Loading…
Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from land use: creating incentives within greenhouse gas emissions trading systems
Terrestrial carbon sinks and sources were introduced into climate change mitigation related policy relatively late in the design of the architecture of those policies. Much literature addresses how terrestrial sources and sinks differ from emissions from fossil fuel combustion and, hence, is a possi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Climatic change 2007-01, Vol.80 (1-2), p.173-197 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-815ee2611f4ad7c6827a8932f31285b9327c45659cb234a73b1f25f316e91b813 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-815ee2611f4ad7c6827a8932f31285b9327c45659cb234a73b1f25f316e91b813 |
container_end_page | 197 |
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 173 |
container_title | Climatic change |
container_volume | 80 |
creator | Reilly, John M Asadoorian, Malcolm O |
description | Terrestrial carbon sinks and sources were introduced into climate change mitigation related policy relatively late in the design of the architecture of those policies. Much literature addresses how terrestrial sources and sinks differ from emissions from fossil fuel combustion and, hence, is a possible justification for differential treatment of them in policy design. Late introduction in climate policy discussions and perceived differences appear to have resulted in very different policy approaches for sinks versus fossil emission sources. The attempt to differentiate has generated complexity in policy design and likely inefficiency in the operation of these policies. We review these issues and find that the characteristics claimed to apply to sinks apply as well to fossil sources, and differences that do exist are often more a matter of degree than of kind. Because cap-and-trade has gained momentum as the instrument of choice to control fossil emissions, we use as a starting point, how such a cap-and-trade system could be altered to include terrestrial carbon sinks and sources. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10584-006-9151-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36459597</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21172118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-815ee2611f4ad7c6827a8932f31285b9327c45659cb234a73b1f25f316e91b813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvw4G01k2y-vEnxCxQveg7ZNLtNaXdrkir992apJ0E8DDPwPjO8w4vQOZArIEReJyBc1RUhotLAoYIDNAEuWQW1IodoQkDwohJ9jE5SWo6TpGKCdi8hh87mMPR4aHEXve8XwzZ53NmE_TqkVKSE2zis8cr2c1y0G-yiLzt9h0PvfJ_Dp0_4K-RF6P8-kaOdjytpl7Jfp1N01NpV8mc_fYre7-_eZo_V8-vD0-z2uXKM1blSwL2nAqCt7Vw6oai0SjPaMqCKN2WSruaCa9dQVlvJGmgpL6rwGhoFbIou93c3cfjY-pRNceT8qjzji0vDRM011_JfkALIUqqAF7_A5bCNfXnCgFZcMFC0QLCHXBxSir41mxjWNu4MEDNGZvaRmRKZGSMzwL4BreCKcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198563182</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from land use: creating incentives within greenhouse gas emissions trading systems</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Reilly, John M ; Asadoorian, Malcolm O</creator><creatorcontrib>Reilly, John M ; Asadoorian, Malcolm O</creatorcontrib><description>Terrestrial carbon sinks and sources were introduced into climate change mitigation related policy relatively late in the design of the architecture of those policies. Much literature addresses how terrestrial sources and sinks differ from emissions from fossil fuel combustion and, hence, is a possible justification for differential treatment of them in policy design. Late introduction in climate policy discussions and perceived differences appear to have resulted in very different policy approaches for sinks versus fossil emission sources. The attempt to differentiate has generated complexity in policy design and likely inefficiency in the operation of these policies. We review these issues and find that the characteristics claimed to apply to sinks apply as well to fossil sources, and differences that do exist are often more a matter of degree than of kind. Because cap-and-trade has gained momentum as the instrument of choice to control fossil emissions, we use as a starting point, how such a cap-and-trade system could be altered to include terrestrial carbon sinks and sources. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10584-006-9151-1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLCHDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Carbon ; Carbon sequestration ; Carbon sinks ; Climate change ; Climate change mitigation ; Climate policy ; Design ; Emission standards ; Emissions trading ; Environmental policy ; Fossil fuels ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Incentives ; Kyoto Protocol ; Land use ; Sinkholes ; Working groups</subject><ispartof>Climatic change, 2007-01, Vol.80 (1-2), p.173-197</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-815ee2611f4ad7c6827a8932f31285b9327c45659cb234a73b1f25f316e91b813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-815ee2611f4ad7c6827a8932f31285b9327c45659cb234a73b1f25f316e91b813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/198563182/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/198563182?