Loading…
The social context of undermining behavior at work
We developed a fairness theory perspective to explain the experience of being “singled out” for social undermining from supervisors and coworkers, and tested our predictions across four distinct social contexts. We argued and predicted that attitudinal and behavioral reactions to undermining (from s...
Saved in:
Published in: | Organizational behavior and human decision processes 2006-09, Vol.101 (1), p.105-126 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-2cf61b0e5cfebf2ef390c37245544555c8b4b91ceecc47c710218a50dd80bd23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-2cf61b0e5cfebf2ef390c37245544555c8b4b91ceecc47c710218a50dd80bd23 |
container_end_page | 126 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 105 |
container_title | Organizational behavior and human decision processes |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | Duffy, Michelle K. Ganster, Daniel C. Shaw, Jason D. Johnson, Jonathan L. Pagon, Milan |
description | We developed a fairness theory perspective to explain the experience of being “singled out” for social undermining from supervisors and coworkers, and tested our predictions across four distinct social contexts. We argued and predicted that attitudinal and behavioral reactions to undermining (from supervisors and coworkers) would be strongest when a correspondingly low level of undermining was found in the social context. The hypothesized cross-level interaction was supported for supervisor and coworker undermining among a sample of officers from the national police force in the Republic of Slovenia (Study 1), replicated for supervisor undermining among soldiers in the US National Guard (Study 2), and further replicated with group-member undermining among a sample of individuals working in student teams (Study 3). We then predicted that justice perceptions would mediate the singled out interaction and tested the mediated-moderation model in a coworker-network context among employees of a restaurant chain (Study 4). The results substantially supported the mediation prediction. These findings from diverse settings demonstrate that considering the social context is important when trying to understand the effects of social undermining behaviors at work. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.04.005 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36513989</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ804813</ericid><els_id>S0749597806000434</els_id><sourcerecordid>36513989</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-2cf61b0e5cfebf2ef390c37245544555c8b4b91ceecc47c710218a50dd80bd23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE2P0zAQhi0EEmXhF8AhQoJbwvgrsQ8c0Gr5XIlL75bjTKhDGgc7Lbv_HrepWIkDh7Elz_POvH4JeUmhokDrd0MV2l03VwygrkBUAPIR2VDQstSawWOygUboUupGPSXPUhoAKK0BNoRtd1ik4LwdCxemBe-WIvTFYeow7v3kpx9Fizt79CEWdil-h_jzOXnS2zHhi8t9RbYfb7bXn8vb75--XH-4LZ1QsJTM9TVtAaXrse0Z9lyD4w0TUopc0qlWtJo6ROdE4xoKjCoroesUtB3jV-TtOnaO4dcB02L2PjkcRzthOCTDa0m5VjqDr_8Bh3CIU7ZmGONUc8HqDPEVcjGkFLE3c_R7G-8NBXPK0AzmnKE5ZWhAmJxhVn1bVRFndH8liDis8NFwm9X5vM91lnLrT4-55nNTGspqs1v2edqbi1GbnB37aCfn04MRRbUSnGbu1cph9A9Lb74qEIry3H5_aefwjx6jSc7j5LDzEd1iuuD_-6k_wu-pRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223193426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The social context of undermining behavior at work</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Duffy, Michelle K. ; Ganster, Daniel C. ; Shaw, Jason D. ; Johnson, Jonathan L. ; Pagon, Milan</creator><creatorcontrib>Duffy, Michelle K. ; Ganster, Daniel C. ; Shaw, Jason D. ; Johnson, Jonathan L. ; Pagon, Milan</creatorcontrib><description>We developed a fairness theory perspective to explain the experience of being “singled out” for social undermining from supervisors and coworkers, and tested our predictions across four distinct social contexts. We argued and predicted that attitudinal and behavioral reactions to undermining (from supervisors and coworkers) would be strongest when a correspondingly low level of undermining was found in the social context. The hypothesized cross-level interaction was supported for supervisor and coworker undermining among a sample of officers from the national police force in the Republic of Slovenia (Study 1), replicated for supervisor undermining among soldiers in the US National Guard (Study 2), and further replicated with group-member undermining among a sample of individuals working in student teams (Study 3). We then predicted that justice perceptions would mediate the singled out interaction and tested the mediated-moderation model in a coworker-network context among employees of a restaurant chain (Study 4). The results substantially supported the mediation prediction. These findings from diverse settings demonstrate that considering the social context is important when trying to understand the effects of social undermining behaviors at work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-5978</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.04.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abusive supervision ; Biological and medical sciences ; Deviance ; Equality ; Fairness theory ; Foreign Countries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Interaction ; Mediation ; Networks ; Occupational psychology ; Organization and management. Professional relation ; Organization theory ; Organizational behavior ; Organizational culture ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Slovenia ; Social Environment ; Social interaction ; Social undermining ; Studies ; Supervisors</subject><ispartof>Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2006-09, Vol.101 (1), p.105-126</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. Sep 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-2cf61b0e5cfebf2ef390c37245544555c8b4b91ceecc47c710218a50dd80bd23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-2cf61b0e5cfebf2ef390c37245544555c8b4b91ceecc47c710218a50dd80bd23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223,33224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ804813$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18198431$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejobhdp/v_3a101_3ay_3a2006_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a105-126.