Loading…
Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work
The current paper examines the dispositional and situational antecedents, as well as the attitudinal and behavioral consequences, of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons. We predicted social comparison frequency would be influenced by uncertainty-related antecedents, and that soci...
Saved in:
Published in: | Organizational behavior and human decision processes 2007, Vol.102 (1), p.59-75 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-fddf6e2023a571e124483a49ed5513b8eb55318a4719800357ed0dcb59de66813 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-fddf6e2023a571e124483a49ed5513b8eb55318a4719800357ed0dcb59de66813 |
container_end_page | 75 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | Organizational behavior and human decision processes |
container_volume | 102 |
creator | Brown, Douglas J. Ferris, D. Lance Heller, Daniel Keeping, Lisa M. |
description | The current paper examines the dispositional and situational antecedents, as well as the attitudinal and behavioral consequences, of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons. We predicted social comparison frequency would be influenced by uncertainty-related antecedents, and that social comparisons in organizations would be characterized by contrast, not assimilation, effects. A large and occupationally diverse sample of 991 employed adults was surveyed at three separate points in time over a 12–16 week period. Our results, based on structural equation modeling, indicated that (a) role ambiguity, task autonomy, and core self-evaluations were significant predictors of upward social comparison, (b) upward social comparison was significantly negatively related to job satisfaction and affective commitment, (c) downward social comparison was significantly positively related to job satisfaction and affective commitment, and (d) upward and downward social comparisons had significant positive and negative indirect effects on the frequency of job search behaviors, respectively. The findings are discussed in terms of their general implications for understanding the importance of directional social comparison processes in organizational settings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.003 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36536593</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ797029</ericid><els_id>S0749597806001105</els_id><sourcerecordid>1187562531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-fddf6e2023a571e124483a49ed5513b8eb55318a4719800357ed0dcb59de66813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFu1DAQtRBILG2_AA4RB25ZxnacxAcOVVWgqFIv9Gx57YnWYTcOdrar_ftONhVIHJA8Hvn5vafxM2PvOaw58Ppzv46brR_XAqAmZA0gX7EVB61KrQW8ZitoKl0q3bRv2bucewDOa4AVM9fDhA49DlMu7OALF4eMvw84OMxF7Ippi0WXFuQ0A4fxaJM_c308DudDji7YHWn3o00hk0Vhp-IY069L9qazu4xXL_2CPX69_Xnzvbx_-HZ3c31fuqpqp7LzvqtRgJBWNRy5IFTaSqNXistNixulJG9t1XDd0utUgx682yjtsa5bLi_Yp8V3TJFmzZPZh-xwt7MDxkM2sla0tCTix3-IfTykgWYzQkhBOcmKSHIhuRRzTtiZMYW9TSfDwcyJm96cEzdz4jNIM5HqblElHNH9kSBiv5CfjLQcBO0nKpI21MIMUo1USptGme20J68Pixem8Nfq9kejGxCarr-8XFOmTwGTyS7Mf-ZDQjcZH8N_R30GIEKszA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223207434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Brown, Douglas J. ; Ferris, D. Lance ; Heller, Daniel ; Keeping, Lisa M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, Douglas J. ; Ferris, D. Lance ; Heller, Daniel ; Keeping, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><description>The current paper examines the dispositional and situational antecedents, as well as the attitudinal and behavioral consequences, of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons. We predicted social comparison frequency would be influenced by uncertainty-related antecedents, and that social comparisons in organizations would be characterized by contrast, not assimilation, effects. A large and occupationally diverse sample of 991 employed adults was surveyed at three separate points in time over a 12–16 week period. Our results, based on structural equation modeling, indicated that (a) role ambiguity, task autonomy, and core self-evaluations were significant predictors of upward social comparison, (b) upward social comparison was significantly negatively related to job satisfaction and affective commitment, (c) downward social comparison was significantly positively related to job satisfaction and affective commitment, and (d) upward and downward social comparisons had significant positive and negative indirect effects on the frequency of job search behaviors, respectively. The findings are discussed in terms of their general implications for understanding the importance of directional social comparison processes in organizational settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-5978</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Comparative Analysis ; Core self-evaluations ; Economic sociology ; Human resources ; Institutional Environment ; Job attitudes ; Job Satisfaction ; Job search ; Mathematical models ; Organizational behavior ; Predictor Variables ; Role Conflict ; Self evaluation ; Self Evaluation (Individuals) ; Self-perception ; Social Attitudes ; Social psychology ; Social status ; Structural Equation Models ; Studies ; Upward and downward social comparison ; Work place</subject><ispartof>Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2007, Vol.102 (1), p.59-75</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. Jan 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-fddf6e2023a571e124483a49ed5513b8eb55318a4719800357ed0dcb59de66813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-fddf6e2023a571e124483a49ed5513b8eb55318a4719800357ed0dcb59de66813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,30999,33223,33224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ797029$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejobhdp/v_3a102_3ay_3a2007_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a59-75.