Outdoor air pollution in close proximity to a continuous point source

• Published in: Atmospheric environment (1994) 2009-06, Vol.43 (20), p.3155-3167
• Main Authors: Klepeis, Neil E., Gabel, Etienne B., Ott, Wayne R., Switzer, Paul
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Air; Biological and medical sciences; Carbon monoxide; Carbon monoxide tracer gas; Cigarettes; Controlled source; Environmental pollutants toxicology; Exposure; Horizontal; Mathematical models; Medical sciences; Outdoor; Outdoor proximity effect; Point sources; Proximity effect (electricity); Real-time monitoring; Regression modeling; Secondhand tobacco smoke; Strength; Toxicology; Wind; Wind direction
• ISSN: 1352-2310; 1873-2844
• DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.03.056

Data are lacking on human exposure to air pollutants occurring in ground-level outdoor environments within a few meters of point sources. To better understand outdoor exposure to tobacco smoke from cigarettes or cigars, and exposure to other types of outdoor point sources, we performed more than 100 controlled outdoor monitoring experiments on a backyard residential patio in which we released pure carbon monoxide (CO) as a tracer gas for continuous time periods lasting 0.5–2 h. The CO was emitted from a single outlet at a fixed per-experiment rate of 120–400 cc min −1 (∼140–450 mg min −1). We measured CO concentrations every 15 s at up to 36 points around the source along orthogonal axes. The CO sensors were positioned at standing or sitting breathing heights of 2–5 ft (up to 1.5 ft above and below the source) and at horizontal distances of 0.25–2 m. We simultaneously measured real-time air speed, wind direction, relative humidity, and temperature at single points on the patio. The ground-level air speeds on the patio were similar to those we measured during a survey of 26 outdoor patio locations in 5 nearby towns. The CO data exhibited a well-defined proximity effect similar to the indoor proximity effect reported in the literature. Average concentrations were approximately inversely proportional to distance. Average CO levels were approximately proportional to source strength, supporting generalization of our results to different source strengths. For example, we predict a cigarette smoker would cause average fine particle levels of approximately 70–110 μg m −3 at horizontal distances of 0.25–0.5 m. We also found that average CO concentrations rose significantly as average air speed decreased. We fit a multiplicative regression model to the empirical data that predicts outdoor concentrations as a function of source emission rate, source–receptor distance, air speed and wind direction. The model described the data reasonably well, accounting for ∼50% of the log-CO variability in 5-min CO concentrations.