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,27901,27902,36037,36038,44339,74638</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reilly, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asadoorian, Malcolm O</creatorcontrib><title>Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from land use: creating incentives within greenhouse gas emissions trading systems</title><title>Climatic change</title><description>Terrestrial carbon sinks and sources were introduced into climate change mitigation related policy relatively late in the design of the architecture of those policies. Much literature addresses how terrestrial sources and sinks differ from emissions from fossil fuel combustion and, hence, is a possible justification for differential treatment of them in policy design. Late introduction in climate policy discussions and perceived differences appear to have resulted in very different policy approaches for sinks versus fossil emission sources. The attempt to differentiate has generated complexity in policy design and likely inefficiency in the operation of these policies. We review these issues and find that the characteristics claimed to apply to sinks apply as well to fossil sources, and differences that do exist are often more a matter of degree than of kind. Because cap-and-trade has gained momentum as the instrument of choice to control fossil emissions, we use as a starting point, how such a cap-and-trade system could be altered to include terrestrial carbon sinks and sources. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Carbon sinks</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Emission standards</subject><subject>Emissions trading</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Kyoto Protocol</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Sinkholes</subject><subject>Working groups</subject><issn>0165-0009</issn><issn>1573-1480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvw4G01k2y-vEnxCxQveg7ZNLtNaXdrkir992apJ0E8DDPwPjO8w4vQOZArIEReJyBc1RUhotLAoYIDNAEuWQW1IodoQkDwohJ9jE5SWo6TpGKCdi8hh87mMPR4aHEXve8XwzZ53NmE_TqkVKSE2zis8cr2c1y0G-yiLzt9h0PvfJ_Dp0_4K-RF6P8-kaOdjytpl7Jfp1N01NpV8mc_fYre7-_eZo_V8-vD0-z2uXKM1blSwL2nAqCt7Vw6oai0SjPaMqCKN2WSruaCa9dQVlvJGmgpL6rwGhoFbIou93c3cfjY-pRNceT8qjzji0vDRM011_JfkALIUqqAF7_A5bCNfXnCgFZcMFC0QLCHXBxSir41mxjWNu4MEDNGZvaRmRKZGSMzwL4BreCKcA</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Reilly, John M</creator><creator>Asadoorian, Malcolm O</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from land use: creating incentives within greenhouse gas emissions trading systems</title><author>Reilly, John M ; Asadoorian, Malcolm O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-815ee2611f4ad7c6827a8932f31285b9327c45659cb234a73b1f25f316e91b813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Carbon sinks</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Emission standards</topic><topic>Emissions trading</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Kyoto Protocol</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Sinkholes</topic><topic>Working groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reilly, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asadoorian, Malcolm O</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reilly, John M</au><au>Asadoorian, Malcolm O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from land use: creating incentives within greenhouse gas emissions trading systems</atitle><jtitle>Climatic change</jtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>197</epage><pages>173-197</pages><issn>0165-0009</issn><eissn>1573-1480</eissn><coden>CLCHDX</coden><abstract>Terrestrial carbon sinks and sources were introduced into climate change mitigation related policy relatively late in the design of the architecture of those policies. Much literature addresses how terrestrial sources and sinks differ from emissions from fossil fuel combustion and, hence, is a possible justification for differential treatment of them in policy design. Late introduction in climate policy discussions and perceived differences appear to have resulted in very different policy approaches for sinks versus fossil emission sources. The attempt to differentiate has generated complexity in policy design and likely inefficiency in the operation of these policies. We review these issues and find that the characteristics claimed to apply to sinks apply as well to fossil sources, and differences that do exist are often more a matter of degree than of kind. Because cap-and-trade has gained momentum as the instrument of choice to control fossil emissions, we use as a starting point, how such a cap-and-trade system could be altered to include terrestrial carbon sinks and sources. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s10584-006-9151-1</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-0009 |
ispartof | Climatic change, 2007-01, Vol.80 (1-2), p.173-197 |
issn | 0165-0009 1573-1480 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36459597 |
source | ABI/INFORM global; Springer Link |
subjects | Carbon Carbon sequestration Carbon sinks Climate change Climate change mitigation Climate policy Design Emission standards Emissions trading Environmental policy Fossil fuels Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Incentives Kyoto Protocol Land use Sinkholes Working groups |
title | Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from land use: creating incentives within greenhouse gas emissions trading systems |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T06%3A43%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mitigation%20of%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20from%20land%20use:%20creating%20incentives%20within%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20trading%20systems&rft.jtitle=Climatic%20change&rft.au=Reilly,%20John%20M&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=197&rft.pages=173-197&rft.issn=0165-0009&rft.eissn=1573-1480&rft.coden=CLCHDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10584-006-9151-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21172118%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-815ee2611f4ad7c6827a8932f31285b9327c45659cb234a73b1f25f316e91b813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198563182&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |