Loading…

Informed consent for orthopaedic surgery: a prospective audit

A prospective audit of 76 patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery was performed. The aim of this audit was to assess how effectively patients are consented at a busy teaching hospital, and to suggest improvements to the process. Evaluates the level of information attained by patients after...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical governance 2003, Vol.8 (3), p.236-241
Main Authors: Sharma, Pankaj, Arya, Anand, Singh, Samrendu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-48870f6d546b969a291d87c5f11eae21d38d73d009af9eb23979284c69615af3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-48870f6d546b969a291d87c5f11eae21d38d73d009af9eb23979284c69615af3
container_end_page 241
container_issue 3
container_start_page 236
container_title Clinical governance
container_volume 8
creator Sharma, Pankaj
Arya, Anand
Singh, Samrendu
description A prospective audit of 76 patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery was performed. The aim of this audit was to assess how effectively patients are consented at a busy teaching hospital, and to suggest improvements to the process. Evaluates the level of information attained by patients after giving consent and their overall satisfaction with the process by use of a questionnaire. Results demonstrated that patients were often given incomplete information about their management. Despite this, patients themselves felt that the level of information given to them was appropriate, and allowed them to make an informed decision. Suggests the use of written information sheets and Internet Web sites to supplement the provision of information to patients. These modalities will allow patients to access as much information as they desire, while avoiding any potential anxiety due to provision of excess information.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/14777270310487066
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35508516</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>445259601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-48870f6d546b969a291d87c5f11eae21d38d73d009af9eb23979284c69615af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1P3DAQBuAIgcTnD-AW9dBTQ2f87Uo9lBVQ1EVIaKVys0w8oaG7SbCTCv49rhb1QIXgZFt-XnvsKYpDhCNEMJ9RaK2ZBo4gjAalNood1NJUCrjZzPO8X2UgtovdlO4AGAiAneLredf0cUWhrPsuUTeWeVn2cfzVD55CW5dpircUH7-Uvhxinwaqx_YPlX4K7bhfbDV-mejgedwrFqcni9n3an55dj77Nq9qbsVYCZNLalSQQt1YZT2zGIyuZYNInhgGboLmAcD6xtIN41ZbZkStrELpG75XfFwfmwu4nyiNbtWmmpZL31E_JSc1MimNeRNyKcFIVG9DBEADNsMPL-BdP8UuP9YxMEJwbXRGuEZ1_qAUqXFDbFc-PjoE97c97r_25Ey1zrRppId_AR9_O6W5lk78ZO74amGu5xcX7kf2sPa0ouiX4V1XfHol8pK6ITT8CTg2qt0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208443787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Informed consent for orthopaedic surgery: a prospective audit</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Sharma, Pankaj ; Arya, Anand ; Singh, Samrendu</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Pankaj ; Arya, Anand ; Singh, Samrendu</creatorcontrib><description>A prospective audit of 76 patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery was performed. The aim of this audit was to assess how effectively patients are consented at a busy teaching hospital, and to suggest improvements to the process. Evaluates the level of information attained by patients after giving consent and their overall satisfaction with the process by use of a questionnaire. Results demonstrated that patients were often given incomplete information about their management. Despite this, patients themselves felt that the level of information given to them was appropriate, and allowed them to make an informed decision. Suggests the use of written information sheets and Internet Web sites to supplement the provision of information to patients. These modalities will allow patients to access as much information as they desire, while avoiding any potential anxiety due to provision of excess information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-7274</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2059-4631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6038</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2059-464X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/14777270310487066</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: MCB UP Ltd</publisher><subject>Access to information ; Audits ; Decision making ; Information dissemination ; Information strategy ; Informed consent ; Internet ; Joint replacement surgery ; Joint surgery ; Needs assessment ; Orthopaedic surgery ; Orthopaedics ; Orthopedics ; Patient information ; Patients ; Physicians ; Prostheses ; Prosthetic devices ; Questionnaires ; Studies ; Surgery ; Teaching hospitals</subject><ispartof>Clinical governance, 2003, Vol.8 (3), p.236-241</ispartof><rights>MCB UP Limited</rights><rights>Copyright MCB UP Limited (MCB) 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-48870f6d546b969a291d87c5f11eae21d38d73d009af9eb23979284c69615af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-48870f6d546b969a291d87c5f11eae21d38d73d009af9eb23979284c69615af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,12826,27902,27903,27904,30978,30979</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Pankaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arya, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Samrendu</creatorcontrib><title>Informed consent for orthopaedic surgery: a prospective audit</title><title>Clinical governance</title><description>A prospective audit of 76 patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery was performed. The aim of this audit was to assess how effectively patients are consented at a busy teaching hospital, and to suggest improvements to the process. Evaluates the level of information attained by patients after giving consent and their overall satisfaction with the process by use of a questionnaire. Results demonstrated that patients were often given incomplete information about their management. Despite this, patients themselves felt that the level of information given to them was appropriate, and allowed them to make an informed decision. Suggests the use of written information sheets and Internet Web sites to supplement the provision of information to patients. These modalities will allow patients to access as much information as they desire, while avoiding any potential anxiety due to provision of excess information.</description><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Information dissemination</subject><subject>Information strategy</subject><subject>Informed consent</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Needs assessment</subject><subject>Orthopaedic surgery</subject><subject>Orthopaedics</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Patient information</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Prosthetic devices</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Teaching hospitals</subject><issn>1477-7274</issn><issn>2059-4631</issn><issn>1758-6038</issn><issn>2059-464X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U1P3DAQBuAIgcTnD-AW9dBTQ2f87Uo9lBVQ1EVIaKVys0w8oaG7SbCTCv49rhb1QIXgZFt-XnvsKYpDhCNEMJ9RaK2ZBo4gjAalNood1NJUCrjZzPO8X2UgtovdlO4AGAiAneLredf0cUWhrPsuUTeWeVn2cfzVD55CW5dpircUH7-Uvhxinwaqx_YPlX4K7bhfbDV-mejgedwrFqcni9n3an55dj77Nq9qbsVYCZNLalSQQt1YZT2zGIyuZYNInhgGboLmAcD6xtIN41ZbZkStrELpG75XfFwfmwu4nyiNbtWmmpZL31E_JSc1MimNeRNyKcFIVG9DBEADNsMPL-BdP8UuP9YxMEJwbXRGuEZ1_qAUqXFDbFc-PjoE97c97r_25Ey1zrRppId_AR9_O6W5lk78ZO74amGu5xcX7kf2sPa0ouiX4V1XfHol8pK6ITT8CTg2qt0</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>Sharma, Pankaj</creator><creator>Arya, Anand</creator><creator>Singh, Samrendu</creator><general>MCB UP Ltd</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0Q</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>Informed consent for orthopaedic surgery: a prospective audit</title><author>Sharma, Pankaj ; Arya, Anand ; Singh, Samrendu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-48870f6d546b969a291d87c5f11eae21d38d73d009af9eb23979284c69615af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Information dissemination</topic><topic>Information strategy</topic><topic>Informed consent</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Needs assessment</topic><topic>Orthopaedic surgery</topic><topic>Orthopaedics</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Patient information</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Prosthetic devices</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Teaching hospitals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Pankaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arya, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Samrendu</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>European Business Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Clinical governance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, Pankaj</au><au>Arya, Anand</au><au>Singh, Samrendu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Informed consent for orthopaedic surgery: a prospective audit</atitle><jtitle>Clinical governance</jtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>236</spage><epage>241</epage><pages>236-241</pages><issn>1477-7274</issn><issn>2059-4631</issn><eissn>1758-6038</eissn><eissn>2059-464X</eissn><abstract>A prospective audit of 76 patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery was performed. The aim of this audit was to assess how effectively patients are consented at a busy teaching hospital, and to suggest improvements to the process. Evaluates the level of information attained by patients after giving consent and their overall satisfaction with the process by use of a questionnaire. Results demonstrated that patients were often given incomplete information about their management. Despite this, patients themselves felt that the level of information given to them was appropriate, and allowed them to make an informed decision. Suggests the use of written information sheets and Internet Web sites to supplement the provision of information to patients. These modalities will allow patients to access as much information as they desire, while avoiding any potential anxiety due to provision of excess information.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>MCB UP Ltd</pub><doi>10.1108/14777270310487066</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1477-7274
ispartof Clinical governance, 2003, Vol.8 (3), p.236-241
issn 1477-7274
2059-4631
1758-6038
2059-464X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_35508516
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)
subjects Access to information
Audits
Decision making
Information dissemination
Information strategy
Informed consent
Internet
Joint replacement surgery
Joint surgery
Needs assessment
Orthopaedic surgery
Orthopaedics
Orthopedics
Patient information
Patients
Physicians
Prostheses
Prosthetic devices
Questionnaires
Studies
Surgery
Teaching hospitals
title Informed consent for orthopaedic surgery: a prospective audit
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T17%3A50%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Informed%20consent%20for%20orthopaedic%20surgery:%20a%20prospective%20audit&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20governance&rft.au=Sharma,%20Pankaj&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=236&rft.epage=241&rft.pages=236-241&rft.issn=1477-7274&rft.eissn=1758-6038&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/14777270310487066&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E445259601%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-48870f6d546b969a291d87c5f11eae21d38d73d009af9eb23979284c69615af3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208443787&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true