Breakup of a drop in a liquid-liquid pipe flow through an orifice

The drop breakup in a heterogeneous turbulent pipe flow developing downstream of an orifice is reported. A two‐phase flow is considered of n‐heptane drops in a water–glycerin solution at three distinct volume concentrations: ϕd = 0 (single‐phase flow), 0.1, and 0.2. The maximum pressure drop across...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:AIChE journal 2007-01, Vol.53 (1), p.56-68
Main Authors: Galinat, S., Garrido Torres, L., Masbernat, O., Guiraud, P., Risso, F., Dalmazzone, C., Noik, C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Applied sciences
breakup probability
Chemical engineering
drop breakup
Exact sciences and technology
Flow velocity
heterogeneous turbulence
Hydrodynamics of contact apparatus
Steam pipes
Turbulence
Turbulent flow
two-phase dispersed flow
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The drop breakup in a heterogeneous turbulent pipe flow developing downstream of an orifice is reported. A two‐phase flow is considered of n‐heptane drops in a water–glycerin solution at three distinct volume concentrations: ϕd = 0 (single‐phase flow), 0.1, and 0.2. The maximum pressure drop across the orifice, ΔPmax, is found to be a linear function of the kinetic energy of the mixture that weakly depends on ϕd. The continuous‐phase velocity field is measured by means of high‐speed particle image velocimetry in an optically homogeneous medium. The turbulence energy level and its spatial distribution are strongly influenced by both the continuous‐phase viscosity and the presence of the dispersed phase. Drop breakup is driven by an inertial mechanism and is observed where the turbulence is the most intense. The breakup probability, the mean number of fragments, and the daughter‐drop Sauter diameter are plotted against the global Weber number based on ΔPmax. For concentrations up to 0.1, breakup statistics are close to those obtained with an isolated drop in a single‐phase flow of water. For ϕd = 0.2, the increase of breakup probability with the Weber number becomes weaker because of the volume reduction of the region of intense turbulence. The evolution of breakup probability with the distance from the orifice indeed shows strong differences between the test cases, arising from modifications in the local structure of the heterogeneous turbulence field. © 2006 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2007
ISSN:0001-1541
1547-5905
DOI:10.1002/aic.11055