Loading…
Comparison of Damage Development in Random Fiber-reinforced Polymers (FRPs) under Cyclic Loading
It has been well known that suppression of debonding and matrix cracking could improve fatigue resistance of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs). In this study, the roles of these two mechanisms on the damage development in FRPs with in-plane random glass fiber reinforcement have been investigated. Two...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of composite materials 2006-01, Vol.40 (1), p.71-91 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-28c1674f182ce683c19499bb49a177e76382466c2675074741d56b33719afb753 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-28c1674f182ce683c19499bb49a177e76382466c2675074741d56b33719afb753 |
container_end_page | 91 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 71 |
container_title | Journal of composite materials |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Setiadi, Y. Jar, P. -Y. B. Kuboki, T. Cheng, J. -J. R. |
description | It has been well known that suppression of debonding and matrix cracking could improve fatigue resistance of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs). In this study, the roles of these two mechanisms on the damage development in FRPs with in-plane random glass fiber reinforcement have been investigated. Two polymers are used as the matrix - isophthalic polyester and polyurethane. Polyurethane-based FRP shows higher ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and strain to failure, but lower elastic modulus. Under zero-tension fatigue loading (with the maximum stress level equivalent to 50% of their respective UTS), the change in modulus, energy dissipation rate, and the corresponding damage development process are investigated. The damage development is analyzed at the macroscopic and microscopic levels, and found to be closely related to the modulus degradation and change in energy dissipation rate. The study concludes that the two FRPs show significantly different behavior under fatigue loading. The polyurethane-based FRP had better fatigue resistance, in view of the mild modulus change and the capability of absorbing energy through plastic deformation. Results from the study suggest that the excellent fatigue resistance of the polyurethane-based FRP is due to good toughness of the matrix. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0021998305053506 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36320321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0021998305053506</sage_id><sourcerecordid>36320321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-28c1674f182ce683c19499bb49a177e76382466c2675074741d56b33719afb753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1LAzEUxIMoWD_uHnNR9LD68r05SmtVKCii4G3NZrMS2U1q0gr9791SQRBET-8wvxmYNwgdETgnRKkLAEq0LhkIEEyA3EIjIhgUSrPnbTRay8Va30V7Ob8BgCJcjtDLOPZzk3yOAccWT0xvXh2euA_XxXnvwgL7gB9MaGKPp752qUjOhzYm6xp8H7tV71LGp9OH-3yGl6FxCY9XtvMWz6JpfHg9QDut6bI7_Lr76Gl69Ti-KWZ317fjy1lhOfBFQUtLpOItKal1smSWaK51XXNthnZOSVZSLqWlUglQXHHSCFkzpog2ba0E20cnm9x5iu9LlxdV77N1XWeCi8tcMckoMEr-BKmmjBBa_gcEIQgMIGxAm2LOybXVPPnepFVFoFqPU_0cZ7Acf2WbbE3XJhOsz98-xVSpBR-4YsPlYZbqLS5TGJ74e-4n3C2Yng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>29205510</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Damage Development in Random Fiber-reinforced Polymers (FRPs) under Cyclic Loading</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Setiadi, Y. ; Jar, P. -Y. B. ; Kuboki, T. ; Cheng, J. -J. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Setiadi, Y. ; Jar, P. -Y. B. ; Kuboki, T. ; Cheng, J. -J. R.</creatorcontrib><description>It has been well known that suppression of debonding and matrix cracking could improve fatigue resistance of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs). In this study, the roles of these two mechanisms on the damage development in FRPs with in-plane random glass fiber reinforcement have been investigated. Two polymers are used as the matrix - isophthalic polyester and polyurethane. Polyurethane-based FRP shows higher ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and strain to failure, but lower elastic modulus. Under zero-tension fatigue loading (with the maximum stress level equivalent to 50% of their respective UTS), the change in modulus, energy dissipation rate, and the corresponding damage development process are investigated. The damage development is analyzed at the macroscopic and microscopic levels, and found to be closely related to the modulus degradation and change in energy dissipation rate. The study concludes that the two FRPs show significantly different behavior under fatigue loading. The polyurethane-based FRP had better fatigue resistance, in view of the mild modulus change and the capability of absorbing energy through plastic deformation. Results from the study suggest that the excellent fatigue resistance of the polyurethane-based FRP is due to good toughness of the matrix.