Loading…

Development of building vulnerability functions in subsidence regions from empirical methods

The extraction of ores and minerals by underground mining often causes ground subsidence phenomena. In urban regions, these phenomena may induce small to severe damage to buildings. To evaluate this damage, several empirical and analytical methods have been developed in different countries. However,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Engineering structures 2009-10, Vol.31 (10), p.2275-2286
Main Authors: Saeidi, Ali, Deck, Olivier, Verdel, Tierry
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d93e00e49896f10234960b38c1a438f3a03b733e5173f0b1f54930b66c2c06713
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d93e00e49896f10234960b38c1a438f3a03b733e5173f0b1f54930b66c2c06713
container_end_page 2286
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2275
container_title Engineering structures
container_volume 31
creator Saeidi, Ali
Deck, Olivier
Verdel, Tierry
description The extraction of ores and minerals by underground mining often causes ground subsidence phenomena. In urban regions, these phenomena may induce small to severe damage to buildings. To evaluate this damage, several empirical and analytical methods have been developed in different countries. However, these methods are difficult to use and compare due to differences in the number of criteria used (from 1 to 12). Furthermore, the results provided by damage evaluation may be significantly different from one method to another. The present paper develops vulnerability functions based on a concept that has been applied in other areas, such as earthquake engineering, and that appears to be a more efficient way to assess building vulnerability in undermined cities. A methodology is described for calculating vulnerability functions in subsidence zones using empirical methods. The first part of the paper focuses on existing empirical methods for damage evaluation, and selected necessary improvements or modifications are justified. The second part focuses on the development of a building typology in subsidence zones and its application in the Lorraine region, where many villages are subject to subsidence problems due to iron-ore mining. The third section describes and discusses the adopted methodology for determining vulnerability and fragility functions or curves. Finally, vulnerability functions are tested and validated with a set of three subsidences that occurred in Lorraine between 1996 and 1999.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.04.010
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34858846</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S014102960900159X</els_id><sourcerecordid>34858846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d93e00e49896f10234960b38c1a438f3a03b733e5173f0b1f54930b66c2c06713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtq4zAUhsXQgUkvz1Btpju7R5fY8jKk7Uyh0E27GxCyfJRRsKVUsgN9-zpJ6barA4f_wv8Rcs2gZMCq222JYZPHNNmx5ABNCbIEBj_IgqlaFLXg4owsgElWAG-qX-Q85y0AcKVgQf7d4R77uBswjDQ62k6-73zY0P3UB0ym9b0f36mbgh19DJn6QPPUZt9hsEgTbo5fl-JAcdj55K3p6YDj_9jlS_LTmT7j1ee9IK8P9y_rv8XT85_H9eqpsJIvx6JrBAKgbFRTOQZcyKaCVijLjBTKCQOirYXAJauFg5a5pWwEtFVluYWqZuKC3Jxydym-TZhHPfhsse9NwDhlLaRaKiWrWVifhDbFnBM6vUt-MOldM9AHmnqrv2jqA00NUs80Z-fvzwqT54UumWB9_rJzDrKWR93qpMN5795j0tn6A6rOJ5wzu-i_7foAAz-QXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>34858846</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of building vulnerability functions in subsidence regions from empirical methods</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Saeidi, Ali ; Deck, Olivier ; Verdel, Tierry</creator><creatorcontrib>Saeidi, Ali ; Deck, Olivier ; Verdel, Tierry</creatorcontrib><description>The extraction of ores and minerals by underground mining often causes ground subsidence phenomena. In urban regions, these phenomena may induce small to severe damage to buildings. To evaluate this damage, several empirical and analytical methods have been developed in different countries. However, these methods are difficult to use and compare due to differences in the number of criteria used (from 1 to 12). Furthermore, the results provided by damage evaluation may be significantly different from one method to another. The present paper develops vulnerability functions based on a concept that has been applied in other areas, such as earthquake engineering, and that appears to be a more efficient way to assess building vulnerability in undermined cities. A methodology is described for calculating vulnerability functions in subsidence zones using empirical methods. The first part of the paper focuses on existing empirical methods for damage evaluation, and selected necessary improvements or modifications are justified. The second part focuses on the development of a building typology in subsidence zones and its application in the Lorraine region, where many villages are subject to subsidence problems due to iron-ore mining. The third section describes and discusses the adopted methodology for determining vulnerability and fragility functions or curves. Finally, vulnerability functions are tested and validated with a set of three subsidences that occurred in Lorraine between 1996 and 1999.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-0296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.04.010</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENSTDF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Buildings ; Buildings. Public works ; Computation methods. Tables. Charts ; Damage ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fragility curve ; Geotechnics ; Horizontal ground strain ; Mining subsidence ; Miscellaneous ; Structural analysis. Stresses ; Types of buildings ; Vulnerability ; Vulnerability curve</subject><ispartof>Engineering structures, 2009-10, Vol.31 (10), p.2275-2286</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d93e00e49896f10234960b38c1a438f3a03b733e5173f0b1f54930b66c2c06713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d93e00e49896f10234960b38c1a438f3a03b733e5173f0b1f54930b66c2c06713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22047410$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saeidi, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deck, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdel, Tierry</creatorcontrib><title>Development of building vulnerability functions in subsidence regions from empirical methods</title><title>Engineering structures</title><description>The extraction of ores and minerals by underground mining often causes ground subsidence phenomena. In urban regions, these phenomena may induce small to severe