Loading…

Critical Evaluation of Compression Interpretation Criteria for Drilled Shafts

This paper is a critical evaluation of the interpretation criteria of drilled shafts under axial compression loading. A wide variety of load test data are used for analysis, and these data are divided into drained and undrained databases. The interpretation criteria are examined from these load test...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering 2009-08, Vol.135 (8), p.1056-1069
Main Authors: Chen, Yit-Jin, Fang, Yi-Chung
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-a90fbe49f1b88cb7fcc0ce5382e8adf0516b08974247eb857c0d1c603785de33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-a90fbe49f1b88cb7fcc0ce5382e8adf0516b08974247eb857c0d1c603785de33
container_end_page 1069
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1056
container_title Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering
container_volume 135
creator Chen, Yit-Jin
Fang, Yi-Chung
description This paper is a critical evaluation of the interpretation criteria of drilled shafts under axial compression loading. A wide variety of load test data are used for analysis, and these data are divided into drained and undrained databases. The interpretation criteria are examined from these load test results to establish a consistent compression interpretation criterion. Among these criteria, the range of each interpretation method presents approximately the same trend for both drained and undrained conditions. The statistical results show that the smaller the compression displacement, the higher the coefficient of variation. Moreover, the undrained load test results reveal less variability than the drained results. The load-displacement curve of a drained loading also demonstrates more ductility than that for undrained loading. Based on these analyses, the relative merits and interrelationships of these criteria are established, and specific design recommendations for the interpretation of compression drilled shaft load test, in terms of both capacity and displacement, are given.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000027
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34726335</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1875859010</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-a90fbe49f1b88cb7fcc0ce5382e8adf0516b08974247eb857c0d1c603785de33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVFLwzAQx4MoOKffoQjKfOi8NGmT-jbqnIOJD-t7SNMEO7p2Jq3gt7ehY29qXi6X-939w_0RusUwx5Dgx9limy0fVvkcp5SEcQLJHPyJ2BmanN7OhzukEEJE8SW6cm43IBR4NEFvma26Ssk6WH7Jupdd1TZBa4Ks3R-sds6n66bTdsi6seo7tK1kYFobPNuqrnUZbD-k6dw1ujCydvrmGKcof1nm2Wu4eV-ts8UmlJTQLpQpmELT1OCCc1UwoxQoHRMeaS5LAzFOCuApoxFluuAxU1BilQBhPC41IVN0P4492Paz164T-8opXdey0W3vBKEsSgiJ_wUj4Jh4dopmf4KYs5jHKWAY0KcRVbZ1zmojDrbaS_stMAhvihDeFLHKhTdAeAPE0ZSh-e6oI92wdGNloyp3mhBhxjhg__Fk5AZMi13b22bY50nhd4EfkaOdbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1875859010</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Critical Evaluation of Compression Interpretation Criteria for Drilled Shafts</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers</source><creator>Chen, Yit-Jin ; Fang, Yi-Chung</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yit-Jin ; Fang, Yi-Chung</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is a critical evaluation of the interpretation criteria of drilled shafts under axial compression loading. A wide variety of load test data are used for analysis, and these data are divided into drained and undrained databases. The interpretation criteria are examined from these load test results to establish a consistent compression interpretation criterion. Among these criteria, the range of each interpretation method presents approximately the same trend for both drained and undrained conditions. The statistical results show that the smaller the compression displacement, the higher the coefficient of variation. Moreover, the undrained load test results reveal less variability than the drained results. The load-displacement curve of a drained loading also demonstrates more ductility than that for undrained loading. Based on these analyses, the relative merits and interrelationships of these criteria are established, and specific design recommendations for the interpretation of compression drilled shaft load test, in terms of both capacity and displacement, are given.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-0241</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000027</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Buildings. Public works ; Compression ; Drilling ; Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geotechnics ; Q1 ; TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><ispartof>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 2009-08, Vol.135 (8), p.1056-1069</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-a90fbe49f1b88cb7fcc0ce5382e8adf0516b08974247eb857c0d1c603785de33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-a90fbe49f1b88cb7fcc0ce5382e8adf0516b08974247eb857c0d1c603785de33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000027$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3239,10049,27905,27906,75940,75948</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21778015$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yit-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Yi-Chung</creatorcontrib><title>Critical Evaluation of Compression Interpretation Criteria for Drilled Shafts</title><title>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</title><description>This