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-793X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0021998305053506</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCOMBI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Composites ; Condensed matter: structure, mechanical and thermal properties ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fatigue, brittleness, fracture, and cracks ; Forms of application and semi-finished materials ; Fracture mechanics (crack, fatigue, damage...) ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...) ; Mechanical and acoustical properties of condensed matter ; Mechanical properties of solids ; Physics ; Polymer industry, paints, wood ; Solid mechanics ; Structural and continuum mechanics ; Technology of polymers</subject><ispartof>Journal of composite materials, 2006-01, Vol.40 (1), p.71-91</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-28c1674f182ce683c19499bb49a177e76382466c2675074741d56b33719afb753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-28c1674f182ce683c19499bb49a177e76382466c2675074741d56b33719afb753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17378954$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Setiadi, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jar, P. -Y. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuboki, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, J. -J. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Damage Development in Random Fiber-reinforced Polymers (FRPs) under Cyclic Loading</title><title>Journal of composite materials</title><description>It has been well known that suppression of debonding and matrix cracking could improve fatigue resistance of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs). In this study, the roles of these two mechanisms on the damage development in FRPs with in-plane random glass fiber reinforcement have been investigated. Two polymers are used as the matrix - isophthalic polyester and polyurethane. Polyurethane-based FRP shows higher ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and strain to failure, but lower elastic modulus. Under zero-tension fatigue loading (with the maximum stress level equivalent to 50% of their respective UTS), the change in modulus, energy dissipation rate, and the corresponding damage development process are investigated. The damage development is analyzed at the macroscopic and microscopic levels, and found to be closely related to the modulus degradation and change in energy dissipation rate. The study concludes that the two FRPs show significantly different behavior under fatigue loading. The polyurethane-based FRP had better fatigue resistance, in view of the mild modulus change and the capability of absorbing energy through plastic deformation. Results from the study suggest that the excellent fatigue resistance of the polyurethane-based FRP is due to good toughness of the matrix.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Composites</subject><subject>Condensed matter: structure, mechanical and thermal properties</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fatigue, brittleness, fracture, and cracks</subject><subject>Forms of application and semi-finished materials</subject><subject>Fracture mechanics (crack, fatigue, damage...)</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...)</subject><subject>Mechanical and acoustical properties of condensed matter</subject><subject>Mechanical properties of solids</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Polymer industry, paints, wood</subject><subject>Solid mechanics</subject><subject>Structural and continuum mechanics</subject><subject>Technology of polymers</subject><issn>0021-9983</issn><issn>1530-793X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1LAzEUxIMoWD_uHnNR9LD68r05SmtVKCii4G3NZrMS2U1q0gr9791SQRBET-8wvxmYNwgdETgnRKkLAEq0LhkIEEyA3EIjIhgUSrPnbTRay8Va30V7Ob8BgCJcjtDLOPZzk3yOAccWT0xvXh2euA_XxXnvwgL7gB9MaGKPp752qUjOhzYm6xp8H7tV71LGp9OH-3yGl6FxCY9XtvMWz6JpfHg9QDut6bI7_Lr76Gl69Ti-KWZ317fjy1lhOfBFQUtLpOItKal1smSWaK51XXNthnZOSVZSLqWlUglQXHHSCFkzpog2ba0E20cnm9x5iu9LlxdV77N1XWeCi8tcMckoMEr-BKmmjBBa_gcEIQgMIGxAm2LOybXVPPnepFVFoFqPU_0cZ7Acf2WbbE3XJhOsz98-xVSpBR-4YsPlYZbqLS5TGJ74e-4n3C2Yng</recordid><startdate>200601</startdate><enddate>200601</enddate><creator>Setiadi, Y.</creator><creator>Jar, P. -Y. B.</creator><creator>Kuboki, T.</creator><creator>Cheng, J. -J. R.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Technomic</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200601</creationdate><title>Comparison of Damage Development in Random Fiber-reinforced Polymers (FRPs) under Cyclic Loading</title><author>Setiadi, Y. ; Jar, P. -Y. B. ; Kuboki, T. ; Cheng, J. -J. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-28c1674f182ce683c19499bb49a177e76382466c2675074741d56b33719afb753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Composites</topic><topic>Condensed matter: structure, mechanical and thermal properties</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fatigue, brittleness, fracture, and cracks</topic><topic>Forms of application and semi-finished materials</topic><topic>Fracture mechanics (crack, fatigue, damage...)</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...)</topic><topic>Mechanical and acoustical properties of condensed matter</topic><topic>Mechanical properties of solids</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Polymer industry, paints, wood</topic><topic>Solid mechanics</topic><topic>Structural and continuum mechanics</topic><topic>Technology of polymers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Setiadi, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jar, P. -Y. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuboki, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, J. -J. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of composite materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Setiadi, Y.</au><au>Jar, P. -Y. B.</au><au>Kuboki, T.</au><au>Cheng, J. -J. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Damage Development in Random Fiber-reinforced Polymers (FRPs) under Cyclic Loading</atitle><jtitle>Journal of composite materials</jtitle><date>2006-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>71-91</pages><issn>0021-9983</issn><eissn>1530-793X</eissn><coden>JCOMBI</coden><abstract>It has been well known that suppression of debonding and matrix cracking could improve fatigue resistance of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs). In this study, the roles of these two mechanisms on the damage development in FRPs with in-plane random glass fiber reinforcement have been investigated. Two polymers are used as the matrix - isophthalic polyester and polyurethane. Polyurethane-based FRP shows higher ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and strain to failure, but lower elastic modulus. Under zero-tension fatigue loading (with the maximum stress level equivalent to 50% of their respective UTS), the change in modulus, energy dissipation rate, and the corresponding damage development process are investigated. The damage development is analyzed at the macroscopic and microscopic levels, and found to be closely related to the modulus degradation and change in energy dissipation rate. The study concludes that the two FRPs show significantly different behavior under fatigue loading. The polyurethane-based FRP had better fatigue resistance, in view of the mild modulus change and the capability of absorbing energy through plastic deformation. Results from the study suggest that the excellent fatigue resistance of the polyurethane-based FRP is due to good toughness of the matrix.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0021998305053506</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9983 |
ispartof | Journal of composite materials, 2006-01, Vol.40 (1), p.71-91 |
issn | 0021-9983 1530-793X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36320321 |
source | Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Applied sciences Composites Condensed matter: structure, mechanical and thermal properties Exact sciences and technology Fatigue, brittleness, fracture, and cracks Forms of application and semi-finished materials Fracture mechanics (crack, fatigue, damage...) Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...) Mechanical and acoustical properties of condensed matter Mechanical properties of solids Physics Polymer industry, paints, wood Solid mechanics Structural and continuum mechanics Technology of polymers |
title | Comparison of Damage Development in Random Fiber-reinforced Polymers (FRPs) under Cyclic Loading |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T22%3A55%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Damage%20Development%20in%20Random%20Fiber-reinforced%20Polymers%20(FRPs)%20under%20Cyclic%20Loading&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20composite%20materials&rft.au=Setiadi,%20Y.&rft.date=2006-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=71-91&rft.issn=0021-9983&rft.eissn=1530-793X&rft.coden=JCOMBI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0021998305053506&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E36320321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-28c1674f182ce683c19499bb49a177e76382466c2675074741d56b33719afb753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=29205510&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0021998305053506&rfr_iscdi=true |