damage to buildings. To evaluate this damage, several empirical and analytical methods have been developed in different countries. However, these methods are difficult to use and compare due to differences in the number of criteria used (from 1 to 12). Furthermore, the results provided by damage evaluation may be significantly different from one method to another. The present paper develops vulnerability functions based on a concept that has been applied in other areas, such as earthquake engineering, and that appears to be a more efficient way to assess building vulnerability in undermined cities. A methodology is described for calculating vulnerability functions in subsidence zones using empirical methods. The first part of the paper focuses on existing empirical methods for damage evaluation, and selected necessary improvements or modifications are justified. The second part focuses on the development of a building typology in subsidence zones and its application in the Lorraine region, where many villages are subject to subsidence problems due to iron-ore mining. The third section describes and discusses the adopted methodology for determining vulnerability and fragility functions or curves. Finally, vulnerability functions are tested and validated with a set of three subsidences that occurred in Lorraine between 1996 and 1999.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fragility curve</subject><subject>Geotechnics</subject><subject>Horizontal ground strain</subject><subject>Mining subsidence</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><subject>Types of buildings</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><subject>Vulnerability curve</subject><issn>0141-0296</issn><issn>1873-7323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtq4zAUhsXQgUkvz1Btpju7R5fY8jKk7Uyh0E27GxCyfJRRsKVUsgN9-zpJ6barA4f_wv8Rcs2gZMCq222JYZPHNNmx5ABNCbIEBj_IgqlaFLXg4owsgElWAG-qX-Q85y0AcKVgQf7d4R77uBswjDQ62k6-73zY0P3UB0ym9b0f36mbgh19DJn6QPPUZt9hsEgTbo5fl-JAcdj55K3p6YDj_9jlS_LTmT7j1ee9IK8P9y_rv8XT85_H9eqpsJIvx6JrBAKgbFRTOQZcyKaCVijLjBTKCQOirYXAJauFg5a5pWwEtFVluYWqZuKC3Jxydym-TZhHPfhsse9NwDhlLaRaKiWrWVifhDbFnBM6vUt-MOldM9AHmnqrv2jqA00NUs80Z-fvzwqT54UumWB9_rJzDrKWR93qpMN5795j0tn6A6rOJ5wzu-i_7foAAz-QXg</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Saeidi, Ali</creator><creator>Deck, Olivier</creator><creator>Verdel, Tierry</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Development of building vulnerability functions in subsidence regions from empirical methods</title><author>Saeidi, Ali ; Deck, Olivier ; Verdel, Tierry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d93e00e49896f10234960b38c1a438f3a03b733e5173f0b1f54930b66c2c06713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fragility curve</topic><topic>Geotechnics</topic><topic>Horizontal ground strain</topic><topic>Mining subsidence</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Structural analysis. Stresses</topic><topic>Types of buildings</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><topic>Vulnerability curve</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saeidi, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deck, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdel, Tierry</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saeidi, Ali</au><au>Deck, Olivier</au><au>Verdel, Tierry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of building vulnerability functions in subsidence regions from empirical methods</atitle><jtitle>Engineering structures</jtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2275</spage><epage>2286</epage><pages>2275-2286</pages><issn>0141-0296</issn><eissn>1873-7323</eissn><coden>ENSTDF</coden><abstract>The extraction of ores and minerals by underground mining often causes ground subsidence phenomena. In urban regions, these phenomena may induce small to severe damage to buildings. To evaluate this damage, several empirical and analytical methods have been developed in different countries. However, these methods are difficult to use and compare due to differences in the number of criteria used (from 1 to 12). Furthermore, the results provided by damage evaluation may be significantly different from one method to another. The present paper develops vulnerability functions based on a concept that has been applied in other areas, such as earthquake engineering, and that appears to be a more efficient way to assess building vulnerability in undermined cities. A methodology is described for calculating vulnerability functions in subsidence zones using empirical methods. The first part of the paper focuses on existing empirical methods for damage evaluation, and selected necessary improvements or modifications are justified. The second part focuses on the development of a building typology in subsidence zones and its application in the Lorraine region, where many villages are subject to subsidence problems due to iron-ore mining. The third section describes and discusses the adopted methodology for determining vulnerability and fragility functions or curves. Finally, vulnerability functions are tested and validated with a set of three subsidences that occurred in Lorraine between 1996 and 1999.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.04.010</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-0296
ispartof Engineering structures, 2009-10, Vol.31 (10), p.2275-2286
issn 0141-0296
1873-7323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_34858846
source Elsevier
subjects Applied sciences
Buildings
Buildings. Public works
Computation methods. Tables. Charts
Damage
Exact sciences and technology
Fragility curve
Geotechnics
Horizontal ground strain
Mining subsidence
Miscellaneous
Structural analysis. Stresses
Types of buildings
Vulnerability
Vulnerability curve
title Development of building vulnerability functions in subsidence regions from empirical methods
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A21%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20building%20vulnerability%20functions%20in%20subsidence%20regions%20from%20empirical%20methods&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20structures&rft.au=Saeidi,%20Ali&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2275&rft.epage=2286&rft.pages=2275-2286&rft.issn=0141-0296&rft.eissn=1873-7323&rft.coden=ENSTDF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.04.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E34858846%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d93e00e49896f10234960b38c1a438f3a03b733e5173f0b1f54930b66c2c06713%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=34858846&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true