paper is a critical evaluation of the interpretation criteria of drilled shafts under axial compression loading. A wide variety of load test data are used for analysis, and these data are divided into drained and undrained databases. The interpretation criteria are examined from these load test results to establish a consistent compression interpretation criterion. Among these criteria, the range of each interpretation method presents approximately the same trend for both drained and undrained conditions. The statistical results show that the smaller the compression displacement, the higher the coefficient of variation. Moreover, the undrained load test results reveal less variability than the drained results. The load-displacement curve of a drained loading also demonstrates more ductility than that for undrained loading. Based on these analyses, the relative merits and interrelationships of these criteria are established, and specific design recommendations for the interpretation of compression drilled shaft load test, in terms of both capacity and displacement, are given.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Compression</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geotechnics</subject><subject>Q1</subject><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><issn>1090-0241</issn><issn>1943-5606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkVFLwzAQx4MoOKffoQjKfOi8NGmT-jbqnIOJD-t7SNMEO7p2Jq3gt7ehY29qXi6X-939w_0RusUwx5Dgx9limy0fVvkcp5SEcQLJHPyJ2BmanN7OhzukEEJE8SW6cm43IBR4NEFvma26Ssk6WH7Jupdd1TZBa4Ks3R-sds6n66bTdsi6seo7tK1kYFobPNuqrnUZbD-k6dw1ujCydvrmGKcof1nm2Wu4eV-ts8UmlJTQLpQpmELT1OCCc1UwoxQoHRMeaS5LAzFOCuApoxFluuAxU1BilQBhPC41IVN0P4492Paz164T-8opXdey0W3vBKEsSgiJ_wUj4Jh4dopmf4KYs5jHKWAY0KcRVbZ1zmojDrbaS_stMAhvihDeFLHKhTdAeAPE0ZSh-e6oI92wdGNloyp3mhBhxjhg__Fk5AZMi13b22bY50nhd4EfkaOdbg</recordid><startdate>20090801</startdate><enddate>20090801</enddate><creator>Chen, Yit-Jin</creator><creator>Fang, Yi-Chung</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090801</creationdate><title>Critical Evaluation of Compression Interpretation Criteria for Drilled Shafts</title><author>Chen, Yit-Jin ; Fang, Yi-Chung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-a90fbe49f1b88cb7fcc0ce5382e8adf0516b08974247eb857c0d1c603785de33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Compression</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geotechnics</topic><topic>Q1</topic><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yit-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Yi-Chung</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Yit-Jin</au><au>Fang, Yi-Chung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Critical Evaluation of Compression Interpretation Criteria for Drilled Shafts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</jtitle><date>2009-08-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>135</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1056</spage><epage>1069</epage><pages>1056-1069</pages><issn>1090-0241</issn><eissn>1943-5606</eissn><abstract>This paper is a critical evaluation of the interpretation criteria of drilled shafts under axial compression loading. A wide variety of load test data are used for analysis, and these data are divided into drained and undrained databases. The interpretation criteria are examined from these load test results to establish a consistent compression interpretation criterion. Among these criteria, the range of each interpretation method presents approximately the same trend for both drained and undrained conditions. The statistical results show that the smaller the compression displacement, the higher the coefficient of variation. Moreover, the undrained load test results reveal less variability than the drained results. The load-displacement curve of a drained loading also demonstrates more ductility than that for undrained loading. Based on these analyses, the relative merits and interrelationships of these criteria are established, and specific design recommendations for the interpretation of compression drilled shaft load test, in terms of both capacity and displacement, are given.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000027</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1090-0241
ispartof Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 2009-08, Vol.135 (8), p.1056-1069
issn 1090-0241
1943-5606
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34726335
source American Society of Civil Engineers
subjects Applied sciences
Buildings. Public works
Compression
Drilling
Earthwork. Foundations. Retaining walls
Exact sciences and technology
Geotechnics
Q1
TECHNICAL PAPERS
title Critical Evaluation of Compression Interpretation Criteria for Drilled Shafts
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T05%3A57%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critical%20Evaluation%20of%20Compression%20Interpretation%20Criteria%20for%20Drilled%20Shafts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geotechnical%20and%20geoenvironmental%20engineering&rft.au=Chen,%20Yit-Jin&rft.date=2009-08-01&rft.volume=135&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1056&rft.epage=1069&rft.pages=1056-1069&rft.issn=1090-0241&rft.eissn=1943-5606&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1875859010%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a434t-a90fbe49f1b88cb7fcc0ce5382e8adf0516b08974247eb857c0d1c603785de33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1875859010&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true