Shrinkage and restrained shrinkage cracking of self-compacting concrete compared to conventionally vibrated concrete

• Published in: Materials and structures 2009-01, Vol.42 (1), p.71-82
• Main Authors: Loser, R., Leemann, A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Applied sciences; Building Materials; Buildings. Public works; Civil Engineering; Concretes; Concretes. Mortars. Grouts; Engineering; Exact sciences and technology; Fracture mechanics; Grain size distribution; Machines; Manufacturing; Materials; Materials Science; Moisture content; Original Article; Other special applications (sand concrete, roller compacted concrete, heavy concrete, architectural concrete, etc.); Pastes; Processes; Risk; Self-compacting concrete; Shrinkage; Solid Mechanics; Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
• ISSN: 1359-5997; 1871-6873
• DOI: 10.1617/s11527-008-9367-9

Self-compacting concrete (SCC) used in Switzerland contains about 80 l/m 3 more volume of paste than conventionally vibrated concrete (CVC). Consequently, there are some systematic differences in the properties of the hardened concrete. Normally, shrinkage of SCC is higher than shrinkage of CVC. Therefore, risk of cracking in case of restrained deformations can be increased for SCC. In this study shrinkage of thirteen different SCC mixtures using volume of paste, water content, type of binder, grain size distribution or content of shrinkage reducing admixture (SRA) as variables was compared with shrinkage of three different CVC mixtures with constant volume of paste but variable w/b. Furthermore, the risk of cracking of the different SCC- and CVC-mixtures in restrained conditions was studied under constant and varying curing conditions. The results show that shrinkage is mainly depending on volume of paste. Due to the higher volume of paste, SCC displayed higher shrinkage than CVC. Adding an SRA was the only measure to reduce shrinkage of SCC to values of CVC. Restrained shrinkage cracking is depending on shrinkage rate, mechanical properties and drying velocity. For slow shrinkage stress development, cracking risk of SCC can be lower compared to CVC despite the higher shrinkage rate.