A comparison between SVC and transcoding

This paper presents a comparison between the scalable extension of H.264/AVC (SVC) and transcoding, in terms of rate-distortion (RD) performance and computational complexity. Both bitrate and spatial resolution reduction cases are included. Simulation results show that, in the aspect of RD performan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on consumer electronics 2008-08, Vol.54 (3), p.1439-1446
Main Authors: Liu, Hui, Wang, Ye-kui, Li, Houqiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adaptation
Automatic voltage control
Bit rate
comparison
Complexity
Computation
Computational complexity
Computer simulation
Decoding
Discrete cosine transforms
Electronics
Extraction
Rate- Distortion (RD) performance
Reduction
Scalability
Spatial resolution
Static VAr compensators
SVC
Transcoding
Video coding
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-69ea4f6a7ebe149fa0d94c1e09e71875418107a7a75df0e36b5d5c77eb3c8ba93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-69ea4f6a7ebe149fa0d94c1e09e71875418107a7a75df0e36b5d5c77eb3c8ba93
container_end_page 1446
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1439
container_title IEEE transactions on consumer electronics
container_volume 54
creator Liu, Hui
Wang, Ye-kui
Li, Houqiang
description This paper presents a comparison between the scalable extension of H.264/AVC (SVC) and transcoding, in terms of rate-distortion (RD) performance and computational complexity. Both bitrate and spatial resolution reduction cases are included. Simulation results show that, in the aspect of RD performance, SVC performs significantly better in bitrate reduction and slightly better in spatial resolution reduction. Meanwhile, SVC adaptation through bitstream extraction has negligible complexity compared with transcoding.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TCE.2008.4637638
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36319892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4637638</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>36319892</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-69ea4f6a7ebe149fa0d94c1e09e71875418107a7a75df0e36b5d5c77eb3c8ba93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwI7FEDMCScrbjrxFF5UOqxEBhtRznglK1SbFTIf49rloYGNANN9zzvtI9hJxTmFAK5nZeTicMQE8KyZXk-oCMqBA6LyhTh2QEYHTOQfJjchLjAoAWgukRubnLfL9au9DGvssqHD4Ru-zlrcxcV2dDcF30fd1276fkqHHLiGf7PSav99N5-ZjPnh-eyrtZ7rngQy4NuqKRTmGFtDCNg9oUniIYVFQrUVBNQbk0om4AuaxELbxKOPe6coaPyfWudx36jw3Gwa7a6HG5dB32m2hTB0immU7k1b8kl5wabVgCL_-Ai34TuvSF1ZJxRRVTCYId5EMfY8DGrkO7cuHLUrBbwzYZtlvDdm84RS52kRYRf_Gf6zcAHnS6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>862371727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison between SVC and transcoding</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Liu, Hui ; Wang, Ye-kui ; Li, Houqiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hui ; Wang, Ye-kui ; Li, Houqiang</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents a comparison between the scalable extension of H.264/AVC (SVC) and transcoding, in terms of rate-distortion (RD) performance and computational complexity. Both bitrate and spatial resolution reduction cases are included. Simulation results show that, in the aspect of RD performance, SVC performs significantly better in bitrate reduction and slightly better in spatial resolution reduction. Meanwhile, SVC adaptation through bitstream extraction has negligible complexity compared with transcoding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-3063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-4127</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TCE.2008.4637638</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITCEDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Automatic voltage control ; Bit rate ; comparison ; Complexity ; Computation ; Computational complexity ; Computer simulation ; Decoding ; Discrete cosine transforms ; Electronics ; Extraction ; Rate- Distortion (RD) performance ; Reduction ; Scalability ; Spatial resolution ; Static VAr compensators ; SVC ; Transcoding ; Video coding</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on consumer electronics, 2008-08, Vol.54 (3), p.1439-1446</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-69ea4f6a7ebe149fa0d94c1e09e71875418107a7a75df0e36b5d5c77eb3c8ba93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-69ea4f6a7ebe149fa0d94c1e09e71875418107a7a75df0e36b5d5c77eb3c8ba93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4637638$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,54795</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ye-kui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Houqiang</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison between SVC and transcoding</title><title>IEEE transactions on consumer electronics</title><addtitle>T-CE</addtitle><description>This paper presents a comparison between the scalable extension of H.264/AVC (SVC) and transcoding, in terms of rate-distortion (RD) performance and computational complexity. Both bitrate and spatial resolution reduction cases are included. Simulation results show that, in the aspect of RD performance, SVC performs significantly better in bitrate reduction and slightly better in spatial resolution reduction. Meanwhile, SVC adaptation through bitstream extraction has negligible complexity compared with transcoding.