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, D. Lance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heller, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeping, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><title>Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work</title><title>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</title><description>The current paper examines the dispositional and situational antecedents, as well as the attitudinal and behavioral consequences, of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons. We predicted social comparison frequency would be influenced by uncertainty-related antecedents, and that social comparisons in organizations would be characterized by contrast, not assimilation, effects. A large and occupationally diverse sample of 991 employed adults was surveyed at three separate points in time over a 12–16 week period. Our results, based on structural equation modeling, indicated that (a) role ambiguity, task autonomy, and core self-evaluations were significant predictors of upward social comparison, (b) upward social comparison was significantly negatively related to job satisfaction and affective commitment, (c) downward social comparison was significantly positively related to job satisfaction and affective commitment, and (d) upward and downward social comparisons had significant positive and negative indirect effects on the frequency of job search behaviors, respectively. The findings are discussed in terms of their general implications for understanding the importance of directional social comparison processes in organizational settings.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Core self-evaluations</subject><subject>Economic sociology</subject><subject>Human resources</subject><subject>Institutional Environment</subject><subject>Job attitudes</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Job search</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Role Conflict</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</subject><subject>Self-perception</subject><subject>Social Attitudes</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social status</subject><subject>Structural Equation Models</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Upward and downward social comparison</subject><subject>Work place</subject><issn>0749-5978</issn><issn>1095-9920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcFu1DAQtRBILG2_AA4RB25ZxnacxAcOVVWgqFIv9Gx57YnWYTcOdrar_ftONhVIHJA8Hvn5vafxM2PvOaw58Ppzv46brR_XAqAmZA0gX7EVB61KrQW8ZitoKl0q3bRv2bucewDOa4AVM9fDhA49DlMu7OALF4eMvw84OMxF7Ippi0WXFuQ0A4fxaJM_c308DudDji7YHWn3o00hk0Vhp-IY069L9qazu4xXL_2CPX69_Xnzvbx_-HZ3c31fuqpqp7LzvqtRgJBWNRy5IFTaSqNXistNixulJG9t1XDd0utUgx682yjtsa5bLi_Yp8V3TJFmzZPZh-xwt7MDxkM2sla0tCTix3-IfTykgWYzQkhBOcmKSHIhuRRzTtiZMYW9TSfDwcyJm96cEzdz4jNIM5HqblElHNH9kSBiv5CfjLQcBO0nKpI21MIMUo1USptGme20J68Pixem8Nfq9kejGxCarr-8XFOmTwGTyS7Mf-ZDQjcZH8N_R30GIEKszA</recordid><startdate>2007</startdate><enddate>2007</enddate><creator>Brown, Douglas J.</creator><creator>Ferris, D. Lance</creator><creator>Heller, Daniel</creator><creator>Keeping, Lisa M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2007</creationdate><title>Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work</title><author>Brown, Douglas J. ; Ferris, D. Lance ; Heller, Daniel ; Keeping, Lisa M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-fddf6e2023a571e124483a49ed5513b8eb55318a4719800357ed0dcb59de66813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Core self-evaluations</topic><topic>Economic sociology</topic><topic>Human resources</topic><topic>Institutional Environment</topic><topic>Job attitudes</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Job search</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Role Conflict</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</topic><topic>Self-perception</topic><topic>Social Attitudes</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social status</topic><topic>Structural Equation Models</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Upward and downward social comparison</topic><topic>Work place</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, D. Lance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heller, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeping, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Douglas J.</au><au>Ferris, D. Lance</au><au>Heller, Daniel</au><au>Keeping, Lisa M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ797029</ericid><atitle>Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work</atitle><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle><date>2007</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>59-75</pages><issn>0749-5978</issn><eissn>1095-9920</eissn><abstract>The current paper examines the dispositional and situational antecedents, as well as the attitudinal and behavioral consequences, of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons. We predicted social comparison frequency would be influenced by uncertainty-related antecedents, and that social comparisons in organizations would be characterized by contrast, not assimilation, effects. A large and occupationally diverse sample of 991 employed adults was surveyed at three separate points in time over a 12–16 week period. Our results, based on structural equation modeling, indicated that (a) role ambiguity, task autonomy, and core self-evaluations were significant predictors of upward social comparison, (b) upward social comparison was significantly negatively related to job satisfaction and affective commitment, (c) downward social comparison was significantly positively related to job satisfaction and affective commitment, and (d) upward and downward social comparisons had significant positive and negative indirect effects on the frequency of job search behaviors, respectively. The findings are discussed in terms of their general implications for understanding the importance of directional social comparison processes in organizational settings.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.003</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-5978 |
ispartof | Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2007, Vol.102 (1), p.59-75 |
issn | 0749-5978 1095-9920 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_36536593 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; ERIC |
subjects | Attitudes Comparative Analysis Core self-evaluations Economic sociology Human resources Institutional Environment Job attitudes Job Satisfaction Job search Mathematical models Organizational behavior Predictor Variables Role Conflict Self evaluation Self Evaluation (Individuals) Self-perception Social Attitudes Social psychology Social status Structural Equation Models Studies Upward and downward social comparison Work place |
title | Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A00%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antecedents%20and%20consequences%20of%20the%20frequency%20of%20upward%20and%20downward%20social%20comparisons%20at%20work&rft.jtitle=Organizational%20behavior%20and%20human%20decision%20processes&rft.au=Brown,%20Douglas%20J.&rft.date=2007&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=59-75&rft.issn=0749-5978&rft.eissn=1095-9920&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1187562531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-fddf6e2023a571e124483a49ed5513b8eb55318a4719800357ed0dcb59de66813%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223207434&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ797029&rfr_iscdi=true |