Loading…

Comparison of Damage Development in Random Fiber-reinforced Polymers (FRPs) under Cyclic Loading

It has been well known that suppression of debonding and matrix cracking could improve fatigue resistance of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs). In this study, the roles of these two mechanisms on the damage development in FRPs with in-plane random glass fiber reinforcement have been investigated. Two...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of composite materials 2006-01, Vol.40 (1), p.71-91
Main Authors: Setiadi, Y., Jar, P. -Y. B., Kuboki, T., Cheng, J. -J. R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-28c1674f182ce683c19499bb49a177e76382466c2675074741d56b33719afb753
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-28c1674f182ce683c19499bb49a177e76382466c2675074741d56b33719afb753
container_end_page 91
container_issue 1
container_start_page 71
container_title Journal of composite materials
container_volume 40
creator Setiadi, Y.
Jar, P. -Y. B.
Kuboki, T.
Cheng, J. -J. R.
description It has been well known that suppression of debonding and matrix cracking could improve fatigue resistance of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs). In this study, the roles of these two mechanisms on the damage development in FRPs with in-plane random glass fiber reinforcement have been investigated. Two polymers are used as the matrix - isophthalic polyester and polyurethane. Polyurethane-based FRP shows higher ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and strain to failure, but lower elastic modulus. Under zero-tension fatigue loading (with the maximum stress level equivalent to 50% of their respective UTS), the change in modulus, energy dissipation rate, and the corresponding damage development process are investigated. The damage development is analyzed at the macroscopic and microscopic levels, and found to be closely related to the modulus degradation and change in energy dissipation rate. The study concludes that the two FRPs show significantly different behavior under fatigue loading. The polyurethane-based FRP had better fatigue resistance, in view of the mild modulus change and the capability of absorbing energy through plastic deformation. Results from the study suggest that the excellent fatigue resistance of the polyurethane-based FRP is due to good toughness of the matrix.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0021998305053506
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36320321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0021998305053506</sage_id><sourcerecordid>36320321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-28c1674f182ce683c19499bb49a177e76382466c2675074741d56b33719afb753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1LAzEUxIMoWD_uHnNR9LD68r05SmtVKCii4G3NZrMS2U1q0gr9791SQRBET-8wvxmYNwgdETgnRKkLAEq0LhkIEEyA3EIjIhgUSrPnbTRay8Va30V7Ob8BgCJcjtDLOPZzk3yOAccWT0xvXh2euA_XxXnvwgL7gB9MaGKPp752qUjOhzYm6xp8H7tV71LGp9OH-3yGl6FxCY9XtvMWz6JpfHg9QDut6bI7_Lr76Gl69Ti-KWZ317fjy1lhOfBFQUtLpOItKal1smSWaK51XXNthnZOSVZSLqWlUglQXHHSCFkzpog2ba0E20cnm9x5iu9LlxdV77N1XWeCi8tcMckoMEr-BKmmjBBa_gcEIQgMIGxAm2LOybXVPPnepFVFoFqPU_0cZ7Acf2WbbE3XJhOsz98-xVSpBR-4YsPlYZbqLS5TGJ74e-4n3C2Yng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>29205510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Damage Development in Random Fiber-reinforced Polymers (FRPs) under Cyclic Loading</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Setiadi, Y. ; Jar, P. -Y. B. ; Kuboki, T. ; Cheng, J. -J. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Setiadi, Y. ; Jar, P. -Y. B. ; Kuboki, T. ; Cheng, J. -J. R.</creatorcontrib><description>It has been well known that suppression of debonding and matrix cracking could improve fatigue resistance of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs). In this study, the roles of these two mechanisms on the damage development in FRPs with in-plane random glass fiber reinforcement have been investigated. Two polymers are used as the matrix - isophthalic polyester and polyurethane. Polyurethane-based FRP shows higher ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and strain to failure, but lower elastic modulus. Under zero-tension fatigue loading (with the maximum stress level equivalent to 50% of their respective UTS), the change in modulus, energy dissipation rate, and the corresponding damage development process are investigated. The damage development is analyzed at the macroscopic and microscopic levels, and found to be closely related to the modulus degradation and change in energy dissipation rate. The study concludes that the two FRPs show significantly different behavior under fatigue loading. The polyurethane-based FRP had better fatigue resistance, in view of the mild modulus change and the capability of absorbing energy through plastic deformation. Results from the study suggest that the excellent fatigue resistance of the polyurethane-based FRP is due to good toughness of the matrix.