Do indicators of nitrogen retention and leaching differ between coniferous and broadleaved forests in Denmark?

• Published in: Forest ecology and management 2009-09, Vol.258 (7), p.1137-1146
• Main Authors: Gundersen, Per, Sevel, Lisbeth, Christiansen, Jesper Riis, Vesterdal, Lars, Hansen, Karin, Bastrup-Birk, Annemarie
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; atmospheric deposition; biogeochemical cycles; Biological and medical sciences; carbon nitrogen ratio; forest soils; forest stands; forest types; Forestry; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Indicators; land use; leaching; losses from soil; N-saturation; nitrates; nitrogen; Nitrogen input–output budgets; precipitation; Soil C/N ratios; soil water; Synecology; temperate forests; Terrestrial ecosystems; Threshold values; throughfall; Throughfall N
• ISSN: 0378-1127; 1872-7042
• DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.06.007

The area of broadleaved forests is projected to increase in Denmark as well as in the rest of Europe. However, studies of the N leaching response to elevated N deposition have focused on coniferous stands and considerable uncertainty still remains on whether broadleaved and coniferous forests respond differently to elevated N. We studied N input–output relations for eight stands intensively monitored during 2002–2005 and literature data for 37 additional stands which together formed a comprehensive dataset on Danish forests including 26 broadleaved stands and 19 coniferous stands. Nitrate leaching was significantly higher in first generation stands on former arable land with mineral soil C/N ratios 10–15, but both low and high rates were observed independent of the N input. A net N loss was observed in some of these stands even though they are in the aggrading phase and accumulate N in the biomass. Broadleaved stands had significantly lower throughfall N deposition than coniferous stands and this seems to be the main process where forest type exerts an influence on the N cycle. Lower soil C/N ratios offset the effect of throughfall N deposition and thus N leaching did not differ between the two forest types. The best regression models for prediction of nitrate leaching included throughfall N deposition and C/N ratio, but only a minor part of the variability was explained. The C/N ratio of the upper mineral soil was more generally applicable than that of the organic layer. The N retention of the soil was reasonably well predicted above a C/N ratio of 25, but below this threshold the importance is not known. We suggest focusing future efforts on quantifying the relative retention functions (sink strength) of the vegetation and the soil organic matter to improve the predictions of N retention and N leaching.