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Automatic voltage control</subject><subject>Bit rate</subject><subject>comparison</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Computational complexity</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Decoding</subject><subject>Discrete cosine transforms</subject><subject>Electronics</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Rate- Distortion (RD) performance</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Scalability</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>Static VAr compensators</subject><subject>SVC</subject><subject>Transcoding</subject><subject>Video coding</subject><issn>0098-3063</issn><issn>1558-4127</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwI7FEDMCScrbjrxFF5UOqxEBhtRznglK1SbFTIf49rloYGNANN9zzvtI9hJxTmFAK5nZeTicMQE8KyZXk-oCMqBA6LyhTh2QEYHTOQfJjchLjAoAWgukRubnLfL9au9DGvssqHD4Ru-zlrcxcV2dDcF30fd1276fkqHHLiGf7PSav99N5-ZjPnh-eyrtZ7rngQy4NuqKRTmGFtDCNg9oUniIYVFQrUVBNQbk0om4AuaxELbxKOPe6coaPyfWudx36jw3Gwa7a6HG5dB32m2hTB0immU7k1b8kl5wabVgCL_-Ai34TuvSF1ZJxRRVTCYId5EMfY8DGrkO7cuHLUrBbwzYZtlvDdm84RS52kRYRf_Gf6zcAHnS6</recordid><startdate>20080801</startdate><enddate>20080801</enddate><creator>Liu, Hui</creator><creator>Wang, Ye-kui</creator><creator>Li, Houqiang</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080801</creationdate><title>A comparison between SVC and transcoding</title><author>Liu, Hui ; Wang, Ye-kui ; Li, Houqiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-69ea4f6a7ebe149fa0d94c1e09e71875418107a7a75df0e36b5d5c77eb3c8ba93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Automatic voltage control</topic><topic>Bit rate</topic><topic>comparison</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Computational complexity</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Decoding</topic><topic>Discrete cosine transforms</topic><topic>Electronics</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Rate- Distortion (RD) performance</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Scalability</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>Static VAr compensators</topic><topic>SVC</topic><topic>Transcoding</topic><topic>Video coding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ye-kui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Houqiang</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on consumer electronics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Hui</au><au>Wang, Ye-kui</au><au>Li, Houqiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison between SVC and transcoding</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on consumer electronics</jtitle><stitle>T-CE</stitle><date>2008-08-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1439</spage><epage>1446</epage><pages>1439-1446</pages><issn>0098-3063</issn><eissn>1558-4127</eissn><coden>ITCEDA</coden><abstract>This paper presents a comparison between the scalable extension of H.264/AVC (SVC) and transcoding, in terms of rate-distortion (RD) performance and computational complexity. Both bitrate and spatial resolution reduction cases are included. Simulation results show that, in the aspect of RD performance, SVC performs significantly better in bitrate reduction and slightly better in spatial resolution reduction. Meanwhile, SVC adaptation through bitstream extraction has negligible complexity compared with transcoding.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TCE.2008.4637638</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-3063
ispartof IEEE transactions on consumer electronics, 2008-08, Vol.54 (3), p.1439-1446
issn 0098-3063
1558-4127
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36319892
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals
subjects Adaptation
Automatic voltage control
Bit rate
comparison
Complexity
Computation
Computational complexity
Computer simulation
Decoding
Discrete cosine transforms
Electronics
Extraction
Rate- Distortion (RD) performance
Reduction
Scalability
Spatial resolution
Static VAr compensators
SVC
Transcoding
Video coding
title A comparison between SVC and transcoding
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A27%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20between%20SVC%20and%20transcoding&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20consumer%20electronics&rft.au=Liu,%20Hui&rft.date=2008-08-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1439&rft.epage=1446&rft.pages=1439-1446&rft.issn=0098-3063&rft.eissn=1558-4127&rft.coden=ITCEDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TCE.2008.4637638&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E36319892%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-69ea4f6a7ebe149fa0d94c1e09e71875418107a7a75df0e36b5d5c77eb3c8ba93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=862371727&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4637638&rfr_iscdi=true