Loading…

Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from land use: creating incentives within greenhouse gas emissions trading systems

Terrestrial carbon sinks and sources were introduced into climate change mitigation related policy relatively late in the design of the architecture of those policies. Much literature addresses how terrestrial sources and sinks differ from emissions from fossil fuel combustion and, hence, is a possi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Climatic change 2007-01, Vol.80 (1-2), p.173-197
Main Authors: Reilly, John M, Asadoorian, Malcolm O
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-815ee2611f4ad7c6827a8932f31285b9327c45659cb234a73b1f25f316e91b813
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-815ee2611f4ad7c6827a8932f31285b9327c45659cb234a73b1f25f316e91b813
container_end_page 197
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 173
container_title Climatic change
container_volume 80
creator Reilly, John M
Asadoorian, Malcolm O
description Terrestrial carbon sinks and sources were introduced into climate change mitigation related policy relatively late in the design of the architecture of those policies. Much literature addresses how terrestrial sources and sinks differ from emissions from fossil fuel combustion and, hence, is a possible justification for differential treatment of them in policy design. Late introduction in climate policy discussions and perceived differences appear to have resulted in very different policy approaches for sinks versus fossil emission sources. The attempt to differentiate has generated complexity in policy design and likely inefficiency in the operation of these policies. We review these issues and find that the characteristics claimed to apply to sinks apply as well to fossil sources, and differences that do exist are often more a matter of degree than of kind. Because cap-and-trade has gained momentum as the instrument of choice to control fossil emissions, we use as a starting point, how such a cap-and-trade system could be altered to include terrestrial carbon sinks and sources. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10584-006-9151-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36459597</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21172118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-815ee2611f4ad7c6827a8932f31285b9327c45659cb234a73b1f25f316e91b813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvw4G01k2y-vEnxCxQveg7ZNLtNaXdrkir992apJ0E8DDPwPjO8w4vQOZArIEReJyBc1RUhotLAoYIDNAEuWQW1IodoQkDwohJ9jE5SWo6TpGKCdi8hh87mMPR4aHEXve8XwzZ53NmE_TqkVKSE2zis8cr2c1y0G-yiLzt9h0PvfJ_Dp0_4K-RF6P8-kaOdjytpl7Jfp1N01NpV8mc_fYre7-_eZo_V8-vD0-z2uXKM1blSwL2nAqCt7Vw6oai0SjPaMqCKN2WSruaCa9dQVlvJGmgpL6rwGhoFbIou93c3cfjY-pRNceT8qjzji0vDRM011_JfkALIUqqAF7_A5bCNfXnCgFZcMFC0QLCHXBxSir41mxjWNu4MEDNGZvaRmRKZGSMzwL4BreCKcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198563182</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from land use: creating incentives within greenhouse gas emissions trading systems</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Reilly, John M ; Asadoorian, Malcolm O</creator><creatorcontrib>Reilly, John M ; Asadoorian, Malcolm O</creatorcontrib><description>Terrestrial carbon sinks and sources were introduced into climate change mitigation related policy relatively late in the design of the architecture of those policies. Much literature addresses how terrestrial sources and sinks differ from emissions from fossil fuel combustion and, hence, is a possible justification for differential treatment of them in policy design. Late introduction in climate policy discussions and perceived differences appear to have resulted in very different policy approaches for sinks versus fossil emission sources. The attempt to differentiate has generated complexity in policy design and likely inefficiency in the operation of these policies. We review these issues and find that the characteristics claimed to apply to sinks apply as well to fossil sources, and differences that do exist are often more a matter of degree than of kind. Because cap-and-trade has gained momentum as the instrument of choice to control fossil emissions, we use as a starting point, how such a cap-and-trade system could be altered to include terrestrial carbon sinks and sources. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10584-006-9151-1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLCHDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Carbon ; Carbon sequestration ; Carbon sinks ; Climate change ; Climate change mitigation ; Climate policy ; Design ; Emission standards ; Emissions trading ; Environmental policy ; Fossil fuels ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Incentives ; Kyoto Protocol ; Land use ; Sinkholes ; Working groups</subject><ispartof>Climatic change, 2007-01, Vol.80 (1-2), p.173-197</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-815ee2611f4ad7c6827a8932f31285b9327c45659cb234a73b1f25f316e91b813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-815ee2611f4ad7c6827a8932f31285b9327c45659cb234a73b1f25f316e91b813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/198563182/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/198563182?