Evaluation of Smoke Toxic Potency Test Methods: Comparison of the NBS Cup Furnace, the Radiant Furnace and the UPITT Tests

A number of smoke toxicity screening tests are being used, and some have been proposed for regulatory purposes. These methods differ markedly in the combustion device, the combustion conditions, the exposure conditions and even the test animal. However, virtually all use an LC50 value, or some letha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of fire sciences 1989-05, Vol.7 (3), p.194-213
Main Authors: Kaplan, Harold L., Switzer, Walter G., Hirschler, Marcelo M., Coaker, A. William
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases
Fires
Gas, fumes
Medical sciences
Toxicology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A number of smoke toxicity screening tests are being used, and some have been proposed for regulatory purposes. These methods differ markedly in the combustion device, the combustion conditions, the exposure conditions and even the test animal. However, virtually all use an LC50 value, or some lethality determination, as the principal or sole measure of toxicity. In this study, lethal potencies were determined by the NBS Cup Furnace, the Radiant Furnace and the UPITT test methods for one nylon- and four PVC based materials. These results were correlated with analytical data to identify the major toxicants responsible for the lethalities. This study shows that, while all of these methods have deficiencies, the UPITT method has more serious lim itations. The use of this method to determine LC 50 values for screening materials may lead to erroneous assessments of the toxic hazards of these materials to humans.
ISSN:0734-9041
1530-8049
DOI:10.1177/073490418900700304