Loading…

Economically Optimal Nitrogen Rate Reduces Soil Residual Nitrate

Post-harvest residual soil NO3-N (RSN) is susceptible to transfer to water resources. Practices that minimize RSN levels can reduce N loss to the environment. Our objectives were (i) to determine if the RSN after corn (Zea mays L.) harvest can be reduced if N fertilizer is applied at the economicall...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental quality 2007-03, Vol.36 (2), p.354-362
Main Authors: Hong, N, Scharf, P.C, Davis, J.G, Kitchen, N.R, Sudduth, K.A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5463-f5b20762550e6de22057b60f89facb784e2337a994062c4180dc7446ab4caa6d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5463-f5b20762550e6de22057b60f89facb784e2337a994062c4180dc7446ab4caa6d3
container_end_page 362
container_issue 2
container_start_page 354
container_title Journal of environmental quality
container_volume 36
creator Hong, N
Scharf, P.C
Davis, J.G
Kitchen, N.R
Sudduth, K.A
description Post-harvest residual soil NO3-N (RSN) is susceptible to transfer to water resources. Practices that minimize RSN levels can reduce N loss to the environment. Our objectives were (i) to determine if the RSN after corn (Zea mays L.) harvest can be reduced if N fertilizer is applied at the economically optimal N rate (EONR) as compared to current producer practices in the midwestern USA and (ii) to compare RSN levels for N fertilizer rates below, at, and above the EONR. Six experiments were conducted in producer fields in three major soil areas (Mississippi Delta alluvial, deep loess, claypan) in Missouri over 2 yr. Predominant soil great groups were Albaqualfs, Argiudolls, Haplaquolls, and Fluvaquents. At four transects in each field, six treatment N rates from 0 to 280 kg N ha-1 were applied, the EONR was determined, and the RSN was measured to a 0.9-m depth from five treatment plots. The EONR at sampling sites varied from 49 to 228 kg N ha-1 depending on site and year. Estimated average RSN at the EONR was 33 kg N ha-1 in the 0.9-m profile. This was at least 12 kg N ha-1 lower than RSN at the producers' N rates. The RSN increased with increasing delta EONR (total N applied - EONR). This relationship was best modeled by a plateau-linear function, with a low RSN plateau at N rates well below the EONR. A linear increase in RSN began anywhere from 65 kg N ha-1 below the EONR to 20 kg N ha-1 above the EONR at the three sites with good data resolution near the EONR. Applying N rates in excess of the EONR produced elevated RSN values in all six experiments. Our results suggest that applying the EONR will produce environmental benefits in an economically sound manner, and that continued attempts to develop methods for accurately predicting EONR are justified.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/jeq2006.0173
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35119766</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1370709731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5463-f5b20762550e6de22057b60f89facb784e2337a994062c4180dc7446ab4caa6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLAzEURoMotj52rnVw4crqzc1rZqdIfSGKrV2HTCYjU6ZNnXSQ_ntTOiC4sIu8T74L9xByQuEKKePXU_eFAPIKqGI7pE8FUwOM0y7pA_C45yh65CCEKQBFUHKf9KhCISRin9wMrZ_7WWVNXa-St8Wympk6ea2Wjf9082Rkli4ZuaK1LiRjX9XxEKqi7Zj4ekT2SlMHd9yth2RyP_y4exy8vD083d2-DKzgkg1Kka9rx7LgZOEQQahcQplmpbG5SrlDxpTJMg4SLacpFFZxLk3OrTGyYIfkYpO7aPxX68JSz6pgXV2bufNt0ExQmikpt4IYOQ6IW0GaSWApU9tBnlLGpIjg-R9w6ttmHtsSwxSPhjIWocsNZBsfQuNKvWhi05uVpqDXRnVnVK-NRvy0y2zzmSt-4U5hBLIN8F3VbvVvmH4evuN6xIsu_GzztzRem8-mCnoyRqAMIOUgWMZ-AKtDsrs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197401793</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economically Optimal Nitrogen Rate Reduces Soil Residual Nitrate</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Hong, N ; Scharf, P.C ; Davis, J.G ; Kitchen, N.R ; Sudduth, K.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hong, N ; Scharf, P.C ; Davis, J.G ; Kitchen, N.R ; Sudduth, K.A</creatorcontrib><description>Post-harvest residual soil NO3-N (RSN) is susceptible to transfer to water resources. Practices that minimize RSN levels can reduce N loss to the environment. Our objectives were (i) to determine if the RSN after corn (Zea mays L.) harvest can be reduced if N fertilizer is applied at the economically optimal N rate (EONR) as compared to current producer practices in the midwestern USA and (ii) to compare RSN levels for N fertilizer rates below, at, and above the EONR. Six experiments were conducted in producer fields in three major soil areas (Mississippi Delta alluvial, deep loess, claypan) in Missouri over 2 yr. Predominant soil great groups were Albaqualfs, Argiudolls, Haplaquolls, and Fluvaquents. At four transects in each field, six treatment N rates from 0 to 280 kg N ha-1 were applied, the EONR was determined, and the RSN was measured to a 0.9-m depth from five treatment plots. The EONR at sampling sites varied from 49 to 228 kg N ha-1 depending on site and year. Estimated average RSN at the EONR was 33 kg N ha-1 in the 0.9-m profile. This was at least 12 kg N ha-1 lower than RSN at the producers' N rates. The RSN increased with increasing delta EONR (total N applied - EONR). This relationship was best modeled by a plateau-linear function, with a low RSN plateau at N rates well below the EONR. A linear increase in RSN began anywhere from 65 kg N ha-1 below the EONR to 20 kg N ha-1 above the EONR at the three sites with good data resolution near the EONR. Applying N rates in excess of the EONR produced elevated RSN values in all six experiments. Our results suggest that applying the EONR will produce environmental benefits in an economically sound manner, and that continued attempts to develop methods for accurately predicting EONR are justified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0173</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17255622</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVQAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Agriculture - economics ; Agriculture - methods ; application timing ; Corn ; Environmental economics ; Environmental impact ; fertilizer application ; fertilizer rates ; Fertilizers ; Fertilizers - economics ; field experimentation ; Harvesting ; Losses ; losses from soil ; Missouri ; nitrate nitrogen ; Nitrates - analysis ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen - administration &amp; dosage ; Nitrogen - economics ; nitrogen fertilizers ; Rain ; Residual soils ; River basins ; Soil Pollutants - analysis ; Soils ; water pollution ; Water resources ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2007-03, Vol.36 (2), p.354-362</ispartof><rights>ASA, CSSA, SSSA</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Mar/Apr 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5463-f5b20762550e6de22057b60f89facb784e2337a994062c4180dc7446ab4caa6d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5463-f5b20762550e6de22057b60f89facb784e2337a994062c4180dc7446ab4caa6d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17255622$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hong, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scharf, P.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, J.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitchen, N.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudduth, K.A</creatorcontrib><title>Economically Optimal Nitrogen Rate Reduces Soil Residual Nitrate</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><description>Post-harvest residual soil NO3-N (RSN) is susceptible to transfer to water resources. Practices that minimize RSN levels can reduce N loss to the environment. Our objectives were (i) to determine if the RSN after corn (Zea mays L.) harvest can be reduced if N fertilizer is applied at the economically optimal N rate (EONR) as compared to current producer practices in the midwestern USA and (ii) to compare RSN levels for N fertilizer rates below, at, and above the EONR. Six experiments were conducted in producer fields in three major soil areas (Mississippi Delta alluvial, deep loess, claypan) in Missouri over 2 yr. Predominant soil great groups were Albaqualfs, Argiudolls, Haplaquolls, and Fluvaquents. At four transects in each field, six treatment N rates from 0 to 280 kg N ha-1 were applied, the EONR was determined, and the RSN was measured to a 0.9-m depth from five treatment plots. The EONR at sampling sites varied from 49 to 228 kg N ha-1 depending on site and year. Estimated average RSN at the EONR was 33 kg N ha-1 in the 0.9-m profile. This was at least 12 kg N ha-1 lower than RSN at the producers' N rates. The RSN increased with increasing delta EONR (total N applied - EONR). This relationship was best modeled by a plateau-linear function, with a low RSN plateau at N rates well below the EONR. A linear increase in RSN began anywhere from 65 kg N ha-1 below the EONR to 20 kg N ha-1 above the EONR at the three sites with good data resolution near the EONR. Applying N rates in excess of the EONR produced elevated RSN values in all six experiments. Our results suggest that applying the EONR will produce environmental benefits in an economically sound manner, and that continued attempts to develop methods for accurately predicting EONR are justified.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agriculture - economics</subject><subject>Agriculture - methods</subject><subject>application timing</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>fertilizer application</subject><subject>fertilizer rates</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Fertilizers - economics</subject><subject>field experimentation</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Losses</subject><subject>losses from soil</subject><subject>Missouri</subject><subject>nitrate nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrates - analysis</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Nitrogen - economics</subject><subject>nitrogen fertilizers</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Residual soils</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>water pollution</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtLAzEURoMotj52rnVw4crqzc1rZqdIfSGKrV2HTCYjU6ZNnXSQ_ntTOiC4sIu8T74L9xByQuEKKePXU_eFAPIKqGI7pE8FUwOM0y7pA_C45yh65CCEKQBFUHKf9KhCISRin9wMrZ_7WWVNXa-St8Wympk6ea2Wjf9082Rkli4ZuaK1LiRjX9XxEKqi7Zj4ekT2SlMHd9yth2RyP_y4exy8vD083d2-DKzgkg1Kka9rx7LgZOEQQahcQplmpbG5SrlDxpTJMg4SLacpFFZxLk3OrTGyYIfkYpO7aPxX68JSz6pgXV2bufNt0ExQmikpt4IYOQ6IW0GaSWApU9tBnlLGpIjg-R9w6ttmHtsSwxSPhjIWocsNZBsfQuNKvWhi05uVpqDXRnVnVK-NRvy0y2zzmSt-4U5hBLIN8F3VbvVvmH4evuN6xIsu_GzztzRem8-mCnoyRqAMIOUgWMZ-AKtDsrs</recordid><startdate>200703</startdate><enddate>200703</enddate><creator>Hong, N</creator><creator>Scharf, P.C</creator><creator>Davis, J.G</creator><creator>Kitchen, N.R</creator><creator>Sudduth, K.A</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200703</creationdate><title>Economically Optimal Nitrogen Rate Reduces Soil Residual Nitrate</title><author>Hong, N ; Scharf, P.C ; Davis, J.G ; Kitchen, N.R ; Sudduth, K.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5463-f5b20762550e6de22057b60f89facb784e2337a994062c4180dc7446ab4caa6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agriculture - economics</topic><topic>Agriculture - methods</topic><topic>application timing</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>fertilizer application</topic><topic>fertilizer rates</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Fertilizers - economics</topic><topic>field experimentation</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Losses</topic><topic>losses from soil</topic><topic>Missouri</topic><topic>nitrate nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrates - analysis</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Nitrogen - economics</topic><topic>nitrogen fertilizers</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Residual soils</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>water pollution</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hong, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scharf, P.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, J.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitchen, N.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudduth, K.A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hong, N</au><au>Scharf, P.C</au><au>Davis, J.G</au><au>Kitchen, N.R</au><au>Sudduth, K.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economically Optimal Nitrogen Rate Reduces Soil Residual Nitrate</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><date>2007-03</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>354</spage><epage>362</epage><pages>354-362</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><coden>JEVQAA</coden><abstract>Post-harvest residual soil NO3-N (RSN) is susceptible to transfer to water resources. Practices that minimize RSN levels can reduce N loss to the environment. Our objectives were (i) to determine if the RSN after corn (Zea mays L.) harvest can be reduced if N fertilizer is applied at the economically optimal N rate (EONR) as compared to current producer practices in the midwestern USA and (ii) to compare RSN levels for N fertilizer rates below, at, and above the EONR. Six experiments were conducted in producer fields in three major soil areas (Mississippi Delta alluvial, deep loess, claypan) in Missouri over 2 yr. Predominant soil great groups were Albaqualfs, Argiudolls, Haplaquolls, and Fluvaquents. At four transects in each field, six treatment N rates from 0 to 280 kg N ha-1 were applied, the EONR was determined, and the RSN was measured to a 0.9-m depth from five treatment plots. The EONR at sampling sites varied from 49 to 228 kg N ha-1 depending on site and year. Estimated average RSN at the EONR was 33 kg N ha-1 in the 0.9-m profile. This was at least 12 kg N ha-1 lower than RSN at the producers' N rates. The RSN increased with increasing delta EONR (total N applied - EONR). This relationship was best modeled by a plateau-linear function, with a low RSN plateau at N rates well below the EONR. A linear increase in RSN began anywhere from 65 kg N ha-1 below the EONR to 20 kg N ha-1 above the EONR at the three sites with good data resolution near the EONR. Applying N rates in excess of the EONR produced elevated RSN values in all six experiments. Our results suggest that applying the EONR will produce environmental benefits in an economically sound manner, and that continued attempts to develop methods for accurately predicting EONR are justified.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society</pub><pmid>17255622</pmid><doi>10.2134/jeq2006.0173</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2425
ispartof Journal of environmental quality, 2007-03, Vol.36 (2), p.354-362
issn 0047-2425
1537-2537
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35119766
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Agriculture
Agriculture - economics
Agriculture - methods
application timing
Corn
Environmental economics
Environmental impact
fertilizer application
fertilizer rates
Fertilizers
Fertilizers - economics
field experimentation
Harvesting
Losses
losses from soil
Missouri
nitrate nitrogen
Nitrates - analysis
Nitrogen
Nitrogen - administration & dosage
Nitrogen - economics
nitrogen fertilizers
Rain
Residual soils
River basins
Soil Pollutants - analysis
Soils
water pollution
Water resources
Zea mays
title Economically Optimal Nitrogen Rate Reduces Soil Residual Nitrate
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T04%3A35%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economically%20Optimal%20Nitrogen%20Rate%20Reduces%20Soil%20Residual%20Nitrate&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Hong,%20N&rft.date=2007-03&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=354&rft.epage=362&rft.pages=354-362&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft.coden=JEVQAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2006.0173&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1370709731%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5463-f5b20762550e6de22057b60f89facb784e2337a994062c4180dc7446ab4caa6d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197401793&rft_id=info:pmid/17255622&rfr_iscdi=true