Loading…

Coverage path planning algorithms for agricultural field machines

In this article, a coverage path planning problem is discussed in the case of agricultural fields and agricultural machines. Methods and algorithms to solve this problem are developed. These algorithms are applicable to both robots and human‐driven machines. The necessary condition is to cover the w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of field robotics 2009-08, Vol.26 (8), p.651-668
Main Authors: Oksanen, Timo, Visala, Arto
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3380-4941f1b52c3be575e2ba8dbed4dc402f32d9206f974c7bb4a11be51de59207643
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3380-4941f1b52c3be575e2ba8dbed4dc402f32d9206f974c7bb4a11be51de59207643
container_end_page 668
container_issue 8
container_start_page 651
container_title Journal of field robotics
container_volume 26
creator Oksanen, Timo
Visala, Arto
description In this article, a coverage path planning problem is discussed in the case of agricultural fields and agricultural machines. Methods and algorithms to solve this problem are developed. These algorithms are applicable to both robots and human‐driven machines. The necessary condition is to cover the whole field, and the goal is to find as efficient a route as possible. As yet, there is no universal algorithm or method capable of solving the problem in all cases. Two new approaches to solve the coverage path planning problem in the case of agricultural fields and agricultural machines are presented for consideration. Both of them are greedy algorithms. In the first algorithm the view is from on top of the field, and the goal is to split a single field plot into subfields that are simple to drive or operate. This algorithm utilizes a trapezoidal decomposition algorithm, and a search is developed of the best driving direction and selection of subfields. This article also presents other practical aspects that are taken into account, such as underdrainage and laying headlands. The second algorithm is also an incremental algorithm, but the path is planned on the basis of the machine's current state and the search is on the next swath instead of the next subfield. There are advantages and disadvantages with both algorithms, neither of them solving the problem of coverage path planning problem optimally. Nevertheless, the developed algorithms are remarkable steps toward finding a way to solve the coverage path planning problem with nonomnidirectional vehicles and taking into consideration agricultural aspects. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rob.20300
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35125416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>35125416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3380-4941f1b52c3be575e2ba8dbed4dc402f32d9206f974c7bb4a11be51de59207643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8yITGk9WfSjKWiLaKiqIAYLcdxUoMTBzsB-u8JBLox3en0vHenB4BzBEcIQjx2Nh1hSCA8AAPEWBTSJIoP9z1LjsGJ9y8QUjJJ2ABMZ_ZdOVGooBbNNqiNqCpdFYEwhXW62ZY-yK0LROG0bE3TOmGCXCuTBaWQW10pfwqOcmG8OvutQ_A0v36cLcPVenEzm65CScgEdrcpylHKsCSpYjFTOBWTLFUZzSSFOCc4SzCM8iSmMk5TKhDqOJQp1o3jiJIhuOj31s6-tco3vNReKtN9rGzrOWEIM4qiDrzsQems907lvHa6FG7HEeTfkngnif9I6thxz35oo3b_g3yzvvpLhH1C-0Z97hPCvfIoJjHjz3cLPt9s2D1-WPJb8gUyp3gN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>35125416</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coverage path planning algorithms for agricultural field machines</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Oksanen, Timo ; Visala, Arto</creator><creatorcontrib>Oksanen, Timo ; Visala, Arto</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, a coverage path planning problem is discussed in the case of agricultural fields and agricultural machines. Methods and algorithms to solve this problem are developed. These algorithms are applicable to both robots and human‐driven machines. The necessary condition is to cover the whole field, and the goal is to find as efficient a route as possible. As yet, there is no universal algorithm or method capable of solving the problem in all cases. Two new approaches to solve the coverage path planning problem in the case of agricultural fields and agricultural machines are presented for consideration. Both of them are greedy algorithms. In the first algorithm the view is from on top of the field, and the goal is to split a single field plot into subfields that are simple to drive or operate. This algorithm utilizes a trapezoidal decomposition algorithm, and a search is developed of the best driving direction and selection of subfields. This article also presents other practical aspects that are taken into account, such as underdrainage and laying headlands. The second algorithm is also an incremental algorithm, but the path is planned on the basis of the machine's current state and the search is on the next swath instead of the next subfield. There are advantages and disadvantages with both algorithms, neither of them solving the problem of coverage path planning problem optimally. Nevertheless, the developed algorithms are remarkable steps toward finding a way to solve the coverage path planning problem with nonomnidirectional vehicles and taking into consideration agricultural aspects. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1556-4959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-4967</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rob.20300</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><ispartof>Journal of field robotics, 2009-08, Vol.26 (8), p.651-668</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3380-4941f1b52c3be575e2ba8dbed4dc402f32d9206f974c7bb4a11be51de59207643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3380-4941f1b52c3be575e2ba8dbed4dc402f32d9206f974c7bb4a11be51de59207643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oksanen, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visala, Arto</creatorcontrib><title>Coverage path planning algorithms for agricultural field machines</title><title>Journal of field robotics</title><addtitle>J. Field Robotics</addtitle><description>In this article, a coverage path planning problem is discussed in the case of agricultural fields and agricultural machines. Methods and algorithms to solve this problem are developed. These algorithms are applicable to both robots and human‐driven machines. The necessary condition is to cover the whole field, and the goal is to find as efficient a route as possible. As yet, there is no universal algorithm or method capable of solving the problem in all cases. Two new approaches to solve the coverage path planning problem in the case of agricultural fields and agricultural machines are presented for consideration. Both of them are greedy algorithms. In the first algorithm the view is from on top of the field, and the goal is to split a single field plot into subfields that are simple to drive or operate. This algorithm utilizes a trapezoidal decomposition algorithm, and a search is developed of the best driving direction and selection of subfields. This article also presents other practical aspects that are taken into account, such as underdrainage and laying headlands. The second algorithm is also an incremental algorithm, but the path is planned on the basis of the machine's current state and the search is on the next swath instead of the next subfield. There are advantages and disadvantages with both algorithms, neither of them solving the problem of coverage path planning problem optimally. Nevertheless, the developed algorithms are remarkable steps toward finding a way to solve the coverage path planning problem with nonomnidirectional vehicles and taking into consideration agricultural aspects. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><issn>1556-4959</issn><issn>1556-4967</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8yITGk9WfSjKWiLaKiqIAYLcdxUoMTBzsB-u8JBLox3en0vHenB4BzBEcIQjx2Nh1hSCA8AAPEWBTSJIoP9z1LjsGJ9y8QUjJJ2ABMZ_ZdOVGooBbNNqiNqCpdFYEwhXW62ZY-yK0LROG0bE3TOmGCXCuTBaWQW10pfwqOcmG8OvutQ_A0v36cLcPVenEzm65CScgEdrcpylHKsCSpYjFTOBWTLFUZzSSFOCc4SzCM8iSmMk5TKhDqOJQp1o3jiJIhuOj31s6-tco3vNReKtN9rGzrOWEIM4qiDrzsQems907lvHa6FG7HEeTfkngnif9I6thxz35oo3b_g3yzvvpLhH1C-0Z97hPCvfIoJjHjz3cLPt9s2D1-WPJb8gUyp3gN</recordid><startdate>200908</startdate><enddate>200908</enddate><creator>Oksanen, Timo</creator><creator>Visala, Arto</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200908</creationdate><title>Coverage path planning algorithms for agricultural field machines</title><author>Oksanen, Timo ; Visala, Arto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3380-4941f1b52c3be575e2ba8dbed4dc402f32d9206f974c7bb4a11be51de59207643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oksanen, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visala, Arto</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of field robotics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oksanen, Timo</au><au>Visala, Arto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coverage path planning algorithms for agricultural field machines</atitle><jtitle>Journal of field robotics</jtitle><addtitle>J. Field Robotics</addtitle><date>2009-08</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>651</spage><epage>668</epage><pages>651-668</pages><issn>1556-4959</issn><eissn>1556-4967</eissn><abstract>In this article, a coverage path planning problem is discussed in the case of agricultural fields and agricultural machines. Methods and algorithms to solve this problem are developed. These algorithms are applicable to both robots and human‐driven machines. The necessary condition is to cover the whole field, and the goal is to find as efficient a route as possible. As yet, there is no universal algorithm or method capable of solving the problem in all cases. Two new approaches to solve the coverage path planning problem in the case of agricultural fields and agricultural machines are presented for consideration. Both of them are greedy algorithms. In the first algorithm the view is from on top of the field, and the goal is to split a single field plot into subfields that are simple to drive or operate. This algorithm utilizes a trapezoidal decomposition algorithm, and a search is developed of the best driving direction and selection of subfields. This article also presents other practical aspects that are taken into account, such as underdrainage and laying headlands. The second algorithm is also an incremental algorithm, but the path is planned on the basis of the machine's current state and the search is on the next swath instead of the next subfield. There are advantages and disadvantages with both algorithms, neither of them solving the problem of coverage path planning problem optimally. Nevertheless, the developed algorithms are remarkable steps toward finding a way to solve the coverage path planning problem with nonomnidirectional vehicles and taking into consideration agricultural aspects. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/rob.20300</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1556-4959
ispartof Journal of field robotics, 2009-08, Vol.26 (8), p.651-668
issn 1556-4959
1556-4967
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35125416
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
title Coverage path planning algorithms for agricultural field machines
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A16%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coverage%20path%20planning%20algorithms%20for%20agricultural%20field%20machines&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20field%20robotics&rft.au=Oksanen,%20Timo&rft.date=2009-08&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=651&rft.epage=668&rft.pages=651-668&rft.issn=1556-4959&rft.eissn=1556-4967&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rob.20300&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E35125416%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3380-4941f1b52c3be575e2ba8dbed4dc402f32d9206f974c7bb4a11be51de59207643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=35125416&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true