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-793X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0021998305053506</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCOMBI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Composites ; Condensed matter: structure, mechanical and thermal properties ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fatigue, brittleness, fracture, and cracks ; Forms of application and semi-finished materials ; Fracture mechanics (crack, fatigue, damage...) ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...) ; Mechanical and acoustical properties of condensed matter ; Mechanical properties of solids ; Physics ; Polymer industry, paints, wood ; Solid mechanics ; Structural and continuum mechanics ; Technology of polymers</subject><ispartof>Journal of composite materials, 2006-01, Vol.40 (1), p.71-91</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-28c1674f182ce683c19499bb49a177e76382466c2675074741d56b33719afb753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-28c1674f182ce683c19499bb49a177e76382466c2675074741d56b33719afb753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17378954$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Setiadi, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jar, P. -Y. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuboki, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, J. -J. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Damage Development in Random Fiber-reinforced Polymers (FRPs) under Cyclic Loading</title><title>Journal of composite materials</title><description>It has been well known that suppression of debonding and matrix cracking could improve fatigue resistance of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs). In this study, the roles of these two mechanisms on the damage development in FRPs with in-plane random glass fiber reinforcement have been investigated. Two polymers are used as the matrix - isophthalic polyester and polyurethane. Polyurethane-based FRP shows higher ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and strain to failure, but lower elastic modulus. Under zero-tension fatigue loading (with the maximum stress level equivalent to 50% of their respective UTS), the change in modulus, energy dissipation rate, and the corresponding damage development process are investigated. The damage development is analyzed at the macroscopic and microscopic levels, and found to be closely related to the modulus degradation and change in energy dissipation rate. The study concludes that the two FRPs show significantly different behavior under fatigue loading. The polyurethane-based FRP had better fatigue resistance, in view of the mild modulus change and the capability of absorbing energy through plastic deformation. Results from the study suggest that the excellent fatigue resistance of the polyurethane-based FRP is due to good toughness of the matrix.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Composites</subject><subject>Condensed matter: structure, mechanical and thermal properties</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fatigue, brittleness, fracture, and cracks</subject><subject>Forms of application and semi-finished materials</subject><subject>Fracture mechanics (crack, fatigue, damage...)</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...)</subject><subject>Mechanical and acoustical properties of condensed matter</subject><subject>Mechanical properties of solids</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Polymer industry, paints, wood</subject><subject>Solid mechanics</subject><subject>Structural and continuum mechanics</subject><subject>Technology of polymers</subject><issn>0021-9983</issn><issn>1530-793X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1LAzEUxIMoWD_uHnNR9LD68r05SmtVKCii4G3NZrMS2U1q0gr9791SQRBET-8wvxmYNwgdETgnRKkLAEq0LhkIEEyA3EIjIhgUSrPnbTRay8Va30V7Ob8BgCJcjtDLOPZzk3yOAccWT0xvXh2euA_XxXnvwgL7gB9MaGKPp752qUjOhzYm6xp8H7tV71LGp9OH-3yGl6FxCY9XtvMWz6JpfHg9QDut6bI7_Lr76Gl69Ti-KWZ317fjy1lhOfBFQUtLpOItKal1smSWaK51XXNthnZOSVZSLqWlUglQXHHSCFkzpog2ba0E20cnm9x5iu9LlxdV77N1XWeCi8tcMckoMEr-BKmmjBBa_gcEIQgMIGxAm2LOybXVPPnepFVFoFqPU_0cZ7Acf2WbbE3XJhOsz98-xVSpBR-4YsPlYZbqLS5TGJ74e-4n3C2Yng</recordid><startdate>200601</startdate><enddate>200601</enddate><creator>Setiadi, Y.</creator><creator>Jar, P. -Y. B.</creator><creator>Kuboki, T.</creator><creator>Cheng, J. -J. R.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Technomic</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200601</creationdate><title>Comparison of Damage Development in Random Fiber-reinforced Polymers (FRPs) under Cyclic Loading</title><author>Setiadi, Y. ; Jar, P. -Y. B. ; Kuboki, T. ; Cheng, J. -J. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-28c1674f182ce683c19499bb49a177e76382466c2675074741d56b33719afb753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Composites</topic><topic>Condensed matter: structure, mechanical and thermal properties</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fatigue, brittleness, fracture, and cracks</topic><topic>Forms of application and semi-finished materials</topic><topic>Fracture mechanics (crack, fatigue, damage...)</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...)</topic><topic>Mechanical and acoustical properties of condensed matter</topic><topic>Mechanical properties of solids</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Polymer industry, paints, wood</topic><topic>Solid mechanics</topic><topic>Structural and continuum mechanics</topic><topic>Technology of polymers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Setiadi, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jar, P. -Y. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuboki, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, J. -J. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of composite materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Setiadi, Y.</au><au>Jar, P. -Y. B.</au><au>Kuboki, T.</au><au>Cheng, J. -J. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Damage Development in Random Fiber-reinforced Polymers (FRPs) under Cyclic Loading</atitle><jtitle>Journal of composite materials</jtitle><date>2006-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>71-91</pages><issn>0021-9983</issn><eissn>1530-793X</eissn><coden>JCOMBI</coden><abstract>It has been well known that suppression of debonding and matrix cracking could improve fatigue resistance of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs). In this study, the roles of these two mechanisms on the damage development in FRPs with in-plane random glass fiber reinforcement have been investigated. Two polymers are used as the matrix - isophthalic polyester and polyurethane. Polyurethane-based FRP shows higher ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and strain to failure, but lower elastic modulus. Under zero-tension fatigue loading (with the maximum stress level equivalent to 50% of their respective UTS), the change in modulus, energy dissipation rate, and the corresponding damage development process are investigated. The damage development is analyzed at the macroscopic and microscopic levels, and found to be closely related to the modulus degradation and change in energy dissipation rate. The study concludes that the two FRPs show significantly different behavior under fatigue loading. The polyurethane-based FRP had better fatigue resistance, in view of the mild modulus change and the capability of absorbing energy through plastic deformation. Results from the study suggest that the excellent fatigue resistance of the polyurethane-based FRP is due to good toughness of the matrix.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0021998305053506</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9983
ispartof Journal of composite materials, 2006-01, Vol.40 (1), p.71-91
issn 0021-9983
1530-793X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36320321
source Sage Journals Online
subjects Applied sciences
Composites
Condensed matter: structure, mechanical and thermal properties
Exact sciences and technology
Fatigue, brittleness, fracture, and cracks
Forms of application and semi-finished materials
Fracture mechanics (crack, fatigue, damage...)
Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)
Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...)
Mechanical and acoustical properties of condensed matter
Mechanical properties of solids
Physics
Polymer industry, paints, wood
Solid mechanics
Structural and continuum mechanics
Technology of polymers
title Comparison of Damage Development in Random Fiber-reinforced Polymers (FRPs) under Cyclic Loading
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T22%3A55%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Damage%20Development%20in%20Random%20Fiber-reinforced%20Polymers%20(FRPs)%20under%20Cyclic%20Loading&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20composite%20materials&rft.au=Setiadi,%20Y.&rft.date=2006-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=71-91&rft.issn=0021-9983&rft.eissn=1530-793X&rft.coden=JCOMBI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0021998305053506&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E36320321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-28c1674f182ce683c19499bb49a177e76382466c2675074741d56b33719afb753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=29205510&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0021998305053506&rfr_iscdi=true