090-0241</issn><issn>1943-5606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkVFLwzAQx4MoOKffoQjKfOi8NGmT-jbqnIOJD-t7SNMEO7p2Jq3gt7ehY29qXi6X-939w_0RusUwx5Dgx9limy0fVvkcp5SEcQLJHPyJ2BmanN7OhzukEEJE8SW6cm43IBR4NEFvma26Ssk6WH7Jupdd1TZBa4Ks3R-sds6n66bTdsi6seo7tK1kYFobPNuqrnUZbD-k6dw1ujCydvrmGKcof1nm2Wu4eV-ts8UmlJTQLpQpmELT1OCCc1UwoxQoHRMeaS5LAzFOCuApoxFluuAxU1BilQBhPC41IVN0P4492Paz164T-8opXdey0W3vBKEsSgiJ_wUj4Jh4dopmf4KYs5jHKWAY0KcRVbZ1zmojDrbaS_stMAhvihDeFLHKhTdAeAPE0ZSh-e6oI92wdGNloyp3mhBhxjhg__Fk5AZMi13b22bY50nhd4EfkaOdbg</recordid><startdate>20090801</startdate><enddate>20090801</enddate><creator>Chen, Yit-Jin</creator><creator>Fang, Yi-Chung</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090801</creationdate><title>Critical Evaluation of Compression Interpretation Criteria for Drilled Shafts</title><author>Chen, Yit-Jin ; Fang, Yi-Chung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-a90fbe49f1b88cb7fcc0ce5382e8adf0516b08974247eb857c0d1c603785de33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Compression</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geotechnics</topic><topic>Q1</topic><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yit-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Yi-Chung</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Yit-Jin</au><au>Fang, Yi-Chung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Critical Evaluation of Compression Interpretation Criteria for Drilled Shafts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</jtitle><date>2009-08-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>135</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1056</spage><epage>1069</epage><pages>1056-1069</pages><issn>1090-0241</issn><eissn>1943-5606</eissn><abstract>This paper is a critical evaluation of the interpretation criteria of drilled shafts under axial compression loading. A wide variety of load test data are used for analysis, and these data are divided into drained and undrained databases. The interpretation criteria are examined from these load test results to establish a consistent compression interpretation criterion. Among these criteria, the range of each interpretation method presents approximately the same trend for both drained and undrained conditions. The statistical results show that the smaller the compression displacement, the higher the coefficient of variation. Moreover, the undrained load test results reveal less variability than the drained results. The load-displacement curve of a drained loading also demonstrates more ductility than that for undrained loading. Based on these analyses, the relative merits and interrelationships of these criteria are established, and specific design recommendations for the interpretation of compression drilled shaft load test, in terms of both capacity and displacement, are given.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000027</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1090-0241 |
ispartof | Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 2009-08, Vol.135 (8), p.1056-1069 |
issn | 1090-0241 1943-5606 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34726335 |
source | American Society of Civil Engineers |
subjects | Applied sciences Buildings. Public works Compression Drilling Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls Exact sciences and technology Geotechnics Q1 TECHNICAL PAPERS |
title | Critical Evaluation of Compression Interpretation Criteria for Drilled Shafts |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T05%3A57%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critical%20Evaluation%20of%20Compression%20Interpretation%20Criteria%20for%20Drilled%20Shafts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geotechnical%20and%20geoenvironmental%20engineering&rft.au=Chen,%20Yit-Jin&rft.date=2009-08-01&rft.volume=135&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1056&rft.epage=1069&rft.pages=1056-1069&rft.issn=1090-0241&rft.eissn=1943-5606&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1875859010%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-a90fbe49f1b88cb7fcc0ce5382e8adf0516b08974247eb857c0d1c603785de33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1875859010&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |