Loading…

The social context of undermining behavior at work

We developed a fairness theory perspective to explain the experience of being “singled out” for social undermining from supervisors and coworkers, and tested our predictions across four distinct social contexts. We argued and predicted that attitudinal and behavioral reactions to undermining (from s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Organizational behavior and human decision processes 2006-09, Vol.101 (1), p.105-126
Main Authors: Duffy, Michelle K., Ganster, Daniel C., Shaw, Jason D., Johnson, Jonathan L., Pagon, Milan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-2cf61b0e5cfebf2ef390c37245544555c8b4b91ceecc47c710218a50dd80bd23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-2cf61b0e5cfebf2ef390c37245544555c8b4b91ceecc47c710218a50dd80bd23
container_end_page 126
container_issue 1
container_start_page 105
container_title Organizational behavior and human decision processes
container_volume 101
creator Duffy, Michelle K.
Ganster, Daniel C.
Shaw, Jason D.
Johnson, Jonathan L.
Pagon, Milan
description We developed a fairness theory perspective to explain the experience of being “singled out” for social undermining from supervisors and coworkers, and tested our predictions across four distinct social contexts. We argued and predicted that attitudinal and behavioral reactions to undermining (from supervisors and coworkers) would be strongest when a correspondingly low level of undermining was found in the social context. The hypothesized cross-level interaction was supported for supervisor and coworker undermining among a sample of officers from the national police force in the Republic of Slovenia (Study 1), replicated for supervisor undermining among soldiers in the US National Guard (Study 2), and further replicated with group-member undermining among a sample of individuals working in student teams (Study 3). We then predicted that justice perceptions would mediate the singled out interaction and tested the mediated-moderation model in a coworker-network context among employees of a restaurant chain (Study 4). The results substantially supported the mediation prediction. These findings from diverse settings demonstrate that considering the social context is important when trying to understand the effects of social undermining behaviors at work.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.04.005
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36513989</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ804813</ericid><els_id>S0749597806000434</els_id><sourcerecordid>36513989</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-2cf61b0e5cfebf2ef390c37245544555c8b4b91ceecc47c710218a50dd80bd23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE2P0zAQhi0EEmXhF8AhQoJbwvgrsQ8c0Gr5XIlL75bjTKhDGgc7Lbv_HrepWIkDh7Elz_POvH4JeUmhokDrd0MV2l03VwygrkBUAPIR2VDQstSawWOygUboUupGPSXPUhoAKK0BNoRtd1ik4LwdCxemBe-WIvTFYeow7v3kpx9Fizt79CEWdil-h_jzOXnS2zHhi8t9RbYfb7bXn8vb75--XH-4LZ1QsJTM9TVtAaXrse0Z9lyD4w0TUopc0qlWtJo6ROdE4xoKjCoroesUtB3jV-TtOnaO4dcB02L2PjkcRzthOCTDa0m5VjqDr_8Bh3CIU7ZmGONUc8HqDPEVcjGkFLE3c_R7G-8NBXPK0AzmnKE5ZWhAmJxhVn1bVRFndH8liDis8NFwm9X5vM91lnLrT4-55nNTGspqs1v2edqbi1GbnB37aCfn04MRRbUSnGbu1cph9A9Lb74qEIry3H5_aefwjx6jSc7j5LDzEd1iuuD_-6k_wu-pRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223193426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The social context of undermining behavior at work</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Duffy, Michelle K. ; Ganster, Daniel C. ; Shaw, Jason D. ; Johnson, Jonathan L. ; Pagon, Milan</creator><creatorcontrib>Duffy, Michelle K. ; Ganster, Daniel C. ; Shaw, Jason D. ; Johnson, Jonathan L. ; Pagon, Milan</creatorcontrib><description>We developed a fairness theory perspective to explain the experience of being “singled out” for social undermining from supervisors and coworkers, and tested our predictions across four distinct social contexts. We argued and predicted that attitudinal and behavioral reactions to undermining (from supervisors and coworkers) would be strongest when a correspondingly low level of undermining was found in the social context. The hypothesized cross-level interaction was supported for supervisor and coworker undermining among a sample of officers from the national police force in the Republic of Slovenia (Study 1), replicated for supervisor undermining among soldiers in the US National Guard (Study 2), and further replicated with group-member undermining among a sample of individuals working in student teams (Study 3). We then predicted that justice perceptions would mediate the singled out interaction and tested the mediated-moderation model in a coworker-network context among employees of a restaurant chain (Study 4). The results substantially supported the mediation prediction. These findings from diverse settings demonstrate that considering the social context is important when trying to understand the effects of social undermining behaviors at work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-5978</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.04.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abusive supervision ; Biological and medical sciences ; Deviance ; Equality ; Fairness theory ; Foreign Countries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Interaction ; Mediation ; Networks ; Occupational psychology ; Organization and management. Professional relation ; Organization theory ; Organizational behavior ; Organizational culture ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Slovenia ; Social Environment ; Social interaction ; Social undermining ; Studies ; Supervisors</subject><ispartof>Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2006-09, Vol.101 (1), p.105-126</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. Sep 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-2cf61b0e5cfebf2ef390c37245544555c8b4b91ceecc47c710218a50dd80bd23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-2cf61b0e5cfebf2ef390c37245544555c8b4b91ceecc47c710218a50dd80bd23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223,33224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ804813$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18198431$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejobhdp/v_3a101_3ay_3a2006_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a105-126.