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duffy, Michelle K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganster, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Jason D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Jonathan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagon, Milan</creatorcontrib><title>The social context of undermining behavior at work</title><title>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</title><description>We developed a fairness theory perspective to explain the experience of being “singled out” for social undermining from supervisors and coworkers, and tested our predictions across four distinct social contexts. We argued and predicted that attitudinal and behavioral reactions to undermining (from supervisors and coworkers) would be strongest when a correspondingly low level of undermining was found in the social context. The hypothesized cross-level interaction was supported for supervisor and coworker undermining among a sample of officers from the national police force in the Republic of Slovenia (Study 1), replicated for supervisor undermining among soldiers in the US National Guard (Study 2), and further replicated with group-member undermining among a sample of individuals working in student teams (Study 3). We then predicted that justice perceptions would mediate the singled out interaction and tested the mediated-moderation model in a coworker-network context among employees of a restaurant chain (Study 4). The results substantially supported the mediation prediction. These findings from diverse settings demonstrate that considering the social context is important when trying to understand the effects of social undermining behaviors at work.</description><subject>Abusive supervision</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Deviance</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Fairness theory</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Mediation</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Organization and management. Professional relation</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Organizational culture</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Slovenia</subject><subject>Social Environment</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social undermining</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><issn>0749-5978</issn><issn>1095-9920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE2P0zAQhi0EEmXhF8AhQoJbwvgrsQ8c0Gr5XIlL75bjTKhDGgc7Lbv_HrepWIkDh7Elz_POvH4JeUmhokDrd0MV2l03VwygrkBUAPIR2VDQstSawWOygUboUupGPSXPUhoAKK0BNoRtd1ik4LwdCxemBe-WIvTFYeow7v3kpx9Fizt79CEWdil-h_jzOXnS2zHhi8t9RbYfb7bXn8vb75--XH-4LZ1QsJTM9TVtAaXrse0Z9lyD4w0TUopc0qlWtJo6ROdE4xoKjCoroesUtB3jV-TtOnaO4dcB02L2PjkcRzthOCTDa0m5VjqDr_8Bh3CIU7ZmGONUc8HqDPEVcjGkFLE3c_R7G-8NBXPK0AzmnKE5ZWhAmJxhVn1bVRFndH8liDis8NFwm9X5vM91lnLrT4-55nNTGspqs1v2edqbi1GbnB37aCfn04MRRbUSnGbu1cph9A9Lb74qEIry3H5_aefwjx6jSc7j5LDzEd1iuuD_-6k_wu-pRw</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>Duffy, Michelle K.</creator><creator>Ganster, Daniel C.</creator><creator>Shaw, Jason D.</creator><creator>Johnson, Jonathan L.</creator><creator>Pagon, Milan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>The social context of undermining behavior at work</title><author>Duffy, Michelle K. ; Ganster, Daniel C. ; Shaw, Jason D. ; Johnson, Jonathan L. ; Pagon, Milan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-2cf61b0e5cfebf2ef390c37245544555c8b4b91ceecc47c710218a50dd80bd23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Abusive supervision</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Deviance</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Fairness theory</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Mediation</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Organization and management. Professional relation</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Organizational culture</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Slovenia</topic><topic>Social Environment</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social undermining</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duffy, Michelle K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganster, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Jason D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Jonathan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagon, Milan</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duffy, Michelle K.</au><au>Ganster, Daniel C.</au><au>Shaw, Jason D.</au><au>Johnson, Jonathan L.</au><au>Pagon, Milan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ804813</ericid><atitle>The social context of undermining behavior at work</atitle><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>105-126</pages><issn>0749-5978</issn><eissn>1095-9920</eissn><abstract>We developed a fairness theory perspective to explain the experience of being “singled out” for social undermining from supervisors and coworkers, and tested our predictions across four distinct social contexts. We argued and predicted that attitudinal and behavioral reactions to undermining (from supervisors and coworkers) would be strongest when a correspondingly low level of undermining was found in the social context. The hypothesized cross-level interaction was supported for supervisor and coworker undermining among a sample of officers from the national police force in the Republic of Slovenia (Study 1), replicated for supervisor undermining among soldiers in the US National Guard (Study 2), and further replicated with group-member undermining among a sample of individuals working in student teams (Study 3). We then predicted that justice perceptions would mediate the singled out interaction and tested the mediated-moderation model in a coworker-network context among employees of a restaurant chain (Study 4). The results substantially supported the mediation prediction. These findings from diverse settings demonstrate that considering the social context is important when trying to understand the effects of social undermining behaviors at work.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.04.005</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-5978 |
ispartof | Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2006-09, Vol.101 (1), p.105-126 |
issn | 0749-5978 1095-9920 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36513989 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Journals; ERIC |
subjects | Abusive supervision Biological and medical sciences Deviance Equality Fairness theory Foreign Countries Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Interaction Mediation Networks Occupational psychology Organization and management. Professional relation Organization theory Organizational behavior Organizational culture Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Slovenia Social Environment Social interaction Social undermining Studies Supervisors |
title | The social context of undermining behavior at work |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A20%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20social%20context%20of%20undermining%20behavior%20at%20work&rft.jtitle=Organizational%20behavior%20and%20human%20decision%20processes&rft.au=Duffy,%20Michelle%20K.&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=105-126&rft.issn=0749-5978&rft.eissn=1095-9920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.04.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E36513989%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-2cf61b0e5cfebf2ef390c37245544555c8b4b91ceecc47c710218a50dd80bd23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223193426&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ804813&rfr_iscdi=true |