Loading…

Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work

The current paper examines the dispositional and situational antecedents, as well as the attitudinal and behavioral consequences, of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons. We predicted social comparison frequency would be influenced by uncertainty-related antecedents, and that soci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Organizational behavior and human decision processes 2007, Vol.102 (1), p.59-75
Main Authors: Brown, Douglas J., Ferris, D. Lance, Heller, Daniel, Keeping, Lisa M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-fddf6e2023a571e124483a49ed5513b8eb55318a4719800357ed0dcb59de66813
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-fddf6e2023a571e124483a49ed5513b8eb55318a4719800357ed0dcb59de66813
container_end_page 75
container_issue 1
container_start_page 59
container_title Organizational behavior and human decision processes
container_volume 102
creator Brown, Douglas J.
Ferris, D. Lance
Heller, Daniel
Keeping, Lisa M.
description The current paper examines the dispositional and situational antecedents, as well as the attitudinal and behavioral consequences, of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons. We predicted social comparison frequency would be influenced by uncertainty-related antecedents, and that social comparisons in organizations would be characterized by contrast, not assimilation, effects. A large and occupationally diverse sample of 991 employed adults was surveyed at three separate points in time over a 12–16 week period. Our results, based on structural equation modeling, indicated that (a) role ambiguity, task autonomy, and core self-evaluations were significant predictors of upward social comparison, (b) upward social comparison was significantly negatively related to job satisfaction and affective commitment, (c) downward social comparison was significantly positively related to job satisfaction and affective commitment, and (d) upward and downward social comparisons had significant positive and negative indirect effects on the frequency of job search behaviors, respectively. The findings are discussed in terms of their general implications for understanding the importance of directional social comparison processes in organizational settings.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36536593</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ797029</ericid><els_id>S0749597806001105</els_id><sourcerecordid>1187562531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-fddf6e2023a571e124483a49ed5513b8eb55318a4719800357ed0dcb59de66813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFu1DAQtRBILG2_AA4RB25ZxnacxAcOVVWgqFIv9Gx57YnWYTcOdrar_ftONhVIHJA8Hvn5vafxM2PvOaw58Ppzv46brR_XAqAmZA0gX7EVB61KrQW8ZitoKl0q3bRv2bucewDOa4AVM9fDhA49DlMu7OALF4eMvw84OMxF7Ippi0WXFuQ0A4fxaJM_c308DudDji7YHWn3o00hk0Vhp-IY069L9qazu4xXL_2CPX69_Xnzvbx_-HZ3c31fuqpqp7LzvqtRgJBWNRy5IFTaSqNXistNixulJG9t1XDd0utUgx682yjtsa5bLi_Yp8V3TJFmzZPZh-xwt7MDxkM2sla0tCTix3-IfTykgWYzQkhBOcmKSHIhuRRzTtiZMYW9TSfDwcyJm96cEzdz4jNIM5HqblElHNH9kSBiv5CfjLQcBO0nKpI21MIMUo1USptGme20J68Pixem8Nfq9kejGxCarr-8XFOmTwGTyS7Mf-ZDQjcZH8N_R30GIEKszA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223207434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Brown, Douglas J. ; Ferris, D. Lance ; Heller, Daniel ; Keeping, Lisa M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, Douglas J. ; Ferris, D. Lance ; Heller, Daniel ; Keeping, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><description>The current paper examines the dispositional and situational antecedents, as well as the attitudinal and behavioral consequences, of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons. We predicted social comparison frequency would be influenced by uncertainty-related antecedents, and that social comparisons in organizations would be characterized by contrast, not assimilation, effects. A large and occupationally diverse sample of 991 employed adults was surveyed at three separate points in time over a 12–16 week period. Our results, based on structural equation modeling, indicated that (a) role ambiguity, task autonomy, and core self-evaluations were significant predictors of upward social comparison, (b) upward social comparison was significantly negatively related to job satisfaction and affective commitment, (c) downward social comparison was significantly positively related to job satisfaction and affective commitment, and (d) upward and downward social comparisons had significant positive and negative indirect effects on the frequency of job search behaviors, respectively. The findings are discussed in terms of their general implications for understanding the importance of directional social comparison processes in organizational settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-5978</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Comparative Analysis ; Core self-evaluations ; Economic sociology ; Human resources ; Institutional Environment ; Job attitudes ; Job Satisfaction ; Job search ; Mathematical models ; Organizational behavior ; Predictor Variables ; Role Conflict ; Self evaluation ; Self Evaluation (Individuals) ; Self-perception ; Social Attitudes ; Social psychology ; Social status ; Structural Equation Models ; Studies ; Upward and downward social comparison ; Work place</subject><ispartof>Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2007, Vol.102 (1), p.59-75</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. Jan 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-fddf6e2023a571e124483a49ed5513b8eb55318a4719800357ed0dcb59de66813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-fddf6e2023a571e124483a49ed5513b8eb55318a4719800357ed0dcb59de66813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,30999,33223,33224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ797029$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejobhdp/v_3a102_3ay_3a2007_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a59-75.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, D. Lance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heller, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeping, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><title>Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work</title><title>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</title><description>The current paper examines the dispositional and situational antecedents, as well as the attitudinal and behavioral consequences, of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons. We predicted social comparison frequency would be influenced by uncertainty-related antecedents, and that social comparisons in organizations would be characterized by contrast, not assimilation, effects. A large and occupationally diverse sample of 991 employed adults was surveyed at three separate points in time over a 12–16 week period. Our results, based on structural equation modeling, indicated that (a) role ambiguity, task autonomy, and core self-evaluations were significant predictors of upward social comparison, (b) upward social comparison was significantly negatively related to job satisfaction and affective commitment, (c) downward social comparison was significantly positively related to job satisfaction and affective commitment, and (d) upward and downward social comparisons had significant positive and negative indirect effects on the frequency of job search behaviors, respectively. The findings are discussed in terms of their general implications for understanding the importance of directional social comparison processes in organizational settings.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Core self-evaluations</subject><subject>Economic sociology</subject><subject>Human resources</subject><subject>Institutional Environment</subject><subject>Job attitudes</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Job search</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Role Conflict</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</subject><subject>Self-perception</subject><subject>Social Attitudes</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social status</subject><subject>Structural Equation Models</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Upward and downward social comparison</subject><subject>Work place</subject><issn>0749-5978</issn><issn>1095-9920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcFu1DAQtRBILG2_AA4RB25ZxnacxAcOVVWgqFIv9Gx57YnWYTcOdrar_ftONhVIHJA8Hvn5vafxM2PvOaw58Ppzv46brR_XAqAmZA0gX7EVB61KrQW8ZitoKl0q3bRv2bucewDOa4AVM9fDhA49DlMu7OALF4eMvw84OMxF7Ippi0WXFuQ0A4fxaJM_c308DudDji7YHWn3o00hk0Vhp-IY069L9qazu4xXL_2CPX69_Xnzvbx_-HZ3c31fuqpqp7LzvqtRgJBWNRy5IFTaSqNXistNixulJG9t1XDd0utUgx682yjtsa5bLi_Yp8V3TJFmzZPZh-xwt7MDxkM2sla0tCTix3-IfTykgWYzQkhBOcmKSHIhuRRzTtiZMYW9TSfDwcyJm96cEzdz4jNIM5HqblElHNH9kSBiv5CfjLQcBO0nKpI21MIMUo1USptGme20J68Pixem8Nfq9kejGxCarr-8XFOmTwGTyS7Mf-ZDQjcZH8N_R30GIEKszA</recordid><startdate>2007</startdate><enddate>2007</enddate><creator>Brown, Douglas J.</creator><creator>Ferris, D. Lance</creator><creator>Heller, Daniel</creator><creator>Keeping, Lisa M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2007</creationdate><title>Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work</title><author>Brown, Douglas J. ; Ferris, D. Lance ; Heller, Daniel ; Keeping, Lisa M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-fddf6e2023a571e124483a49ed5513b8eb55318a4719800357ed0dcb59de66813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Core self-evaluations</topic><topic>Economic sociology</topic><topic>Human resources</topic><topic>Institutional Environment</topic><topic>Job attitudes</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Job search</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Role Conflict</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</topic><topic>Self-perception</topic><topic>Social Attitudes</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social status</topic><topic>Structural Equation Models</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Upward and downward social comparison</topic><topic>Work place</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, D. Lance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heller, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeping, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Douglas J.</au><au>Ferris, D. Lance</au><au>Heller, Daniel</au><au>Keeping, Lisa M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ797029</ericid><atitle>Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work</atitle><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle><date>2007</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>59-75</pages><issn>0749-5978</issn><eissn>1095-9920</eissn><abstract>The current paper examines the dispositional and situational antecedents, as well as the attitudinal and behavioral consequences, of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons. We predicted social comparison frequency would be influenced by uncertainty-related antecedents, and that social comparisons in organizations would be characterized by contrast, not assimilation, effects. A large and occupationally diverse sample of 991 employed adults was surveyed at three separate points in time over a 12–16 week period. Our results, based on structural equation modeling, indicated that (a) role ambiguity, task autonomy, and core self-evaluations were significant predictors of upward social comparison, (b) upward social comparison was significantly negatively related to job satisfaction and affective commitment, (c) downward social comparison was significantly positively related to job satisfaction and affective commitment, and (d) upward and downward social comparisons had significant positive and negative indirect effects on the frequency of job search behaviors, respectively. The findings are discussed in terms of their general implications for understanding the importance of directional social comparison processes in organizational settings.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.003</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-5978
ispartof Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2007, Vol.102 (1), p.59-75
issn 0749-5978
1095-9920
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36536593
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; ERIC
subjects Attitudes
Comparative Analysis
Core self-evaluations
Economic sociology
Human resources
Institutional Environment
Job attitudes
Job Satisfaction
Job search
Mathematical models
Organizational behavior
Predictor Variables
Role Conflict
Self evaluation
Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Self-perception
Social Attitudes
Social psychology
Social status
Structural Equation Models
Studies
Upward and downward social comparison
Work place
title Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A00%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antecedents%20and%20consequences%20of%20the%20frequency%20of%20upward%20and%20downward%20social%20comparisons%20at%20work&rft.jtitle=Organizational%20behavior%20and%20human%20decision%20processes&rft.au=Brown,%20Douglas%20J.&rft.date=2007&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=59-75&rft.issn=0749-5978&rft.eissn=1095-9920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1187562531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-fddf6e2023a571e124483a49ed5513b8eb55318a4719800357ed0dcb59de66813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223207434&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ797029&rfr_iscdi=true