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duffy, Michelle K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganster, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Jason D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Jonathan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagon, Milan</creatorcontrib><title>The social context of undermining behavior at work</title><title>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</title><description>We developed a fairness theory perspective to explain the experience of being “singled out” for social undermining from supervisors and coworkers, and tested our predictions across four distinct social contexts. We argued and predicted that attitudinal and behavioral reactions to undermining (from supervisors and coworkers) would be strongest when a correspondingly low level of undermining was found in the social context. The hypothesized cross-level interaction was supported for supervisor and coworker undermining among a sample of officers from the national police force in the Republic of Slovenia (Study 1), replicated for supervisor undermining among soldiers in the US National Guard (Study 2), and further replicated with group-member undermining among a sample of individuals working in student teams (Study 3). We then predicted that justice perceptions would mediate the singled out interaction and tested the mediated-moderation model in a coworker-network context among employees of a restaurant chain (Study 4). The results substantially supported the mediation prediction. These findings from diverse settings demonstrate that considering the social context is important when trying to understand the effects of social undermining behaviors at work.</description><subject>Abusive supervision</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Deviance</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Fairness theory</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Mediation</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Organization and management. Professional relation</subject><subject>Organization theory</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Organizational culture</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Slovenia</subject><subject>Social Environment</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social undermining</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><issn>0749-5978</issn><issn>1095-9920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE2P0zAQhi0EEmXhF8AhQoJbwvgrsQ8c0Gr5XIlL75bjTKhDGgc7Lbv_HrepWIkDh7Elz_POvH4JeUmhokDrd0MV2l03VwygrkBUAPIR2VDQstSawWOygUboUupGPSXPUhoAKK0BNoRtd1ik4LwdCxemBe-WIvTFYeow7v3kpx9Fizt79CEWdil-h_jzOXnS2zHhi8t9RbYfb7bXn8vb75--XH-4LZ1QsJTM9TVtAaXrse0Z9lyD4w0TUopc0qlWtJo6ROdE4xoKjCoroesUtB3jV-TtOnaO4dcB02L2PjkcRzthOCTDa0m5VjqDr_8Bh3CIU7ZmGONUc8HqDPEVcjGkFLE3c_R7G-8NBXPK0AzmnKE5ZWhAmJxhVn1bVRFndH8liDis8NFwm9X5vM91lnLrT4-55nNTGspqs1v2edqbi1GbnB37aCfn04MRRbUSnGbu1cph9A9Lb74qEIry3H5_aefwjx6jSc7j5LDzEd1iuuD_-6k_wu-pRw</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>Duffy, Michelle K.</creator><creator>Ganster, Daniel C.</creator><creator>Shaw, Jason D.</creator><creator>Johnson, Jonathan L.</creator><creator>Pagon, Milan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>The social context of undermining behavior at work</title><author>Duffy, Michelle K. ; Ganster, Daniel C. ; Shaw, Jason D. ; Johnson, Jonathan L. ; Pagon, Milan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-2cf61b0e5cfebf2ef390c37245544555c8b4b91ceecc47c710218a50dd80bd23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Abusive supervision</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Deviance</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Fairness theory</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Mediation</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Organization and management. Professional relation</topic><topic>Organization theory</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Organizational culture</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Slovenia</topic><topic>Social Environment</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social undermining</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duffy, Michelle K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganster, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Jason D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Jonathan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagon, Milan</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duffy, Michelle K.</au><au>Ganster, Daniel C.</au><au>Shaw, Jason D.</au><au>Johnson, Jonathan L.</au><au>Pagon, Milan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ804813</ericid><atitle>The social context of undermining behavior at work</atitle><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>105-126</pages><issn>0749-5978</issn><eissn>1095-9920</eissn><abstract>We developed a fairness theory perspective to explain the experience of being “singled out” for social undermining from supervisors and coworkers, and tested our predictions across four distinct social contexts. We argued and predicted that attitudinal and behavioral reactions to undermining (from supervisors and coworkers) would be strongest when a correspondingly low level of undermining was found in the social context. The hypothesized cross-level interaction was supported for supervisor and coworker undermining among a sample of officers from the national police force in the Republic of Slovenia (Study 1), replicated for supervisor undermining among soldiers in the US National Guard (Study 2), and further replicated with group-member undermining among a sample of individuals working in student teams (Study 3). We then predicted that justice perceptions would mediate the singled out interaction and tested the mediated-moderation model in a coworker-network context among employees of a restaurant chain (Study 4). The results substantially supported the mediation prediction. These findings from diverse settings demonstrate that considering the social context is important when trying to understand the effects of social undermining behaviors at work.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.04.005</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-5978
ispartof Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2006-09, Vol.101 (1), p.105-126
issn 0749-5978
1095-9920
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36513989
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Journals; ERIC
subjects Abusive supervision
Biological and medical sciences
Deviance
Equality
Fairness theory
Foreign Countries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Interaction
Mediation
Networks
Occupational psychology
Organization and management. Professional relation
Organization theory
Organizational behavior
Organizational culture
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Slovenia
Social Environment
Social interaction
Social undermining
Studies
Supervisors
title The social context of undermining behavior at work
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A20%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20social%20context%20of%20undermining%20behavior%20at%20work&rft.jtitle=Organizational%20behavior%20and%20human%20decision%20processes&rft.au=Duffy,%20Michelle%20K.&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=105-126&rft.issn=0749-5978&rft.eissn=1095-9920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.04.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E36513989%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-2cf61b0e5cfebf2ef390c37245544555c8b4b91ceecc47c710218a50dd80bd23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223193426&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ804813&rfr_iscdi=true