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,27901,27902,36037,36038,44339,74638</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reilly, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asadoorian, Malcolm O</creatorcontrib><title>Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from land use: creating incentives within greenhouse gas emissions trading systems</title><title>Climatic change</title><description>Terrestrial carbon sinks and sources were introduced into climate change mitigation related policy relatively late in the design of the architecture of those policies. Much literature addresses how terrestrial sources and sinks differ from emissions from fossil fuel combustion and, hence, is a possible justification for differential treatment of them in policy design. Late introduction in climate policy discussions and perceived differences appear to have resulted in very different policy approaches for sinks versus fossil emission sources. The attempt to differentiate has generated complexity in policy design and likely inefficiency in the operation of these policies. We review these issues and find that the characteristics claimed to apply to sinks apply as well to fossil sources, and differences that do exist are often more a matter of degree than of kind. Because cap-and-trade has gained momentum as the instrument of choice to control fossil emissions, we use as a starting point, how such a cap-and-trade system could be altered to include terrestrial carbon sinks and sources. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Carbon sinks</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Emission standards</subject><subject>Emissions trading</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Kyoto Protocol</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Sinkholes</subject><subject>Working groups</subject><issn>0165-0009</issn><issn>1573-1480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvw4G01k2y-vEnxCxQveg7ZNLtNaXdrkir992apJ0E8DDPwPjO8w4vQOZArIEReJyBc1RUhotLAoYIDNAEuWQW1IodoQkDwohJ9jE5SWo6TpGKCdi8hh87mMPR4aHEXve8XwzZ53NmE_TqkVKSE2zis8cr2c1y0G-yiLzt9h0PvfJ_Dp0_4K-RF6P8-kaOdjytpl7Jfp1N01NpV8mc_fYre7-_eZo_V8-vD0-z2uXKM1blSwL2nAqCt7Vw6oai0SjPaMqCKN2WSruaCa9dQVlvJGmgpL6rwGhoFbIou93c3cfjY-pRNceT8qjzji0vDRM011_JfkALIUqqAF7_A5bCNfXnCgFZcMFC0QLCHXBxSir41mxjWNu4MEDNGZvaRmRKZGSMzwL4BreCKcA</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Reilly, John M</creator><creator>Asadoorian, Malcolm O</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from land use: creating incentives within greenhouse gas emissions trading systems</title><author>Reilly, John M ; Asadoorian, Malcolm O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-815ee2611f4ad7c6827a8932f31285b9327c45659cb234a73b1f25f316e91b813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Carbon sinks</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Emission standards</topic><topic>Emissions trading</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Kyoto Protocol</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Sinkholes</topic><topic>Working groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reilly, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asadoorian, Malcolm O</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture &amp; Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reilly, John M</au><au>Asadoorian, Malcolm O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from land use: creating incentives within greenhouse gas emissions trading systems</atitle><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>197</epage><pages>173-197</pages><issn>0165-0009</issn><eissn>1573-1480</eissn><coden>CLCHDX</coden><abstract>Terrestrial carbon sinks and sources were introduced into climate change mitigation related policy relatively late in the design of the architecture of those policies. Much literature addresses how terrestrial sources and sinks differ from emissions from fossil fuel combustion and, hence, is a possible justification for differential treatment of them in policy design. Late introduction in climate policy discussions and perceived differences appear to have resulted in very different policy approaches for sinks versus fossil emission sources. The attempt to differentiate has generated complexity in policy design and likely inefficiency in the operation of these policies. We review these issues and find that the characteristics claimed to apply to sinks apply as well to fossil sources, and differences that do exist are often more a matter of degree than of kind. Because cap-and-trade has gained momentum as the instrument of choice to control fossil emissions, we use as a starting point, how such a cap-and-trade system could be altered to include terrestrial carbon sinks and sources. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s10584-006-9151-1</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-0009
ispartof Climatic change, 2007-01, Vol.80 (1-2), p.173-197
issn 0165-0009
1573-1480
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36459597
source ABI/INFORM global; Springer Link
subjects Carbon
Carbon sequestration
Carbon sinks
Climate change
Climate change mitigation
Climate policy
Design
Emission standards
Emissions trading
Environmental policy
Fossil fuels
Greenhouse effect
Greenhouse gases
Incentives
Kyoto Protocol
Land use
Sinkholes
Working groups
title Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from land use: creating incentives within greenhouse gas emissions trading systems
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T06%3A43%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mitigation%20of%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20from%20land%20use:%20creating%20incentives%20within%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20trading%20systems&rft.jtitle=Climatic%20change&rft.au=Reilly,%20John%20M&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=197&rft.pages=173-197&rft.issn=0165-0009&rft.eissn=1573-1480&rft.coden=CLCHDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10584-006-9151-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21172118%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-815ee2611f4ad7c6827a8932f31285b9327c45659cb234a73b1f25f316e91b813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198563182&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true